Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
I've added this topic to the meeting agenda [1] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings#Next_meeting Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > > On 16:28 Jul 10, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it > > > often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest > > > python-cinderclient review request to get more stats. > > > > > > Review request to make this voting: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional > > > > Add an agenda item to the next Cinder meeting. Sure there should be no > > objections. > > > > Just an FYI that these tests used to always be voting until they were > removed > from tempest. [1][2] Almost every other project that did the same client > test > migration from tempest just made the new client specific jobs voting from > the > start so there was no loss in coverage. I'm not entirely sure why > cinderclient > got stuck as experimental jobs, but it doesn't seem overly contentious to > me > to just flip the switch. > > -Matt Treinish > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178757/ > [2] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/063018.html > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:04:05PM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > On 16:28 Jul 10, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it > > often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest > > python-cinderclient review request to get more stats. > > > > Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ > > > > [1] > > http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional > > Add an agenda item to the next Cinder meeting. Sure there should be no > objections. > Just an FYI that these tests used to always be voting until they were removed from tempest. [1][2] Almost every other project that did the same client test migration from tempest just made the new client specific jobs voting from the start so there was no loss in coverage. I'm not entirely sure why cinderclient got stuck as experimental jobs, but it doesn't seem overly contentious to me to just flip the switch. -Matt Treinish [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178757/ [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-April/063018.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On 16:28 Jul 10, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it > often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest > python-cinderclient review request to get more stats. > > Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ > > [1] > http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional Add an agenda item to the next Cinder meeting. Sure there should be no objections. -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Review request to make this voting I'm sorry for typo. Of course, it's a review request to make this job non-voting in check queue. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
Hi Mike, Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest python-cinderclient review request to get more stats. Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ [1] http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer, http://blog.e0ne.info/, http://notacash.com/, http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 21:48 Jul 06, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > > every patch to python-cinderclient? > > I'm fine with this as long as the job has been stable since it was > introduced > as experimental. You mind posting the stats? > > -- > Mike Perez > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On 21:48 Jul 06, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > every patch to python-cinderclient? I'm fine with this as long as the job has been stable since it was introduced as experimental. You mind posting the stats? -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:48:27PM +0300, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] > for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. > > Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's > almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, > we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses > own client for all APIs. > > Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask > everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with > current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in > #openstack-cinder in IRC. > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > every patch to python-cinderclient? > +1 I think it is a great idea to move it to non-voting. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ > [2] > https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests > > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
On 7/6/15 10:28 PM, sean.mcgin...@gmx.com wrote: > I support moving it to non-voting from the experimental queue. It will > be much more visible that way if something breaks. That makes sense to me. > - Reply message - > From: "Ivan Kolodyazhny" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" > Cc: "Oleksiy Butenko" , "Kyrylo Romanenko" > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests > Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 1:48 PM > > Hi all, > > As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] > for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. > > Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's > almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, > we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses > own client for all APIs. > > Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask > everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with > current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in > #openstack-cinder in IRC. > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > every patch to python-cinderclient? > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ > [2] > https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests > > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
I support moving it to non-voting from the experimental queue. It will be much more visible that way if something breaks. - Reply message - From: "Ivan Kolodyazhny" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Cc: "Oleksiy Butenko" , "Kyrylo Romanenko" Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 1:48 PM Hi all, As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses own client for all APIs. Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in #openstack-cinder in IRC. Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with every patch to python-cinderclient? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ [2] https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests
Hi all, As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses own client for all APIs. Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in #openstack-cinder in IRC. Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with every patch to python-cinderclient? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ [2] https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
