RE: sect163k1 public keys

2008-10-09 Thread Bill Colvin
I suspect that the smaller one is using Certicom's patented point compression 
representation of the public key.

Not sure on the signature part of your question.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno Vétel
Sent: October 9, 2008 4:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: sect163k1 public keys

hello

It seems that sect163k1 public keys can have two formats

The first with a key lentgh of 43 bytes which seems to be the standard,
the second used by openssl with length 64 bytes.

Can anyone tell me where I can find informations on that and what it the
impact on signature.

I used a development snapshot (openssl-SNAP-20080930) of openssl 

Thanks for your help

Bruno Vetel



__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: sect163k1 public keys

2008-10-09 Thread Bruno Vétel
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:51 -0600, Bill Colvin wrote:
 I suspect that the smaller one is using Certicom's patented point compression 
 representation of the public key.

Hello Bill

Thanks for your answer but I
don't think so. Following this url, 

http://tls.secg.org/index1.php?action=certificate

the uncompressed size is 43 bytes and the compressed
form 22

Bruno



 
 Not sure on the signature part of your question.
 
 Bill
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno Vétel
 Sent: October 9, 2008 4:35 PM
 To: openssl-users@openssl.org
 Subject: sect163k1 public keys
 
 hello
 
 It seems that sect163k1 public keys can have two formats
 
 The first with a key lentgh of 43 bytes which seems to be the standard,
 the second used by openssl with length 64 bytes.
 
 Can anyone tell me where I can find informations on that and what it the
 impact on signature.
 
 I used a development snapshot (openssl-SNAP-20080930) of openssl 
 
   Thanks for your help
 
   Bruno Vetel
 
 
 
 __
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 __
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]