Hi Richard. thanks for your reply. In my experiments so far, I have seen
the messages about size_t and unsigned long. This is the one that worried me
some.
How can I watch for news about this work?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7d WIN - IA64 port
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mcast.net> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:41:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
d.mclellan> Hi: I'm now investigating build OpenSSL -0.9.7d on a WIN
d.mclellan> IA64 architecture machine. Has anyone had any experience
d.mclellan> with this, or is there any active work in progress to
d.mclellan> support WIN IA64 platforms? d.mclellan> Thanks very much.
The absolutely biggest problem is that size_t is 64 bits while unsigned long
is 32 bits. This leads to a ton of warnings/errors concerning size
differences when OpenSSL uses unsigned long, unsigned int or int for things
that should really be size_t.
There's a branch where work on this is done, although very slowly (at least
for the moment). If I didn't have to spend time chasing down finances to
survive, that would be one of those things I'd work on, as it also concerns
a favorite O/S of mine, VMS.
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richard.levitte.org/
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]