[Openstack] make swift.common.utils.streq_const_time more efficient
def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): result |= ord(a) ^ ord(b) return result == 0 + If s1 and s2 are of the same length, then the function will compare every characters in them. I think it may be more efficient as follow: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): if ord(a) ^ ord(b): return False return True ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [swift] make swift.common.utils.streq_const_time more efficient
def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): result |= ord(a) ^ ord(b) return result == 0 + If s1 and s2 are of the same length, then the function will compare every characters in them. I think it may be more efficient as follow: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): if ord(a) ^ ord(b): return False return True ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [openstack][swift]make swift.common.utils.streq_const_time more efficient
def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): result |= ord(a) ^ ord(b) return result == 0 + If s1 and s2 are of the same length, then the function will compare every characters in them. I think it may be more efficient as follow: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): if ord(a) ^ ord(b): return False return True ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
Russell Bryant wrote: On 09/12/2012 08:56 PM, Syd (Sydney) Logan wrote: Guess the only advantage would be to minimize the chance of someone missing the security related messages in the noise of a heavy traffic mailing list. Even if there were a specialized list, I’d think you’d want to cross post security issues to all lists, depending on severity (and with security, all issues are generally severe). We have started posting the security advisories to the openstack-announce list, as well. That should cover those wanting to watch out for them on a low volume mailing list. I like the simple group of openstack@, openstack-dev@, and openstack-announce@. That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting... Reminder: here were the other options: Option A1 (separate operators, general named openstack-general): openstack-gene...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option A2 (separate operators, general just named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option B1 (single user/general list, named openstack-user): openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option Z (keep current situation): openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org My own order of preference is A1, B2, A2, B1, Z. I'm fine with B2 if people in -operators are OK with it. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] make swift.common.utils.streq_const_time more efficient
That function's purpose is to compare strings without short-circuiting, to foil timing attacks against token comparisons or similar. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mike Green iasy...@gmail.com wrote: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): result |= ord(a) ^ ord(b) return result == 0 + If s1 and s2 are of the same length, then the function will compare every characters in them. I think it may be more efficient as follow: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): if ord(a) ^ ord(b): return False return True ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) 1.7.0 released
Hi everyone, The latest release of OpenStack Object Storage, also known as Swift, is now available at: https://launchpad.net/swift/folsom/1.7.0 Unless some critical issue is uncovered, this should be the last release of Swift in the Folsom series, and that version shall be included in the common OpenStack Folsom release on September 27. Note that the on-disk format of the ring files changed in 1.7.0. To upgrade safely, you should follow John's advice, posted at: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg16188.html Regards, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
It may be worth trying to write a short sentence describing the purpose of each list. The kind of sentence new users will see when deciding which lists to subscribe to. Personally - I think it's going to be difficult to come up with a clear distinction between the general and operators lists, and if there is no clear distinction, I see no value in separate lists.. B2 (or B1) would be my preference. Thanks, Kiall On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Russell Bryant wrote: On 09/12/2012 08:56 PM, Syd (Sydney) Logan wrote: Guess the only advantage would be to minimize the chance of someone missing the security related messages in the noise of a heavy traffic mailing list. Even if there were a specialized list, I’d think you’d want to cross post security issues to all lists, depending on severity (and with security, all issues are generally severe). We have started posting the security advisories to the openstack-announce list, as well. That should cover those wanting to watch out for them on a low volume mailing list. I like the simple group of openstack@, openstack-dev@, and openstack-announce@. That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting... Reminder: here were the other options: Option A1 (separate operators, general named openstack-general): openstack-gene...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option A2 (separate operators, general just named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option B1 (single user/general list, named openstack-user): openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option Z (keep current situation): openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org My own order of preference is A1, B2, A2, B1, Z. I'm fine with B2 if people in -operators are OK with it. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Last day to join the Foundation to participate in TC vote !
Final reminder: Today is the last day for technical contributors to join the OpenStack Foundation as Individual Members and be able to vote (or be elected) in the upcoming Technical Committee election: Thierry Carrez wrote: Being a representation of the technical contributors in the project, the TC is elected by the Active Technical Contributors (ATCs), i.e. anyone who committed a change to one of the official OpenStack projects[3] (which the TC oversees) in the year before August 29, 23:59 PST. This includes doc and infrastructure projects. The Foundation bylaws also mandate that ATCs are individual members of the Foundation. That means that *in order to vote* (or propose your candidacy to the committee), you additionally have to *join the Foundation* if you haven't done so yet. The email you specify there will be the one used in the election process. The cut-off date for joining the Foundation to be able to participate to this election is set to the end of day (23:59 PST), Thursday September 13. You can do so at: http://openstack.org/join -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
I like option B because this is more clear view of the project as we did in many opensource projects before. Obviously the cross-posting is inevitable. the goal should limit the number of cross-postings. Cheers, Dan Option B: openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org On 12 September 2012 21:23, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On 09/04/2012 09:57 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote: Do we have information on the type/number of discussions that are user and not operator? general and not user or operator? well, that would be good to know. Like it would be good to understand what sort of topics we get on each lists. From what I see, the topics discussed on operators and on launchpad seem very similar to me. I'm leaning on the side of merging the two lists because even if the operators are a very specific, identifiable group of people, the discussions they have seem to be 'general'. I can run some numbers but I'm not sure what to look for. I can calculate the most frequent words in the subject lines in the operators lists (not on launchpad): would that give us an understanding of what discussions are being held there? How else would you mine the mailbox archives? One thing to keep in mind is that the more divisions there are in a set of things which are conceptually similar, the greater amount of confusion that will result... a sacred truth. I know that technically operators are different than users different than firstcomers to OpenStack. The reality of human interaction though is that nobody reads the descriptions of the lists and messages end up being posted randomly. Generally more lists equals more crossposts (at best). /stef ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Dan He --- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Writing Methods for Nova API
Hi-
I'm trying to understand the NOVA api request process flow.
Using my custom script, testing.py, I have created a server with some
metadata. It was successful. But I have modified to script this way.
I have written a definition,
metadetailserver(self,detailed=True,search_opts=sMetadata) in a custom file
testing.py which uses the novaclient apis.
the sMetadata is a dict with the following values: sMetadata =
{key:Created By,value:TestApp.py}
Also, in the wsgi.py, I have handled this method for framing the request as
server/metadetail/ with the metadata values as options using URLencode.
But then I understood that in nova/api/compute/__init__.py have routers and
resource handlers which map the request to the respective controller and
methods.
I want to know on
[1] How to map the request to the appropriate controller and method ?
With respect to my code study, I came to know that there are view builders
which frame the response in XML or Json formats.
[2] How to hook a self/newly defined view builder with the new method.
In the code flow study, I was confused or lost at certain points of request
flow.
Can any one kindly help me understand the same.
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
--
Trinath Somanchi,
+91 9866 235 130
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] nova-translation-* jobs in Jenkins
Ying Chun Guo wrote: I'd like to understand if there are any jobs in Jenkins running to upload and download translations from Transifex. I see some nova-translation-* jobs active, but I cannot figure out which website they are connecting with, Lauchpad or Transifex. Can somebody tell me? As far as I can tell, the Transifex-powered Jenkins jobs are: https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/nova-propose-translation-update https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/nova-upstream-translation-update Still failing ATM but almost there. nova-translations-* are the launchpad-powered ones. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Understanding NOVA api
Hi- With respect to Essex Release, I'm trying you understand the nova api. How to the client sent URIs are mapped to controller methods? Like, I prepared the URI as /server/details/id is mapped to get_details in the server class of Nova API. How is this logical mapping done? Please help me understand the same. -- Regards, -- Trinath Somanchi, +91 9866 235 130 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] paas in openstack and forked cloudfoindry
frans, The cloud foundry community has a number of vendors that have leveraged the CloudFoundry core in commercial offerings including ActiveState's Stackato and Vmware' cloudfoundry.com The CloudFoundry PaaS project is a great example of an OpenPaaS - and, in all it's variations, cloudfoundry runs and scales wells on OpenStack. Forks and extensions to the core project are to be expected and encouraged This is the bazaar effect of open source, the cloud foundry open source project has an active and vibrant Community - and makes it open for business as each variation meets the needs of different use cases. CloudFoundry.com is VMware's publicly hosted PaaS that offers a subset of the languages available in the Open Source code base. Stackato delivers the software for Enterprise Private Clouds to install and manage their own Private PaaSes on-premise. We obviously have added alot of additional functionality to make Stackato secure and enable it to be easy to deploy on-premise. ActiveState's Stackato leverages cloudfoundry and a number of other open source projects in our commercial Private PaaS offering. We maintain API compatibility with CloudFoundry, we contribute back to the project, we've open sourced our client and continue to enhance our offerings. I'd encourage anyone in the OpenStack community to take a closer look at the cloud foundry project and get involved in helping to continue to ensure that it works well as an OpenPaaS for OpenStack. Diane Mueller Sent from my iPad On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all we try to make openstack as paas using cloudfoundry. and also seeking alternative to it shocked that there are forked cloudfiundry. and got that vmware manage different way his cloudfoundry there are piston, stackato i hear appfog never hear cf manage the way people do. in this case forking esp bosh bosh is the link to openstack and got the forker using openstack as platform i try to see in different way. hoe openstack work with them and what is the best glad there are competition. but sadly one become many rather unique innovation any feedback? i try to promote open paas and openstack in one community program thx all Frans Thamura Meruvian ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSA 2012-012] Horizon, Open redirect through 'next' parameter (CVE-2012-3540)
Has a fix for this been backported to essex/stable branch? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This advisory included the wrong CVE. It was CVE-2012-3540. Sorry about that. On 08/30/2012 11:10 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: OpenStack Security Advisory: 2012-012 CVE: CVE-2012-3542 This should have been CVE-2012-3540 Date: August 30, 2012 Title: Open redirect through 'next' parameter Impact: Medium Reporter: Thomas Biege (SUSE) Products: Horizon Affects: Essex (2012.1) Description: Thomas Biege from SUSE reported a vulnerability in Horizon authentication mechanism. By adding a malicious 'next' parameter to a Horizon authentication URL and enticing an unsuspecting user to follow it, the victim might get redirected after authentication to a malicious site where useful information could be extracted. Only setups running Essex are affected. Fixes: 2012.1: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/commit/35eada8a27323c0f83c400177797927aba6bc99b References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3542 This should have been: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3540 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1039077 Notes: This fix will be included in a future Essex (2012.1) release. - -- Russell Bryant OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/iDEACgkQFg9ft4s9SAbPBQCgndIk58K5ZF71PCxmWfDjV9MO 4yoAoJDGBeqC4TbJnyo+AsEeQYeTQEe6 =zO6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] paas in openstack and forked cloudfoindry
yes, that why i found OpenPaaS (openpaas.or.id), in conjuction with openstack-id inside openpaas we create cloudfoundry-id. and now try to learn and research the effect of cloudfoundry, and value proposition on openstack yes, we tested OpenStack + Stackato here, and tomorrow the cloud roadshow for startup just starting. hope Indonesia can bring new value in how PaaS value-ing the startup to more competitive Frans On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Diane Mueller ActiveState dia...@activestate.com wrote: frans, The cloud foundry community has a number of vendors that have leveraged the CloudFoundry core in commercial offerings including ActiveState's Stackato and Vmware' http://cloudfoundry.comcloudfoundry.com The CloudFoundry PaaS project is a great example of an OpenPaaS - and, in all it's variations, cloudfoundry runs and scales wells on OpenStack. Forks and extensions to the core project are to be expected and encouraged This is the bazaar effect of open source, the cloud foundry open source project has an active and vibrant Community - and makes it open for business as each variation meets the needs of different use cases. CloudFoundry.com is VMware's publicly hosted PaaS that offers a subset of the languages available in the Open Source code base. Stackato delivers the software for Enterprise Private Clouds to install and manage their own Private PaaSes on-premise. We obviously have added alot of additional functionality to make Stackato secure and enable it to be easy to deploy on-premise. ActiveState's Stackato leverages cloudfoundry and a number of other open source projects in our commercial Private PaaS offering. We maintain API compatibility with CloudFoundry, we contribute back to the project, we've open sourced our client and continue to enhance our offerings. I'd encourage anyone in the OpenStack community to take a closer look at the cloud foundry project and get involved in helping to continue to ensure that it works well as an OpenPaaS for OpenStack. Diane Mueller Sent from my iPad On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all we try to make openstack as paas using cloudfoundry. and also seeking alternative to it shocked that there are forked cloudfiundry. and got that vmware manage different way his cloudfoundry there are piston, stackato i hear appfog never hear cf manage the way people do. in this case forking esp bosh bosh is the link to openstack and got the forker using openstack as platform i try to see in different way. hoe openstack work with them and what is the best glad there are competition. but sadly one become many rather unique innovation any feedback? i try to promote open paas and openstack in one community program thx all Frans Thamura Meruvian ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.netopenstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [ceilometer] Bare metal and Metering
On 09/13/2012 04:33 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Reading through the post from Mirantis on bare metal support on OpenStack (http://www.mirantis.com/blog/bare-metal-provisioning-with-openstack-cloud/), I was wondering how this would interact with the metering work in ceilometer. So far, only libvirt driven hypervisors are covered. For bare metal, or other hypervisors, new pollsters would be needed. Contributions are welcome :) Nick signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSA 2012-012] Horizon, Open redirect through 'next' parameter (CVE-2012-3540)
According to Russell's message - this bug only affects the essex/stable branch.. No backport is necessary I guess.. Also - https://github.com/openstack/horizon/tree/stable/essex shows the most recent commit is the commit/fix he linked to.. Thanks, Kiall On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, andi abes andi.a...@gmail.com wrote: Has a fix for this been backported to essex/stable branch? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This advisory included the wrong CVE. It was CVE-2012-3540. Sorry about that. On 08/30/2012 11:10 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: OpenStack Security Advisory: 2012-012 CVE: CVE-2012-3542 This should have been CVE-2012-3540 Date: August 30, 2012 Title: Open redirect through 'next' parameter Impact: Medium Reporter: Thomas Biege (SUSE) Products: Horizon Affects: Essex (2012.1) Description: Thomas Biege from SUSE reported a vulnerability in Horizon authentication mechanism. By adding a malicious 'next' parameter to a Horizon authentication URL and enticing an unsuspecting user to follow it, the victim might get redirected after authentication to a malicious site where useful information could be extracted. Only setups running Essex are affected. Fixes: 2012.1: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/commit/35eada8a27323c0f83c400177797927aba6bc99b References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3542 This should have been: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3540 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1039077 Notes: This fix will be included in a future Essex (2012.1) release. - -- Russell Bryant OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA/iDEACgkQFg9ft4s9SAbPBQCgndIk58K5ZF71PCxmWfDjV9MO 4yoAoJDGBeqC4TbJnyo+AsEeQYeTQEe6 =zO6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [swift] make swift.common.utils.streq_const_time more efficient
The intended purpose of this string comparison is to explicitly compare every character. Doing it this way guards against timing attacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_attack). --John On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Mike Green iasy...@gmail.com wrote: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): result |= ord(a) ^ ord(b) return result == 0 + If s1 and s2 are of the same length, then the function will compare every characters in them. I think it may be more efficient as follow: def streq_const_time(s1, s2): if len(s1) != len(s2): return False result = 0 for (a, b) in zip(s1, s2): if ord(a) ^ ord(b): return False return True ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] strange problem when reboot nova-compute node: domain not found: no domain with matching name
Hi, I've installed essex and when I reboot one of the nova-compute node and next when I start nova-compute service again,the system promote: Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name 'instance-000a' Then I found: #ls /var/lib/nova/instances _base instance-000a instance-000b instance-000c #ls /etc/libvirt/qemu instance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml Network So: /var/lib/nova/instances/instance-000a# virsh define libvirt.xml Domain instance-000a defined from libvirt.xml And: #ls /etc/libvirt/qemu Instance-000a.xml instance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml network Then I restart: nova-compute , and nova-compute could normally started. I did not understand why reboot compute node,and usually the first instance's xml file was deleted and nova-compute will terminate. By the way, when I create a new instance, the first line in the log also is : Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name 'instance-000a' Anyone who had met such a problem and why? Regards, romi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS?
hi all can help me to understand MaaS, the bare metal cloud how OpenStack can run in a MaaS, and what is MaaS thx in advanced F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] paas in openstack and forked cloudfoindry
and this is appfog. http://blog.cloudfoundry.org/2012/09/13/how-we-built-appfog-using-cloud-foundry/ -- Frans Thamura (曽志胜) Shadow Master and Lead Investor Meruvian. Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider. Mobile: +628557888699 Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id) FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian Website: http://www.meruvian.org We grow because we share the same belief. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: yes, that why i found OpenPaaS (openpaas.or.id), in conjuction with openstack-id inside openpaas we create cloudfoundry-id. and now try to learn and research the effect of cloudfoundry, and value proposition on openstack yes, we tested OpenStack + Stackato here, and tomorrow the cloud roadshow for startup just starting. hope Indonesia can bring new value in how PaaS value-ing the startup to more competitive Frans On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Diane Mueller ActiveState dia...@activestate.com wrote: frans, The cloud foundry community has a number of vendors that have leveraged the CloudFoundry core in commercial offerings including ActiveState's Stackato and Vmware' http://cloudfoundry.comcloudfoundry.com The CloudFoundry PaaS project is a great example of an OpenPaaS - and, in all it's variations, cloudfoundry runs and scales wells on OpenStack. Forks and extensions to the core project are to be expected and encouraged This is the bazaar effect of open source, the cloud foundry open source project has an active and vibrant Community - and makes it open for business as each variation meets the needs of different use cases. CloudFoundry.com is VMware's publicly hosted PaaS that offers a subset of the languages available in the Open Source code base. Stackato delivers the software for Enterprise Private Clouds to install and manage their own Private PaaSes on-premise. We obviously have added alot of additional functionality to make Stackato secure and enable it to be easy to deploy on-premise. ActiveState's Stackato leverages cloudfoundry and a number of other open source projects in our commercial Private PaaS offering. We maintain API compatibility with CloudFoundry, we contribute back to the project, we've open sourced our client and continue to enhance our offerings. I'd encourage anyone in the OpenStack community to take a closer look at the cloud foundry project and get involved in helping to continue to ensure that it works well as an OpenPaaS for OpenStack. Diane Mueller Sent from my iPad On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all we try to make openstack as paas using cloudfoundry. and also seeking alternative to it shocked that there are forked cloudfiundry. and got that vmware manage different way his cloudfoundry there are piston, stackato i hear appfog never hear cf manage the way people do. in this case forking esp bosh bosh is the link to openstack and got the forker using openstack as platform i try to see in different way. hoe openstack work with them and what is the best glad there are competition. but sadly one become many rather unique innovation any feedback? i try to promote open paas and openstack in one community program thx all Frans Thamura Meruvian ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] paas in openstack and forked cloudfoindry
and this is appfog. http://blog.cloudfoundry.org/2012/09/13/how-we-built-appfog-using-cloud-foundry/ -- Frans Thamura (曽志胜) Shadow Master and Lead Investor Meruvian. Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider. Mobile: +628557888699 Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id) FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian Website: http://www.meruvian.org We grow because we share the same belief. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: yes, that why i found OpenPaaS (openpaas.or.id), in conjuction with openstack-id inside openpaas we create cloudfoundry-id. and now try to learn and research the effect of cloudfoundry, and value proposition on openstack yes, we tested OpenStack + Stackato here, and tomorrow the cloud roadshow for startup just starting. hope Indonesia can bring new value in how PaaS value-ing the startup to more competitive Frans On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Diane Mueller ActiveState dia...@activestate.com wrote: frans, The cloud foundry community has a number of vendors that have leveraged the CloudFoundry core in commercial offerings including ActiveState's Stackato and Vmware' http://cloudfoundry.comcloudfoundry.com The CloudFoundry PaaS project is a great example of an OpenPaaS - and, in all it's variations, cloudfoundry runs and scales wells on OpenStack. Forks and extensions to the core project are to be expected and encouraged This is the bazaar effect of open source, the cloud foundry open source project has an active and vibrant Community - and makes it open for business as each variation meets the needs of different use cases. CloudFoundry.com is VMware's publicly hosted PaaS that offers a subset of the languages available in the Open Source code base. Stackato delivers the software for Enterprise Private Clouds to install and manage their own Private PaaSes on-premise. We obviously have added alot of additional functionality to make Stackato secure and enable it to be easy to deploy on-premise. ActiveState's Stackato leverages cloudfoundry and a number of other open source projects in our commercial Private PaaS offering. We maintain API compatibility with CloudFoundry, we contribute back to the project, we've open sourced our client and continue to enhance our offerings. I'd encourage anyone in the OpenStack community to take a closer look at the cloud foundry project and get involved in helping to continue to ensure that it works well as an OpenPaaS for OpenStack. Diane Mueller Sent from my iPad On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all we try to make openstack as paas using cloudfoundry. and also seeking alternative to it shocked that there are forked cloudfiundry. and got that vmware manage different way his cloudfoundry there are piston, stackato i hear appfog never hear cf manage the way people do. in this case forking esp bosh bosh is the link to openstack and got the forker using openstack as platform i try to see in different way. hoe openstack work with them and what is the best glad there are competition. but sadly one become many rather unique innovation any feedback? i try to promote open paas and openstack in one community program thx all Frans Thamura Meruvian ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Open Stack and (HSM) Hardware security modules
My name is Mark Yakabuski, from SFNT, we are an HSM vendor (I want to be transparent on that). We are looking at integrating our HSM API's into Open Stack. This email is not intended to market HSMs - it is intended to identify what the Open Stack community might find valuable in an HSM integration. As some background, in case you are not aware of what HSMs are or where they get used (apologize for those that already know): Where do HSMs get used today? Here are some examples: - PKI CA's, OCSP, RA's - SSL cert vaulting - Financial Transactions - Time stamping - E-Document signing - Admin PW vaulting - DNSSEC - Secure Manufacturing - Smart Grid (AMI) - Code Signing - E-passport Issuance HSMs are FIPS and Common Criteria Validated Hardware devices, used to securely protect/offload/accelerate the keys/operations needed for high assurance and high value transactions. HSMs protect the lifecycle of the keys; creation, backup, usage and destruction, within the Secure validated envelope of the HSM. One of the largest benefits of HSMs is their value in Industry compliance, and the secure log/audit capabilities they provide for the who/what/when operations they perform. I am looking for opinions/feedback on the interest in this offering. Are there any opinions on: - what capabilities the Open Stack community would like to see from an HSM? - The use cases where the Open Stack community would use an HSM? Mark Yakabuski VP Product Management HSM SafeNet-inc mark.yakabu...@safenet-inc.com 613-614-3407 The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS?
Hi Frans, There's a wealth of info over at the MAAS website https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS/. It is Canonical's method for PXE booting and installing an OS so that a further service, called Juju, can be used to assign the functions/roles to a server that previously had nothing installed (bare metal). If you're familiar with Cobbler, it is that service with extra hooks to Juju. With Juju you can allocate roles to your MAAS provisioned servers such as, be a Glance server, or Compute host in a very simple way similar to what apt does for installing packages on a server. Regards, Kev On Sep 13, 2012 5:27 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all can help me to understand MaaS, the bare metal cloud how OpenStack can run in a MaaS, and what is MaaS thx in advanced F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] strange problem when reboot nova-compute node: domain not found: no domain with matching name
Hello romi, Image got into a stuck state , only solution is to hack your database for this particular instance and mark it as deleted, den restart nova-* service, it would start working. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:45 PM, romi zhang romizhang1...@163.com wrote: Hi, ** ** I’ve installed essex and when I reboot one of the nova-compute node and next when I start nova-compute service again,the system promote: Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name ‘instance-000a’ ** ** Then I found: #ls /var/lib/nova/instances _base instance-000a instance-000b instance-000c #ls /etc/libvirt/qemu instance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml Network ** ** So: /var/lib/nova/instances/instance-000a# virsh define libvirt.xml Domain instance-000a defined from libvirt.xml And: #ls /etc/libvirt/qemu Instance-000a.xml instance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml network* *** ** ** Then I restart: nova-compute , and nova-compute could normally started.** ** I did not understand why reboot compute node,and usually the first instance’s xml file was deleted and nova-compute will terminate. ** ** By the way, when I create a new instance, the first line in the log also is : Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name ‘instance-000a’ ** ** Anyone who had met such a problem and why? ** ** Regards, ** ** romi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- * With Regards * * Ritesh Nanda * *** * http://www.ericsson.com/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS?
Hi Frans, If you're interested in bare-metal cloud, not MaaS specifically, we(USC/ISI and NTT docomo) want to introduce our bare-metal stuff also. :) http://wiki.openstack.org/GeneralBareMetalProvisioningFramework https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/general-bare-metal-provisioning-framework - Non-PXE support (Tilera+PDU): nova/virt/baremetal - General bare-metal framework including PXE+IPMI support: review pending (will be resumed in early Grizzly, maybe next week) - Working branch: https://github.com/NTTdocomo-openstack/nova/tree/multinode (reference: nova/virt/baremetal/doc/*)(final debugging) Thanks, Mikyung - Original Message - From: Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.uk To: Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 2:35:10 PM Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS? Hi Frans, There's a wealth of info over at the MAAS website https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS/ . It is Canonical's method for PXE booting and installing an OS so that a further service, called Juju, can be used to assign the functions/roles to a server that previously had nothing installed (bare metal). If you're familiar with Cobbler, it is that service with extra hooks to Juju. With Juju you can allocate roles to your MAAS provisioned servers such as, be a Glance server, or Compute host in a very simple way similar to what apt does for installing packages on a server. Regards, Kev On Sep 13, 2012 5:27 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all can help me to understand MaaS, the bare metal cloud how OpenStack can run in a MaaS, and what is MaaS thx in advanced F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] strange problem when reboot nova-compute node: domain not found: no domain with matching name
Hi Romi,what $ virsh list --all gives you ? Nuage Co - Razique Mahrouarazique.mahr...@gmail.com Le 13 sept. 2012 à 21:11, Ritesh Nanda riteshnand...@gmail.com a écrit :Hello romi, Image got into a stuck state , only solution is to hack your database for this particular instance and mark it as deleted, den restart nova-* service, it would start working. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:45 PM, romi zhang romizhang1...@163.com wrote: Hi,I’ve installed essex and when I reboot one of the nova-compute node and next when I start nova-compute service again,the system promote:Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name ‘instance-000a’ Then I found: #ls /var/lib/nova/instances_base instance-000a instance-000b instance-000c#ls /etc/libvirt/qemuinstance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml Network So:/var/lib/nova/instances/instance-000a# virsh define libvirt.xmlDomain instance-000a defined from libvirt.xmlAnd:#ls /etc/libvirt/qemuInstance-000a.xml instance-000b.xml instance-000c.xml network Then I restart: nova-compute , and nova-compute could normally started.I did not understand why reboot compute node,and usually the first instance’s xml file was deleted and nova-compute will terminate.By the way, when I create a new instance, the first line in the log also is : Libvirt: QEMU error: Domain not found: no domain with matching name ‘instance-000a’Anyone who had met such a problem and why?Regards,romi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- With Regards Ritesh Nanda ___Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstackPost to : openstack@lists.launchpad.netUnsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstackMore help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS?
hi kevin and mikyung i must learn all :) to educate the member which i try to develop it (openstack-id). and now try to link openstack to education, start with our PaaS initiative under JENI (JAva Education). the basic idea of baremetal is to boot using PXE, any idea recommended hardware to start this baremetal testing? Frans On 9/14/12, Mikyung Kang mkk...@isi.edu wrote: Hi Frans, If you're interested in bare-metal cloud, not MaaS specifically, we(USC/ISI and NTT docomo) want to introduce our bare-metal stuff also. :) http://wiki.openstack.org/GeneralBareMetalProvisioningFramework https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/general-bare-metal-provisioning-framework - Non-PXE support (Tilera+PDU): nova/virt/baremetal - General bare-metal framework including PXE+IPMI support: review pending (will be resumed in early Grizzly, maybe next week) - Working branch: https://github.com/NTTdocomo-openstack/nova/tree/multinode (reference: nova/virt/baremetal/doc/*)(final debugging) Thanks, Mikyung - Original Message - From: Kevin Jackson ke...@linuxservices.co.uk To: Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 2:35:10 PM Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Q] What is MaaS? Hi Frans, There's a wealth of info over at the MAAS website https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS/ . It is Canonical's method for PXE booting and installing an OS so that a further service, called Juju, can be used to assign the functions/roles to a server that previously had nothing installed (bare metal). If you're familiar with Cobbler, it is that service with extra hooks to Juju. With Juju you can allocate roles to your MAAS provisioned servers such as, be a Glance server, or Compute host in a very simple way similar to what apt does for installing packages on a server. Regards, Kev On Sep 13, 2012 5:27 PM, Frans Thamura fr...@meruvian.org wrote: hi all can help me to understand MaaS, the bare metal cloud how OpenStack can run in a MaaS, and what is MaaS thx in advanced F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- -- Frans Thamura (曽志胜) Shadow Master and Lead Investor Meruvian. Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider. Mobile: +628557888699 Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id) FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian Website: http://www.meruvian.org We grow because we share the same belief. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
On 09/13/2012 01:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting... Reminder: here were the other options: Option A1 (separate operators, general named openstack-general): openstack-gene...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option A2 (separate operators, general just named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option B1 (single user/general list, named openstack-user): openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org All lovely options, if we started with mailing lists today. Unfortunately we already have the list openstack-operators *and* we have the general list to move to a new host. I'd rather not move *two* lists, annoying two large sets of people and losing many of them in the process. Sometimes (and I believe this is one of the cases) you have to live with 'technical debt'. The viable options are A1 or A2 or A3* (s/openstack-general/openstack-users/) or Option C (dev, announce and operators as user/general list --no renames, no moving stuff around, just a new description) openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option Z (keep current situation): forget about this, we have to move out of LP for lists. I would go with option C but if that's not an option then let's create a new list (B1 nomenclature for the new list gets my vote) and leave -operators as is. /stef ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.orgwrote: On 09/13/2012 01:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: That would be option B2 (single user/general list, named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting... Reminder: here were the other options: Option A1 (separate operators, general named openstack-general): openstack-gene...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option A2 (separate operators, general just named openstack): openst...@lists.openstack.org openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Option B1 (single user/general list, named openstack-user): openstack-u...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org All lovely options, if we started with mailing lists today. Unfortunately we already have the list openstack-operators *and* we have the general list to move to a new host. I'd rather not move *two* lists, annoying two large sets of people and losing many of them in the process. Sometimes (and I believe this is one of the cases) you have to live with 'technical debt'. The viable options are A1 or A2 or A3* (s/openstack-general/openstack-users/) or Option C (dev, announce and operators as user/general list --no renames, no moving stuff around, just a new description) openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Given no option Bs, the simplicity of option C is most appealing to me. d Option Z (keep current situation): forget about this, we have to move out of LP for lists. I would go with option C but if that's not an option then let's create a new list (B1 nomenclature for the new list gets my vote) and leave -operators as is. /stef ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
On 09/13/2012 09:04 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org Option C (dev, announce and operators as user/general list --no renames, no moving stuff around, just a new description) openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org openstack-...@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org Given no option Bs, the simplicity of option C is most appealing to me. +1 -- Russell Bryant ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Cells Status
Hi Stackers, We didnt find any information related to CELLS [which is planned to replace ZONES] in the latest Folsom pre-release. Can any body give us information on this. -Balaji On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote: I found time to update the branch with the latest code tonight: https://github.com/comstud/nova/tree/cells_service I put a review up here as a WIP also: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10707/ I reviewed what's changed since the last update… and it was essentially: Rebase against master… resolving things that had moved to openstack-common Push bandwidth usage updates to top level API cell. Push instance metadata updates to top level API cell (though I don't think they would change in a child cell) instance system metadata syncing with instance updates Better delete instance handling Removed broken near/far filter which could have potential DoS issues, until it can be redone Looks like I might have lost some code cleanups I had done previously… and I'll restore those asap. The cells code as it is in the above branch is what's now running in a production environment and working… but there's still some edge cases of issues and doesn't support things like security groups and host aggregates. I'll give an update tomorrow about trying to land this in folsom… but I'll probably be posting it at the new dev list: openstack-...@lists.openstack.org - Chris On Aug 1, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Chris Behrens wrote: Ah, hit send early from my phone. There's a few additions I have in a private branch along with it being up2date with trunk. Will get that into the public branch and get the update out tomorrow! On Aug 1, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote: I'll push up the latest tomorrow, promise! And I'll give an update at that time. Sorry, been crazy times lately preparing for Rackspace's release today. We are live with cells, and I'm extremely anxious to start getting it into trunk. There's been a few additions not in the branch on github. - Chris On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Russell Sim russell@gmail.com wrote: Hey, We have been experimenting with the cells branch and I'm hoping I can get an update. The branch on github hasn't been updated for a couple of months and we are starting to hack on it but we are hesitant because we are aware that there are uncommitted changes. Cheers, Russell ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_nova_trunk #571
Title: precise_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_trunk/571/Project:precise_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:00:33 -0400Build duration:4 min 42 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesAvoid live migrate overwriting the other task_stateby wenjianhneditnova/tests/scheduler/test_scheduler.pyeditnova/scheduler/driver.pyeditnova/tests/api/openstack/compute/contrib/test_admin_actions.pyeditnova/tests/compute/test_compute.pyeditnova/compute/api.pyConsole Output[...truncated 5602 lines...]dch -a [c2501d8] Prevent Partial terminations in EC2dch -a [0fa231f] Add flag cinder_endpoint_template to volume.cinderdch -a [7483115] Handle missing network_size in nova-managedch -a [223b9f1] Adds API sample test for Flavors Extra Data extension.dch -a [4599261] More specific lxml versions in tools/pip-requiresdch -a [d741328] Fix flavor deletion when there is a deleted flavordch -a [210dc28] Make size optional when creating a volume from a snapshot.dch -a [847fb38] Add documentation for scheduler filters scopedch -a [c2ec406] Add and fix tests for attaching volumes.dch -a [5f9ae51] Fix auth parameter passed to libvirt openAuth() methoddch -a [4c72bfc] xapi: Fix live block migrationdch -a [69f6b86] Add a criteria to sort a list of dict in api samplesdch -a [0d956a8] delete a module never useddch -a [cc85320] Update SolidFire volume driverdch -a [0599406] Adds get_available_resource to hyperv driverdch -a [c3476b5] Create image of volume-backed instance via native APIdch -a [5339141] Improve floating IP delete speed.dch -a [1b87d59] Have device mapping use autocreated device nodesdch -a [79db483] remove a never used importdch -a [b35b34a] fix unmounting of LXC containers in the presence of symlinksdch -a [4fe722a] Add ServerStartStop extension API testdch -a [ccc0bfb] Set install_requires in setup.py.dch -a [85923aa] Add Server Detail and Metadata testsdch -a [6392ad2] xenapi: Make dom0 serialization consistent.dch -a [b97a0be] Correct ephemeral disk cache filename.dch -a [ff3b994] Handle missing 'provider_location' in rm_export.dch -a [4fc05bf] Nail the pip requirement at 1.1.dch -a [f192a16] rbd: implement create_volume_from_snapshotdch -a [0a09bf5] Specify the conf file when creating a volume.dch -a [1f82e30] Fix xml metadata for volumes api in nova-volume.debcommitTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk #569
Title: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_nova_trunk/569/Project:quantal_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:30:34 -0400Build duration:6 min 25 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesFix FLAGS.volumes_dir help messageby jogoeditnova/volume/iscsi.pyeditetc/nova/nova.conf.sampleConsole Output[...truncated 3743 lines...]INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/quantal-folsom-proposed /tmp/tmpLGWxm0/novamk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpLGWxm0/nova/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 8c168dd4fd55aed89b62eec5a0506299dd0d0438..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/quantal-folsom --forcedch -b -D quantal --newversion 2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -b -D quantal --newversion 2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [a7cfd75] Fix FLAGS.volumes_dir help messagedch -a [5f4d20e] Avoid VM task state revert on instance terminationdch -a [a3bdc16] Avoid live migrate overwriting the other task_statedch -a [843af52] Check flavor id on resize.dch -a [c9e5739] Rename _unplug_vifs to unplug_vifsdch -a [3c79641] PowerVM: Establish SSH connection at use timedch -a [b006e6b] libvirt: Fix live block migrationdch -a [f534648] Change comment for function _destroydch -a [0d2523f] Stop fetch_ca from throwing IOError exceptionsdch -a [ca94280] Add 'detaching' to volume statusdch -a [f5ad3bc] Reset task state before reschedulingdch -a [5465d13] fix rpcapi version.dch -a [0fa231f] Add flag cinder_endpoint_template to volume.cinderdch -a [223b9f1] Adds API sample test for Flavors Extra Data extension.dch -a [4599261] More specific lxml versions in tools/pip-requiresdch -a [d741328] Fix flavor deletion when there is a deleted flavordch -a [cc85320] Update SolidFire volume driverdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC nova_2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d quantal-folsom -n -A nova_2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1.dscTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'quantal-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'quantal-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2012.2+git201209130334~quantal-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk #570
Title: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_nova_trunk/570/Project:quantal_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:00:34 -0400Build duration:7 min 3 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesAdd reservations parameter when cast create_volume to volume managerby revieweditnova/volume/api.pyConsole Output[...truncated 3747 lines...]bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/quantal-folsom-proposed /tmp/tmpTa7NyZ/novamk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpTa7NyZ/nova/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 8c168dd4fd55aed89b62eec5a0506299dd0d0438..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/quantal-folsom --forcedch -b -D quantal --newversion 2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -b -D quantal --newversion 2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [24fa0cc] Add reservations parameter when cast "create_volume" to volume managerdch -a [a7cfd75] Fix FLAGS.volumes_dir help messagedch -a [5f4d20e] Avoid VM task state revert on instance terminationdch -a [a3bdc16] Avoid live migrate overwriting the other task_statedch -a [843af52] Check flavor id on resize.dch -a [c9e5739] Rename _unplug_vifs to unplug_vifsdch -a [3c79641] PowerVM: Establish SSH connection at use timedch -a [b006e6b] libvirt: Fix live block migrationdch -a [f534648] Change comment for function _destroydch -a [0d2523f] Stop fetch_ca from throwing IOError exceptionsdch -a [ca94280] Add 'detaching' to volume statusdch -a [f5ad3bc] Reset task state before reschedulingdch -a [5465d13] fix rpcapi version.dch -a [0fa231f] Add flag cinder_endpoint_template to volume.cinderdch -a [223b9f1] Adds API sample test for Flavors Extra Data extension.dch -a [4599261] More specific lxml versions in tools/pip-requiresdch -a [d741328] Fix flavor deletion when there is a deleted flavordch -a [cc85320] Update SolidFire volume driverdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC nova_2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d quantal-folsom -n -A nova_2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1.dscTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'quantal-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'quantal-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2012.2+git201209130604~quantal-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_nova_trunk #574
Title: precise_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_trunk/574/Project:precise_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:30:35 -0400Build duration:6 min 7 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesBackport changes from Cinder to Nova-Volumeby bswartzaddnova/volume/nfs.pyaddnova/tests/test_nfs.pyaddnova/volume/netapp_nfs.pyeditnova/exception.pyeditnova/volume/netapp.pyaddnova/tests/test_netapp_nfs.pyeditnova/tests/test_netapp.pyReturn 400 if create volume snapshot force parameter is invalidby zrzhiteditnova/api/openstack/volume/snapshots.pyeditnova/utils.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/volumes.pyeditnova/tests/api/openstack/volume/test_snapshots.pyeditnova/tests/api/openstack/compute/contrib/test_snapshots.pyValidate keypair create request bodyby sirisha_devinenieditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/keypairs.pyeditnova/tests/api/openstack/compute/contrib/test_keypairs.pyConsole Output[...truncated 5623 lines...]dch -a [c2501d8] Prevent Partial terminations in EC2dch -a [0fa231f] Add flag cinder_endpoint_template to volume.cinderdch -a [7483115] Handle missing network_size in nova-managedch -a [223b9f1] Adds API sample test for Flavors Extra Data extension.dch -a [4599261] More specific lxml versions in tools/pip-requiresdch -a [d741328] Fix flavor deletion when there is a deleted flavordch -a [210dc28] Make size optional when creating a volume from a snapshot.dch -a [847fb38] Add documentation for scheduler filters scopedch -a [c2ec406] Add and fix tests for attaching volumes.dch -a [5f9ae51] Fix auth parameter passed to libvirt openAuth() methoddch -a [4c72bfc] xapi: Fix live block migrationdch -a [69f6b86] Add a criteria to sort a list of dict in api samplesdch -a [0d956a8] delete a module never useddch -a [cc85320] Update SolidFire volume driverdch -a [0599406] Adds get_available_resource to hyperv driverdch -a [c3476b5] Create image of volume-backed instance via native APIdch -a [5339141] Improve floating IP delete speed.dch -a [1b87d59] Have device mapping use autocreated device nodesdch -a [79db483] remove a never used importdch -a [b35b34a] fix unmounting of LXC containers in the presence of symlinksdch -a [4fe722a] Add ServerStartStop extension API testdch -a [ccc0bfb] Set install_requires in setup.py.dch -a [85923aa] Add Server Detail and Metadata testsdch -a [6392ad2] xenapi: Make dom0 serialization consistent.dch -a [b97a0be] Correct ephemeral disk cache filename.dch -a [ff3b994] Handle missing 'provider_location' in rm_export.dch -a [4fc05bf] Nail the pip requirement at 1.1.dch -a [f192a16] rbd: implement create_volume_from_snapshotdch -a [0a09bf5] Specify the conf file when creating a volume.dch -a [1f82e30] Fix xml metadata for volumes api in nova-volume.debcommitTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_swift_trunk #73
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/73/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:23:10 -0400Build duration:4 min 9 secBuild cause:Started by user zulBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 3627 lines...]ERROR:root:Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'swift_1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/precise-folsom-proposed /tmp/tmpPmL1eJ/swiftmk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpPmL1eJ/swift/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 73846c2c38728fb32da2b7c8540cffb738b22c42..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/precise-folsom --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -b -D precise --newversion 1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [343968b] added disable_fallocate info to docsdch -a [463da7e] Adds Error Handling to swift-drive-audit for missing or unreadable /var/log/kern.logdch -a [d24e280] obj replicator speed updch -a [063789b] container_info returns a dictdch -a [a2ac5ef] swift constraints are now settable via configdch -a [3139760] Fix pep8 issuesdch -a [cde6d59] Fix pep8 issuesdch -a [c0537ac] Breakout search_devs & add get_builder() for reusedch -a [54e28fa] fix some formatdch -a [4d6ae96] fix some format issuredch -a [edaaa47] format some code according to pep8dch -a [46a093f] Obj replicator cleans up files where part dirs should be.dch -a [d56772a] Fix pep8 issues in test_memcached.py.dch -a [314d3b7] Fall back to UDP if /dev/log does not exist.dch -a [ed3b12d] Can run swift-bench across multiple cores/servers.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC swift_1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-folsom -n -A swift_1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1.dscTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'swift_1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-folsom', '-n', '-A', 'swift_1.7.1+git201209131124~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_nova_trunk #576
Title: precise_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_trunk/576/Project:precise_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:00:35 -0400Build duration:13 minBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesAdd 422 test unit test for servers APIby markmceditnova/tests/api/openstack/compute/test_servers.pyConsole Output[...truncated 5629 lines...]dch -a [c2501d8] Prevent Partial terminations in EC2dch -a [0fa231f] Add flag cinder_endpoint_template to volume.cinderdch -a [7483115] Handle missing network_size in nova-managedch -a [223b9f1] Adds API sample test for Flavors Extra Data extension.dch -a [4599261] More specific lxml versions in tools/pip-requiresdch -a [d741328] Fix flavor deletion when there is a deleted flavordch -a [210dc28] Make size optional when creating a volume from a snapshot.dch -a [847fb38] Add documentation for scheduler filters scopedch -a [c2ec406] Add and fix tests for attaching volumes.dch -a [5f9ae51] Fix auth parameter passed to libvirt openAuth() methoddch -a [4c72bfc] xapi: Fix live block migrationdch -a [69f6b86] Add a criteria to sort a list of dict in api samplesdch -a [0d956a8] delete a module never useddch -a [cc85320] Update SolidFire volume driverdch -a [0599406] Adds get_available_resource to hyperv driverdch -a [c3476b5] Create image of volume-backed instance via native APIdch -a [5339141] Improve floating IP delete speed.dch -a [1b87d59] Have device mapping use autocreated device nodesdch -a [79db483] remove a never used importdch -a [b35b34a] fix unmounting of LXC containers in the presence of symlinksdch -a [4fe722a] Add ServerStartStop extension API testdch -a [ccc0bfb] Set install_requires in setup.py.dch -a [85923aa] Add Server Detail and Metadata testsdch -a [6392ad2] xenapi: Make dom0 serialization consistent.dch -a [b97a0be] Correct ephemeral disk cache filename.dch -a [ff3b994] Handle missing 'provider_location' in rm_export.dch -a [4fc05bf] Nail the pip requirement at 1.1.dch -a [f192a16] rbd: implement create_volume_from_snapshotdch -a [0a09bf5] Specify the conf file when creating a volume.dch -a [1f82e30] Fix xml metadata for volumes api in nova-volume.debcommitTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['debcommit']' returned non-zero exit status 7Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_folsom_melange_trunk #1
Title: precise_folsom_melange_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_melange_trunk/1/Project:precise_folsom_melange_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:00:31 -0400Build duration:3 min 10 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 610 lines...]Setting up pbzip2 (1.1.6-1) ...Setting up debootstrap (1.0.39ubuntu0.1) ...Setting up python-support (1.0.14ubuntu2) ...Setting up python-fpconst (0.7.2-4) ...Setting up python-soappy (0.12.0-4) ...Setting up python-debianbts (1.10build1) ...Setting up piuparts (0.43ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-crypto (2.4.1-1ubuntu0.1) ...Setting up python-distro-info (0.8.2) ...Setting up python-httplib2 (0.7.2-1ubuntu2) ...Setting up python-keyring (0.7.1-1fakesync1) ...Setting up python-simplejson (2.3.2-1) ...Setting up python-lazr.uri (1.0.3-1) ...Setting up python-wadllib (1.3.0-2) ...Setting up python-oauth (1.0.1-3build1) ...Setting up python-zope.interface (3.6.1-1ubuntu3) ...Setting up python-lazr.restfulclient (0.12.0-1ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-launchpadlib (1.9.12-1) ...Setting up python-paramiko (1.7.7.1-2) ...Setting up equivs (2.0.9) ...Processing triggers for libc-bin ...ldconfig deferred processing now taking placeProcessing triggers for python-support ...INFO:root:Branching lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed to determine build-depsDEBUG:root:['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed', '/tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melange']bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed/".ERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed', '/tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melange']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed', '/tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melange']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed /tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melangeTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed', '/tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melange']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwdu(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/melange/precise-folsom-proposed', '/tmp/tmpDdcZY6/melange']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_folsom_deploy #293
Title: precise_folsom_deploy General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_deploy/293/Project:precise_folsom_deployDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:26:32 -0400Build duration:16 minBuild cause:Started by user adamBuilt on:masterHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesNo ChangesBuild Artifactslogs/syslog.tar.gzlogs/test-02.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-03.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-04.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-06.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-07.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-08.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-09.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-10.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-11.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzConsole Output[...truncated 2665 lines...] -> Relation: nova-cloud-controller:identity-service <-> keystone:identity-service -> Relation: glance:shared-db <-> mysql:shared-db -> Relation: glance:identity-service <-> keystone:identity-service -> Relation: nova-volume:shared-db <-> mysql:shared-db -> Relation: nova-volume:amqp <-> rabbitmq:amqp -> Relation: openstack-dashboard:identity-service <-> keystone:identity-service -> Relation: nova-compute:shared-db <-> mysql:shared-db -> Relation: nova-compute:amqp <-> rabbitmq:amqp -> Relation: nova-compute:image-service <-> glance:image-service -> Relation: nova-compute:network-manager <-> nova-cloud-controller:network-manager -> Relation: nova-compute:identity-service <-> keystone:identity-service- Ensuring relation state- Deployment complete in 966 seconds.- Juju command log:juju deploy --config=/tmp/tmp38yfkx --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:nova-compute nova-computejuju deploy --config=/tmp/tmp38yfkx --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:nova-volume nova-volumejuju deploy --config=/tmp/tmp38yfkx --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:nova-cloud-controller nova-cloud-controllerjuju deploy --config=/tmp/tmp38yfkx --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:keystone keystonejuju deploy --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:rabbitmq rabbitmqjuju deploy --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:mysql mysqljuju deploy --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:openstack-dashboard openstack-dashboardjuju deploy --config=/tmp/tmp38yfkx --repository=/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace local:glance glancejuju add-relation keystone:shared-db mysql:shared-dbjuju add-relation nova-cloud-controller:shared-db mysql:shared-dbjuju add-relation nova-cloud-controller:amqp rabbitmq:amqpjuju add-relation nova-cloud-controller:image-service glance:image-servicejuju add-relation nova-cloud-controller:identity-service keystone:identity-servicejuju add-relation glance:shared-db mysql:shared-dbjuju add-relation glance:identity-service keystone:identity-servicejuju add-relation nova-volume:shared-db mysql:shared-dbjuju add-relation nova-volume:amqp rabbitmq:amqpjuju add-relation openstack-dashboard:identity-service keystone:identity-servicejuju add-relation nova-compute:shared-db mysql:shared-dbjuju add-relation nova-compute:amqp rabbitmq:amqpjuju add-relation nova-compute:image-service glance:image-servicejuju add-relation nova-compute:network-manager nova-cloud-controller:network-managerjuju add-relation nova-compute:identity-service keystone:identity-service+ rc=0+ echo 'Deployer returned: 0'Deployer returned: 0+ [[ 0 != 0 ]]+ jenkins-cli build precise_folsom_coverage+ exit 0Archiving artifactsEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_folsom_nova_trunk #578
Title: precise_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_trunk/578/Project:precise_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:32:55 -0400Build duration:17 minBuild cause:Started by user adamBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 4 out of the last 5 builds failed.20ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 18118 lines...]deleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-api-os-volume_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-api_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-cert_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-common_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-kvm_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-lxc_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-qemu_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-uml_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-xcp_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute-xen_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-compute_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-console_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-consoleauth_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-doc_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-network_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-objectstore_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-scheduler_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-vncproxy_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-volume_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-xcp-network_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/nova-xcp-plugins_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/n/nova/python-nova_2012.2+git201209072153~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Pushing changes back to bzr testing branchDEBUG:root:['bzr', 'push', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom']Pushed up to revision 387.INFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: e8d0f9940edd1043162c187ec92f93e8c9fafb02INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom-proposed /tmp/tmpeHElKa/novamk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpeHElKa/nova/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a No change rebuild.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC nova_2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-folsom -n -A nova_2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/folsom-trunk-testing nova_2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include precise-folsom nova_2012.2+git201209131837~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesbzr push lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/precise-folsom+ [ ! 0 ]+ jenkins-cli build precise_folsom_deployEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
