[osol-discuss] Is raidz root support on Solaris 11

2011-11-15 Thread Andrew Watkins


Can I ask if raidz is support on root with Solaris 11?

I am having problem doing it from auto-installer and I just thought that 
may be the reason.


Cheers,

Andrew
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Is raidz root support on Solaris 11

2011-11-15 Thread Casper . Dik

>
>Can I ask if raidz is support on root with Solaris 11?
>
>I am having problem doing it from auto-installer and I just thought that 
>may be the reason.


No possible; only a mirror is allowed (and only standard  compression, not
gzip).

Casper

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox

2011-11-15 Thread Sebastien Roy

On 11/15/11 12:43 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote:

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Deniz Rende  wrote:

It could be that this anet resource automatically picked the wrong
lower link.  From the global zone, what do "dladm show-link" and
"ipadm show-addr" say?


I get the following information:
root@solaris11:~# dladm show-link
LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER
net0phys  1500   up   --
zdev1/net0  vnic  1500   up   net0
root@solaris11:~# ipadm show-addr
ADDROBJ   TYPE STATEADDR
lo0/v4static   ok   127.0.0.1/8
net0/v4   static   ok   192.168.1.20/24
lo0/v6static   ok   ::1/128
net0/v6   addrconf ok   fe80::a00:27ff:fe22:cf2f/10
I don't know if it worths to mention but the version of Solaris 11 is the
text installI also don't have any trouble GZ networking:
root@solaris11:~# ping www.google.com
www.google.com is alive


I suspect that what is happening is that the zdev1/net0 vnic thinks it
is OK to allocate another MAC (Ethernet) address but virtualbox isn't
happy with it and thinks something in the VM is trying to spoof
packets  There may be a way within virtualbox to disable this
behavior, but I've not used virtualbox recently enough to remember.


Perhaps try different virtualbox networking "modes" (I assume bridge 
mode is being used)?  In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox.


-Seb
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox

2011-11-15 Thread Deniz Rende
Hi Seb,


> (I assume bridge mode is being used)?


Yes, that is correct, I'll try the other "modes" later on. I did a scratch
install of the zone, and I got the same results.

 In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox.


+1

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sebastien Roy wrote:

> On 11/15/11 12:43 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Deniz Rende
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> It could be that this anet resource automatically picked the wrong
 lower link.  From the global zone, what do "dladm show-link" and
 "ipadm show-addr" say?

>>>
>>> I get the following information:
>>> root@solaris11:~# dladm show-link
>>> LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER
>>> net0phys  1500   up   --
>>> zdev1/net0  vnic  1500   up   net0
>>> root@solaris11:~# ipadm show-addr
>>> ADDROBJ   TYPE STATEADDR
>>> lo0/v4static   ok   127.0.0.1/8
>>> net0/v4   static   ok   192.168.1.20/24
>>> lo0/v6static   ok   ::1/128
>>> net0/v6   addrconf ok   fe80::a00:27ff:fe22:cf2f/10
>>> I don't know if it worths to mention but the version of Solaris 11 is the
>>> text installI also don't have any trouble GZ networking:
>>> root@solaris11:~# ping www.google.com
>>> www.google.com is alive
>>>
>>
>> I suspect that what is happening is that the zdev1/net0 vnic thinks it
>> is OK to allocate another MAC (Ethernet) address but virtualbox isn't
>> happy with it and thinks something in the VM is trying to spoof
>> packets  There may be a way within virtualbox to disable this
>> behavior, but I've not used virtualbox recently enough to remember.
>>
>
> Perhaps try different virtualbox networking "modes" (I assume bridge mode
> is being used)?  In any case, I'd submit a bug against virtualbox.
>
> -Seb
>



-- 
Deniz Rende

Web: http://www.machine-unix.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox

2011-11-15 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Deniz Rende  wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Option 1: Use shared-stack
>
> But that means that I am not going to be able to use all the goodies that
> come with ip-excl. :(

Agreed.  :(

>>
>>  You will then need to transition your network configuration in the
>
> zone from net0 to net1.
> Do you mean, sysconfig configure here or some othe procedure. Right now it
> looks like this:
> LINK                CLASS     MTU    STATE    OVER
> net0                phys      1500   up       --
> net1                phys      1500   unknown  --
> zdev1/net1          phys      1500   unknown  --

Whatever you do to reconfigure it, you need to do it in the zone.  You
can use sysconfig configure, or use ipadm.  I think the steps are
something along the lines of:

root@zone# ipadm delete-ip net0/
root@zone# ipadm create-ip net1/v4
root@zone# ipadm create-addr -T static -a local=addr/mask net1/v4

My fingers are still learning the new magic, so there could be
something horribly wrong in my advice.  If Seb gives conflicting
advice, he's probably right.

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox

2011-11-15 Thread Sebastien Roy

On 11/15/11 02:46 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Deniz Rende  wrote:


  You will then need to transition your network configuration in the


zone from net0 to net1.
Do you mean, sysconfig configure here or some othe procedure. Right now it
looks like this:
LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER
net0phys  1500   up   --
net1phys  1500   unknown  --
zdev1/net1  phys  1500   unknown  --


Whatever you do to reconfigure it, you need to do it in the zone.  You
can use sysconfig configure, or use ipadm.  I think the steps are
something along the lines of:

root@zone# ipadm delete-ip net0/
root@zone# ipadm create-ip net1/v4
root@zone# ipadm create-addr -T static -a local=addr/mask net1/v4

My fingers are still learning the new magic, so there could be
something horribly wrong in my advice.  If Seb gives conflicting
advice, he's probably right.


Since you brought it up... ;-)  The objects that ipadm manipulates are 
IP interfaces and addresses.  In the above example, the delete-ip and 
create-ip subcommands are manipulating IP interfaces, and the 
create-addr subcommand is manipulating an IP address over one of those 
interfaces.  "net0" and "net1" are IP interface names.  "net1/v4" is the 
name of an IP address over the "net1" IP interface.  So the sequence is:


# ipadm delete-ip net0
# ipadm create-ip net1
# ipadm create-addr -T static -a / net1/v4

-Seb
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris11 zone networking on VirtualBox

2011-11-15 Thread Deniz Rende
Seb/Mike,

Thanks for your inputs, I also asked the same question in VirtualBox
forums. I'll retry this again tonight and see. I ended up having troubles
with reconfiguration. I am going to go ahead and do another scratch install
tonight!, I'll keep you guys posted.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Deniz Rende  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Sebastien Roy 
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/11 02:46 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Deniz Rende
>>>  wrote:
>>>

>  You will then need to transition your network configuration in the
>

 zone from net0 to net1.
 Do you mean, sysconfig configure here or some othe procedure. Right now
 it
 looks like this:
 LINKCLASS MTUSTATEOVER
 net0phys  1500   up   --
 net1phys  1500   unknown  --
 zdev1/net1  phys  1500   unknown  --

>>>
>>> Whatever you do to reconfigure it, you need to do it in the zone.  You
>>> can use sysconfig configure, or use ipadm.  I think the steps are
>>> something along the lines of:
>>>
>>> root@zone# ipadm delete-ip net0/
>>> root@zone# ipadm create-ip net1/v4
>>> root@zone# ipadm create-addr -T static -a local=addr/mask net1/v4
>>>
>>> My fingers are still learning the new magic, so there could be
>>> something horribly wrong in my advice.  If Seb gives conflicting
>>> advice, he's probably right.
>>>
>>
>> Since you brought it up... ;-)  The objects that ipadm manipulates are IP
>> interfaces and addresses.  In the above example, the delete-ip and
>> create-ip subcommands are manipulating IP interfaces, and the create-addr
>> subcommand is manipulating an IP address over one of those interfaces.
>>  "net0" and "net1" are IP interface names.  "net1/v4" is the name of an IP
>> address over the "net1" IP interface.  So the sequence is:
>>
>> # ipadm delete-ip net0
>> # ipadm create-ip net1
>> # ipadm create-addr -T static -a / net1/v4
>>
>> -Seb
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Deniz Rende
>
> Web: http://www.machine-unix.com
>
>
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?

2011-11-15 Thread Calum Benson

On 11 Nov 2011, at 05:10, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:

> Anybody know why they're calling it "the first cloud os?"
> 
> Just cuz they wanted to throw in a buzzword?

Here's a short blog entry that attempts an explanation...


Cheeri,
Calum.

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation Ireland Ltd.
mailto:calum.ben...@oracle.com Solaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.oracle.com/calum  +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Oracle Corp.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?

2011-11-15 Thread Ian Collins

On 11/16/11 12:49 PM, Calum Benson wrote:

On 11 Nov 2011, at 05:10, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:


Anybody know why they're calling it "the first cloud os?"

Just cuz they wanted to throw in a buzzword?

Here's a short blog entry that attempts an explanation...



Ah, so the full title should be "The First Cloud OS for Java 
applications" :)


Just when we thought we were safe from the dreaded J word...

--
Ian.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?

2011-11-15 Thread Gary
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

> So it's impossible to use Solaris elsewhere than on Oracle hw/sw.

Have you looked at the Solaris subscriptions for non Oracle x86 hardware?
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/solaris/non-sun-x86-081976.html
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?

2011-11-15 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: Ian Collins [mailto:i...@ianshome.com]
> 
> On 11/16/11 12:49 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
> > On 11 Nov 2011, at 05:10, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> >
> >> Anybody know why they're calling it "the first cloud os?"
> >>
> >> Just cuz they wanted to throw in a buzzword?
> > Here's a short blog entry that attempts an explanation...
> > 
> 
> Ah, so the full title should be "The First Cloud OS for Java
> applications" :)
> 
> Just when we thought we were safe from the dreaded J word...

To be fair, you could buy one solaris server, and run an infinite number of
zones in there.  This is really no different from paravirtualization in
linux, but you have the advantages of ZFS and Crossbow.  So from that
standpoint, I would acknowledge this as a cloud OS.  But then so is solaris
10 and opensolaris and openindiana...   ;-)

But a host based on solaris and zones, versus a linux machine with xen or
whatever...  Sure, it's a solid competitor.  "First cloud OS?"  maybe not,
but whatever.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?

2011-11-15 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Gary
> 
> > So it's impossible to use Solaris elsewhere than on Oracle hw/sw.
> 
> Have you looked at the Solaris subscriptions for non Oracle x86 hardware?
> http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/solaris/non-sun-x86-
> 081976.html

Been there.  Bought that.  Never again.

>From now on, I'm either solaris on oracle hardware, or nexenta on whatever
they recommend, or ...  I won't outrule openindiana, but I can't name any
specific platform I would accept right now.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Change host name on ora-Sol 11

2011-11-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Is there some different way to change host name in oracle-solaris 11?

There is no /etc/nodename file.  and I find the only place under /etc/
the hosts' current name is referenced is in:
   /etc/svc/profile/site/sc_profile.xml

That doesn't look like the kind of place renaming would be done.

So any special technique involved or am expected to create /etc/nodename?


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Change host name on ora-Sol 11

2011-11-15 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 11/15/11 18:43, Harry Putnam wrote:

Is there some different way to change host name in oracle-solaris 11?


http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/glilb.html#scrolltoc

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Change host name on ora-Sol 11

2011-11-15 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Harry Putnam  wrote:
> Is there some different way to change host name in oracle-solaris 11?
>
> There is no /etc/nodename file.  and I find the only place under /etc/
> the hosts' current name is referenced is in:
>   /etc/svc/profile/site/sc_profile.xml
>
> That doesn't look like the kind of place renaming would be done.
>
> So any special technique involved or am expected to create /etc/nodename?

>From nodename(4):

 When a machine is standalone or its IP address is configured
 locally,  the  svc:/system/identity:node  SMF  service has a
 property, namely nodename, for setting the system name.

 To set the name of the node use the following command:

   # svccfg -s node setprop config/nodename = "mynodename"
   # svcadm refresh node


-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Change host name on ora-Sol 11

2011-11-15 Thread Mark Haywood

 On 11/15/11 9:55 PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Harry Putnam  wrote:

Is there some different way to change host name in oracle-solaris 11?

There is no /etc/nodename file.  and I find the only place under /etc/
the hosts' current name is referenced is in:
   /etc/svc/profile/site/sc_profile.xml

That doesn't look like the kind of place renaming would be done.

So any special technique involved or am expected to create /etc/nodename?

 From nodename(4):

  When a machine is standalone or its IP address is configured
  locally,  the  svc:/system/identity:node  SMF  service has a
  property, namely nodename, for setting the system name.

  To set the name of the node use the following command:

# svccfg -s node setprop config/nodename = "mynodename"
# svcadm refresh node


I think there might be a bug here. You will also have to restart the 
service, 'svcadm restart node'.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org