Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-04-05 Thread carson

 "Bodo" == Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Don Badrak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I get lots conflicts with builtins and some undeclared macros:
 [Configure irix-gcc (or irix64-gcc)]

 pem.h:6: warning: `EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE' redefined
 ../../include/evp.h:108: warning: this is the location of the previous definition

Bodo occur.  It appears that either your copy of pem.h or your C
Bodo preprocessor is broken ...

SGI's C compiler does indeed have a nasty cpp bug involving #ifndef
statements. Changing them to #if !defined() statements fixes this, and
there is a patch available. This may or may not be your problem, but
it's worth checking.

Sorry I can't provide a patch reference, but I'm not the one who
maintains our SGI environment - I just reported the bug and lo - the
mighty SAs did perform a miracle. :)

-- 
Carson Gaspar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html
Queen Trapped in a Butch Body
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-04-03 Thread Ben Laurie

Bodo Moeller wrote:
   -  Scrap crypto/pem/ctx_size.c and crypto/pem/pem.org (with
  appropriate changes to the Makefile);

What do you do about the stuff it generates, then?

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
 - Indira Gandhi
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-04-02 Thread Bodo Moeller

Don Badrak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Bodo Moeller:

 It appears that either your copy of pem.h or your C
 preprocessor is broken ...

 It is probably an irix64-gcc vs irix-gcc thing.  I'll have to look deeper
 at the differences between the two.  I don't believe the gcc preprocessor
 is broken, since it's worked for everything else.  But, maybe it's not
 using it.

It's very unlikely that any preprocessor would be so broken as to
cause the problem you had.  The duplicate definition of
EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE that your compiler complained about should never be
read because it is protected by #ifndef HEADER_ENVELOPE_H, and the
previous #include "evp.h" defines HEADER_ENVELOPE_H.  But pem.h is an
automatically generated header file, and your problems may have to
do with that.  (Or maybe your header file search path contains some
other file called evp.h, e.g. from an older version of SSLeay.)

This automatically generated part is totally superfluous, as evp.h is
#included anyway (if this wasn't the case, pem.h would define dummy
structure types struct evp_.../enp_... that have the correct size, but
consist just of one component of type char[EVP_..._SIZE] -- these
don't necessarily have the correct alignment, so this is rubbish in
every respect).  One of the automatically generated macros
(EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE) is even wrong -- evp.h now uses 16+20, while the
unused definition in pem.h is automatically generated to be the
maximum of MD2_DIGEST_LEN, MD5_DIGEST_LEN, and SHA_DIGEST_LEN,
i.e. 20).  The SSL library still assumes that EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE is 20;
I'm not sure if there was a specific reason for increasing its value
(in earlier versions, it was consistent).


After once more pointing out what nightmare of inconsistencies is
caused by the approach of automatically generating lots of bits and
pieces, let me suggest changes:

  -  Scrap crypto/pem/ctx_size.c and crypto/pem/pem.org (with
 appropriate changes to the Makefile);

  -  remove the "#ifndef HEADER_ENVELOPE_H"-part of pem.h;

  -  and change the comments inside pem.h (the first line shouldn't
 call it "pem.org" any longer, and the warning that the file is
 automatically generated no longer applies).
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-03-31 Thread Niels Poppe

(sorry.. forgot to finish  send this message off.. there you go)

Mike Hess wrote:
 
 I believe I encountered a problem compiling openssl-0.9.2b on IRIX 6.2
 similar to the one encountered in an earlier note on Digital UNIX V4.0E.
 
 I used the solution 1, (./Configure irix-cc no-asm) recommended below but
 wonder whether you have a patch file below for solution 2.
 
 Below are the errors I encountered during make after
[...]

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_div_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_div.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sub_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).

 ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).

 Michael R.A. Hess -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 573-882-2000

There has been some discussion on bn_div_words around in openssl-dev:

 From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: A.L. Group plc
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Patch: BN_div_words in asm/alpha.s
 
 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
  
  Hi all,
  
  here is a patch for adding bn_div_words to asm/alpha.s. It got lost
  somehow, but without the assembler version won't compile.
  
  I'm not entirely familiar with the internal working of openssl, but to
  my untrained eye bn_asm.c:bn_div_words and bn_mulw.c:bn_div64 are
  looking suspiciously similar. Is there a special reason for it or can we
  just scrap one version ?
  (I suspect that's also why bn_div_words does not appear in asm/alpha.s;
  it just got renamed to bn_div64 hoping that all functions would call
  this and not bn_div_words. Evolutionary programming :-).
 
 Looks to me like the whole of bn_mulw.c is redundant. bn_div_words and
 bn_div64 are indeed identical, and bn_div64 is not actually used
 anywhere, AFAICS.
 
 So, I'm going to blow away bn_mulw.c, and rename bn_div64 to
 bn_div_words in alpha.s.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ben.
 

Looking at crypto/bn/asm/{mips1,mips3,r3000}.s I see bn_div64 is
implemented in all of those.

Try  see whether
- ./Configure irix64-cc no-asm
- ./Configure irix-n64-cc no-asm
work, build, and pass make test

I think we can assume without no-asm they all fail, so
change bn_div64 to bn_div_words in the 3 assembler files above,
then try
- ./Configure irix-cc
- ./Configure irix64-cc
- ./Configure irix-n64-cc

and report what symbols are missing then ...

-- 
Niels Poppe - org.net bv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-03-31 Thread Don Badrak

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Niels Poppe wrote:

 (sorry.. forgot to finish  send this message off.. there you go)

[chop]
 
 There has been some discussion on bn_div_words around in openssl-dev:
 
  From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Organization: A.L. Group plc
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Patch: BN_div_words in asm/alpha.s
  
  Hannes Reinecke wrote:
   
   Hi all,
   
   here is a patch for adding bn_div_words to asm/alpha.s. It got lost
   somehow, but without the assembler version won't compile.
   
   I'm not entirely familiar with the internal working of openssl, but to
   my untrained eye bn_asm.c:bn_div_words and bn_mulw.c:bn_div64 are
   looking suspiciously similar. Is there a special reason for it or can we
   just scrap one version ?
   (I suspect that's also why bn_div_words does not appear in asm/alpha.s;
   it just got renamed to bn_div64 hoping that all functions would call
   this and not bn_div_words. Evolutionary programming :-).
  
  Looks to me like the whole of bn_mulw.c is redundant. bn_div_words and
  bn_div64 are indeed identical, and bn_div64 is not actually used
  anywhere, AFAICS.
  
  So, I'm going to blow away bn_mulw.c, and rename bn_div64 to
  bn_div_words in alpha.s.
  
  Cheers,
  
  Ben.
  
 
 Looking at crypto/bn/asm/{mips1,mips3,r3000}.s I see bn_div64 is
 implemented in all of those.
 
 Try  see whether
 - ./Configure irix64-cc no-asm
 - ./Configure irix-n64-cc no-asm
 work, build, and pass make test

No go on this one.  I built with "irix64-gcc no-asm", and it fails the
exptest as follows (yipes):

mont and recp results differ
a (455) = 
5F3155A6B3B4E28410F42E9B8DBAD719A4A52DD5EEA30E6276D77BD15743232869DDAE5D70683F508A8EFF4FCB3777B6EC8FE91A47A97E0049
b (493) = 
1E115BCCCAE984E5994833DA4C30D418DF649EB2AE283BF850A7804711B89D3D970F7764AA8D939D700FB433CFF9C72E5F25D4728D5A831584E9FA77A8A0
m (496) = 
92853BD41425AE78793934E7FCD45909D25452DAEA74855216FA3FADE8674C60ED0D11929E69003D13D759237AE9AC7168C9C1ABAB14A07348E8F597
recp 
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
 A7!
!
!
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
 5B!
!
!
8E1DD89D
mont 
=3719792ED445DEC8CE0D9A0B2CC7DF4A84EEC02A991BE83A23E1AC797A1C71D9B3F31F3FE8B910190635CF6804DD5D0329CC35C1E47303B051A5F5865069

If I do it as "irix-gcc no-asm", it compiles, and the tests all pass (after
excluding the rsa_oaep_test).

 I think we can assume without no-asm they all fail, so
 change bn_div64 to bn_div_words in the 3 assembler files above,
 then try
 - ./Configure irix-cc
 - ./Configure irix64-cc
 - ./Configure irix-n64-cc
 
 and report what symbols are missing then ...

I get lots conflicts with builtins and some undeclared macros:

[Configure irix-gcc (or irix64-gcc)]

pem.h:6: warning: `EVP_MAX_MD_SIZE' redefined
../../include/evp.h:108: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from ../cryptlib.h:63,
 from pem_sign.c:60:
/usr/include/string.h:67: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcpy'
/usr/include/string.h:74: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcmp'

Problems to compile openssl on IRIX 6.2

1999-03-30 Thread Mike Hess

I believe I encountered a problem compiling openssl-0.9.2b on IRIX 6.2
similar to the one encountered in an earlier note on Digital UNIX V4.0E.

I used the solution 1, (./Configure irix-cc no-asm) recommended below but
wonder whether you have a patch file below for solution 2.

Below are the errors I encountered during make after
./Configure irix-cc
make
...

making all in apps...
cc -DMONOLITH -I../include -O2 -use_readonly_const -DTERMIOS
-DB_ENDIAN -c verify.c
...
cc -DMONOLITH -I../include -O2 -use_readonly_const -DTERMIOS
-DB_ENDIAN -c nseq.c
cc -DMONOLITH -I../include -O2 -use_readonly_const -DTERMIOS
-DB_ENDIAN -c openssl.c
rm -f openssl
cc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -O2 -use_readonly_const
-DTERMIOS -DB_ENDIAN openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o enc.o
gendh.o errstr.o ca.o  pkcs7.o crl2p7.o crl.o  rsa.o dsa.o dsaparam.o
x509.o genrsa.o gendsa.o s_server.o s_client.o speed.o  s_time.o apps.o
s_cb.o s_socket.o version.o sess_id.o  ciphers.o nseq.o -L. -L.. -L../..
-L../../.. -L.. -lssl -L.. -lcrypto
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_div_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_div.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sub_words" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_mul_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba4" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: ERROR 33: Unresolved text symbol "bn_sqr_comba8" -- 1st referenced by
../libcrypto.a(bn_sqr.o).
Use linker option -v to see when and which objects, archives and
dsos are loaded.
ld: INFO 152: Output file removed because of error.
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)

Detlef Schmier wrote:

 Hello,

 I try to compile openssl-0.9.2b on "Digital UNIX V4.0E (Rev. 1091)" using
 the normal C-compiler.

 Make stops to load openssl after all libraries are compiled:


 ld:
 Unresolved:
 bn_div_words
 *** Exit 1
 Stop.


 Please advice


There are three options to solve this:
1. pass no-asm to ./Configure,
2. patch asm/alpha.s to include bn_div_words, or,
3. start with 2 above, then find an axp guru and optimize things.

Michael R.A. Hess -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 573-882-2000
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]