Re: [PATCH] config mod for crays
my apologies. i neglected to include the second half.
here is the entire modification.---
--- config.orig Mon Feb 4 16:12:43 2002
+++ config Tue Feb 5 16:01:09 2002
@@ -302,6 +302,13 @@
echo ${MACHINE}-whatever-cygwin32; exit 0
;;
+*CRAY T3E)
+ echo cray-t3e; exit 0;
+ ;;
+
+*CRAY*)
+ echo cray-t90; exit 0;
+ ;;
esac
#
@@ -562,6 +569,8 @@
mips-sony-newsos4) OUT=newsos4-gcc ;;
*-*-cygwin32) OUT=CygWin32
options=$options no-threads no-asm ;;
+ cray-t90) OUT=cray-t90 ;;
+ cray-t3e) OUT=cray-t3e ;;
*) OUT=`echo $GUESSOS | awk -F- '{print $3}'`;;
esac
Wendy Palm wrote:
please add to config. currently, we need to run Configure cray-t3e
or Configure cray-t90-cc. this patch would allow sites to just
run the same config line they do for other archs.
thanks much.
--- config.orig Mon Feb 4 16:21:40 2002
+++ config Mon Feb 4 16:24:04 2002
@@ -336,6 +336,14 @@
echo ${MACHINE}-whatever-cygwin32; exit 0
;;
+*:CRAY T3E)
+ echo cray-t3e; exit 0;
+ ;;
+
+*CRAY*)
+ echo cray-t90-cc; exit 0;
+ ;;
+
esac
#
--
wendy palm
Cray OS Sustaining Engineering, Cray Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 651-605-9154
--
wendy palm
Cray OS Sustaining Engineering, Cray Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 651-605-9154
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des str2key.c
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:40:10PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: This looks like an incompatible change (not just a bugfix), so it definitely should be documented in CHANGES. (Or, if compatibility is important here, the change should not be done at all.) I'm a little unsure about how it is incompatible. So, the resulting keys will possibly differ in the last byte. In what way does that become a problem If you previously used this function with a string that was mapped to a weak key, it will now be mapped to a different key, so decryption won't work as expected. (Arguably you don't need decryption if it was a weak key, but it's in incompatibility nevertheless.) -- Bodo Möller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/Mitarbeiter/moeller/0x36d2c658.html * TU Darmstadt, Theoretische Informatik, Alexanderstr. 10, D-64283 Darmstadt * Tel. +49-6151-16-6628, Fax +49-6151-16-6036 __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des str2key.c
From: Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] moeller If you previously used this function with a string that was mapped to moeller a weak key, it will now be mapped to a different key, so decryption moeller won't work as expected. (Arguably you don't need decryption if it was moeller a weak key, but it's in incompatibility nevertheless.) Hmm, quite... Sorry for not having my brain connected. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des str2key.c
From: Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] moeller This looks like an incompatible change (not just a bugfix), so it moeller definitely should be documented in CHANGES. (Or, if compatibility is moeller important here, the change should not be done at all.) I'm a little unsure about how it is incompatible. So, the resulting keys will possibly differ in the last byte. In what way does that become a problem (which I assume you mean when you point out the incompatibility)? Assar, shall I take your note (that became the CVS log), or do you want to write it yourself? -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 services
Hi there, I have a small problem with designing services which use openssl libraries. When I design server and client programs as exe files and install them on Win2000 platform, the system operates as it is expected. Then I have put both programs to operate as Win2000 services. What has happened is that when I put local host in the client as localhost or 127.0.0.1 the system will not simply work at all. When I put its real IP address or DNS name such as mytestingcomputer, the client is able to locate sever (operates as Windows2000 service). Then I have stripped the programs of ssl, and redesign it with tcp, the system operates OK. After that, I have debuged my program and locate BIO_set_conn_hostname. The input value to this instruction was ok. Then I have redesigned the program and used different openssl instructions based on socket implementation, where I have been able to follow the local address of the host implementation. The problem is that inside openssl the localhost and 127.0.0.1 are not simply recognised at all, and they are interpreted as unknown address. I have experimented with Service and its property (logon) under setting, but it still failed to resolve the local host address. I believe that there is some interaction between Win2000 service and openssl implementation, but I do not know where to look inside the code to find bug. I am asking developers whether they could point me to the places (either web sites or books) or even piece of openssl code to investigate the problem little bit further. I appreciate any help or suggestion. Thanks in advance. Alex Cosic __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
