Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process > > -1 > > Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0 > release? > > I think we need some sort of definition of missing features. Some features (e.g. SRP) were deliberately excluded from 3.0, but I tend to treat all the other features available in 1.1.1 and missing in 3.0 as bugs. -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process -1 Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0 release? Kurt
Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
-1 post closing of the vote for the record Tomas On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 14:19 +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process > Proposed by Shane Lontis > Public: yes > opened: 2021-08-17 > closed: 2021-mm-dd > accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) > > Dmitry [ ] > Matt [-1] > Pauli [+1] > Tim [ 0] > Richard [+1] > Shane [+1] > Tomas [ ] > Kurt [ ] > Matthias [ ] > Nicola [+1] -- Tomáš Mráz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb [You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your conscience.]
Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
The vote has closed and passed. Pauli topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Shane Lontis Public: yes opened: 2021-08-17 closed: 2021-08-18 accepted: yes (for: 5, against: 1, abstained: 1, not voted: 3) Dmitry [+1] Matt [-1] Pauli [+1] Tim [ 0] Richard [+1] Shane [+1] Tomas [ ] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [+1] On 17/8/21 11:19 pm, Matt Caswell wrote: topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Shane Lontis Public: yes opened: 2021-08-17 closed: 2021-mm-dd accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) Dmitry [ ] Matt [-1] Pauli [+1] Tim [ 0] Richard [+1] Shane [+1] Tomas [ ] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [+1]
Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
+1 On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:19 PM Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process > Proposed by Shane Lontis > Public: yes > opened: 2021-08-17 > closed: 2021-mm-dd > accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) > >Dmitry [ ] >Matt [-1] >Pauli [+1] >Tim[ 0] >Richard[+1] >Shane [+1] >Tomas [ ] >Kurt [ ] >Matthias [ ] >Nicola [+1] > -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Shane Lontis Public: yes opened: 2021-08-17 closed: 2021-mm-dd accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) Dmitry [ ] Matt [-1] Pauli [+1] Tim[ 0] Richard[+1] Shane [+1] Tomas [ ] Kurt [ ] Matthias [ ] Nicola [+1]
