Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-15 Thread Oleg Gelbukh 
Jeremy, thank you, that's excellent news. The Infra team is doing awesome
work to improve the processes in all possible ways.

Andreas, I will take a closer look, but it seems to be exactly what I had
in mind. Thanks for sharing!

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:

> On 04/14/2016 06:30 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
>>
>>> The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is:
>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html
>>>
>>
>> At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't (and
>> haven't for some time) really support pip versions as old as the
>> ones which predate prerelease identification in their version
>> parsing so could probably just start running the same sdist
>> publication to PyPI for prereleases as we do for full release
>> version tags.
>>
>
> this one merged recently:
> https://review.openstack.org/300124
>
> I think it does what you describe - or is anything else to do?
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-15 Thread Andreas Jaeger 

On 04/14/2016 06:30 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:

On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote:

The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html


At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't (and
haven't for some time) really support pip versions as old as the
ones which predate prerelease identification in their version
parsing so could probably just start running the same sdist
publication to PyPI for prereleases as we do for full release
version tags.


this one merged recently:
https://review.openstack.org/300124

I think it does what you describe - or is anything else to do?

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
   HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley 
On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
> The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html

At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't (and
haven't for some time) really support pip versions as old as the
ones which predate prerelease identification in their version
parsing so could probably just start running the same sdist
publication to PyPI for prereleases as we do for full release
version tags.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Oleg Gelbukh 
The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis Inc.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Oleg Gelbukh 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for replying to this old thread, but I would really like to see
> this moving.
>
> There's a 'pre-release' pipeline in Zuul which serves exactly that
> purpose: handle pre-release tags (beta-versions). However, per this thread,
> it is not recommended due to possible issues with pip unable to
> differentiate pre-release versions from main releases.
>
> Another option here is to publish minor versions of the package, i.e.
> start with 9.0.0 early, and then increase to 9.0.1 etc once the development
> progresses.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Oleg Gelbukh
> Mirantis Inc.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Yuriy Taraday 
> wrote:
>
>> By the way, it would be very helpful for testing external tools if we had
>> 7.0.1 release on PyPI as well. It seems python-fuelclient somehow ended up
>> with a "stable/7.0.1" branch instead of "7.0.1" tag.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM Roman Prykhodchenko 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack
>>> Infra actually support this?
>>>
>>> > 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh 
>>> написав(ла):
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our
>>> package (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and
>>> keystoneclient dependencies.
>>> >
>>> > New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun
>>> due to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is
>>> released along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version
>>> available from PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on
>>> packages available in centos6/python26).
>>> >
>>> > The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of
>>> fuelclient (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to
>>> pip/tox, this will allow to run unittests against the proper set of
>>> requirements. On the other hand, it will not break the users consuming the
>>> latest stable (7.0.0) version with old requirements from PyPI.
>>> >
>>> > Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I
>>> will create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in
>>> the current release cycle.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Oleg Gelbukh
>>> > Mirantis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> __
>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Oleg Gelbukh 
Hi,

I'm sorry for replying to this old thread, but I would really like to see
this moving.

There's a 'pre-release' pipeline in Zuul which serves exactly that purpose:
handle pre-release tags (beta-versions). However, per this thread, it is
not recommended due to possible issues with pip unable to differentiate
pre-release versions from main releases.

Another option here is to publish minor versions of the package, i.e. start
with 9.0.0 early, and then increase to 9.0.1 etc once the development
progresses.

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis Inc.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Yuriy Taraday  wrote:

> By the way, it would be very helpful for testing external tools if we had
> 7.0.1 release on PyPI as well. It seems python-fuelclient somehow ended up
> with a "stable/7.0.1" branch instead of "7.0.1" tag.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM Roman Prykhodchenko  wrote:
>
>> Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack Infra
>> actually support this?
>>
>> > 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh 
>> написав(ла):
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our
>> package (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and
>> keystoneclient dependencies.
>> >
>> > New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun
>> due to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is
>> released along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version
>> available from PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on
>> packages available in centos6/python26).
>> >
>> > The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of
>> fuelclient (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to
>> pip/tox, this will allow to run unittests against the proper set of
>> requirements. On the other hand, it will not break the users consuming the
>> latest stable (7.0.0) version with old requirements from PyPI.
>> >
>> > Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I
>> will create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in
>> the current release cycle.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Oleg Gelbukh
>> > Mirantis
>> >
>> >
>> __
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-21 Thread Yuriy Taraday 
By the way, it would be very helpful for testing external tools if we had
7.0.1 release on PyPI as well. It seems python-fuelclient somehow ended up
with a "stable/7.0.1" branch instead of "7.0.1" tag.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM Roman Prykhodchenko  wrote:

> Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack Infra
> actually support this?
>
> > 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh 
> написав(ла):
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our
> package (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and
> keystoneclient dependencies.
> >
> > New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun
> due to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is
> released along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version
> available from PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on
> packages available in centos6/python26).
> >
> > The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of
> fuelclient (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to
> pip/tox, this will allow to run unittests against the proper set of
> requirements. On the other hand, it will not break the users consuming the
> latest stable (7.0.0) version with old requirements from PyPI.
> >
> > Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I will
> create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in the
> current release cycle.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Oleg Gelbukh
> > Mirantis
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-20 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko 
Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack Infra 
actually support this?

> 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh  написав(ла):
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our package 
> (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and 
> keystoneclient dependencies.
> 
> New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun due to 
> introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is released 
> along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version available from 
> PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on packages available 
> in centos6/python26).
> 
> The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of fuelclient 
> (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to pip/tox, this 
> will allow to run unittests against the proper set of requirements. On the 
> other hand, it will not break the users consuming the latest stable (7.0.0) 
> version with old requirements from PyPI.
> 
> Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I will 
> create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in the 
> current release cycle.
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Oleg Gelbukh
> Mirantis
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-20 Thread Oleg Gelbukh 
Hi,

Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our package
(fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and
keystoneclient dependencies.

New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun due
to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is
released along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version
available from PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on
packages available in centos6/python26).

The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of fuelclient
(8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to pip/tox, this
will allow to run unittests against the proper set of requirements. On the
other hand, it will not break the users consuming the latest stable (7.0.0)
version with old requirements from PyPI.

Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I will
create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in the
current release cycle.

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
Mirantis
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev