Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] PTL non candidacy

2018-02-06 Thread Kevin Zhao
Hongbin,

Thanks for your enormous contribution to Zun as PTL for last several
releases. Fortunately, we will still be happy to work together in Zun.

I will try my best to support Shengqin in the next release, hope Zun to be
more mature and  in the future.



On 7 February 2018 at 04:09, Hongbin Lu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Just let you know that I won't run for Zun PTL for Rocky because we
> already have a good PTL candidate:
>
>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541187/
>
> I am happy to see that we are able to circulate the PTL role and this is
> an indication that our project become mature and our community is healthy.
> I will definitely continue my contribution to Zun regardless of I am the
> PTL or not.
>
> It is a pleasure to work with you and I am looking forwarding to working
> with our new PTL to continue to build our project.
>
> Best regards,
> Hongbin
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Change in Zun core team

2017-11-22 Thread Kevin Zhao
+1 for both

On 22 November 2017 at 09:08, Shuu Mutou <shu-mu...@rf.jp.nec.com> wrote:

> +1 for them, includes the new voting schema.
>
> Best regards,
> Shu
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hongbin Lu [mailto:hongbin...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:16 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Cc: miao.hong...@zte.com.cn
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Change in Zun core team
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to announce the following change to the Zun core reviewers
> > team.
> >
> > + miaohb (miao-hongbao)
> > - Sheel Rana (ranasheel2000)
> >
> > Miaohb has been consistently contributed to Zun for a few months. So far,
> > he has 60 commits in Zun, which ranked on top 3 in the commit metric. I
> > think his hard work justified his qualification as a core reviewer in
> Zun.
> >
> > This change was approved unanimously by the existing core team. Below are
> > the core team members who supported this change:
> >
> > Hongbin Lu
> > Shunli Zhou
> > Kien Nguyen
> > Kevin Zhao
> > Madhuri Kumari
> > Namrata Sitlani
> > Shubham Sharma
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hongbin
> >
> > [1] http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits=zun-group
> > <http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits=zun-group>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal to add Marcin (hrw) to kolla images core team

2017-11-03 Thread Kevin Zhao
+1.
Great work Marcin!

On 3 November 2017 at 14:50, Martin André  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Michał Jastrzębski 
> wrote:
> > It's my great pleasure to start another voting for core team addition!
> >
> > Everyone knows hrw, thanks to him Kolla now runs on both Power and ARM!
> > Voting will be open for 14 days (until 16th of Nov).
> >
> > Consider this mail my +1 vote
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michal
> >
> > 
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose change of the core team

2017-09-16 Thread Kevin Zhao
+1 on both

On 15 September 2017 at 08:40, Qiming Teng 
wrote:

> +1 on both.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:58:48PM +, Hongbin Lu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I propose the following change of the Zun core reviewer team.
> >
> > + Kien Nguyen (kiennt2609)
> > - Aditi Sharma (adi-sky17)
> >
> > Kien has been contributing to the Zun project for a few months. His
> contributions include proposing high-quality codes, providing helpful code
> reviews, participating team discussion at weekly team meeting and IRC, etc.
> He is the one who setup the multi-node job in the CI and the job is up and
> running now. I think his contribution is significant which qualifies him to
> be a core reviewer. Aditi is a member of the initial core team but becomes
> inactive for a while.
> >
> > Core reviewers, please cast your vote on this proposal.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hongbin
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose addition of Zun core team and removal notice

2017-06-20 Thread Kevin Zhao
+1 for me.
Thx!

On 20 June 2017 at 13:50, Pradeep Singh  wrote:

> +1 from me,
> Thanks Shunli for your great work :)
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Hongbin Lu 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose the following change to the Zun core team:
>>
>>
>>
>> + Shunli Zhou (shunliz)
>>
>>
>>
>> Shunli has been contributing to Zun for a while and did a lot of work. He
>> has completed the BP for supporting resource claim and be closed to finish
>> the filter scheduler BP. He showed a good understanding of the Zun’s code
>> base and expertise on other OpenStack projects. The quantity [1] and
>> quality of his submitted code also shows his qualification. Therefore, I
>> think he will be a good addition to the core team.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition, I have a removal notice. Davanum Srinivas (Dims) and Yanyan
>> Hu requested to be removed from the core team. Dims had been helping us
>> since the inception of the project. I treated him as mentor and his
>> guidance is always helpful for the whole team. As the project becomes
>> mature and stable, I agree with him that it is time to relieve him from the
>> core reviewer responsibility because he has many other important
>> responsibilities for the OpenStack community. Yanyan’s leaving is because
>> he has been relocated and focused on an out-of-OpenStack area. I would like
>> to take this chance to thank Dims and Yanyan for their contribution to Zun.
>>
>>
>>
>> Core reviewers, please cast your vote on this proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Hongbin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Proposal a change of Zun core team

2017-05-01 Thread Kevin Zhao
+1 for me,

Thanks

On 29 April 2017 at 12:05, Hongbin Lu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I proposes a change of Zun’s core team memberships as below:
>
>
>
> + Feng Shengqin (feng-shengqin)
>
> - Wang Feilong (flwang)
>
>
>
> Feng Shengqin has contributed a lot to the Zun projects. Her contribution
> includes BPs, bug fixes, and reviews. In particular, she completed an
> essential BP and had a lot of accepted commits in Zun’s repositories. I
> think she is qualified for the core reviewer position. I would like to
> thank Wang Feilong for his interest to join the team when the project was
> found. I believe we are always friends regardless of his core membership.
>
>
>
> By convention, we require a minimum of 4 +1 votes from Zun core reviewers
> within a 1 week voting window (consider this proposal as a +1 vote from
> me). A vote of -1 is a veto. If we cannot get enough votes or there is a
> veto vote prior to the end of the voting window, this proposal is rejected.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hongbin
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

2017-03-22 Thread Kevin Zhao
Hongbin,

I see. Thanks for your advice . I can deploy multiple compute hosts now
follow the guide.


Best Regards,
Kevin Zhao

On 23 March 2017 at 11:14, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote:

> Kevin,
>
>
>
> I don’t think there is any such document right now. I submitted a ticket
> for creating one:
>
>
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/1675245
>
>
>
> There is a guidance for setting up a multi-host devstack environment:
> https://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/guides/multinode-lab.html .
> You could possibly use it as a starting point and inject Zun-specific
> configuration there. The guide divide nodes into two kinds: cluster
> controller and compute node. In the case of Zun, zun-api & zun-compute can
> run on cluster controller, and zun-compute can run on compute node. Hope it
> helps.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hongbin
>
>
>
> *From:* Kevin Zhao [mailto:kevin.z...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* March-22-17 10:39 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with
> multiple hosts
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Nowadays I want to try Zun in multiple hosts. But I didn't find the
> doc about how to deploy it.
>
> I wonder where is document to show the users about how to deploy zun
> with multiple hosts? That will be easy for development.
>
> Thanks  :-)
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Zun] Document about how to deploy Zun with multiple hosts

2017-03-22 Thread Kevin Zhao
Hi guys,
Nowadays I want to try Zun in multiple hosts. But I didn't find the doc
about how to deploy it.
I wonder where is document to show the users about how to deploy zun
with multiple hosts? That will be easy for development.
Thanks  :-)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of the Zun core team membership

2017-02-01 Thread Kevin Zhao
Thanks Hongbin and Zun Team,

I'll exert my best efforts to meet the expectations.

Best Regards,
Kevin Zhao


On 31 January 2017 at 03:34, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the votes. According to the feedback, this proposal is
> approved. Welcome Kevin to the core team.
>
> Best regards,
> Hongbin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Qiming Teng [mailto:teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: January-29-17 6:54 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Propose a change of the Zun core team
> membership
>
> +1 to both.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:56:00PM +, Hongbin Lu wrote:
> > Hi Zun cores,
> >
> > I proposed a change of Zun core team membership as below:
> >
> > + Kevin Zhao (kevin-zhao)
> > - Haiwei Xu (xu-haiwei)
> >
> > Kevin has been working for Zun for a while, and made significant
> contribution. He submitted several non-trivial patches with high quality.
> One of his challenging task is adding support of container interactive
> mode, and it looks he is capable to handle this challenging task (his
> patches are under reviews now). I think he is a good addition to the core
> team. Haiwei is a member of the initial core team. Unfortunately, his
> activity dropped down in the past a few months.
> >
> > According to the OpenStack Governance process [1], we require a minimum
> of 4 +1 votes from Zun core reviewers within a 1 week voting window
> (consider this proposal as a +1 vote from me). A vote of -1 is a veto. If
> we cannot get enough votes or there is a veto vote prior to the end of the
> voting window, this proposal is rejected.
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hongbin
> >
>
> > __
> >  OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Help: How to make Nova official support AArch64?

2016-12-27 Thread Kevin Zhao
Hi Jay && Matt,
 Thanks for your valuable help~
 I will continue to work on this now for 3rd CI

Best Regards,
Kevin Zhao

On 21 December 2016 at 10:34, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

> On 12/20/2016 7:27 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/2016 12:45 AM, Kevin Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Nova,
>>>   Greetings from ARM and Linaro :D
>>>   This is Kevin Zhao from ARM. Nowadays Linaro and other
>>> contributors have submitted some patches to Nova community , fixing bugs
>>> for Nova running on AArch64. Now we can successfully running a OpenStack
>>> cluster on AArch64 and pass much of the tempest test. The
>>> virtuallization hypervisor is based on Libvirt+KVM.
>>>
>>>   Actually in Barcelona Keynote(interoperability Challenge
>>> <https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/openstack-interopera
>>> bility-challenge-running-unmodified-apps-in-any-openstack-cloud>,
>>>
>>> at 10:30') one of the OpenStack interoperability cloud is from Linaro,
>>> all based on AArch64 machines.
>>>I see there is a Nova support matrix
>>> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html>. So my
>>> question is :
>>> *   what do we need to do, so that Nova can official support AArch64
>>> architecture? for example add AArch64 to this support matrix?*
>>>
>>>Sincerely thanks for your help. Any of your response will be
>>> really appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> I think the first thing you would need to do is set up some sort of
>> continuous integration system that can be notified by upstream patch
>> changes/pushes and report results of Tempest testing against a build of
>> OpenStack on AArch64 machines.
>>
>> You can read about setting up third-party CI for this here:
>>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/
>>
>> Best,
>> -jay
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> Yeah as Jay said it's probably 3rd party CI to recognize it in the support
> matrix.
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [nova] Help: How to make Nova official support AArch64?

2016-12-19 Thread Kevin Zhao
Hello Nova,
  Greetings from ARM and Linaro :D
  This is Kevin Zhao from ARM. Nowadays Linaro and other contributors
have submitted some patches to Nova community , fixing bugs for Nova
running on AArch64. Now we can successfully running a OpenStack cluster on
AArch64 and pass much of the tempest test. The virtuallization hypervisor
is based on Libvirt+KVM.

  Actually in Barcelona Keynote(interoperability Challenge
<https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/openstack-interoperability-challenge-running-unmodified-apps-in-any-openstack-cloud>,
at 10:30') one of the OpenStack interoperability cloud is from Linaro, all
based on AArch64 machines.
   I see there is a Nova support matrix
<http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html>. So my
question is :
*   what do we need to do, so that Nova can official support AArch64
architecture? for example add AArch64 to this support matrix?*

   Sincerely thanks for your help. Any of your response will be really
appreciated.

Best Regards,
Kevin Zhao
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev