Re: [osol-help] Problem downloading VirtualBox from extra repository

2009-08-05 Thread Patrick Van de Casteele

Hi Andrew,

A colleague of mine had similar problems installing Sun Studio 12, and 
tweaked the PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT value. This worked for him, and after 
doing the same, I could install Virtualbox as well:


   # export PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT=300
   # pkg install virtualbox
   DOWNLOAD  PKGS   FILESXFER (MB)
   Completed  2/2 324/32474.0/74.0

   PHASEACTIONS
   Install Phase401/401
   PHASE  ITEMS
   Reading Existing Index   8/8
   Indexing Packages2/2

I suggest you also give that a try :)

Kind regards,

Patrick.

andrew wrote:

div id=jive-html-wrapper-div

Hi Andrew,br
br
I'm getting the same, so I doubt it's your
  

specific


system that is the
cause. I tried using Package Manager as well as
command line.br
  

OK, so the problem looks like it is with the
repository itself. Unfortunately there is no contact
email address or telephone number on the extra
repository registration page so I've no idea who to
contact about this problem. Hm. I'll cross-post
to indiana-discuss in case someone there knows what
to do.

Cheers

Andrew.



Oops - forgot to include the original problem in my CC. Basically downloading VirtualBox 
from the extra repository fails - it gets to about 57MB then jumps back to 
51MB, continues to 57MB then jumps back. It does this a few times then fails complaining 
about a network error. A second person has posted to opensolaris-help to say they are 
having the same problem, so it looks like it could be a problem with the file in the 
repository itself.

Cheers

Andrew.
  
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-help] OpenSolaris 2009.06 stalls always after some 5 minutes

2009-08-05 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
 I gave OpenSolaris 2009.06 a shot, on an old HP
 nx6320. 

I am running it daily on an equally old HP NX6310 (I *think* yours has got Core 
2 Duo CPU, whereas mine is the older Core Duo ; 'isainfo -k' will confirm 
this). 

 Already during the install, it slows down
 considerably, and got stuck completely. The third
 effort succeeded finally.

Check if the disk controller is configured to run in SATA mode. 

 Now, after reboot, the system is normal, if not
 snappy, for a few minutes, then the mouse starts to
 react slow, that is, it jumps as if it would read the
 position data once per second, and after a few more
 minutes it freezes completely: no more keyboard, no
 more mouse, and it doesn't answer to ping-s any more.

Sounds like some interrupt flood to me. Try disabling bits that do not work on 
OpenSolaris, like the BlueTooth. Never had anything similar on this laptop 
under OpenSolaris yet. On an older PIII box under Nevada snv-117 or thereabouts 
I have the top-left-corner jumping cursor, which is very annoying (but then I 
have the same on a different NetBSD machine under Xorg 1.6.1, so my take is 
this is an upstream problem), so at the end I disabled cde-login and gdm and am 
using it solely as a server. 
 
 Hard reboot, and the same starts all over.
 Since it is a fresh install from the original CD, I
 guess, there is a serious problem. The same notebook
 runs XP and Ubuntu very well; memory test goes
 through for  24 hours.
 
 I have tried an update, which resulted in an
 'opensolaris-1' grub entry, and it behaves likewise.
 It has 4 GB of RAM. 

2GB on mine...

 Just after boot, 31% thereof are
 consumes for programs, 0% for cache, by the desktop
 alone. Is that normal?

On the machine I am presently on (2GB memory, dual Opteron 246), after 20 days 
uptime (rebooted only because an image-update) I have 45% memory use (Firefox 
3.51 being the greatest hog with about 10 tabs open). ZFS is usually taking 
most of the rest for ARC as far as I can gather. I've got

set zfs:zfs_arc_max=831155200

in my /etc/system to limit it's use a little. 

 
 Uwe

Chavdar Ivanov
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


[osol-help] ZFS CIFS problem with Ubuntu, NFS as an alternative?

2009-08-05 Thread Christian Flaig
Hello,

I got a very strange problem here, tried out many things, can't solve it.
I run a virtual machine via VirtualBox 2.2.4, with Ubuntu 9.04. OpenSolaris as 
the host is 2009-06, with snv118. Now I try to mount (via CIFS) a share in 
Ubuntu from OpenSolaris. Mounting is successful, I can see all files, also 
change directories. But I can't read the files! Whenever I try to copy a file, 
I get a Permission denied from Ubuntu. But when I mount the same share in 
Windows XP, I can read the files also. So might be an Ubuntu issue, anyone also 
experienced this? Any logs I can check/configure to find out more?
Here the permissions for the directory (tmns is the user I use for mounting):
dr-xr-xr-x+ 31 chrisstaff588 Aug  4 23:57 video
  user:tmns:r-x---a-R-c---:fd-:allow
 user:chris:rwxpdDaARWcCos:fd-:allow
(The x shouldn't be necessary, but XP seems not able to list subdirectories 
without it...)

So I thought about using NFS instead, which should be better for an Unix - Unix 
connection anyway. But here I face another issue, which might be because of 
missing knowledge about NFS...
I share the video directory above with the ZFS sharenfs command, options are 
anon=0,ro. Without anon=0 I always get a Permission denied when I want to 
mount the share via NFS on Ubuntu (mounting with root user). But with anon=0 
I can only read the files on the Ubuntu side with root, the mounted directory 
had numerical ids for owner and group on the Ubuntu side.
Any clue how I can solve this?

Many thanks for your help, I'm not sure how to progress on this...

Cheers,

Chris
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] Multiple Hard disk problem

2009-08-05 Thread Gurpreet
 Well it looks like you're just about there. If you
 have valid vtoc on the device then you should be able
 to use it. Not sure why you can't see it in the gui.
 Maybe you need to log out and back in again? Or try a
 devfsadm -v but if you can see it in format that is
 probably not necessary.

Hi blueatom...

well yes i can see it in format, but how to use this hard disk? like when u 
click save as, and i want to store that particular file in that hard disk how 
to do that
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] ZFS CIFS problem with Ubuntu, NFS as an alternative?

2009-08-05 Thread Christian Flaig
Little update...

I can read files (within the share) with the following ACL:
-r--r--r--+  1 chrisstaff 35 Aug  5 13:18 .txt
  user:tmns:r-x---a-R-c---:--I:allow
 user:chris:rwxpdDaARWc--s:--I:allow
  everyone@:r-a-R-c--s:---:allow

(Line with everyone@ is added compared to the first posting.)

I thought the ZFS CIFS server would map the user used for mouting (tmns) to the 
local user tmns, and I wouldn't need the everyone line... Anything wrong with 
my thought?

Thanks for your help.

Chris
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] OpenSolaris 2009.06 stalls always after some 5 minutes

2009-08-05 Thread Jürgen Keil
 It has 4 GB of RAM. Just after boot, 31% thereof are
 consumes for programs, 0% for cache, by the desktop
 alone. Is that normal?

Where are these percentages coming from?
mdb -k ::memstat command?

My 8GB box shows 0% (12MB) for Exec and libs,
and 85% Free, and the rest is used by the kernel.
(Just after a boot)

Could this be a memory leak in some user land program?
Does prstat -s rss / prstat -s size list any processes
that have quickly growing memory consumption ?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] Massive zpool import delay [SOLVED]

2009-08-05 Thread Dunc
Jürgen Keil wrote:
 Dunc wrote:
 
   lwp# 4 / thread# 4  
 feef1777 readlink (fe76d23c, fe76d63c, fe76ce38, 805a55d) + 7
 0805a77d devfsadm_mklink (fe76ddac, 818c898,  81a9210, 0) + 231
 fd67097a zfs  (81a9210, 818c898, 80a9fa8, 81a9240) + 17e
 0805964a minor_process (818c898, 81a9210, fe76e314, 805939e) + 13e
 080594c3 check_minor_type (818c898, 81a9210, fe76e89c, febdbe6a) + 133
 febdbf27 walk_one_minor_list (fe76e2c8, 0, 10, fe76e89c, 8059390, ef7f000) + 
 cb
 febdc000 di_walk_minor (816b058, 0, 10, fe76e89c, 8059390, 807d52c) + 90
 08057b89 devi_tree_walk (fe76e89c, df07, 0, 8058736) + 10d
 08058749 sync_handler (0, fe76e8ec, 514, 0, 0, 80586ac) + 9d
 feef1ff2 __door_return () + 52
 
 lwp #4 in devfsadm seems to be busy;
 I suspect this thread is consuming (all?) the cpu time.
 
 A prstat -L will show which process threads consume cpu time.
 Does devfsadm/4 (lwp#4 in process devfsadm)  consume all of
 devfsadm's cpu time?
 
 What system call activity is reported by truss -l -v all -p `pgrep -x 
 devfsadm ` ?

I forgot to follow up on this.

Thanks very much for all your help Jürgen, I'll remember these commands
for the future.

It turned out there was loads of snapshots of a zvol that had been
created by timeslider. Someone in #opensolaris did point me at it being
caused by many snapshots before I asked on here, and I'd deleted them
all from my zfs filesystems, but not the zvols.

It seems that devfsadm was running so much as lots of new devices were
arriving in /dev/zvol/


Thanks again for your help,

Cheers,

Dunc


___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org

[osol-help] datalink-management:default failing after new SNV 101b install

2009-08-05 Thread Greg Terkanian
I've just installed SNV 2008.11 on a server and during text boot, I get the 
following errors:

svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/datalink-management:default: Method 
/lib/svc/method/svc-dlmgmtd failed with exit status 95.

svc.startd[7]: network/datalink-management:default failed fatally: transitioned 
to maintenance (see 'svcs -xv' for details)

The log file for network-datalink-management:default just contains the same 
information.

This is not my first 2008.11 install and I'd like to shy away from using 
2009.06 since this system will be replicating zfs file systems to another 
system and I worry about zfs version compatibilities.

Thanks.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] crash after ndis, how to restore it?

2009-08-05 Thread Anon Y Mous
I just remembered something. There is a -r option that you can pass to the 
unix kernel through grub at boot time. I think one of my manuals said something 
like:

Option -r reconfigures the /dev and /devices directories by probing all the 
attached hardware devices. You'll need to use this when you add new devices to 
a system or if you change the configuration of a hardware device. The kernel 
will rebuild the /dev and /devices directory with the names and references 
required to use the devices.

So try booting with a -rv option in grub and tell me if it works. I'm not an 
expert by any means but trying to tell the kernel at boot time to reconfigure 
the device tree like this might do the trick.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] opensolaris 64 bit version

2009-08-05 Thread Jürgen Keil
 I resolve this problem, I removed the graphics card
 ASUS EN8400GS/HTP from PCI bus.

That appears to be an nVidia PCI Express graphics card.

 Now it's work correctly.

Hmm, let's say you've worked around the bug.

Something seems to be broken, when the system hangs
when that nvidia video card was installed.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] Can't install on PowerEdge 2400

2009-08-05 Thread Jürgen Keil
 How can I install OpenSolaris (2009.06) on a Dell PowerEdge 2400?
 
 The problem is:
   * SCSI CDROM and Disks

What kind of SCSI controller ?
Is it supported by OpenSolaris ?

What is reported by the Device Detection Tool ?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] ZFS CIFS problem with Ubuntu, NFS as an alternative?

2009-08-05 Thread Bartlomiej Pelc
Chech if UIDs of user tmns are same on Ubuntu and OpenSolaris boxes:
Can do that by typing:
# grep tmns /etc/passwd
on both of them.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


[osol-help] kernel panic

2009-08-05 Thread Miguel Garcia


Hi, I've the same problem, I am using a OpenSolaris , output:

Started domain OpenSolaris
 v3.1.0-rc7-2950.fc8 chgset 'unavailable'
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_101b 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.

panic[cpu0]/thread=fbc5dba0: Grant Table setup failed

fbc90830 unix:gnttab_setup+6d ()
fbc90880 unix:gnttab_init+5b ()
fbc908c0 unix:startup_modules+266 ()
fbc908e0 unix:startup+57 ()
fbc90910 genunix:main+27 ()
fbc90920 unix:_locore_start+80 ()

skipping system dump - no dump device configured
rebooting...

It seems that the problem might  be a xen bug.. .but before  this 
happens I run this same domains disk, on a x86 32bit machine and works 
good.. I also used this domains with unix64 and boot_archive(64) in a 64 
bit machine..and for some time it works (I was running on a NFS) , after 
that I run on normal system...and boom.. kernel panic. Please.. some help

cheers

--
Miguel Garcia
http://pwp.netcabo.pt/miguelgarcia/
«The only limiting factor of the Linux operating system, is his user.» - 
Linus Torvalds


___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] Ploblem with Internet Connection

2009-08-05 Thread parkp...@hotmail.com
I have missing VIA Technology.lnc VT6102 [Rhine-II] driver

Missing:[third-party]

What sould I do to this problem?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] kernel panic

2009-08-05 Thread Jürgen Keil
 SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_101b 64-bit
...
 panic[cpu0]/thread=fbc5dba0: Grant Table setup failed
 
 fbc90830 unix:gnttab_setup+6d ()
 fbc90880 unix:gnttab_init+5b ()
 fbc908c0 unix:startup_modules+266 ()
 fbc908e0 unix:startup+57 ()
 fbc90910 genunix:main+27 ()
 fbc90920 unix:_locore_start+80 ()
 
 skipping system dump - no dump device configured
 rebooting...


Build 101b is quite old...  Did you test if the problem
can be reproduced with the current opensolaris 2009.06 
release?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


[osol-help] Building a ZFS vault, anyone with similar specs?

2009-08-05 Thread Muki Key Oot
I'm looking to build a ZFS storage box, and like most people who do this, I've 
dubbed it The Vault. The specs are below:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ZBDV8TJO
http://rapidshare.com/files/264238634/The_Vault.pdf
http://mukiex.dnsdojo.net/The_Vault.pdf (my home linux box, be gentle!)

To summarize, it's an Intel Atom 330, 2GB RAM, a Sata card based on the SIL3124 
chipset, two Compact Flash adapters (with 2 4GB cards), and 4 1.5 TB hard 
drives.

As you can probably guess, the plan is to install OpenSolaris as a ZFS mirror 
onto the CF cards (using a temporary optical drive I'll remove after 
installation) and import the 4 drives (taking up each case slot, including the 
5.25 one) as a RAIDZ.

So the questions are as follows, if anyone has made a similar contraption:
- Will the PCI SATA card cut it? The chipset looks compatible AFAICT.
- For that matter, will the motherboard SATA work? Important for the ZFS boot 
install.
- Is this enough power? I know an ATOM with 2 gigs is pretty darn low, but keep 
in mind that I have no plans to EVER connect this box to a monitor after 
install. It's SSH all the way. All I plan to do with it is make it a fileserver 
and POSSIBLY a print server. Realistically, once I can scrounge up the cash to 
create The Monster (that 20-slot hotplug case on Newegg looks plenty sexy), 
it'll become a portable NAS, so it's not exactly murdering itself on running 
programs.

Any help or advice on this setup would be greatly appreciated.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


[osol-help] NVIDIA vs ATI 3D acceleration on OpenSolaris

2009-08-05 Thread Hillel Lubman
What is in better supported under OpenSolaris, NVIDIA or ATI video cards in 
regards to 3D acceleration? I was planning to get a new laptop and was 
considering the video card choice.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-help] NVIDIA vs ATI 3D acceleration on OpenSolaris

2009-08-05 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Hillel Lubman wrote:
 What is in better supported under OpenSolaris, NVIDIA or ATI video cards in 
 regards to 3D acceleration? I was planning to get a new laptop and was 
 considering the video card choice.

Absolutely NVIDIA - right now, there is almost no 3D acceleration
for any ATI cards, while NVIDIA provides their fully accelerated driver,
which is bundled into the OpenSolaris system.

There are also accelerated 3D drivers for Intel graphics, thanks to
Intels work to help port their accelerated open source drivers to
OpenSolaris, and they will also give better performance for now than
any ATI card could.

-- 
-Alan Coopersmith-   alan.coopersm...@sun.com
 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering

___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org


[osol-help] HP w1907 Monitor + Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE Video Card

2009-08-05 Thread Aaron Epps
After installing 2009.06, the highest resolution that the Nvidia config tool 
will let me select is 1024x768. How do I OpenSolaris to support the monitors 
native resolution of 1440x...@60hz?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org