Re: Cygwin compilation fails with 0.9.7-stable
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 23:41:00 -0800 (PST), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0x68):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0xf3a):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(yx86-out.o)(.text+0x9):crypt586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman collect2: ld returned 1 exit status dkaufman make[1]: *** [openssl] Error 1 dkaufman make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/CYGWIN/ssl097-1213/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021213/apps' dkaufman make: *** [sub_all] Error 1 Hmm, if you do something like 'nm libcrypto.a', can you see the symbol DES_SPtrans anywhere? It should be part of ecb_enc.obj... It has _DES_SPtrans, but not DES_SPtrans. Results of nm follow: ecb_enc.o: b .bss d .data t .text T _DES_SPtrans 08f0 T _DES_ecb_encrypt U _DES_encrypt1 08a0 T _DES_options 0004 D _OSSL_DES_version D _OSSL_libdes_version t ___gnu_compiled_c b _buf.7 0008 d _init.6 U _sprintf t gcc2_compiled. dx86-out.o: b .bss d .data r .rdata$zzz t .text U DES_SPtrans 1ec8 T _DES_decrypt3 2198 T _DES_ede3_cbc_encrypt T _DES_encrypt1 0f20 T _DES_encrypt2 1da4 T _DES_encrypt3 1fec T _DES_ncbc_encrypt t gcc2_compiled. yx86-out.o: b .bss d .data 0abe t .fcrypt_body_end r .rdata$zzz t .text U DES_SPtrans T _fcrypt_body t gcc2_compiled. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cygwin compilation fails with 0.9.7-stable
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 14 Dec 2002 23:41:00 -0800 (PST), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dkaufman gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o gendh.o errstr.o ca.o pkcs7.o crl2p7.o crl.o rsa.o rsautl.o dsa.o dsaparam.o x509.o genrsa.o gendsa.o s_server.o s_client.o speed.o s_time.o apps.o s_cb.o s_socket.o app_rand.o version.o sess_id.o ciphers.o nseq.o pkcs12.o pkcs8.o spkac.o smime.o rand.o engine.o ocsp.o ../libssl.a ../libcrypto.a ; \ dkaufman else \ dkaufman gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=i486 -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o gendh.o errstr.o ca.o pkcs7.o crl2p7.o crl.o rsa.o rsautl.o dsa.o dsaparam.o x509.o genrsa.o gendsa.o s_server.o s_client.o speed.o s_time.o apps.o s_cb.o s_socket.o app_rand.o version.o sess_id.o ciphers.o nseq.o pkcs12.o pkcs8.o spkac.o smime.o rand.o engine.o ocsp.o -L.. -lssl -L.. -lcrypto ; \ dkaufman fi dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0x68):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0xf3a):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(yx86-out.o)(.text+0x9):crypt586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman collect2: ld returned 1 exit status dkaufman make[1]: *** [openssl] Error 1 dkaufman make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/CYGWIN/ssl097-1213/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021213/apps' dkaufman make: *** [sub_all] Error 1 Hmm, if you do something like 'nm libcrypto.a', can you see the symbol DES_SPtrans anywhere? It should be part of ecb_enc.obj... The torture never stops. It surely have everything to do with DES PIC-ification. I'll look into it during the day and I'm pretty sure the fix will be in tonight snapshot. A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make depend fails for gcc (0.9.6h)
I just compiled openssl-0.9.6h (from CVS) with Cygwin. I configured with no-idea no-rc5 no-mdc2 no-shared. Make depend fails because Cygwin has no program named makedepend, which is called by util/domd. I borrowed the domd from 0.9.7, which has a provision for gcc being the makedepend program, and the rest of the compilation went fine, including make test and make install. I am not sure I see a simple fix, since in 0.9.7 the Configure script determines if the makedepend program should be gcc or not. Do we need to put this in the Configure script and modify Makefile.org and util/domd accordingly? I presume that this applies to any gcc compilation where there is no separate makedepend program. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cygwin compilation fails with 0.9.7-stable
dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0x68):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(dx86-out.o)(.text+0xf3a):des-586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman ../libcrypto.a(yx86-out.o)(.text+0x9):crypt586.s: undefined reference to `DES_SPtrans' dkaufman collect2: ld returned 1 exit status dkaufman make[1]: *** [openssl] Error 1 dkaufman make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/CYGWIN/ssl097-1213/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021213/apps' dkaufman make: *** [sub_all] Error 1 Hmm, if you do something like 'nm libcrypto.a', can you see the symbol DES_SPtrans anywhere? It should be part of ecb_enc.obj... The torture never stops. It surely have everything to do with DES PIC-ification. I'll look into it during the day and I'm pretty sure the fix will be in tonight snapshot. A. Checkout CVS or wait till tonight (openssl.org night:-) and pull the snapshot. A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cygwin compilation fails with 0.9.7-stable
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:20:33 -0800 (PST), Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dkaufman It has _DES_SPtrans, but not DES_SPtrans. Results of nm follow: Ah, C compilers do that, that's true... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make depend fails for gcc (0.9.6h)
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:31:52AM -0800, Doug Kaufman wrote: I just compiled openssl-0.9.6h (from CVS) with Cygwin. I configured with no-idea no-rc5 no-mdc2 no-shared. Make depend fails because Cygwin has no program named makedepend, which is called by util/domd. I borrowed the domd from 0.9.7, which has a provision for gcc being the makedepend program, and the rest of the compilation went fine, including make test and make install. I am not sure I see a simple fix, since in 0.9.7 the Configure script determines if the makedepend program should be gcc or not. Do we need to put this in the Configure script and modify Makefile.org and util/domd accordingly? I presume that this applies to any gcc compilation where there is no separate makedepend program. Doug `makedepend' is typically part of the XFree86 package, in Cygwin as well as on Linux systems. Just install the Cygwin XFree86 package. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make depend fails for gcc (0.9.6h)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:02:34 +0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: vinschen `makedepend' is typically part of the XFree86 package, in Cygwin as vinschen well as on Linux systems. Just install the Cygwin XFree86 package. I must admit it would be a little silly to install XFree86 just to get hold of makedepend. (and it's beyond me why makedepend still hasn't become a separate package, but that's not your fault) -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Make depend fails for gcc (0.9.6h)
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:58:18PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:02:34 +0100, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: vinschen `makedepend' is typically part of the XFree86 package, in Cygwin as vinschen well as on Linux systems. Just install the Cygwin XFree86 package. I must admit it would be a little silly to install XFree86 just to get hold of makedepend. (and it's beyond me why makedepend still hasn't become a separate package, but that's not your fault) You can't rely on it's existance and that's not a Cygwin problem. It's just that most today's Linux/Unix installations have X installed by default so you'll never see that problem. Just curious: What about Apple's OS X? It has no X so it probably has no makedepend, too. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002
16:27:54 +0100 (CET), Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
appro Log:
appro Another Solaris shared build clean-up. This is not actually needed if one
appro uses WorkShop C. It's gcc driver that brings copy of libgcc.a into .so
appro otherwise. In case you wonder what it's -Wl,-z... and not just -z. Problem
appro is that gcc driver apparently omits all -z options but -z text. Don't ask
appro me why. I'm not committing corresponding workaround into the HEAD as
appro Makefile.shared reportedly needs even more work...
appro
appro Summary:
appro RevisionChanges Path
appro 1.154.2.41 +2 -1 openssl/Makefile.org
appro
appro
appro Index: openssl/Makefile.org
appro
appro $ cvs diff -u -r1.154.2.40 -r1.154.2.41 Makefile.org
appro --- openssl/Makefile.org 15 Dec 2002 06:45:46 - 1.154.2.40
appro +++ openssl/Makefile.org 15 Dec 2002 15:27:53 - 1.154.2.41
appro @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@
approset -x; ${CC} ${SHARED_LDFLAGS} -G -dy -z text \
appro -o lib$$i.so.${SHLIB_MAJOR}.${SHLIB_MINOR} \
appro -h lib$$i.so.${SHLIB_MAJOR}.${SHLIB_MINOR} \
appro - -z allextract lib$$i.a $$libs ${EX_LIBS} -lc ) || exit
1; \
appro + -Wl,-z,allextract lib$$i.a -Wl,-z,defaultextract \
appro + $$libs ${EX_LIBS} -lc ) || exit 1; \
appro libs=$$libs -l$$i; \
appro done; \
appro fi
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU? It works *perfectly* with vendor compiler! Trust me:-) A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:43:46 +0100, Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: appro Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU? appro appro It works *perfectly* with vendor compiler! Trust me:-) A. Really? They understand -Wl? I thought that was the hight of GNU specificness (I know, not a real word. Just understand it, please). -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
appro Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU? appro appro It works *perfectly* with vendor compiler! Trust me:-) A. Really? They understand -Wl? Yes. Well, I can tell for version 3, but even WorkShop C 4 understands -Wl. There is a whole bunch of compiler drivers that understand -Wl, MIPSpro C does, Compaq C does, HP C does... In fact I can't think of one that does *not*... A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl Makefile.org
appro Whoaa there, how does that change work when the compiler is *not* GNU? appro appro It works *perfectly* with vendor compiler! Trust me:-) A. Really? They understand -Wl? Yes. Well, I can tell for version 3, ^^^ I meant I can *not* tell for for version 3. A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug in openssl-0.9.7-stable install_docs (head3)
I know that the problem of head3 in the pod files has been brought up before, but I thought it had been resolved. Doing make install_docs, using the latest 0.9.7-stable files from cvs, I get an error in processing doc/crypto/engine.pod, related to head3. The man page is created, but is truncated at the first head3 in the pod file. This is the only file where I see the problem. The error message that I get is: installing man3/engine.3 Can't locate object method cmd_head3 via package Pod::Man at \ /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Pod/Man.pm line 463, GEN0 line 191. The engine.pod file is dated 4 August 2002. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in openssl-0.9.7-stable install_docs (head3)
* Doug Kaufman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I know that the problem of head3 in the pod files has been brought up before, but I thought it had been resolved. Doing make install_docs, using the latest 0.9.7-stable files from cvs, I get an error in processing doc/crypto/engine.pod, related to head3. The man page is created, but is truncated at the first head3 in the pod file. This is the only file where I see the problem. The error message that I get is: installing man3/engine.3 Can't locate object method cmd_head3 via package Pod::Man at \ /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Pod/Man.pm line 463, GEN0 line 191. Yes, this was left in limbo a bit. I'm of the mind that as far as pod manipulations go, we should catch up with the later perl versions that allow up to 4 levels of 'head'er. Ie. update our bundled version of pod2man, and use that if the system's version is too old. However, others had suggested we stick with the two levels offered by the (not yet obsolete) version of Perl most people have. The argument seems to be between the value of the pod files themselves (ie. people wanting to manually convert them to html, latex, or whatever) and the improvements possible in the man pages openssl generates from those pods. My opinion is that the man pages generated by make install_docs is all that matters w.r.t. version choices, and if others want to use the pod files directly they can obtain versions of the pod tools that can handle them. I think with 0.9.7 in beta, I will try to replace the =head3 items with something else in the 0.9.7 branch, but leave it as-is in the cvs HEAD until we can get some definitive decision on how to proceed. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.openssl.org/ __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #401] Bug in openssl-0.9.7-stable install_docs (head3)
I know that the problem of head3 in the pod files has been brought up before, but I thought it had been resolved. Doing make install_docs, using the latest 0.9.7-stable files from cvs, I get an error in processing doc/crypto/engine.pod, related to head3. The man page is created, but is truncated at the first head3 in the pod file. This is the only file where I see the problem. The error message that I get is: installing man3/engine.3 Can't locate object method cmd_head3 via package Pod::Man at \ /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/Pod/Man.pm line 463, GEN0 line 191. The engine.pod file is dated 4 August 2002. Doug -- Doug Kaufman Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #373] Fw: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32) ?
yea, I think that patch should be ok.
Louis Solomon
www.SteelBytes.com
- Original Message -
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #373] Fw: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32)
?
I can see that happening. Would the following patch help?
Index: ssl/ssl_ciph.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33.2.3
diff -u -u -r1.33.2.3 ssl_ciph.c
--- ssl/ssl_ciph.c 19 Jul 2002 19:53:02 - 1.33.2.3
+++ ssl/ssl_ciph.c 12 Dec 2002 22:32:30 -
@@ -751,7 +751,9 @@
*/
if (rule_str == NULL) return(NULL);
+ CRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
+ CRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
/*
* To reduce the work to do we only want to process the compiled
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 2 Dec 2002
09:09:25 +0100 (MET), Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
rt ok,
rt here's the cause I think ...
rt
rt SSL_CTX_new(...)
rt {
rt ...
rt ssl_create_cipher_list(...)
rt ...
rt }
rt
rt static int init_ciphers=1;
rt
rt ssl_create_cipher_list(...)
rt {
rt ...
rt if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
rt ...
rt ssl_cipher_get_disabled()
rt ...
rt }
rt
rt load_ciphers()
rt {
rt init_ciphers = 0;
rt ... // mark_1
rt init ssl_cipher_methods[]
rt ...
rt }
rt
rt ssl_cipher_get_disabled()
rt {
rt ...
rt use ssl_cipher_methods[] // mark_2
rt ...
rt }
rt
rt consider this:
rt thread_1 calls SSL_CTX_new() and reaches mark_1
rt a context switch happens (thread_1 stalls, and thread_2 becomes
rt active)
rt thread_2 calls SSL_CTX_new() and reaches mark_2
rt
rt thread_2 will be trying to read from ssl_cipher_methods which is
rt uninitialised !!
rt
rt any one care to fix the 0.9.7 beta ? (or 0.9.6g)
rt
rt Louis Solomon
rt www.SteelBytes.com
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #373] Fw: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32) ?
* Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] via RT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
yea, I think that patch should be ok.
+ CRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
+ CRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
Is this one of those performance-critical cases were you should run a
test outside the lock first? Ie.
if (init_ciphers)
{
CRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
CRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
}
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openssl.org/
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #373] Fw: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32) ?
The patch was confirmed today, and thereby committed. This ticket is now resolved. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #373] Fw: is SSL_CTX_new() thread safe (on win32)?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:49:02
-0500, Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff Is this one of those performance-critical cases were you should run a
geoff test outside the lock first? Ie.
geoff
geoffif (init_ciphers)
geoff{
geoffCRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
geoffif (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
geoffCRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
geoff}
Good point.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
