Re: DSS cipherspecs ...

1999-03-31 Thread Bodo Moeller

Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

[...]
 The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.

I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
definition ("hashing [...] produces two values, r and s. The DSS
signature is an opaque vector [...] the contents of which are the DER
encoding of [...]").  Which leads to the question: Are there any
browsers that are not based on SSLeay/OpenSSL and support TLS 1.0?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Compiling OpenSSL 0.9.2b on Win32

1999-03-31 Thread Erwann ABALEA

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Jerry Baker wrote:

 After thouroughly following the directions that come with the
 distribution (including fixing some broken stuff that's not documented
 like a bunch of link files in place of some includes), I am running into
 an error that I cannot figure out. The compiler spits out "LIBEAY32.def
 : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol BIO_get_ex_num". I am
 absolutely 100% positive that all paths are correct and all settings are
 good. I have several times wiped out the entire src tree for OpenSSL and
 unpacked the tarball to start fresh. Same error everytime. Any ideas
 anyone?

 This is all on Win98 with MS VC++ 6.0 SP2

I compiled the 0.9.2b version on my Win98+VC++5.0 without any trouble, by
running only 3 commands, like described in the INSTALL.W32 doc:
perl Configure VC-WIN32
ms\do_ms.bat
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak

Maybe you missed one step? Or your VC++6.0 is the problem?

-- 
Erwann ABALEA
System and Development Engineer - Certplus SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5 -

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problem compiling C++ code that includes des.h

1999-03-31 Thread Jon Parry-McCulloch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Hi,

I have C++ module where I want to use SSL objects.

I am including some openssl .h files which include "des.h".
"des.h" declares function crypt() .

I had a similar problem a longtime ago. As I recall we fixed it by
adding

#define _KERBEROS_DES_H

into the code to stop des.h being included by unistd.h

I don't know if this is the same thing that you're seeing or a
different manifestation of something similar.

Jon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBNwHu6ngWiDO86u4+EQINkwCg0zo9UxGQGsl2YTOuYpFlUoMSkgIAoPee
uCs2S47gozR7itl1/DCWt0TX
=kICY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Compiling OpenSSL 0.9.2b on Win32

1999-03-31 Thread Francois

I did compile 0.9.2b on Win98 w/ VC6.0 and no problem.
(followed the same steps as described below)

fyi.

-Original Message-
From: Erwann ABALEA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: Compiling OpenSSL 0.9.2b on Win32


On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Jerry Baker wrote:

 After thouroughly following the directions that come with the
 distribution (including fixing some broken stuff that's not documented
 like a bunch of link files in place of some includes), I am running into
 an error that I cannot figure out. The compiler spits out "LIBEAY32.def
 : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol BIO_get_ex_num". I am
 absolutely 100% positive that all paths are correct and all settings are
 good. I have several times wiped out the entire src tree for OpenSSL and
 unpacked the tarball to start fresh. Same error everytime. Any ideas
 anyone?

 This is all on Win98 with MS VC++ 6.0 SP2

I compiled the 0.9.2b version on my Win98+VC++5.0 without any trouble, by
running only 3 commands, like described in the INSTALL.W32 doc:
perl Configure VC-WIN32
ms\do_ms.bat
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak

Maybe you missed one step? Or your VC++6.0 is the problem?

-- 
Erwann ABALEA
System and Development Engineer - Certplus SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RSA PGP Key ID: 0x2D0EABD5 -

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Crypt::OpenSSL

1999-03-31 Thread Ed Peschko

hey,

Did this ever happen? I looked on CPAN a couple of days ago, but saw nothing..

Ed
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NT perl SSL

1999-03-31 Thread Andy Shaw

Hi all,

My continued efforts to install Net::SSLeay on NT have hit another
hurdle.

Firstly I have,

1. Built openssl-0.9.1c without asm to build the win32dll's.
2. Copied this entire directory structure toit's installation directory.
3. Renames out32dll to bin so that Makefile.pl in Net::SSLeay can find
ssleay
4. Altered Makefile.pl to check for ssleay.exe not ssleay
5. Finally got a make file to build the Perl.

Now running nmake install gives 
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(266) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ';'
before '-'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(266) : error C2238: unexpected token(s)
preceding ';'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(417) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')'
before '-'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(417) : error C2059: syntax error : '-'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(417) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')'
before '-'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2059: syntax error : '-'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2501: 'PL_na' : missing
decl-specifiers
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2062: type 'unsigned long'
unexpected
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2501: 'b' : missing
decl-specifiers
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : warning C4228: nonstandard extension used
: qualifiers after comma in declarator list are ignored
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2062: type 'int' unexpected
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : error C2501: 'nb' : missing
decl-specifiers
c:\openssl/include\bn.h(426) : warning C4228: nonstandard extension used
: qualifiers after comma in declarator list are ignored
c:\openssl/include\asn1.h(138) : fatal error C1903: unable to recover
from previous error(s); stopping compilation
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl.exe' : return code '0x2'
Stop.

What am I doing wrong? Why is this so hard?

Andy

-- 

Andy Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44 (0)1223 715002
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: error in ceritificate request from MSIE 4.0

1999-03-31 Thread Max Liccardo



Hubert Froehlich wrote:

 

 Um, I am working on the same. The scripts mentioned above already include the
 'msie_hack' option...

 When working on the Unix side all works fine. Just when trying them out with
 MSIE I got some error code like 0x80092004

 I'm familiar with Unix, Linux and all that, not with Microsoft (here: NT 4.0,
 MSIE 4.0). Any idea?





Hi,
try these parameters into your request cgi...They worked for me.

Enroll.KeySpec = 1
  Enroll.GenKeyFlags = 3
  Enroll.providerType = 1
  Enroll.providerName = "Microsoft Base Cryptographic Provider v1.0"
  Enroll.HashAlgorithm = "MD5"
-
If you have problem, I can send you the cgi I use.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DSS cipherspecs ...

1999-03-31 Thread Dr Stephen Henson

Bodo Moeller wrote:
 
 Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 [...]
  The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.
 
 I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
 definition ("hashing [...] produces two values, r and s. The DSS
 signature is an opaque vector [...] the contents of which are the DER
 encoding of [...]").  

Unfortunately the SSL spec isn't so clear. The three formats in use are:

1. OpenSSL/SSLeay: DSS-sig structure with outer length parameter.
2. Sun HotJava: DSS-sig but without length parameter.
3. Netscape: 40 byte raw encoding of r and s with length parameter.

Steve.
-- 
Dr Stephen N. Henson.   http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the   OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NT perl SSL

1999-03-31 Thread dougc

Andy,
I just went throught the considerable pain in almost exactly what you
have
done so far. I was extremly lucky to get the help of the folks on
this and
some other news groups. I am including 4 messages that detail many
steps that
need to be taken to fix files in the build process. Read all the
messages first
then see what your files look like, then take the steps slowly. Thats
what I
did and was finally able to compile yesterday. I did need to get a
new
Makefile.PL for the net::ssleay that had the correct set of
libraries. I
would be happy to send you that if you need it. Hope this helps. Here
goes

From: "Francois Orsini" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dougc@lynxhub
Subject: Re: Win 32 DLL library  NET_SSLEAY
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:28:53 -0800


Doug,

To get you moving, Here is what you need to do to fix your
compilation problem. I used Net_SSLeay 1.0.3, SSLeay 0.9.0b
and MSVC++ 6.0

1) The \use\local\ssl\include\bn.h file contains a  bn_blinding_st
structure
 definition with a "mod" member.  Rename it to "modnum".

2) In the \usr\local\ssl\include\ssl.h file, a function declaration
used a argument
name of "list", which appears to be an MSVC reserved word, as this
generates a
compiler error (under VC6 at least).  Rename the argument to
"listref". 
NOTE: (2 instances of this type of error, in ssl.h)

3) ssleay.xs - Conversion errors with regards to the
SSL_CTX_set_verify function. 
Attempting to convert a (SV *) to a (void *) - This is easy to
fix:
   
SSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx,mode,(int(*)(void))ssleay_ctx_verify_callback_g
lue);

4) If you get some undefined for RAND_seed(), RAND_xxx(), etc...:
   Add: #include rand.h
   in ssleay.xs before "buffer.h"


Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:37:44 -0500
From: Jack Velte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Compiling Crypt::SSLeay on Windows with VC++
To: dougc@lynxhub


Manually add the 3 ssl libraries to Crypt::SSLeay Makefile.  I couldn't get
makefile.pl to write the libraries correctly to the created Makefile.  I
added them to the EXTRALIBS and LDLOADLIBS lines.  You probably want to use
the path to the output of Your compilation in step 0.  :-)

"C:/Perl/local/openssl-SNAP-19990314-0330/out32dll/libeay32.lib"
"C:/Perl/local/openssl-SNAP-19990314-0330/out32dll/RSAglue.lib"
"C:/Perl/local/openssl-SNAP-19990314-0330/out32dll/ssleay32.lib"

-- 
3
-- 

Fix reserved words in openssl ssl.h and bn.h function prototype
headers.  My system needs the same fix for older versions of ssleay.
(Back to SSLeay-0.9.0b at least.)  Since you already compiled
openssl, and we are only changing function prototypes, this should
have no effect on Crypt::SSLeay.

I don't know why the C compiler complains about these reserved words when
compiling SSLeay/OpenSSL suite compiles, but it does.
--

ssl.h:
('list')
void SSL_set_client_CA_list(SSL *s, STACK *list);
-
void SSL_set_client_CA_list(SSL *s, STACK *list_x);

('list')
void SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(SSL_CTX *ctx, STACK *list);
-
void SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(SSL_CTX *ctx, STACK *list_x);

('mod')
bn.h:
 BIGNUM *mod; /* just a reference */
-
 BIGNUM *mod_x; /* just a reference */

('mod')
BN_BLINDING *BN_BLINDING_new(BIGNUM *A,BIGNUM *Ai,BIGNUM *mod);
-
BN_BLINDING *BN_BLINDING_new(BIGNUM *A,BIGNUM *Ai,BIGNUM *mod_x);

('na')
void bn_mul_normal(BN_ULONG *r,BN_ULONG *a,int na,BN_ULONG *b,int nb);
-
void bn_mul_normal(BN_ULONG *r,BN_ULONG *a,int na_x,BN_ULONG *b,int nb);

--
4
--

copy the openssl libraries to somewhere on your path.  (or your perl5lib
path -- i have my lib directory on both for now.)

--
"nmake" should now compile Crypt::SSLeay
"nmake install" installs the library.

now if you use 

new HTTP::Request('GET', "https://www.foo.com/"); 

the LWP library will automatically use the SSL libraries.

a simple test downloading a secure page worked for me.

-jack

From: "Francois Orsini" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dougc@lynxhub
Subject: Re: Win 32 DLL library  NET_SSLEAY
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 15:21:44 -0800


I know what it is...
all the functions must be declared ANSI (PROTO)...

so make sure the args type is declared within the function ()
such as:
static int
not_here(char *s)
{


}

You need to do this for all of them...
I must have done it but do not remember...

if it is too much hassle for you : i'll send you my ssleay.xs

Hope this helps,

--francois

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Francois Orsini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Win 32 DLL library  NET_SSLEAY


Francois,
I made good progress with your help, thanks so much. I have now
gotten past the compile problem for SSLeay.c, but have run into
something strange 

Re: DSS cipherspecs ...

1999-03-31 Thread Bodo Moeller

On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:15:23PM +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
 Bodo Moeller wrote:
 Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The SSL spec isn't clear on the format of the DSS signature.

 I hadn't noticed that problem -- the TLS RFC does have an explicit
 definition ("hashing [...] produces two values, r and s. The DSS
 signature is an opaque vector [...] the contents of which are the DER
 encoding of [...]").  

 Unfortunately the SSL spec isn't so clear. The three formats in use are:

 1. OpenSSL/SSLeay: DSS-sig structure with outer length parameter.
 2. Sun HotJava: DSS-sig but without length parameter.
 3. Netscape: 40 byte raw encoding of r and s with length parameter.

Case 1 being exactly what RFC 2246 asks for, right?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-03-31 Thread Niels Poppe

(sorry.. forgot to finish  send this message off.. there you go)

Mike Hess wrote:
 
 I believe I encountered a problem compiling openssl-0.9.2b on IRIX 6.2
 similar to the one encountered in an earlier note on Digital UNIX V4.0E.
 
 I used the solution 1, (./Configure irix-cc no-asm) recommended below but
 wonder whether you have a patch file below for solution 2.
 
 Below are the errors I encountered during make after
[...]

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_div_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_div.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sub_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).

 Michael R.A. Hess -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 573-882-2000

There has been some discussion on bn_div_words around in openssl-dev:

 From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: A.L. Group plc
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Patch: BN_div_words in asm/alpha.s
 
 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
  
  Hi all,
  
  here is a patch for adding bn_div_words to asm/alpha.s. It got lost
  somehow, but without the assembler version won't compile.
  
  I'm not entirely familiar with the internal working of openssl, but to
  my untrained eye bn_asm.c:bn_div_words and bn_mulw.c:bn_div64 are
  looking suspiciously similar. Is there a special reason for it or can we
  just scrap one version ?
  (I suspect that's also why bn_div_words does not appear in asm/alpha.s;
  it just got renamed to bn_div64 hoping that all functions would call
  this and not bn_div_words. Evolutionary programming :-).
 
 Looks to me like the whole of bn_mulw.c is redundant. bn_div_words and
 bn_div64 are indeed identical, and bn_div64 is not actually used
 anywhere, AFAICS.
 
 So, I'm going to blow away bn_mulw.c, and rename bn_div64 to
 bn_div_words in alpha.s.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ben.
 

Looking at crypto/bn/asm/{mips1,mips3,r3000}.s I see bn_div64 is
implemented in all of those.

Try  see whether
- ./Configure irix64-cc no-asm
- ./Configure irix-n64-cc no-asm
work, build, and pass make test

I think we can assume without no-asm they all fail, so
change bn_div64 to bn_div_words in the 3 assembler files above,
then try
- ./Configure irix-cc
- ./Configure irix64-cc
- ./Configure irix-n64-cc

and report what symbols are missing then ...

-- 
Niels Poppe - org.net bv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Telnet+telnetd on AIX

1999-03-31 Thread Nelson Murilo



Hi,

I'm have one AIX box withless Internet conection and not
C compile too. 
Anyone have SSLtelnet work like a charm in AIX 3.4
or know any url for binary package?

Thanks for your time and attention,

-- 
./nelson -murilo



__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-03-31 Thread Don Badrak

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Niels Poppe wrote:

 (sorry.. forgot to finish  send this message off.. there you go)

[chop]
 
 There has been some discussion on bn_div_words around in openssl-dev:
 
  From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Organization: A.L. Group plc
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Patch: BN_div_words in asm/alpha.s
  
  Hannes Reinecke wrote:
   
   Hi all,
   
   here is a patch for adding bn_div_words to asm/alpha.s. It got lost
   somehow, but without the assembler version won't compile.
   
   I'm not entirely familiar with the internal working of openssl, but to
   my untrained eye bn_asm.c:bn_div_words and bn_mulw.c:bn_div64 are
   looking suspiciously similar. Is there a special reason for it or can we
   just scrap one version ?
   (I suspect that's also why bn_div_words does not appear in asm/alpha.s;
   it just got renamed to bn_div64 hoping that all functions would call
   this and not bn_div_words. Evolutionary programming :-).
  
  Looks to me like the whole of bn_mulw.c is redundant. bn_div_words and
  bn_div64 are indeed identical, and bn_div64 is not actually used
  anywhere, AFAICS.
  
  So, I'm going to blow away bn_mulw.c, and rename bn_div64 to
  bn_div_words in alpha.s.
  
  Cheers,
  
  Ben.
  
 
 Looking at crypto/bn/asm/{mips1,mips3,r3000}.s I see bn_div64 is
 implemented in all of those.
 
 Try  see whether
 - ./Configure irix64-cc no-asm
 - ./Configure irix-n64-cc no-asm
 work, build, and pass make test

No go on this one.  I built with "irix64-gcc no-asm", and it fails the
exptest as follows (yipes):

mont and recp results differ
a (455) = 
5F3155A6B3B4E28410F42E9B8DBAD719A4A52DD5EEA30E6276D77BD15743232869DDAE5D70683F508A8EFF4FCB3777B6EC8FE91A47A97E0049
b (493) = 
1E115BCCCAE984E5994833DA4C30D418DF649EB2AE283BF850A7804711B89D3D970F7764AA8D939D700FB433CFF9C72E5F25D4728D5A831584E9FA77A8A0
m (496) = 
92853BD41425AE78793934E7FCD45909D25452DAEA74855216FA3FADE8674C60ED0D11929E69003D13D759237AE9AC7168C9C1ABAB14A07348E8F597
recp 
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
 A7!
!
!
37C1E092696BFBD4AF940D78AEE7A474736F4C8E71E8CD69E0B586A663912498A420A90D53101209372C43B2F37ACEA14DC2586AA257BE1606954C89D1292825769944589078C5A5A3B0666524D94261BDD53C842B5DD5D30AC68D26A17F6635AB83EE4AA92390E9E2D4530C9BBE6D3F1E7846F6B74197BA5149B51C5ABC822C2181333E9A793336A3D1DF355DE6C13CAD6FE1E228ABA058640A2F39C9242712290172062F7371EC697CF49FCBD7B961BB24B03FAA7619D3BC26F389BFE3F7DA417AD2B5F82A335C927BD8094EEF5476E44D5DAF8A65D0B9BF1E676264C39E095C445F53966CA3DAD76D308B00A96F321C07EFD8E8A76460DA37636298F754A3E351204EBAA1960A91B873691AB5FCB4985845B53EB10D082C4C624D2DD47650FAD95542AC9D7DC96C62D2A7051B2F029C767A868CCB67C3A174099196E0887FE47CE994CD91E94CEDD948ED51C5E3F9466A5E4EB2D868C71E67D0109C04678A2268CA1BCF99EEC95E1CB3BF1FD94B047B6806FA5F81E00AE1D6C39F5A729A8DE5443AE7AC76DB53092403171B7E6D1C625229389E7A8C3DB041842A3E469FAD12962937E635A223E5C00B077786DCF2C7B143A25DA91D94630BD6ABE302A54B2FBE429519E8600C454CC8598F0FA87A883BB828A05E1AB0D25C7C0BA6EC7DE9FA1C6C9B06AA0AAA4CD9544E908AB!
 5B!
!
!
8E1DD89D
mont 
=3719792ED445DEC8CE0D9A0B2CC7DF4A84EEC02A991BE83A23E1AC797A1C71D9B3F31F3FE8B910190635CF6804DD5D0329CC35C1E47303B051A5F5865069

If I do it as "irix-gcc no-asm", it compiles, and the tests all pass (after
excluding the rsa_oaep_test).

 I think we can assume without no-asm they all fail, so
 change bn_div64 to bn_div_words in the 3 assembler files above,
 then try
 - ./Configure irix-cc
 - ./Configure irix64-cc
 - ./Configure irix-n64-cc
 
 and report what symbols are missing then ...

I get lots conflicts with builtins and some undeclared macros:

[Configure irix-gcc (or irix64-gcc)]

pem.h:6: warning: `EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE' redefined
../../include/evp.h:108: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from ../cryptlib.h:63,
 from pem_sign.c:60:
/usr/include/string.h:67: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcpy'
/usr/include/string.h:74: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcmp'