Hi Richard. thanks for your reply. In my experiments so far, I have seen
the messages about size_t and unsigned long. This is the one that worried me
some.
How can I watch for news about this work?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7d WIN - IA64 port
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mcast.net on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:41:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
d.mclellan Hi: I'm now investigating build OpenSSL -0.9.7d on a WIN
d.mclellan IA64 architecture machine. Has anyone had any experience
d.mclellan with this, or is there any active work in progress to
d.mclellan support WIN IA64 platforms? d.mclellan Thanks very much.
The absolutely biggest problem is that size_t is 64 bits while unsigned long
is 32 bits. This leads to a ton of warnings/errors concerning size
differences when OpenSSL uses unsigned long, unsigned int or int for things
that should really be size_t.
There's a branch where work on this is done, although very slowly (at least
for the moment). If I didn't have to spend time chasing down finances to
survive, that would be one of those things I'd work on, as it also concerns
a favorite O/S of mine, VMS.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
