Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-13 Thread Everett Toews
Please note that should be #openstack-sdks (plural) !

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Sean Dague  wrote:
> 
> The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
> not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
> about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
> right people in a conversation to make a decision.
> 
> I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
> the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
> openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
> happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
> incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
> already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
> forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
> whole space of a more usable API for users.
> 
> This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
> events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.
> 
> Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)

A little bit of data to inform the decision. I threw together a quick n' dirty 
spreadsheet [1] to see what the user overlap is like.

16 of the 39 in #openstack-api are already in #openstack-sdks.

I'm actually not super opinionated on it. But I suppose I'd lean towards 
folding it in.

Would like to hear what others in the API WG think.

Everett

[1] 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12i1bSIu38yLXnAiasNjb4Nzhy1yaHmVOQ3kFr1GIFIk/edit?usp=sharing
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-13 Thread Steve Martinelli

As a -sdks regular, I wouldn't mind some of the API folks crashing the
channel :)

If it makes sense, then why not. There are already some folks that are
involved in both efforts (Everett).

Steve



From:   Sean Dague 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Date:   2015/11/13 07:59 AM
Subject:[openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with
#openstack-sdk?



The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
right people in a conversation to make a decision.

I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
whole space of a more usable API for users.

This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.

Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)

 -Sean

--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-13 Thread Jay Pipes

Cool with me.

On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:

The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
right people in a conversation to make a decision.

I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
whole space of a more usable API for users.

This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.

Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)

-Sean



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-13 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Sean Dague  wrote:

> I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
> the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
> openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
> happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
> incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
> already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
> forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
> whole space of a more usable API for users.
>

As part of another project crashing in -sdks I am fine with this. ;)  I
like the idea of some consolidation, ever since Keystone left -dev it's
been REALLY quite there too.

dt

-- 

Dean Troyer
dtro...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread michael mccune

On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:

The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
right people in a conversation to make a decision.

I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
whole space of a more usable API for users.

This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.

Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)


i don't necessarily have an outright objection to this, but i would like 
explore the future possibilities of this change.


i think there is possibility for the api-wg to grow and take on more 
responsibility within the openstack community and i'm curious about the 
net effect down the road if that expansion were to occur. are there any 
side-effects we should be aware of as we merge the two 
channels/communities into one namespace?


i realize there is some overlap of engineering/design that takes place 
on these channels, i'm just concerned about the idea of merging the two 
and then at some point in the future wanting to separate them. i'm not 
proposing these thoughts to quash the idea of joining, i'd just like to 
more fully understand the longer term implications of a merge.


anyone with more experience in this community-oriented side of things 
have some light to shed?


thanks,
mike


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/16/2015 09:34 AM, michael mccune wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
>> not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
>> about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
>> right people in a conversation to make a decision.
>>
>> I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
>> the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
>> openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
>> happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
>> incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
>> already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
>> forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
>> whole space of a more usable API for users.
>>
>> This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
>> events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.
>>
>> Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)
> 
> i don't necessarily have an outright objection to this, but i would like
> explore the future possibilities of this change.
> 
> i think there is possibility for the api-wg to grow and take on more
> responsibility within the openstack community and i'm curious about the
> net effect down the road if that expansion were to occur. are there any
> side-effects we should be aware of as we merge the two
> channels/communities into one namespace?
> 
> i realize there is some overlap of engineering/design that takes place
> on these channels, i'm just concerned about the idea of merging the two
> and then at some point in the future wanting to separate them. i'm not
> proposing these thoughts to quash the idea of joining, i'd just like to
> more fully understand the longer term implications of a merge.
> 
> anyone with more experience in this community-oriented side of things
> have some light to shed?

Typically the only real reason to spin off another channel is that there
are now too many conversations happening all at once that are unrelated
and people are finding it is impeding their ability to get work done. I
can't imagine this happening any time within the next couple of years.
An average day in #openstack-api is < 20 messages (from a quick spot
check in IRC logs).

I feel there is a lot of benefits in having these groups that do related
work all doing it in one channel. Even though it's a number of discreet
outputs, the "hallway track" of having api producers and consumers doing
their business all in front of each other should quite help in ensuring
that we all make something better.

-Sean


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-16 Thread michael mccune

On 11/16/2015 09:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote:

On 11/16/2015 09:34 AM, michael mccune wrote:

On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:

The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
right people in a conversation to make a decision.

I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk
the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are
incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
whole space of a more usable API for users.

This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum
events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.

Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)


i don't necessarily have an outright objection to this, but i would like
explore the future possibilities of this change.

i think there is possibility for the api-wg to grow and take on more
responsibility within the openstack community and i'm curious about the
net effect down the road if that expansion were to occur. are there any
side-effects we should be aware of as we merge the two
channels/communities into one namespace?

i realize there is some overlap of engineering/design that takes place
on these channels, i'm just concerned about the idea of merging the two
and then at some point in the future wanting to separate them. i'm not
proposing these thoughts to quash the idea of joining, i'd just like to
more fully understand the longer term implications of a merge.

anyone with more experience in this community-oriented side of things
have some light to shed?


Typically the only real reason to spin off another channel is that there
are now too many conversations happening all at once that are unrelated
and people are finding it is impeding their ability to get work done. I
can't imagine this happening any time within the next couple of years.
An average day in #openstack-api is < 20 messages (from a quick spot
check in IRC logs).

I feel there is a lot of benefits in having these groups that do related
work all doing it in one channel. Even though it's a number of discreet
outputs, the "hallway track" of having api producers and consumers doing
their business all in front of each other should quite help in ensuring
that we all make something better.


thanks for the clarifications Sean, i appreciate the extra resolution 
and i agree that having both these groups able to comment on similar 
issues in a common place seems ideal.


regards,
mike


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-30 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/16/2015 11:09 AM, michael mccune wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 09:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 11/16/2015 09:34 AM, michael mccune wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2015 07:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
 The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's
 not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget
 about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the
 right people in a conversation to make a decision.

 I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make
 #openstack-sdk
 the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the
 openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are
 happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so
 are
 incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is
 already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing
 forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the
 whole space of a more usable API for users.

 This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low
 quorum
 events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead.

 Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)
>>>
>>> i don't necessarily have an outright objection to this, but i would like
>>> explore the future possibilities of this change.
>>>
>>> i think there is possibility for the api-wg to grow and take on more
>>> responsibility within the openstack community and i'm curious about the
>>> net effect down the road if that expansion were to occur. are there any
>>> side-effects we should be aware of as we merge the two
>>> channels/communities into one namespace?
>>>
>>> i realize there is some overlap of engineering/design that takes place
>>> on these channels, i'm just concerned about the idea of merging the two
>>> and then at some point in the future wanting to separate them. i'm not
>>> proposing these thoughts to quash the idea of joining, i'd just like to
>>> more fully understand the longer term implications of a merge.
>>>
>>> anyone with more experience in this community-oriented side of things
>>> have some light to shed?
>>
>> Typically the only real reason to spin off another channel is that there
>> are now too many conversations happening all at once that are unrelated
>> and people are finding it is impeding their ability to get work done. I
>> can't imagine this happening any time within the next couple of years.
>> An average day in #openstack-api is < 20 messages (from a quick spot
>> check in IRC logs).
>>
>> I feel there is a lot of benefits in having these groups that do related
>> work all doing it in one channel. Even though it's a number of discreet
>> outputs, the "hallway track" of having api producers and consumers doing
>> their business all in front of each other should quite help in ensuring
>> that we all make something better.
> 
> thanks for the clarifications Sean, i appreciate the extra resolution
> and i agree that having both these groups able to comment on similar
> issues in a common place seems ideal.

Ok, I'm going to assume with no real disagreement we're agreed here. I'm
moving the api-wg notifications to #openstack-sdks now -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251357/1/gerritbot/channels.yaml,cm

-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-11-30 Thread michael mccune

On 11/30/2015 08:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote:

Ok, I'm going to assume with no real disagreement we're agreed here. I'm
moving the api-wg notifications to #openstack-sdks now -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251357/1/gerritbot/channels.yaml,cm


ok, i think we've got a few spots in the documentation that refer to 
openstack-api. we can start the process of adjusting all those to 
openstack-sdks.


mike


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [api] consolidate IRC change with #openstack-sdk?

2015-12-01 Thread Everett Toews
On Nov 30, 2015, at 7:58 AM, michael mccune  wrote:
> 
> On 11/30/2015 08:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Ok, I'm going to assume with no real disagreement we're agreed here. I'm
>> moving the api-wg notifications to #openstack-sdks now -
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251357/1/gerritbot/channels.yaml,cm
> 
> ok, i think we've got a few spots in the documentation that refer to 
> openstack-api. we can start the process of adjusting all those to 
> openstack-sdks.

I updated the couple of places I could find on the wiki. I also sent out a 
personalized message to everyone in the now defunct #openstack-api channel on 
Freenode.

See you in #openstack-sdks (don't forget it's plural!)

Everett
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev