[OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
Greetings, Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my personal goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other people and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come to mind. However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without giving some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our Austin talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider doing to same for other conferences? Or I am just being paranoid. PB ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct place is something we should be careful to do. We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the > dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my > personal > goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other > people > and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come > to > mind. > > However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without > giving > some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our > Austin > talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider > doing to > same for other conferences? > > Or I am just being paranoid. > > PB > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Spencer Krum n...@spencerkrum.com ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
I appreciate you starting this thread Paul. Being able to collaborate with other folks from the infra team on preparing talks for confs is great, and gives the chance to people who are interested in the project but are 'shy' to speak up alone in stage to overcome that barrier. This will also avoid having talks with repeating topics on same/similar confs. Looking forward to collaborate on upcoming confs :-) . Ricky 2016-05-02 20:55 GMT+02:00 Spencer Krum : > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct > place is something we should be careful to do. > > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. > > On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the > > dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my > > personal > > goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other > > people > > and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come > > to > > mind. > > > > However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without > > giving > > some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our > > Austin > > talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider > > doing to > > same for other conferences? > > > > Or I am just being paranoid. > > > > PB > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > -- > Spencer Krum > n...@spencerkrum.com > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
I am happy to do that too Inviato da iPhone > Il giorno 02 mag 2016, alle ore 12:46, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz > ha scritto: > > I appreciate you starting this thread Paul. > > Being able to collaborate with other folks from the infra team on preparing > talks for confs is > great, and gives the chance to people who are interested in the project but > are 'shy' to speak up > alone in stage to overcome that barrier. > > This will also avoid having talks with repeating topics on same/similar confs. > > Looking forward to collaborate on upcoming confs :-) . > > Ricky > > 2016-05-02 20:55 GMT+02:00 Spencer Krum : >> I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start >> a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate >> attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each >> other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel >> any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination >> sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear >> to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct >> place is something we should be careful to do. >> >> We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on >> talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > >> > Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the >> > dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my >> > personal >> > goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other >> > people >> > and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come >> > to >> > mind. >> > >> > However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without >> > giving >> > some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our >> > Austin >> > talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider >> > doing to >> > same for other conferences? >> > >> > Or I am just being paranoid. >> > >> > PB >> > >> > ___ >> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> >> -- >> Spencer Krum >> n...@spencerkrum.com >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346! > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346! ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct > place is something we should be careful to do. > > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it all organized in the longer term. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate > > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each > > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel > > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination > > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear > > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct > > place is something we should be careful to do. > > > > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on > > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. > > Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks > have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. > > I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think > we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it > all organized in the longer term. > I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks people are thinking of talking at. > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum > wrote: > > > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > > > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to > coordinate > > > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each > > > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel > > > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but > coordination > > > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear > > > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct > > > place is something we should be careful to do. > > > > > > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on > > > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. > > > > Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks > > have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. > > > > I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think > > we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it > > all organized in the longer term. > > > I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks > people are thinking of talking at. > > > -- > > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 > > > > I like the coordination, sometimes it is useful if suddenly two folks are interested in talking at the same conference (either can be a cooler bigger talk, or each can be more specialized). :) --Morgan ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
On 05/03/2016 02:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum >> wrote: I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to >> coordinate attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but >> coordination sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct place is something we should be careful to do. We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. >>> >>> Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks >>> have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. >>> >>> I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think >>> we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it >>> all organized in the longer term. >>> >> I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks >> people are thinking of talking at. >> >>> -- >>> Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 >>> >> >> > I like the coordination, sometimes it is useful if suddenly two folks are > interested in talking at the same conference (either can be a cooler bigger > talk, or each can be more specialized). :) > > --Morgan > > > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > I think co-ordination is a great idea and has been mentioned several times already will help to ensure coverage at important conferences and giving correct attribution to tool authors and contributors. I do want to state that I don't think it is a requirement. As an example, I found out about PyCon CA the Sunday after the proposals closed the Friday prior and submitted a proposal within 15 minutes of discovering the conference. (My talk was accepted.) So my point is, don't let the process prevent you from submitting a talk if you have a tight deadline. Submit by all means, then co-ordinate after, as fits your use case. Thanks for starting the conversation Paul, Anita. ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: >> > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start >> > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate >> > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each >> > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel >> > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination >> > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear >> > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct >> > place is something we should be careful to do. >> > >> > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on >> > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. >> >> Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks >> have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. >> >> I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think >> we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it >> all organized in the longer term. >> > I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks > people are thinking of talking at. Your wish... https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-conferences-2016 -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
