[openstack-dev] FW: [kolla] [neutron] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

[Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)]

Meeting room “Vail” has been reserved on Tuesday 2-4 pm for this.

https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Queens-PTG-Discussion-Rooms

Regards,
Vikram Hosakote
IRC:  vhosakot

From: Thomas Morin 
Date: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 10:39 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [neutron] PTG cross-platform meetup 
possibility

Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot), 2017-09-07 15:38:
> Would there be any interest in meeting with the Kolla team at the PTG
> to discuss neutron’s
> integration with containers and Kubernetes especially about the new
> networking
> technologies like VPP, fd.io, OpenDaylight, OVS-DPDK, OVN, service
> chaining (SFC), etc?
>
> If yes, would Tuesday 2 pm work?  I’m thinking about an hour or two
> for the session.

If this happens I'm interested to follow.

-Thomas

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] [tripleo] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

[Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)]

Yes!  Exactly right, Monday is with deployment tool teams and Wednesday
is Kolla+TripleO meet.

Today is Saturday, and tomorrow is Sunday! ☺

Regards,
Vikram Hosakote
IRC:  vhosakot

From: Richard Wellum 
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date: Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 7:52 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] [tripleo] PTG 
cross-platform meetup possibility


Yes.

Thanks,

Rich

On Sat, Sep 9, 2017, 12:59 AM Emilien Macchi 
> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Michał Jastrzębski 
> wrote:
> I know about wed meeting. This is when we wanted to discuss kolla-k8s and
> tripleo shared resources,  whatever they might be.  I assumed Mon meeting is
> different?

So Monday is cross deployment projects collaboration meeting and
Wednesday is whatever TripleO / Kolla collab related things.
Does it make sense?
--
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I’ve added this topic after TST003. Is this okay for everyone?
I think you should refer to IFA011 [1] in the VNF package data structure and 
additional data processing topic.

Br,
Gerg0

[1]: 
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-IFA/001_099/011/02.01.01_60/gs_NFV-IFA011v020101p.pdf

From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 1:28 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Cc: Pierre Lynch_Internet ; Ildiko Vancsa 
; Diego Lopez_Internet ; 
Perala, Timo (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; Silvia Almagia 
; Laurent Vreck ; Michele 
CARIGNANI 
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack 
meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Hello!

I created an etherpad with the topics I want to discuss:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-glare-etsi

There I want to make a brief overview of glare features, that may be useful for 
vnf packages support, and get a list of requirements from ETSI NFV delegates, 
they want to see in the catalog of VNF packages.

Best regards,
Mikhail Fedosin

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
> wrote:
Hi,

We can try to squeeze it into the schedule. Can you collect your discussion 
topics to an etherpad so we can decide on the timing of the timeslot?

Br,
Gerg0

From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 3:46 PM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack 
meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Yes, It will be even better! I can record a demo and publish it before the 
meeting.

Could you schedule a short talk about IFA007 during the workshop?

Best regards,
Mikhail Fedosin

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
> wrote:
Hi,

Thanks for the proposal. The aim of this workshop is to accelerate the 
collaboration between OpenStack and ETSI and not to execute demonstrations. 
However if you have technical questions to IFA about IFA007 then we can add 
that as an agenda point.

Br,
Gerg0

From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 1:03 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
>

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack 
meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Hello!

I would also like to discuss the possibility of using Glare for cataloging VNF 
packages. Generally speaking Glare satisfies all the requirements from the 
standard 
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-IFA/001_099/007/02.01.01_60/gs_NFV-IFA007v020101p.pdf
Could we include this topic in the discussions, too?

I plan to create an artifact type and present a short demo there, about how 
glare can work with the packages. If this topic is interesting, then we can 
discuss it in more detail on Wednesday or Thursday in dedicated Glare team room.

Best regards,
Mikhail Fedosin

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
> wrote:
Hi,

Thanks for the clarification.

Our understanding was that with Panko it is possible to subscribe to the state 
of the different resource of the cloud as it is descibed in [1]. This is why we 
mapped the Virtualised [Compute|Network|Storage] Resources Capacity Management 
Interfaces to Panko.

[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Telemetry#Managed

Br,
Gerg0


-Original Message-
From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 3:05 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack 
meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017


> Gaps to be discussed are here:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-expla
> ined

i added a note in etherpad but it seems you want Ceilometer (+Gnocchi if you 
need storagE) and not Panko. Panko only handles storage of events (more 
metadata focused data) while Ceilometer handles the actual generation of both 
events and metrics, the latter being the one you want it seems. Gnocchi is used 
for optimised time-series metric storage.

unfortunately, i don't believe anyone from Telemetry teams are attending the 
PTG but we can be reached on ML or #openstack-telemetry.

cheers,

--
gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cinder V1 API Removal

[Dean Troyer]

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Sean McGinnis  wrote:
> Well, it's now been many releases, and we've had the v1 API disabled by
> default for awhile now. Patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499342/ now removes that API. Queens
> onward, it will not be possible
> to run with V1 anymore.

It looks like DevStack had two approaches to dealing with the Volume
v1 endpoint [0], [1] (did I miss any others?).  What is the
recommended configuration in a no-v1 world for the 'volume' service
endpoint?  Go ahead and set the endpoint without the 'v1' like we have
always wanted to do?

I'm finding I need to dynamically check for volume v1 now in the OSC
functional tests (we can't remove v1 support for a while yet) which
wants the new full version discovery which wants...  it's 'wants' all
the way down. :)

dt

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485232
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453320 (abandoned)

-- 

Dean Troyer
dtro...@gmail.com

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [relmgt] Libraries published to pypi with YYYY.X.Z versions

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2017-09-07 08:59:15 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2017-09-01 09:51:36 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Yes, for a first batch I propose we clean up the following:
> >>
> >> python-congressclient 2015.1.0
> >> python-congressclient 2015.1.0rc1
> >> python-designateclient 2013.1.a8.g3a2a320
> >> networking-hyperv 2015.1.0
> > [...]
> > 
> > Are we waiting for any confirmation on this, or does a week of
> > silence constitute tacit approval? Should I go ahead and delete
> > these from PyPI now?
> 
> Yes please.

I have removed the above releases from PyPI as requested. Releases
made through our CI builds can still be found on
https://tarballs.openstack.org/ if needed in the future, even if
deleted from PyPI.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Update on Zuul v3 Rollout plans for PTG week

[Monty Taylor]

Heya everybody!

You may or may not be aware that we've been targeting a go-live for Zuul 
v3 for Monday of the PTG. After our status meeting on the topic this 
afternoon we have decided to hold-off and do a bit more work on the 
migration itself while we're in Denver together.


Zuul v3 itself is in great shape, but it turns out a community of 
thousands of developers has produced a LOT of job content over the last 
7 years, and we want to hammer on the translation and migration plans a 
bit more before we unleash it on everyone. If all goes well we're still 
hoping to leave Denver having migrated all the things.


We have a session planned Monday afternoon to go over v3 and what it 
means at 2:00PM in Vail. That session is still on, however, for those of 
you who either can't be there or prefer reading, we've also put a bunch 
of migration information into the Infra Manual:


  https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/zuulv3.html

As we work over the first part of the week you may see Zuul running some 
jobs on your patches and leaving results. If you do - don't freak out, 
it's just us making sure things are working. We also may grab a few of 
you to verify that migrated versions of your jobs are working properly. 
Or you may not notice anything at all until the go-live happens.


See you in Denver!
Monty

PS. If you are reading this and thinking to yourself, "what the heck is 
he talking about?" - the following resources might be interesting:


* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4EmE1QEvNU - Video of presentation 
from Barcelona about Zuul v3 - a bit old, but has some good background
* http://amo-probos.org/post/18 - Jim's blog post about the switch to 
the Ansible-based Zuul 2.5 we're running now
* http://inaugust.com/talks/test-it-like-you-deploy-it.html - Some 
slides I use to talk about Zuul v3 sometimes
* 
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/zuulv3.html 
- The Zuul v3 spec itself


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] [tripleo] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

[Richard Wellum]

Yes.

Thanks,

Rich

On Sat, Sep 9, 2017, 12:59 AM Emilien Macchi  wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Michał Jastrzębski 
> wrote:
> > I know about wed meeting. This is when we wanted to discuss kolla-k8s and
> > tripleo shared resources,  whatever they might be.  I assumed Mon
> meeting is
> > different?
>
> So Monday is cross deployment projects collaboration meeting and
> Wednesday is whatever TripleO / Kolla collab related things.
> Does it make sense?
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Announcements

[Rob Cresswell]

Hey everyone,

I've made a Google Hangouts group for us to catch up at the PTG. Please ping me 
on IRC (robcresswell) or email me if you'd like the link to join. It would be 
great to meet you all in real life :)

Also there will be no IRC meeting next week (13th of September) and I expect 
IRC to be quieter than usual due to PTG attendance.

Rob
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev