Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is there blueprint to add argument collection UI for action
Stan, Thanks for your information very much. I’m looking forward for this feature! ☺ Thanks, Tony From: Stan Lagun [mailto:sla...@mirantis.com] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2015 4:52 AM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [murano] Is there blueprint to add argument collection UI for action Tony, Here is the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/action-ui The problem is much bigger then it seems to. Action parameters are very similar to regular application properties and thus there should be a dedicated dynamic UI form (think ui.yaml) for each action describing its inputs. We discussed it many times and each time the resolution was that it is better to do major refactoring of dynamic UI forms before introducing additional forms. The intention was to either simplify or completely get rid of ui.yaml because it is yet another DSL to learn. Most of the information from ui.yaml could be obtained by examining MuranoPL class properties. And what is missing could be added as additional metadata right to the classes. However a lot of work requires to do it properly (starting from new API that would be MuranoPL-aware). That's why we still have no proper UI for the actions. Maybe we should reconsider and to have many ui forms in single package until we have a better solution. Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:42 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Stan and Murano developers, The current murano-dashboards can add the action button for the actions defined in Murano class definition automatically, which is great. Is there any blueprint to add argument collection UI for the action? Currently, the murano-dashboards only uses environment_id + action_id to run the actions, and user has no way to provide action arguments from UI. Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral
Stan, I got it. Thanks for your information. ☺ Thanks, Tony From: Stan Lagun [mailto:sla...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:21 PM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:07 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: For the object storage support, does Murano have any plan to support the auto-uploading function? Murano has plans to support everything applications may need. It is just a matter of priorities/schedule/time etc. It will happen much sooner with your help/contributions. Currently AFAIK there is no blueprint for this feature so nobody developing it Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [murano] Is there blueprint to add argument collection UI for action
Dear Stan and Murano developers, The current murano-dashboards can add the action button for the actions defined in Murano class definition automatically, which is great. Is there any blueprint to add argument collection UI for the action? Currently, the murano-dashboards only uses environment_id + action_id to run the actions, and user has no way to provide action arguments from UI. Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral
Stan, Thanks for your valuable comments! For the object storage support, does Murano have any plan to support the auto-uploading function? Thanks, Tony From: Stan Lagun [mailto:sla...@mirantis.com] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 6:32 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony, Technically your solution is possible. Murano agent can be installed manually. All queue names are in agent's config file. Murano can talk to that manually installed agent and put files to that server. However I strongly advice not to do that. First of all it is not secure. Murano agent was designed as a remote execution mechanism rather than a tool to transfer files. Also it was design to be installed on VM rather that on a shared server. Currently there is no authentication for agents. Although it is not truly secure it still provides significant level of security because to make use of the agent you need to know its queue name which is a long random string that only murano engine and agent know and AMQP doesn't provide an API to query list of queue names. But if you install agent manually there will be a single queue. And all applications that need to access that agent will also need to know queue name. Thus it can be easily be compromised and attackers will gain ability to execute arbitrary code on the nova server. It is also doesn't seem like a right solution. There should not be such specific requirements like this to perform such trivial thing. Especially if it involves using tool that was design for something else. So what is the right solution? I can see 2 possible ways to address this issue: 1. Improve Mistral API to support file attachments to its workbooks (if it doesn't support it yet). Improve murano-mistral integration to support this feature. 2. Implement integration of Murano with object storage. Thus it will be possible from Murano workflow to upload file and provide Mistral with a URI to it. Solution #2 seem to be better. At least because it opens new possibilities for all applications and not just those that use Mistral. There is also a workaround that I can think of: make Murano application create temporary VM with FTP server or something like that, put file into it and give Mistral a URI it could use to access the file. Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:06 PM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Alexander and Murano developers and testers, Any suggestion for this? ☺ Thanks, Tony From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:12 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Alexander, Thanks for your response. During the workflow running stage, it may need to access some other artifacts. In my case, I use Mistral workflow to call Ansible playbook, and I need Murano to put Ansible playbook into right place on Mistral server so that Mistral workflow can find it. Thanks, Tony From: Alexander Tivelkov [mailto:ativel...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony, Probably I am missing something, but why do you need Murano Agent to interact with Mistral? You can call Mistral APIs right from MuranoPL code being executed by Murano Engine. Murano's core library contains the io.murano.system.MistralClient class ([1]) which may be used to upload and run mistral workflows. Please let me know if you need more details on this [1] https://github.com/openstack/murano/blob/master/murano/engine/system/mistralclient.py On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both Murano artifacts and Mistral artifacts to Murano; 2. Murano transmits the Mistral artifacts to Mistral, and Mistral does its work. After study, I thought muranoagent may be helpful and plan to install a muranoagent on the Mistral server since it can put files into nova server, and can run scripts on the nova server. After further study, I found muranoagent solution may be not feasible: 1. muranoagent and murano-e
Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application
Hi Anastasia, Thanks for your information. “environment-apps-edit” can be used as “environment-apps-create”, I got it. ☺ Thanks, Tony From: Anastasia Kuznetsova [mailto:akuznets...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 4:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application Hi Tony, We have already implemented commands which allow user to configure and deploy environments via CLI. Please, take a look to this article: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/murano/draft/enduser-guide/deploying_using_cli.html On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:18 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application. Based on my current understanding, I want to use muranoclient cli as following: 1. “environment-create” to create Murano environment; 2. “environment-session-create” to create session for the environment; 3. “environment-apps-create” to create application for the session. This command hasn’t been implemented yet, thus I implement it by studying “do_environment_apps_edit” to send POST request to “services” object. Could you please help to check if my thought is right? If it is right, I meet the following issue: When an environment includes several applications, I need to generate an uuid for each application, and use the uuid to let one application reference to another application. It is a little strange to let user provide this kind of information, and I doubt if I’m using Murano in a wrong way, and Murano isn’t designed for this. Could you please help to check? Is Murano designed to be able to expose RESTful to do all the works(including application creation/deployment) that user can do from UI? Please advice, Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Best regards, Anastasia Kuznetsova __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application
Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application. Based on my current understanding, I want to use muranoclient cli as following: 1. "environment-create" to create Murano environment; 2. "environment-session-create" to create session for the environment; 3. "environment-apps-create" to create application for the session. This command hasn't been implemented yet, thus I implement it by studying "do_environment_apps_edit" to send POST request to "services" object. Could you please help to check if my thought is right? If it is right, I meet the following issue: When an environment includes several applications, I need to generate an uuid for each application, and use the uuid to let one application reference to another application. It is a little strange to let user provide this kind of information, and I doubt if I'm using Murano in a wrong way, and Murano isn't designed for this. Could you please help to check? Is Murano designed to be able to expose RESTful to do all the works(including application creation/deployment) that user can do from UI? Please advice, Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral
Dear Alexander and Murano developers and testers, Any suggestion for this? ☺ Thanks, Tony From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:12 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Alexander, Thanks for your response. During the workflow running stage, it may need to access some other artifacts. In my case, I use Mistral workflow to call Ansible playbook, and I need Murano to put Ansible playbook into right place on Mistral server so that Mistral workflow can find it. Thanks, Tony From: Alexander Tivelkov [mailto:ativel...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony, Probably I am missing something, but why do you need Murano Agent to interact with Mistral? You can call Mistral APIs right from MuranoPL code being executed by Murano Engine. Murano's core library contains the io.murano.system.MistralClient class ([1]) which may be used to upload and run mistral workflows. Please let me know if you need more details on this [1] https://github.com/openstack/murano/blob/master/murano/engine/system/mistralclient.py On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both Murano artifacts and Mistral artifacts to Murano; 2. Murano transmits the Mistral artifacts to Mistral, and Mistral does its work. After study, I thought muranoagent may be helpful and plan to install a muranoagent on the Mistral server since it can put files into nova server, and can run scripts on the nova server. After further study, I found muranoagent solution may be not feasible: 1. muranoagent and murano-engine(dsl) uses rabbitMQ to communicate. 2. When an Agent object is created in DSL, murano-engine creates a unique message queue to communicate with the muranoagent in nova instance: The queue name consists of current murano environment id, and the nova instance murano object id. 3. During murano creates the nova instance, it passes this unique queue name via nova user_data to muranoagent on guest. In this way, muranoagents on different guests can communicate with murano-engine separately. This doesn’t suit the muranoagent + Mistral server solution. We only want to install one muranoagent in Mistral server, and it should only listen on one message queue. We can’t create new muranoagent for each murano environment. To achieve this, one solution that I can think is to modify murano code to implement a new MistralAgent to listen on a pre-defined message queue. Could you please share your ideas about this? If you have other solution, please also help to share it. ☺• Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral
Alexander, Thanks for your response. During the workflow running stage, it may need to access some other artifacts. In my case, I use Mistral workflow to call Ansible playbook, and I need Murano to put Ansible playbook into right place on Mistral server so that Mistral workflow can find it. Thanks, Tony From: Alexander Tivelkov [mailto:ativel...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony, Probably I am missing something, but why do you need Murano Agent to interact with Mistral? You can call Mistral APIs right from MuranoPL code being executed by Murano Engine. Murano's core library contains the io.murano.system.MistralClient class ([1]) which may be used to upload and run mistral workflows. Please let me know if you need more details on this [1] https://github.com/openstack/murano/blob/master/murano/engine/system/mistralclient.py On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both Murano artifacts and Mistral artifacts to Murano; 2. Murano transmits the Mistral artifacts to Mistral, and Mistral does its work. After study, I thought muranoagent may be helpful and plan to install a muranoagent on the Mistral server since it can put files into nova server, and can run scripts on the nova server. After further study, I found muranoagent solution may be not feasible: 1. muranoagent and murano-engine(dsl) uses rabbitMQ to communicate. 2. When an Agent object is created in DSL, murano-engine creates a unique message queue to communicate with the muranoagent in nova instance: The queue name consists of current murano environment id, and the nova instance murano object id. 3. During murano creates the nova instance, it passes this unique queue name via nova user_data to muranoagent on guest. In this way, muranoagents on different guests can communicate with murano-engine separately. This doesn’t suit the muranoagent + Mistral server solution. We only want to install one muranoagent in Mistral server, and it should only listen on one message queue. We can’t create new muranoagent for each murano environment. To achieve this, one solution that I can think is to modify murano code to implement a new MistralAgent to listen on a pre-defined message queue. Could you please share your ideas about this? If you have other solution, please also help to share it. ☺• Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral
Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both Murano artifacts and Mistral artifacts to Murano; 2. Murano transmits the Mistral artifacts to Mistral, and Mistral does its work. After study, I thought muranoagent may be helpful and plan to install a muranoagent on the Mistral server since it can put files into nova server, and can run scripts on the nova server. After further study, I found muranoagent solution may be not feasible: 1. muranoagent and murano-engine(dsl) uses rabbitMQ to communicate. 2. When an Agent object is created in DSL, murano-engine creates a unique message queue to communicate with the muranoagent in nova instance: The queue name consists of current murano environment id, and the nova instance murano object id. 3. During murano creates the nova instance, it passes this unique queue name via nova user_data to muranoagent on guest. In this way, muranoagents on different guests can communicate with murano-engine separately. This doesn’t suit the muranoagent + Mistral server solution. We only want to install one muranoagent in Mistral server, and it should only listen on one message queue. We can’t create new muranoagent for each murano environment. To achieve this, one solution that I can think is to modify murano code to implement a new MistralAgent to listen on a pre-defined message queue. Could you please share your ideas about this? If you have other solution, please also help to share it. ☺ Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Renat, Thanks for your valuable suggestions! Tony From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 2:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral On 20 Oct 2015, at 14:58, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Another question is: If I use custom action to run Ansible, the Ansible playbook should be stored on the same server of Mistral. Is it right? Depends on how this action is implemented (it can, for example, do ssh to other servers) but the simplest implementation would be with playbooks on the same server, yes. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Renat, Another question is: If I use custom action to run Ansible, the Ansible playbook should be stored on the same server of Mistral. Is it right? Thanks, Tony From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral On 19 Oct 2015, at 07:53, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: The “custom action” needs to re-install Mistral. If the Mistral service is part of 3rd party OpenStack, it may be unacceptable to let every user create his own customer action. What do you think? Yes, correct. It requires reinstall. If your goal is to give users possibility to create custom actions "on the fly” then it’s now impossible in Mistral for fundamental reasons. We can’t let users upload arbitrary Python code via API for security reasons. However, we have a couple of ideas that we’re going to explore in order to partially close this gap: * Keep action code on a client-side, sort of what StackStorm does. But IMO we could think about automating it in a more elegant and transparent way. For example, we could use decorators in python code that would associate a function or a class with a certain workflow task. Then a workflow could call this code back while its running using some mechanism (i.e. some special action). In this case, however, we’d have to have a process handling callback requests from Mistral on a client side. The alternative: using HTTP Long Poll mechanism so that a client could claim available tasks itself. * We have BP [1] that describes the idea of using so-called action providers. It assumes that we can register trustworthy action providers that could dynamically provide new actions to Mistral. I personally like this idea and to some extent it would solve this issue but it requires some additional setup which works for cases like StackStorm but doesn’t work if we want to use Mistral as is, as a hosted workflow service. Anyway, whatever solution we accept it will be a trade-off and depend on a particular use case. Ad-hoc actions may also work for you if, for example, we create enough base actions that they could be built upon. Say if most of your actions are HTTP based then you can just create your own library (e.g. a workbook) of ad-hoc actions that will be wrappers around std.http. Also look at what StackStorm does, it may also be helpful. Thanks [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/action-providers __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Renat, Thanks for your info. I like your option2(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/action-providers). ☺ Any schedule for this? Looks like it isn’t started yet. Thanks, Tony From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral On 19 Oct 2015, at 07:53, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: The “custom action” needs to re-install Mistral. If the Mistral service is part of 3rd party OpenStack, it may be unacceptable to let every user create his own customer action. What do you think? Yes, correct. It requires reinstall. If your goal is to give users possibility to create custom actions "on the fly” then it’s now impossible in Mistral for fundamental reasons. We can’t let users upload arbitrary Python code via API for security reasons. However, we have a couple of ideas that we’re going to explore in order to partially close this gap: * Keep action code on a client-side, sort of what StackStorm does. But IMO we could think about automating it in a more elegant and transparent way. For example, we could use decorators in python code that would associate a function or a class with a certain workflow task. Then a workflow could call this code back while its running using some mechanism (i.e. some special action). In this case, however, we’d have to have a process handling callback requests from Mistral on a client side. The alternative: using HTTP Long Poll mechanism so that a client could claim available tasks itself. * We have BP [1] that describes the idea of using so-called action providers. It assumes that we can register trustworthy action providers that could dynamically provide new actions to Mistral. I personally like this idea and to some extent it would solve this issue but it requires some additional setup which works for cases like StackStorm but doesn’t work if we want to use Mistral as is, as a hosted workflow service. Anyway, whatever solution we accept it will be a trade-off and depend on a particular use case. Ad-hoc actions may also work for you if, for example, we create enough base actions that they could be built upon. Say if most of your actions are HTTP based then you can just create your own library (e.g. a workbook) of ad-hoc actions that will be wrappers around std.http. Also look at what StackStorm does, it may also be helpful. Thanks [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/action-providers __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Dmitri, >From StackStorm's document, it can run Mistral's workflow, and Mistral >workflow can call StackStorm custom actions. Could you please help to explain how it is implemented? examples.mistral-basic: description: A basic workflow that runs an arbitrary linux command. type: direct input: - cmd output: stdout: <% $.stdout %> tasks: task1: action: core.local cmd=<% $.cmd %> <<<< Here calls StackStorm custom action. publish: stdout: <% $.task1.stdout %> stderr: <% $.task1.stderr %> Thanks, Tony From: Dmitri Zimine [mailto:dzim...@stackstorm.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:27 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Tony, You can also connect Mistral with Ansible via StackStorm and Ansible integration pack: 1) StackStorm http://docs.stackstorm.com 2) https://github.com/StackStorm/st2contrib/tree/master/packs/ansible StackStorm is open-source Apache 2.0 "wrapper" around Mistral workflow service that integrates 3rd party tools. Disclosure: I work for StackStorm, I think it's appropriate to pitch here an open source project that addresses the problem. DZ. On Oct 15, 2015, at 11:35 PM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Mistral developers and testers, We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Dmitri, I think I got it. "st2/st2common/st2common/util/workflow/mistral.py" StackStorm uses function "_transform_action" here to transform action from StackStorm action style to "st2.action" style, and then call Mistral to execute workflow, since "st2.action" is Mistral's custom action. Please help to double confirm. Thanks, Tony From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 6:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Dmitri, >From StackStorm's document, it can run Mistral's workflow, and Mistral >workflow can call StackStorm custom actions. Could you please help to explain how it is implemented? examples.mistral-basic: description: A basic workflow that runs an arbitrary linux command. type: direct input: - cmd output: stdout: <% $.stdout %> tasks: task1: action: core.local cmd=<% $.cmd %> <<<< Here calls StackStorm custom action. publish: stdout: <% $.task1.stdout %> stderr: <% $.task1.stderr %> Thanks, Tony From: Dmitri Zimine [mailto:dzim...@stackstorm.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:27 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Tony, You can also connect Mistral with Ansible via StackStorm and Ansible integration pack: 1) StackStorm http://docs.stackstorm.com 2) https://github.com/StackStorm/st2contrib/tree/master/packs/ansible StackStorm is open-source Apache 2.0 "wrapper" around Mistral workflow service that integrates 3rd party tools. Disclosure: I work for StackStorm, I think it's appropriate to pitch here an open source project that addresses the problem. DZ. On Oct 15, 2015, at 11:35 PM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Mistral developers and testers, We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Renat, Thanks for your valuable comments. ☺ The “custom action” needs to re-install Mistral. If the Mistral service is part of 3rd party OpenStack, it may be unacceptable to let every user create his own customer action. What do you think? Thanks, Tony From: Renat Akhmerov [mailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 3:25 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Hi, see my answers inline. On 16 Oct 2015, at 12:35, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? I would recommend to write a custom action (not ad-hoc actions in DSL, they are pretty limited). You can just write a python class and make it available in Mistral workflow. It is pretty easy to do and described at [1]. In Python you’ll have more control on how to call ansible properly. If you have any specific questions on that you can join our IRC channel #openstack-mistral and talk to us there. My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Yes, you can use std.ssh action but I guess it won’t be too convenient because you’ll have to deal with shell commands directly. Yes, ad-hoc actions can help you do it in a more elegant manner but they are pretty limited and allow to create only wrappers. With Python custom actions (it can be a class hierarchy, for example) you can do much more. For instance, you can expose individual ansible actions and transform their params in a form that better fits workflow DSL. Anyway, it’s just my preference. You may like this second option better. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Yes, like I described above. [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/mistral/developer/creating_custom_action.html Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Dmitri, Thanks for your valuable info. :) I suppose the flow here should be: Mistral calls StackStorm, and StackStorm calls Ansible. Is it right? The big benefit here should be we only need to install StackStorm custom action into Mistral, and StackStorm will handle all the interfaces to other automation tools, such as Ansible. Is it right? Thanks, Tony From: Dmitri Zimine [mailto:dzim...@stackstorm.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:27 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Tony, You can also connect Mistral with Ansible via StackStorm and Ansible integration pack: 1) StackStorm http://docs.stackstorm.com 2) https://github.com/StackStorm/st2contrib/tree/master/packs/ansible StackStorm is open-source Apache 2.0 "wrapper" around Mistral workflow service that integrates 3rd party tools. Disclosure: I work for StackStorm, I think it's appropriate to pitch here an open source project that addresses the problem. DZ. On Oct 15, 2015, at 11:35 PM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: Dear Mistral developers and testers, We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Dear Mistral developers and testers, We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral
Another question is: If I want to call a user-defined script in Mistral, what action should be used? Still use "ssh std_action"? Thanks in advance, Tony From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) [mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 2:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [mistral] How to call 3rd-party tools(such as Ansible) in Mistral Dear Mistral developers and testers, We have developed some Ansible playbooks for operation automation, and we are investigating if we can change the automation engine from Ansible to Mistral since Mistral has powerful workflow control. Could you please help to provide how to let Mistral call Ansible playbook or Ansible module? My understanding is to use ssh std_action to let Mistral access Ansible server to call Ansible playbook/modules since Mistral ad-hoc action must base on an existing system action. Another question is: If we install Mistral and Ansible on a same server, is it possible to simplify it? Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-LBaaS] Can anyone help to share a procedure to install lbaas on Kilo?
Kobi, Thanks for your info very much! Is there any document to install lbaas manually? My environment is installed manually instead by devstack or packstack. Thanks, Tony From: Kobi Samoray [mailto:ksamo...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:55 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-LBaaS] Can anyone help to share a procedure to install lbaas on Kilo? Hi Tony, Try the following: https://chapter60.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/installing-openstack-lbaas-version-2-on-kilo-using-devstack/ On Oct 13, 2015, at 14:11, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: I installed an OpenStack environment manually, and I can’t use devstack or packstack to install neutron lbaas. Can anyone help to share a procedure to install lbaas on Kilo? I can’t find one from Google. ☹ Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [neutron-LBaaS] Can anyone help to share a procedure to install lbaas on Kilo?
I installed an OpenStack environment manually, and I can't use devstack or packstack to install neutron lbaas. Can anyone help to share a procedure to install lbaas on Kilo? I can't find one from Google. :( Thanks in advance, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Russell and Kevin, Thanks for your detail information! I got it. Thanks again, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:18 AM To: Kevin Benton; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/27/2015 06:50 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Assuming it implements the normal provider networks API, you just > specify the segmentation_id when you create the network. > > neutron net-create NET_NAME --provider:network_type vlan > --provider:physical_network physnet1 --provider:segmentation_id > VLAN_TAG Yes, the OVN plugin will implement the normal provider networks API. It's a WIP. My first goal was to just implement support for "--provider:network_type flat" end to end. I have the OVN side merged and now I'm working on the Neutron plugin piece. Once that's done, I'll go back add add VLAN support, which shouldn't be very difficult at that point. I'm aiming to have all of that done by the Tokyo summit (among other things). > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:50 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) > <tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com > <mailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com>> > wrote: > > Russell, > > Another question is about "localnet". It is a very useful feature. > :-) > > Is it possible to assign which VLAN tag will be used for a specific > provider network? > In your example in > > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/c02819293d52f7ea7b714242d871b2b01f57f905 > : "physnet1" is used as physical network, and br-eth1 is used as the > provider network OpenFlow switch. > If we can assign the VLAN tag of the provider network, is the VLAN > tag translation done by "br-int" or "br-eth1"? -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Russell, Another question is about "localnet". It is a very useful feature. :-) Is it possible to assign which VLAN tag will be used for a specific provider network? In your example in https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/c02819293d52f7ea7b714242d871b2b01f57f905 : "physnet1" is used as physical network, and br-eth1 is used as the provider network OpenFlow switch. If we can assign the VLAN tag of the provider network, is the VLAN tag translation done by "br-int" or "br-eth1"? Thanks, Tony -----Original Message- From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 2:26 PM To: 'Russell Bryant'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? Russell, Thanks for your valuable information. I understood Geneve is some kind of tunnel format for network virtualization encapsulation, just like VxLAN. But I'm still confused by the connection between Geneve and VTEP. I suppose VTEP should be on behalf of "VxLAN Tunnel Endpoint", which should be used for VxLAN only. Does it become some "common tunnel endpoint" in OVN, and can be also used as a tunnel endpoint for Geneve? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:04 AM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/24/2015 10:37 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Russell, > > Thanks for your detail explanation and kind help! > I have understand how container in VM can acquire network interfaces in > different neutron networks now. > For the connections between compute nodes, I think I need to study Geneve > protocol and VTEP first. > Any further question, I may need to continue consulting you. :-) OVN uses Geneve in conceptually the same way as to how the Neutron reference implementation (ML2+OVS) uses VxLAN to create overlay networks among the compute nodes for tenant overlay networks. VTEP gateways or provider networks come into play when you want to connect these overlay networks to physical, or "underlay" networks. Hope that helps, -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Russell, Thanks for your valuable information. I understood Geneve is some kind of tunnel format for network virtualization encapsulation, just like VxLAN. But I'm still confused by the connection between Geneve and VTEP. I suppose VTEP should be on behalf of "VxLAN Tunnel Endpoint", which should be used for VxLAN only. Does it become some "common tunnel endpoint" in OVN, and can be also used as a tunnel endpoint for Geneve? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:04 AM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/24/2015 10:37 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Russell, > > Thanks for your detail explanation and kind help! > I have understand how container in VM can acquire network interfaces in > different neutron networks now. > For the connections between compute nodes, I think I need to study Geneve > protocol and VTEP first. > Any further question, I may need to continue consulting you. :-) OVN uses Geneve in conceptually the same way as to how the Neutron reference implementation (ML2+OVS) uses VxLAN to create overlay networks among the compute nodes for tenant overlay networks. VTEP gateways or provider networks come into play when you want to connect these overlay networks to physical, or "underlay" networks. Hope that helps, -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Russell, Thanks for your detail explanation and kind help! I have understand how container in VM can acquire network interfaces in different neutron networks now. For the connections between compute nodes, I think I need to study Geneve protocol and VTEP first. Any further question, I may need to continue consulting you. :-) Thanks for your help again, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? I'll reply to each of your 3 messages here: On 09/23/2015 05:57 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Hi Russell, > > I just realized OVN plugin is an independent plugin of OVS plugin. Yes, it's a plugin developed in the "networking-ovn" project. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/networking-ovn/ > In this case, how do we handle the provider network connections between > compute nodes? Is it handled by OVN actually? I'm going to start by explaining the status of OVN itself, and then I'll come back and address the Neutron integration: -- OVN -- OVN implements logical networks as overlays using the Geneve protocol. Connecting from logical to physical networks is done by one of two ways. The first is using VTEP gateways. This could be hardware or software gateways that implement the hardware_vtep schema. This is typically a TOR switch that supports the vtep schema, but I believe someone is going to build a software version based on ovs and dpdk. OVN includes a daemon called "ovn-controller-vtep" that is run for each vtep gateway to manage connectivity between OVN networks and the gateway. It could run on the switch itself, or some other management host. The last set of patches to get this working initially were merged just 8 days ago. The ovn-architecture document describes "Life Cycle of a VTEP gateway": https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml#L820 or you can find a temporary copy of a rendered version here: http://www.russellbryant.net/ovs-docs/ovn-architecture.7.pdf The second is what Neutron refers to as "provider networks". OVN does support this, as well. It was merge just a couple weeks ago. The commit message for OVN "localnet" ports goes into quite a bit of detail about how this works in OVN: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/c02819293d52f7ea7b714242d871b2b01f57f905 -- Neutron -- Both of these things are freshly implemented in OVN so the Neutron integration is a WIP. For vtep gateways, there's not an established API. networking-l2gw is the closest thing, but I've got some concerns with both the API and implementation. As a first baby step, we're just going to provide a hack that lets an admin create a connection between a network and gateway using a neutron port with a special binding:profile. We'll also be continuing to look at providing a proper API. For provider networks, working with them in Neutron will be no different than it is today with the current OVS support. I just have to finish the Neutron plugin integration, which I just started on yesterday. > > Thanks, > Tony > > -Original Message- > From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:58 PM > To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for > usage questions)' > Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support > to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? > > Hi Russell, > > Is there any material to explain how OVN parent port work? Note that while this uses a binding:profile hack for now, we're going to update the plugin to support the vlan-aware-vms API for this use case once that is completed. http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-ovn/containers.html http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/vlan-aware-vms.html https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/CONTAINERS.OpenStack.md https://github.com/shettyg/ovn-docker > Thanks, > Tony > > -Original Message- > From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:02 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to > setup multiple neutron networks for one container? > > Russell, > > Thanks for your info. > If I want to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different > neutron networks(for example, netA and netB), is it mandatory to let > the VM hosting containers have network interfaces in netA and netB, > and ovn will help to direct the container
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Hi Russell, I just realized OVN plugin is an independent plugin of OVS plugin. In this case, how do we handle the provider network connections between compute nodes? Is it handled by OVN actually? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:58 PM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? Hi Russell, Is there any material to explain how OVN parent port work? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:02 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? Russell, Thanks for your info. If I want to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different neutron networks(for example, netA and netB), is it mandatory to let the VM hosting containers have network interfaces in netA and netB, and ovn will help to direct the container traffic to its corresponding VM network interfaces? from https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/CONTAINERS.OpenStack.md : "This VLAN tag is stripped out in the hypervisor by OVN." I suppose when the traffic goes out the VM, the VLAN tag has already been stripped out. When the traffic arrives ovs on physical host, it will be tagged with neutron local vlan. Is it right? Thanks in advance, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/22/2015 08:08 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Dear all, > > For neutron ovn plugin supports containers in one VM, My understanding is one > container can't be assigned two network interfaces in different neutron > networks. Is it right? > The reason: > 1. One host VM only has one network interface. > 2. all the VLAN tags are stripped out when the packet goes out the VM. > > If it is True, does neutron ovn plugin or ovn has plan to support this? You should be able to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different networks. The traffic for each interface will be tagged with a unique VLAN ID on its way in and out of the VM, the same way it is done for each container with a single interface. -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Hi Russell, Is there any material to explain how OVN parent port work? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:02 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? Russell, Thanks for your info. If I want to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different neutron networks(for example, netA and netB), is it mandatory to let the VM hosting containers have network interfaces in netA and netB, and ovn will help to direct the container traffic to its corresponding VM network interfaces? from https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/CONTAINERS.OpenStack.md : "This VLAN tag is stripped out in the hypervisor by OVN." I suppose when the traffic goes out the VM, the VLAN tag has already been stripped out. When the traffic arrives ovs on physical host, it will be tagged with neutron local vlan. Is it right? Thanks in advance, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/22/2015 08:08 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Dear all, > > For neutron ovn plugin supports containers in one VM, My understanding is one > container can't be assigned two network interfaces in different neutron > networks. Is it right? > The reason: > 1. One host VM only has one network interface. > 2. all the VLAN tags are stripped out when the packet goes out the VM. > > If it is True, does neutron ovn plugin or ovn has plan to support this? You should be able to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different networks. The traffic for each interface will be tagged with a unique VLAN ID on its way in and out of the VM, the same way it is done for each container with a single interface. -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Russell, Thanks for your info. If I want to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different neutron networks(for example, netA and netB), is it mandatory to let the VM hosting containers have network interfaces in netA and netB, and ovn will help to direct the container traffic to its corresponding VM network interfaces? from https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/CONTAINERS.OpenStack.md : "This VLAN tag is stripped out in the hypervisor by OVN." I suppose when the traffic goes out the VM, the VLAN tag has already been stripped out. When the traffic arrives ovs on physical host, it will be tagged with neutron local vlan. Is it right? Thanks in advance, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container? On 09/22/2015 08:08 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Dear all, > > For neutron ovn plugin supports containers in one VM, My understanding is one > container can't be assigned two network interfaces in different neutron > networks. Is it right? > The reason: > 1. One host VM only has one network interface. > 2. all the VLAN tags are stripped out when the packet goes out the VM. > > If it is True, does neutron ovn plugin or ovn has plan to support this? You should be able to assign multiple interfaces to a container on different networks. The traffic for each interface will be tagged with a unique VLAN ID on its way in and out of the VM, the same way it is done for each container with a single interface. -- Russell Bryant __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Dear all, For neutron ovn plugin supports containers in one VM, My understanding is one container can't be assigned two network interfaces in different neutron networks. Is it right? The reason: 1. One host VM only has one network interface. 2. all the VLAN tags are stripped out when the packet goes out the VM. If it is True, does neutron ovn plugin or ovn has plan to support this? Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [neutron] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?
Dear all, For neutron ovn plugin supports containers in one VM, My understanding is one container can't be assigned two network interfaces in different neutron networks. Is it right? The reason: 1. One host VM only has one network interface. 2. all the VLAN tags are stripped out when the packet goes out the VM. If it is True, does neutron ovn plugin or ovn has plan to support this? Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support edit function?
Dear OpenStack developers, Currently, murano dynamic-ui is one-time GUI, and I can't edit data what has been submitted. Does murano dynamic-ui have plan to support edit function in the future? For example, developer develops some Wizard GUI to do some configuration, and user wants to change some configuration after the deployment. Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support edit function?
Kirll, Thanks for your info very much! We will study it first. Thanks, Tony From: Kirill Zaitsev [mailto:kzait...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:12 PM To: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Does murano dymamic-ui have plan to support edit function? Hi, sure there are such plans! This have been long referred as per-component-UI. I’m really hoping there would be some traction about it during mitaka cycle. Not in liberty though, feature freeze is less than a month away. btw, if you’re interested in custom tweaking and fine-tuning of murano object-model you can take a look at these CLI tools https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-muranoclient+branch:master+topic:bp/env-configuration-from-cli,n,z and this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208659/ commit in particular. Although using those would require you to have some knowledge about how murano handles things internally. -- Kirill Zaitsev Murano team Software Engineer Mirantis, Inc On 12 Aug 2015 at 13:23:47, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) (tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.commailto:tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com) wrote: Dear OpenStack developers, Currently, murano dynamic-ui is “one-time” GUI, and I can’t edit data what has been submitted. Does murano dynamic-ui have plan to support edit function in the future? For example, developer develops some Wizard GUI to do some configuration, and user wants to change some configuration after the deployment. Thanks, Tony __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribemailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev