Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Robert Schiele wrote:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:50:52PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:



If I would need it, I would do

grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )

and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at the
right point...


And now what is the advantage of this solution to the awk script from Pascal?


This is not what was set against Pascal's solution.

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:13:25PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> You do realize this is just a puzzle / contest / obfuscated 
> programming / mine's-(smaller|faster|cleverer|cooler)-than-yours kind 
> of thing, right?

Sure, and I act as referee to smash down the solutions that did not win the
contest.

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele  Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpGdS76esLDt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Robert,

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 21:22, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:50:52PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > If I would need it, I would do
> >
> > grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )
> >
> > and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at
> > the right point...
>
> And now what is the advantage of this solution to the awk script from
> Pascal?

You do realize this is just a puzzle / contest / obfuscated 
programming / mine's-(smaller|faster|cleverer|cooler)-than-yours kind 
of thing, right?


> Robert


RRS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:31:38AM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 23:50 schrieb Eberhard Moenkeberg:
> > If I would need it, I would do
> >
> > grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )
> >
> > and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at
> > the right point...
> 
> No, it does *not* need a subprocess. You just need to expand the 
> pipe ;-)
> 
> grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | { read a b c; echo $b ; }
> 
> Topped again :-)

No.  In this case the implementation requires forking bash like in the example
above to handle the fifo queue thus there is actually no difference here.

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele  Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpAF8QDBWIi6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] Firefox profile not working on a vfat partition. Permissions I think.

2005-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Rosenauer
Hi,

On 2005-10-21 at 10:43:51 -0400, Michael A. Elkevizth wrote (shortened):

> Ok, sorry it took me so long to reply to this, I have been too busy to get
> to try this. I downloaded and ran Firefox 1.5b2 right from www.mozilla.org .
> The same error occurs if I try to use a profile from a vfat partition (like
> I said in an earlier post, the error wording is slightly different in 1.5,
> but I think it is the exact same error). I tried moving the profile to the
> /boot partition just to test it, and it works fine from there. I also tried
> as root and a normal user (both with full access to the partition), so the
> problem is either with the way Firefox is creating the lock, or the way 10.0
> is allowing access. I have been running 1.5b2 on WinXP Pro since it was
> released with no problems. Same basic setup, Windows partition is NTFS,
> profile is on a FAT32 partition.

just to let you know.
We fixed it and it will be made available at least with our upcoming
Firefox 1.5 package.
I'm not sure if we will get an official update for this problem for 
10.0.
But when Firefox 1.5 will be finally released you can get it from
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/mozilla/
(release candidates will be available in the experimental subtree in
addition but there is no package with the fix yet. If you'll see a
change in the packages in experimental/firefox the fix will be in there)


CU,

   Wolfgang

-- 
SUSE LINUX GmbH -o)   Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0
Maxfeldstr. 5   /\\   Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679
90409 Nuernberg, Germany   _\_v   simply change to www.suse.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:50:52PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> If I would need it, I would do
> 
> grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )
> 
> and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at the 
> right point...

And now what is the advantage of this solution to the awk script from Pascal?

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele  Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpHcYRAAqUyX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] what happens to BZ bugs?

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Janne,

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 11:40, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just out of curiosity, what happens to reported bugs (BZ)? Some
> of them seem to disappear without a trace with no hint what so
> ever about what happened to them. I've had half-a-dozen bugs
> just disappear while after being assigned. Quite rude, really..

Well, the one I filed, 
 is still there, 
but so far has attracted no attention, it would seem 
().


Randall Schulz

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Christian,

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:31, Christian Boltz wrote:
> ...
>
> Anybody out there who wants to top one of my solutions? *eg*

Well, here's a BASH-resident (no subprocesses forked) solution:

  physmem() {
while read fieldName value units; do
  if [ "$fieldName" = "MemTotal:" ]; then
echo "$value"
  fi
done \
 ...
>
> Christian Boltz


Randall Schulz

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Christian Boltz wrote:

Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 23:50 schrieb Eberhard Moenkeberg:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Robert Schiele wrote:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:13:09PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Pascal Bleser wrote:



[...]

Right. Topped.


But there is a big problem with that solution anyway: It assumes
that MemTotal is the first line in /proc/meminfo.  If one decides
to reorder this table in the kernel or add some headline all your
scripts using this solution will break.


Surely. It was just a sports exercise.

If I would need it, I would do

grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )

and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at
the right point...


No, it does *not* need a subprocess. You just need to expand the
pipe ;-)

grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | { read a b c; echo $b ; }

Topped again :-)


Not really; the top solution does not call ANY external program.


If you (or other readers) want an explanation about expanding the
subshell or even need to "export" variables from subshells, have a look
at my homepage [1]:
http://www.cboltz.de/de/linux/bash/?os (german)
http://www.cboltz.de/en/linux/bash/?os (english)


Thanks; but just bookmarked now - too late tonight.


Oh, there's another way ;-)
set -- `grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo` ; echo $2

This time, I topped myself ;-)


Just using bash intrinsics is the skill.


Anybody out there who wants to top one of my solutions? *eg*


BTW: Christoph just told me that he is really upset about the
ignorance of all the readers here. He had done all his best to cat a
good MemTotal value from a real system, but noone did realize it...


Now as you mention it - "MemTotal: 526525152 kB" (500 GB) is something
I'd like to have ;-)  (even all machines I have here together don't
have that much _hard disk_ space...)


You know, a man's ram size is directly proportional to the size 
of his ...

Or was that reverse proportional?

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello,

Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 23:50 schrieb Eberhard Moenkeberg:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:13:09PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Pascal Bleser wrote:
[...]
> Right. Topped.
>
> > But there is a big problem with that solution anyway: It assumes
> > that MemTotal is the first line in /proc/meminfo.  If one decides
> > to reorder this table in the kernel or add some headline all your
> > scripts using this solution will break.
>
> Surely. It was just a sports exercise.
>
> If I would need it, I would do
>
> grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )
>
> and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at
> the right point...

No, it does *not* need a subprocess. You just need to expand the 
pipe ;-)

grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | { read a b c; echo $b ; }

Topped again :-)

If you (or other readers) want an explanation about expanding the 
subshell or even need to "export" variables from subshells, have a look 
at my homepage [1]:
http://www.cboltz.de/de/linux/bash/?os (german)
http://www.cboltz.de/en/linux/bash/?os (english)

Oh, there's another way ;-)
set -- `grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo` ; echo $2

This time, I topped myself ;-)

Anybody out there who wants to top one of my solutions? *eg*

> BTW: Christoph just told me that he is really upset about the
> ignorance of all the readers here. He had done all his best to cat a
> good MemTotal value from a real system, but noone did realize it...

Now as you mention it - "MemTotal: 526525152 kB" (500 GB) is something 
I'd like to have ;-)  (even all machines I have here together don't 
have that much _hard disk_ space...)


Regards,

Christian Boltz

[1] new design still pending because of a problem with IE :-(
-- 
[Debian] für meinen privaten Rechner ist es mir zu konservativ.
Da bastel ich gerne mal und wälze mich wollüstig in Featureitis
und Versionismus und bin erst glücklich, wenn das System ernst-
lich Schaden genommen hat.[Ratti in suse-linux]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Wireless network - reconfigure every reboot

2005-10-25 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello,

Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 16:27 schrieb Ilker:
> If it'll help you, i also have an unsupported wireless lan card (not
> intel) and here's what i've done to get it working:
>
> Installed dhcpcd package.
> chmod 777 /sbin/dhcpcd

Wow. Very good idea :-/

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> echo -e '#!/bin/sh\nrm -rf /' > /sbin/dhcpd
   
Do you still think chmod 777 is a good idea? (Hint: 755 is ways better!)

Oh, please do *not* test what the generated script would do!

> /sbin/dhcpcd -G  wlan0
>
> and put a shell script at /etc/init.3 (or something like that)
> includes:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> /sbin/dhcpcd -G 192.168.1.1  wlan0
  
Are you really sure that this is part of your command line?

> and that completely worked, without any other software.It starts up
> automatically on every boot.I'm sorry if this information is not
> releated any ways (?).Just you can put a shell script to get it
> working on every boot.

Have a look at /etc/init.d/skeleton to see how initscripts should be 
written. 

Your short script may work (at least as long as you don't use insserv - 
it will move your script to start first. This will make it fail because 
the network script won't be run yet.) - but it is a very bad style.

[moved fullquote to /dev/null]

Fullquotes and top-posting are "not very popular" in these list - please 
have a look at http://www.opensuse.org/Opensuse_mailing_list_netiquette


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
> In Yast2-System-Editor /etc/sysconfig-Dateien in 
> System-Kernel-MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT ide-scsi eintragen.
David, bitte wegschauen... Nein David, das hast Du nicht gesehen. Es
ist alles OK, David... Ganz ruhig... :-)
[> Arne Dieckmann und Thomas Hertweck in suse-linux]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Problem with EOS 20D

2005-10-25 Thread Steven Lamb

Marcus Meissner wrote:


On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:24:14AM +1000, Steven Lamb wrote:
 


Hi,
I have installed Suse 10.0 on my toshiba A70 laptop but I noticed that 
the camera is not being detected via the USB2 port. I have other devices 
which are being detected fine via USB2. 
   



Is it detected on the USB 1 port (if you have any)?

What is the "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" output with the camera attached?

Can you switch the camera mode between Normal and PTP (to PTP if possible).

Ciao, Marcus
 

Below is the output of the cat. I tried PTP and Normal mode on all USB 
ports but the camera was still not detected. I tried another USB device 
and this worked without a problem.



T:  Bus=03 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=480 MxCh= 6
B:  Alloc=  0/800 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=01 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor= ProdID= Rev= 2.06
S:  Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.13-15-smp ehci_hcd
S:  Product=EHCI Host Controller
S:  SerialNumber=:00:13.2
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=256ms

T:  Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=04a9 ProdID=30eb Rev= 0.01
S:  Manufacturer=Canon Inc.
S:  Product=Canon Digital Camera
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=100mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=64ms

T:  Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 3
B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor= ProdID= Rev= 2.06
S:  Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.13-15-smp ohci_hcd
S:  Product=OHCI Host Controller
S:  SerialNumber=:00:13.1
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms

T:  Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 3
B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor= ProdID= Rev= 2.06
S:  Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.13-15-smp ohci_hcd
S:  Product=OHCI Host Controller
S:  SerialNumber=:00:13.0
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub


E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] aes-256-cbc and aes-cbc-256

2005-10-25 Thread Stephen J. Thompson
Hello all,

I have some encrypted images that I used to be able to access via the 
following command:

openssl aes-256-cbc -d -in /home/stephen/.encrypted_drive/encrypted.key | 
mount -p0 -o 
loop,encryption=aes-cbc-256 /home/stephen/.encrypted_drive/encrypted.img 
/home/stephen/Secured

but since switching to opensuse I am unable to, I get the following error:

bad decrypt
17887:error:06065064:digital envelope routines:EVP_DecryptFinal:bad 
decrypt:evp_enc.c:509:
ioctl: LOOP_SET_STATUS: Invalid argument, requested cipher or key length (256 
bits) not supported by kernel


Can anyone help?

Thanks.

Stephen.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Robert Schiele wrote:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:13:09PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Pascal Bleser wrote:



Just for the record:
awk '/^MemTotal:/{print $2}' /proc/meminfo


Topped:
(read a b c; echo $b ) 

Why doing a fork?  You could do it without a fork as well:

$ read a b c 

Right. Topped.


But there is a big problem with that solution anyway: It assumes that MemTotal
is the first line in /proc/meminfo.  If one decides to reorder this table in
the kernel or add some headline all your scripts using this solution will
break.


Surely. It was just a sports exercise.

If I would need it, I would do

grep ^MemTotal /proc/meminfo | (read a b c; echo $b )

and here bash needs the "(...)" to force the subprocess forking at the 
right point...
By this long long traded experience of necessity, I did not see your 
solution.


BTW: Christoph just told me that he is really upset about the 
ignorance of all the readers here. He had done all his best to cat a

good MemTotal value from a real system, but noone did realize it...

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:13:09PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> >Just for the record:
> >awk '/^MemTotal:/{print $2}' /proc/meminfo
> 
> Topped:
> (read a b c; echo $b ) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpOFydF2Rjmh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] what happens to BZ bugs?

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Janne Karhunen wrote:

> Just out of curiosity, what happens to reported bugs (BZ)? Some of them 
> seem to disappear without a trace with no hint what so ever about what 
> happened to them. I've had half-a-dozen bugs just disappear while after 
> being assigned. Quite rude, really..

This shouldn't happen - can you please give me a bug where this happend? 
(The only possible thing I could imagine would be that the bug permissions 
change when a bug is moved to another product.)


Regards
Christoph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Asteriks configuration

2005-10-25 Thread Maged Hussein
Hi,
You should post to asterisk users mailing list (
http://www.asterisk.org/support/#mailing_list)

Good Day,

On 10/26/05, Damian Mihai Liviu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to 'point' a FWD, Callware or IPKall
> number/virtual
> number to an Asteriks server bypassing the PSTN network to connect cu
> Asteriks? I need to do a setup like this:
>
> 1 local VoIP provider for calls within the country. Calls will be made
> directly from the endpoint. Another VoIP provider for international calls.
> The users will call the Asteriks server, get dial tone the dial the
> international number.
>
> Can you point me to some documentation to make this task.
>
> And the last question: Is possible to dial into Asteriks server via
> virtual
> numbers?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Damian Mihai Liviu
> Phone: +40741226993
> URL: http://liviudm.blogspot.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [opensuse] pam-devel

2005-10-25 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2005-10-25 18:05:09 -0200, Roberto Salomon wrote:
> This same issue was present in 9.3... Whereis pam-devel? Shouldn't it be 
> included in the OSS release of SuSE Linux? If not, where can it be 
> downloaded from?

http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/suse/i586/pam-devel-0.80-6.i586.rpm
http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/suse/x86_64/pam-devel-0.80-6.x86_64.rpm

hope this helps

darix

p.s.: ppc(64) have equivalent links.
p.p.s.: maybe add an FTP install source in yast?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

hI,

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Pascal Bleser wrote:

Randall R Schulz wrote:

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:09, Anders Johansson wrote:

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:59, Daniel Hatfield wrote:



Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory
installed in a system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for
a script.

  $ cat /proc/meminfo
  MemTotal: 526525152 kB
  [...]
  $

Or to be more specific:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal

Or to be even more specific
cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal|awk '{print $2}'

Or, to be more parsimonious:
% grep -h MemTotal /proc/meminfo |awk '{print $2}'
If I knew anything at all about awk, I'd know whether it could handle
the selection (grep) part, too, but I don't.


Just for the record:
awk '/^MemTotal:/{print $2}' /proc/meminfo


Topped:
(read a b c; echo $b ) 

[opensuse] pam-devel

2005-10-25 Thread Roberto Salomon
This same issue was present in 9.3... Whereis pam-devel? Shouldn't it be 
included in the OSS release of SuSE Linux? If not, where can it be 
downloaded from?


Salomon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Pascal Bleser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:09, Anders Johansson wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:59, Daniel Hatfield wrote:
> Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory
> installed in a system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for
> a script.
   $ cat /proc/meminfo
   MemTotal: 526525152 kB
   [...]
   $
>>> Or to be more specific:
>>> cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal
>> Or to be even more specific
>> cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal|awk '{print $2}'
> Or, to be more parsimonious:
> % grep -h MemTotal /proc/meminfo |awk '{print $2}'
> If I knew anything at all about awk, I'd know whether it could handle 
> the selection (grep) part, too, but I don't.

Just for the record:
awk '/^MemTotal:/{print $2}' /proc/meminfo

cheers
- --
  -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
  /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXoyrr3NMWliFcXcRAlVBAJ4pP4WO8S4f6Gy/uRWyljiZpj4nOQCgom+x
LCL/B9eOqtZEjBNkgtiUBd8=
=JZpp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] Asteriks configuration

2005-10-25 Thread Damian Mihai Liviu
Hi,

Is there any possibility to 'point' a FWD, Callware or IPKall number/virtual 
number to an Asteriks server bypassing the PSTN network to connect cu 
Asteriks? I need to do a setup like this:

1 local VoIP provider for calls within the country. Calls will be made 
directly from the endpoint. Another VoIP provider for international calls. 
The users will call the Asteriks server, get dial tone the dial the 
international number.

Can you point me to some documentation to make this task.

And the last question: Is possible to dial into Asteriks server via virtual 
numbers?

Cheers,
-- 
Damian Mihai Liviu
Phone: +40741226993
URL: http://liviudm.blogspot.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] what happens to BZ bugs?

2005-10-25 Thread Kirk Coombs
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 12:40 pm, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> Some
> of them seem to disappear without a trace with no hint what so
> ever about what happened to them. I've had half-a-dozen bugs
> just disappear while after being assigned

Can you get to them if you use the bug number? My guess is that you are 
searching for them and they are not showing up in the search results. Make 
sure that you search ALL of them. By default the unconfirmed, resolved, 
verified, and closed bugs are NOT searched. This can be configured using an 
advanced search.

Maybe your bugs are just getting fixed so they don't show up anymore. ;-)

Kirk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] what happens to BZ bugs?

2005-10-25 Thread Per Jessen
Janne Karhunen wrote:

> Just out of curiosity, what happens to reported bugs (BZ)? Some
> of them seem to disappear without a trace with no hint what so
> ever about what happened to them. I've had half-a-dozen bugs
> just disappear while after being assigned. Quite rude, really..

How do you define _disappear_?  

Does this return a 404?  Or the Novell equivalent of "report not found".

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=


/Per Jessen, Zürich


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] what happens to BZ bugs?

2005-10-25 Thread Janne Karhunen
Hi,

Just out of curiosity, what happens to reported bugs (BZ)? Some
of them seem to disappear without a trace with no hint what so
ever about what happened to them. I've had half-a-dozen bugs 
just disappear while after being assigned. Quite rude, really..


-- 
// Janne

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Smart package manager

2005-10-25 Thread Ken Schneider
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 17:40 +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Ken Schneider wrote:
> 
> > Trying to use smart on a 9.3 system. When running smart update the cache
> > will only build to 91% then the apt crashes with the following:
> > 
> > smart update suse-93-security-apt
> > Traceback (most recent call last):##
> > ( 91%)
> >   File "/usr/bin/smart", line 193, in ?
> > main(sys.argv[1:])
> >   File "/usr/bin/smart", line 166, in main
> > exitcode = iface.run(opts.command, opts.argv)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/interface.py", line 53,
> > in run
> > result = _command.main(self._ctrl, opts)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/commands/update.py", line
> > 77, in main
> > ctrl.reloadChannels()
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/control.py", line 375, in
> > reloadChannels
> > self._cache.load()
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/backends/rpm/header.py",
> > line 253, in load
> > reqdict[(f[i]&7744 and PreReq or Req,
> > TypeError: unsubscriptable object
> > 
> > Any clues on how to fix this?
> 
> --- smart/backends/rpm/header.py
> +++ smart/backends/rpm/header.py
> @@ -246,6 +250,8 @@
>  # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_PREUN |
>  # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_POST |
>  # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_POSTUN == 7744
> +if type(f) != list:
> +  f = [f]
>  reqdict[(f[i]&7744 and PreReq or Req,
>   intern(ni), r, vi)] = True
>  reqargs = reqdict.keys()
> 
> 
> Regards
>   Christoph
> 
Thank you very much. Problem solved.


-- 
Ken Schneider
UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Gomez, Daniel
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:09, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:59, Daniel Hatfield wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory installed 
> > > > in a system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for a script.
> > >
> > >   $ cat /proc/meminfo
> > >   MemTotal: 526525152 kB
> > >   [...]
> > >   $
> >
> > Or to be more specific:
> > cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal
>
> Or to be even more specific
>
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal|awk '{print $2}'
>
>% grep -h MemTotal /proc/meminfo |awk '{print $2}'

Single command:
awk '/MemTotal/{print $2}' /proc/meminfo


Re: [opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Kunael
> "Just using ssh connections" isn't very specific + I guess I'm not the
> only one who is using ssh very intensively on a daily basis (and I didn't
> slip into this once).

Ok. I'll think is a hardware problem of my machine; in fact is the first time 
I've these problems with ssh sessions. A conflict with hardware is really 
possibility...

> I'd recomment to "monitor" that very maschine with a serial console to be
> able to catch potential error messages or even oops.

I'll do it.

-- 
¡Share your knowledge!

Linux user id 332494  # http://counter.li.org/
PGP id 0xC5ABA76A  # http://pgp.mit.edu/


pgpGRjRBfMBxj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Kunael wrote:

> > Could you please point out a way how to reproduce this problem? I 
> > don't think this is a "bug" in OpenSSH, but rather a hardware or 
> > kernel problem... ;)
>
> Yes Christoph you've all the reason... the post title isn't the best.
> 
> The only way to reproduce (the only way I know at present moment) the 
> crash is simply use a ssh connection. The ssh-client machine simply lose 
> connection, but not appear anymore problem and the ssh-server (the 
> machine which runs under SuSE 10) appears completly freeze.

"Just using ssh connections" isn't very specific + I guess I'm not the 
only one who is using ssh very intensively on a daily basis (and I didn't 
slip into this once).


> Only mechanical reset is able :(
> 
> I've watched in /var dir and I've not found anything interesting.
> 
> ¿Where do I watch to get more info?

I'd recomment to "monitor" that very maschine with a serial console to be 
able to catch potential error messages or even oops.


Regards
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Jon Nelson
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Kunael wrote:

> > Could you please point out a way how to reproduce this problem? I don't
> > think this is a "bug" in OpenSSH, but rather a hardware or kernel
> > problem... ;)
> 
> Yes Christoph you've all the reason... the post title isn't the best. 
> 
> The only way to reproduce (the only way I know at present moment) the crash 
> is 
> simply use a ssh connection. The ssh-client machine simply lose connection, 
> but not appear anymore problem and the ssh-server (the machine which runs 
> under SuSE 10) appears completly freeze. 
> 
> Only mechanical reset is able :(
> 
> I've watched in /var dir and I've not found anything interesting.
> 
> ¿Where do I watch to get more info? 

First, verify that the software that is installed is not corrupt.
Do this in a shell, as root (use "su -" not "su" if you don't login as 
root):

( rpm -Va 2>&1 ) | tee rpmVa
or
rpm -Va > rpmVa 2>&1

and then examine the file rpmVa for files that have changed. There will 
always be some, devices, some files in /etc, and so on, but pay 
particular attention to *anything* in /sbin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /usr/bin, 
etc

However, I'm guessing that you have hardware issues, just based upon 
experience with this sort of thing.  One thing you could tell us is what 
the output from dmesg is after startup; knowing the hardware could help 
- it's entirely possible that it's a strange or weird network card and 
ssh just triggers a bug in the driver.

--
Carpe diem - Seize the day.
Carp in denim - There's a fish in my pants!

Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Kunael
> Could you please point out a way how to reproduce this problem? I don't
> think this is a "bug" in OpenSSH, but rather a hardware or kernel
> problem... ;)

Yes Christoph you've all the reason... the post title isn't the best. 

The only way to reproduce (the only way I know at present moment) the crash is 
simply use a ssh connection. The ssh-client machine simply lose connection, 
but not appear anymore problem and the ssh-server (the machine which runs 
under SuSE 10) appears completly freeze. 

Only mechanical reset is able :(

I've watched in /var dir and I've not found anything interesting.

¿Where do I watch to get more info? 

TIA.

-- 
¡Share your knowledge!

Linux user id 332494  # http://counter.li.org/
PGP id 0xC5ABA76A  # http://pgp.mit.edu/


pgpUzgUZPHlAU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Anders,

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:09, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:59, Daniel Hatfield wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory
> > > > installed in a system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for
> > > > a script.
> > >
> > >   $ cat /proc/meminfo
> > >   MemTotal: 526525152 kB
> > >   [...]
> > >   $
> >
> > Or to be more specific:
> > cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal
>
> Or to be even more specific
>
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal|awk '{print $2}'

Or, to be more parsimonious:

% grep -h MemTotal /proc/meminfo |awk '{print $2}'


If I knew anything at all about awk, I'd know whether it could handle 
the selection (grep) part, too, but I don't.


Randall Schulz

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Anders Johansson
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 17:59, Daniel Hatfield wrote:
> > > Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory installed in a
> > > system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for a script.
> >
> >   $ cat /proc/meminfo
> >   MemTotal: 526525152 kB
> >   [...]
> >   $
>
> Or to be more specific:
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal

Or to be even more specific

cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal|awk '{print $2}'

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Daniel Hatfield
> > Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory installed in a
> > system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for a script.
> 
>   $ cat /proc/meminfo
>   MemTotal: 526525152 kB
>   [...]
>   $

Or to be more specific:
cat /proc/meminfo | grep MemTotal

~Daniel


Re: [opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Kunael wrote:

> I use SuSE 10.0. I installed it some days ago and works fine in general 
> sense in my opinion (the increase of speed is great specially).
> 
> Today I was working with this SuSE 10 box from another machine using ssh 
> connection. The problem is the system crash totally (in remote machine, 
> of course); the system doesn't reboot or suspend ssh services, simply 
> appears "freeze"... mouse doesn't works, keyboard doesn't works...
> 
> When the system crash I was using ssh+screen, so I've try without screen 
> but I've got same crash again.

Could you please point out a way how to reproduce this problem? I don't 
think this is a "bug" in OpenSSH, but rather a hardware or kernel 
problem... ;)


Regards
Christoph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory installed in a
> system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for a script.

  $ cat /proc/meminfo
  MemTotal: 526525152 kB
  [...]
  $


Regards
Christoph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] Amount of physical memory

2005-10-25 Thread Frank.Pikelner
Is there a way to obtain the amount of physical memory installed in a
system from within SuSE 10 console? This is for a script.

 

Thank you,

 

Frank






 
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information 
that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and erase 
this e-mail message immediately.

 
Le present message electronique (y compris les pieces qui y sont annexees, le 
cas echeant) s'adresse au destinataire indique et peut contenir des 
renseignements de caractere prive ou confidentiel. Si vous n'etes pas le 
destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit 
de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire. Si ce message vous a ete 
transmis par erreur, veuillez en informer l'expediteur et le supprimer 
immediatement.
-
 




Re: [opensuse] Smart package manager

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Ken Schneider wrote:

> Trying to use smart on a 9.3 system. When running smart update the cache
> will only build to 91% then the apt crashes with the following:
> 
> smart update suse-93-security-apt
> Traceback (most recent call last):##
> ( 91%)
>   File "/usr/bin/smart", line 193, in ?
> main(sys.argv[1:])
>   File "/usr/bin/smart", line 166, in main
> exitcode = iface.run(opts.command, opts.argv)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/interface.py", line 53,
> in run
> result = _command.main(self._ctrl, opts)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/commands/update.py", line
> 77, in main
> ctrl.reloadChannels()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/control.py", line 375, in
> reloadChannels
> self._cache.load()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/backends/rpm/header.py",
> line 253, in load
> reqdict[(f[i]&7744 and PreReq or Req,
> TypeError: unsubscriptable object
> 
> Any clues on how to fix this?

--- smart/backends/rpm/header.py
+++ smart/backends/rpm/header.py
@@ -246,6 +250,8 @@
 # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_PREUN |
 # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_POST |
 # RPMSENSE_SCRIPT_POSTUN == 7744
+if type(f) != list:
+  f = [f]
 reqdict[(f[i]&7744 and PreReq or Req,
  intern(ni), r, vi)] = True
 reqargs = reqdict.keys()


Regards
Christoph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Amarok and HyperThreading CPUs -- Attn. Pascal Bleser

2005-10-25 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Randall R Schulz wrote:

> According to the exchange (currently) at the bottom of 
> , this has been 
> fixed in 1.3.5.

... this version will hit EDGE very soon (it's already been submitted to 
our build system).


Regards
Christoph

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] Amarok and HyperThreading CPUs -- Attn. Pascal Bleser

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi,

On the off chance that the pertinent parties (Pascal B., are you 
listening?) are unware, the following is what greeted me upon starting 
Amarok after upgrading to the latest release (1.3.3) from Guru's RPM 
repository:

"You are using a processor with the HyperThreading feature enabled. 
Please note that amaroK may be unstable with this configuration.

"If you are experiencing problems, use the Linux kernel option 'NOHT', 
or disable HyperThreading in your BIOS setup.

"More information can be found in the README file. For further 
assistance join us at #amarok on irc.freenode.net."


I think I can attest to the unstability of Amarok, having experienced 
more than one crash in 1.3.1.

According to the exchange (currently) at the bottom of 
, this has been 
fixed in 1.3.5.


Randall Schuzl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Missing compress in SUSE10?

2005-10-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 01:06, Rasmus Plewe wrote:
> ...
> > > > If it mattered to me, I'd probably just put a symlink in my
> > > > ~/bin directory.
> > >
> > > Or even straight into /usr/bin. It seems odd that the script is
> > > there, but the symlink isn't.
> >
> > As to putting the symlink into a central bin directory, I don't
> > like altering the system itself.
>
> I think the ideologically correct place for the symlink would be in
> /usr/local/bin, since you created the symlink yourself and it was not
> put there by the system(-vendor).

Yes, that's probably best.


> Rasmus


RRS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Difference between 'Evaluation Version' and what I purchased?

2005-10-25 Thread Shriramana Sharma
Tuesday 25 Oct 2005 19:23 samaye Jon Nelson alekhiit:

> What, if any, differences are there between the 'Evaluation Version' and
> the copy of SUSE 10.0 that will (hopefully) arrive today or tomorrow?

This question has been previously asked and replied to on this and other 
lists. See the notes to the table at 
http://www.opensuse.org/Download#Release_Table - specifically 1 and 3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Changes to Resetting root password in OSS10?

2005-10-25 Thread Ilker
You may try to press esc when GRUB comes, then press e to edit your boot
parameters.Add these
linux 1 init=/bin/sh

This should do the work.Or maybe boot with a live-cd and edit /etc/shadow...

On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Montag 24 Oktober 2005 21:36 schrieb Shriramana Sharma
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have a graphical GRUB boot menu with multi-OS boot (SUSE and
> > WinXP). How do I access the text mode, since the command you seem to
> > advise is applicable only at the GRUB prompt?/
>
> Hi Shriramana;
>
> press F2 (or F3) at the boot screen and add your additions. (To have
> always a text boot menu: comment out "gfxmenu")
> But I'm afraid you will end up with a line
> Give root password to login:
>
> -- mdc
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [opensuse] Wireless network - reconfigure every reboot

2005-10-25 Thread Ilker
Hi all,
If it'll help you, i also have an unsupported wireless lan card (not intel)
and here's what i've done to get it working:

Installed dhcpcd package.
chmod 777 /sbin/dhcpcd
/sbin/dhcpcd -G  wlan0

and put a shell script at /etc/init.3 (or something like that) includes:

#!/bin/sh
/sbin/dhcpcd -G 192.168.1.1  wlan0

and that completely worked, without any other software.It starts up
automatically on every boot.I'm sorry if this information is not releated
any ways (?).Just you can put a shell script to get it working on every
boot.

On 10/24/05, 'o-Dzin Tridral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If it makes any sense to anyone, there's mention of martians in
> /var/log/messages ... (?)
>
> On 24/10/05, 'o-Dzin Tridral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For me this doesn't seem to make any difference
> >
> > I tried calling it ifcfg-wlan0 and the interface didn't come up. It
> > wouldn't come up when I did the down/up thing either. Then I renamed it
> > ifcfg-eth1. It still wouldn't come up on boot but it would come up if I
> took
> > it down and up again. So just the same as when it had the long name.
> >
> > Is there anything I can get out of the boot message that would show what
> > was happening? eth1 does get a mention during boot but doesn't stay on
> the
> > screen long enough for me to see what happens.
> >
> > I'd appreciate any comments.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > 'o-Dzin
> >
> > On 24/10/05, jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > ByteEnable wrote:
> > >
> > > >copy
> > > >
> > > >ifcfg-wlan-id-00:12:f0:73:7d:a7
> > > >
> > > >to
> > > >
> > > >ifcfg-wlan0
> > > >
> > > >Thats what I had to do on my daughters laptop. I had to rerun yast on
> > > every
> > > >boot until I did that.
> > > >
> > > >Byte
> > > >
> > > >On Sunday 23 October 2005 16:50, 'o-Dzin Tridral wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Dear byte,
> > > >>
> > > >>This is /etc/sysconfig/network
> > > >>
> > > >>drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 368 2005-10-23 22:40 .
> > > >>drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 1584 2005-10-19 23:27 ..
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6979 2005-09-09 17:15 config
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6707 2005-10-19 23:34 dhcp
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 141 2005-09-09 17:15 ifcfg-lo
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5779 2005-09-09 17:15 ifcfg.template
> > > >>-rw--- 1 root root 686 2005-10-21 23:36
> > > ifcfg-wlan-id-00:12:f0:73:7d:a7
> > > >>drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 48 2005-09-09 17:27 if-down.d
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 239 2005-09-09 17:15 ifroute-lo
> > > >>drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 88 2005-10-19 22:55 if-up.d
> > > >>drwx-- 2 root root 48 2005-09-09 17:27 providers
> > > >>drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1336 2005-10-19 22:55 scripts
> > > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5469 2005-10-19 22:54 wireless
> > > >>
> > > >>Is there anything here that I can provide more details about?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thank you!
> > > >>
> > > >>'o-Dzin
> > > >>
> > > >>On 23/10/05, ByteEnable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Could you list the contents of your
> > > >>>
> > > >>>/etc/sysconfig/network
> > > >>>
> > > >>>directory?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Byte
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >-
> > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > In other words , what your saying is to rename:
> > >
> > > ifcfg-wlan-id-00:12:f0:73:7d:a7
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > ifcfg-wlan0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 'ö-Dzin Tridral
> > Caerdydd, Cymru
> > www.spacious-passion.org  <
> http://www.spacious-passion.org>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 'ö-Dzin Tridral
> Caerdydd, Cymru
> www.spacious-passion.org  <
> http://www.spacious-passion.org>
>
>


[opensuse] Difference between 'Evaluation Version' and what I purchased?

2005-10-25 Thread Jon Nelson

What, if any, differences are there between the 'Evaluation Version' and 
the copy of SUSE 10.0 that will (hopefully) arrive today or tomorrow?

I'm not talking about the OSS version.

--
Carpe diem - Seize the day.
Carp in denim - There's a fish in my pants!

Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Shriramana Sharma
Tuesday 25 Oct 2005 17:52 samaye Ken Schneider alekhiit:

> What errors do you get when trying to use YOU? Perhaps it is better to
> fix the problem than dance around it.

YOU freezes at "Getting a list of mirror servers" and after quite a while 
says:

Warning
Cannot fetch remote server list. Only user-defined patch sources will be 
available.
Possible solution:
Check network connection
Details:
URL: http://www.suse.de/cgi-bin/suseservers.cgicouldn't connect to host
[Details] [Retry] [Ignore] [Abort Update]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] Smart package manager

2005-10-25 Thread Ken Schneider
Trying to use smart on a 9.3 system. When running smart update the cache
will only build to 91% then the apt crashes with the following:

smart update suse-93-security-apt
Traceback (most recent call last):##
( 91%)
  File "/usr/bin/smart", line 193, in ?
main(sys.argv[1:])
  File "/usr/bin/smart", line 166, in main
exitcode = iface.run(opts.command, opts.argv)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/interface.py", line 53,
in run
result = _command.main(self._ctrl, opts)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/commands/update.py", line
77, in main
ctrl.reloadChannels()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/control.py", line 375, in
reloadChannels
self._cache.load()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/smart/backends/rpm/header.py",
line 253, in load
reqdict[(f[i]&7744 and PreReq or Req,
TypeError: unsubscriptable object

Any clues on how to fix this?

-- 
Ken Schneider
UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Ken Schneider
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 15:03 +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Tuesday 25 Oct 2005 13:30 samaye Adrian Schroeter alekhiit:
> 
> > It will become available via YOU 
> 
> I've been having problems with YOU and could never get it to work. So till 
> today I have been downloading everything and installing myself.
> 
What errors do you get when trying to use YOU? Perhaps it is better to
fix the problem than dance around it.

-- 
Ken Schneider
UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] thunderbird

2005-10-25 Thread Ken Schneider
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 08:49 +0100, Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> You are correct sir.  I had an old thunderbird in ~/bin ( copied
> over from a previous install from backup ).  Deleted it and all
> fine.  Seems as if ~/bin was being looked at prior to the shared
> bin.
> 
> Thanks for that
> 
> Regards
> 
> F

echo $PATH will show the answer to that question.

-- 
Ken Schneider
UNIX  since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE  since 1998


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] Bug in OpenSSH

2005-10-25 Thread Kunael
Hi all,

I use SuSE 10.0. I installed it some days ago and works fine in general sense 
in my opinion (the increase of speed is great specially).

Today I was working with this SuSE 10 box from another machine using ssh 
connection. The problem is the system crash totally (in remote machine, of 
course); the system doesn't reboot or suspend ssh services, simply appears 
"freeze"... mouse doesn't works, keyboard doesn't works...

When the system crash I was using ssh+screen, so I've try without screen but 
I've got same crash again. 

¿Any idea?

-- 
¡Share your knowledge!

Linux user id 332494  # http://counter.li.org/
PGP id 0xC5ABA76A  # http://pgp.mit.edu/


pgpUonnM2XroL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse] Smart and memory

2005-10-25 Thread Guðlaugur Jóhannesson

Pascal Bleser wrote:

Actually it loads the whole cache (including repository cache information) into 
memory for optimum
speed.


So the dependency calculations are faster


You could also disable that cache and see whether it improves the memory 
consumption (I strongly
assume so).


How do I disable the cache?  is it a good idea?


Please read here for further information:
http://labix.org/smart/faq#head-0f33fad77b42d8aeff51a73100a340a883b2b144

(and please let us know about the results ;))


This one talks about psyco which I disabled, but it only reduced the 
memory consumption to about 140 Mb which was not really worth it because 
the program ran slower.  I guess I will just have to accept it that 
smart needs a large brain.


Thanks anyhow for the tip

--
Guðlaugur Jóhannesson
http://www.hi.is/~gudlaugu
Phone: +354 849 8405

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] thunderbird

2005-10-25 Thread meister
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2005 12:42 schrieb Rasmus Plewe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:02:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2005 09:49 schrieb Francesco Scaglioni
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > ... Seems as if ~/bin was being looked at prior to the shared
> > > bin.
> > on an old *nix system the order was /usr/(s)bin /usr/local/(s)bin.
> > So you always end up with the commands the admin configured. On
> > newer (Linux) systems the order changed: ~/bin /usr/local/bin
> > /usr/bin to give programms that the user installed a chance.
> > The old fashion is more secure and suitable for a multiuser
> > (server) system, the newer fashion is really usefull for a single
> > user (home user) system.

Hi Rasmus,

> I disagree. No user has to have write access to /usr/local. If users
> can write into any directory in the default path: shoot the admin.

yes, you are right. No ordinary user should be able to write 
to /usr/local.

> Would you like to explain why you think it is more secure that /usr
> takes precedence over /usr/local[0]? This would make it very hard for
> the admin to 'replace' commands without altering the installed files.

Because so you always get the command, that came with the distributed os 
and not the 'replaced' one. If you place e.g. a more powerfull "grep" 
command in /usr/local/bin, thats fine for the commandline usage, but 
some os-distributed scripts may fail, because they relay on the "old 
style" command in /usr/bin. Thats a problem I ran in on an old 
SCO-Unix.

> There is a lot of sense in having the order something like
> $HOME/bin;/urs/local/bin;/bin,

ACK

> and there is no other risk than that a 
> user might shoot himself (and not others) in the foot.

Here is /usr/local/bin a question. If you install a new "grep" 
in /usr/local/bin and your co-user installs some pice of software (as 
root (su)), the installer may fail, because of the wrong "grep" being 
used. Sure you can argue "the installer should provide it's own $PATH", 
but most of them just do a "which prog" or even nothing.

> You might 
> however argue about having $HOME/bin in there, I grant you that.

I _love_ ~/bin in front of my $PATH, to overwrite system commands for 
_my own_ user.

> And 
> *sbin* does not belong into a users PATH by default, IMHO.

On my own user, I often put it in, especially while testing new 
(SuSE-)distros. It's an easy way for lazy people :-)

> [0] I tend to think that it always was /usr/local over /usr, in the
> history of Unix, but am not historian enough to be able to prove
> it.

On SCO 3.2 there is /bin;/usr/bin;/usr/local/bin

BTW: The same arguments used here for bin apply also to lib IMHO.

-- mdc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] The contribution place was mistaken.

2005-10-25 Thread Marcus Rueckert
hi,

from few latin chars in your mail it looks like that you tell them
SUSE Linux 10.0 == openSUSE 10.0. this is wrong. sorry.

openSUSE is the project.
SUSE Linux 10.0 is the distribution.
it comes as box and as SUSE Linux 10.0 OSS on the FTP.

correct me if my guess was wrong. :)

darix


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] The contribution place was mistaken.

2005-10-25 Thread Masaru Imai
Sorry.
It was going to contribute to suselinux-ja-ML, and this mail was mistaken, and 
has been sent here.

火曜日 25 10月 2005 19:56、Masaru Imai さんは書きました:
> 今井です。
>
> 今月発売のLinux WORLD12月号ではSUSE Linux10.0
> (openSUSE 10.0RC1)の特集記事が載った訳ですが、
>
> 一番最初にNovell日本法人の岡本さんへのインタビューが顔写真
> 付きで出てますね。
>
> それ以降はSUSE Linuxの紹介になるわけですが、
>
> そのインタビューの後の特集記事Part2でささいな事ではありますが
> 考えようによっては大きな問題が1つあります。
>
> というのもSUSE Linux10.0 FTP版なんて言葉使ってしまってるので
> SUSE Linux10.0=openSUSE 10.0という勘違い?を書いた人本人
> (著者)がしてしまっているので
> SUSE Linux10.0は全てオープンソースのもので構築されている様に
> 書かれておりRealPlayerだのScrobatReader等オープンでないものは
> 含まれていない様に書かれてしまっている点です。
>
> 使う人の評価基準もばらばらなのでこの辺りの誤解?が元でマイナスに
> 働かなければ良いのですが。
>
> Part3のインストール編ではイースターエッグの画面がデフォルトで表示
> されるかの如く書かれてるので付録版で特殊な加工でもされてない限り
> そのへんでクレームがなければ?いいんですけどね。

-- 
~
Masaru Imai
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:  http://www10.ocn.ne.jp/~masimai/

~

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] gcc 3.2

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Schiele
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:10:29PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 22:47, Damian Mihai Liviu wrote:
> > There is no kqemu kernel module because it's not GPL
> 
> Is that because GPL and non-GPL are like software matter and anti-matter 
> annihilating when they come into contact with each other, destroying 
> your computer, you, your home or office and probably the entire state 
> you live in (especially if it's Rhode Island)??

In the first place this is because the author does not allow redistribution
without his explicit consent.

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele  Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpYVoOZM1M9A.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[opensuse] LinuxWORLD12月号にSUSE Linux10.0(正しくはopenSUSE 10.0 RC1)の特集

2005-10-25 Thread Masaru Imai
今井です。

今月発売のLinux WORLD12月号ではSUSE Linux10.0
(openSUSE 10.0RC1)の特集記事が載った訳ですが、

一番最初にNovell日本法人の岡本さんへのインタビューが顔写真
付きで出てますね。

それ以降はSUSE Linuxの紹介になるわけですが、

そのインタビューの後の特集記事Part2でささいな事ではありますが
考えようによっては大きな問題が1つあります。

というのもSUSE Linux10.0 FTP版なんて言葉使ってしまってるので
SUSE Linux10.0=openSUSE 10.0という勘違い?を書いた人本人
(著者)がしてしまっているので
SUSE Linux10.0は全てオープンソースのもので構築されている様に
書かれておりRealPlayerだのScrobatReader等オープンでないものは
含まれていない様に書かれてしまっている点です。

使う人の評価基準もばらばらなのでこの辺りの誤解?が元でマイナスに
働かなければ良いのですが。

Part3のインストール編ではイースターエッグの画面がデフォルトで表示
されるかの如く書かれてるので付録版で特殊な加工でもされてない限り
そのへんでクレームがなければ?いいんですけどね。

-- 
~
今井 優
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:  http://www10.ocn.ne.jp/~masimai/

~

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] ? Howto setup wireless usb adaptor under 9.3

2005-10-25 Thread Simon Crute
On Friday 14 October 2005 02:03, Winston Graeme wrote:
> Okay Ill use this list to actually also for once ask
> for help .. .
>
> Im running SuSE 9.3 retail version.
> I installed various wireless tools from the DVD.
>
> I'm trying to get my wireless internet connection to
> work.
> It is router with internet connection & my computer is
> connected to that (or not in current case xept under
> Windows) via a Belkin USB wireless adaptor.

I've no idea if the belkin usb wireless adaptor will work or not. 

does anything useful show up in /var/log/messages when you plug and unplug the 
adapter ?

does iwconfig show anything useful ?



-- 
Simon Crute
IS&T UKB 
Novell UK

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] thunderbird

2005-10-25 Thread Rasmus Plewe
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:02:20PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2005 09:49 schrieb Francesco Scaglioni 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ... Seems as if ~/bin was being looked at prior to the shared
> > bin.
> 
> on an old *nix system the order was /usr/(s)bin /usr/local/(s)bin. So 
> you always end up with the commands the admin configured. On newer 
> (Linux) systems the order changed: ~/bin /usr/local/bin /usr/bin
> to give programms that the user installed a chance.
> The old fashion is more secure and suitable for a multiuser (server) 
> system, the newer fashion is really usefull for a single user (home 
> user) system.

I disagree. No user has to have write access to /usr/local. If users can
write into any directory in the default path: shoot the admin. 

Would you like to explain why you think it is more secure that /usr
takes precedence over /usr/local[0]? This would make it very hard for
the admin to 'replace' commands without altering the installed files. 

There is a lot of sense in having the order something like 
$HOME/bin;/urs/local/bin;/bin, and there is no other risk than that a
user might shoot himself (and not others) in the foot. You might however
argue about having $HOME/bin in there, I grant you that. And *sbin* does
not belong into a users PATH by default, IMHO. 


Rasmus

[0] I tend to think that it always was /usr/local over /usr, in the
history of Unix, but am not historian enough to be able to prove it. 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Problem with EOS 20D

2005-10-25 Thread jdd

Steven Lamb wrote:

Can you switch the camera mode between Normal and PTP (to PTP if 
possible).


it solve the problem with my 350d. in ptp mode, the camera 
is seen and files can be loaded, it's perfectly seen by digikam


thanks
jdd


--
pour m'écrire, aller sur:
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.net
http://arvamip.free.fr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread meister
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2005 10:02 schrieb Eberhard Moenkeberg 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2 09:57:23 /mirr/bin > dir
> /pub/suse/../projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/ insgesamt

Hi,

one question before I trash my installation: Will this packages work for 
Alpha2 too?

-- mdc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] thunderbird

2005-10-25 Thread meister
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2005 09:49 schrieb Francesco Scaglioni 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ... Seems as if ~/bin was being looked at prior to the shared
> bin.

Hi,

on an old *nix system the order was /usr/(s)bin /usr/local/(s)bin. So 
you always end up with the commands the admin configured. On newer 
(Linux) systems the order changed: ~/bin /usr/local/bin /usr/bin
to give programms that the user installed a chance.
The old fashion is more secure and suitable for a multiuser (server) 
system, the newer fashion is really usefull for a single user (home 
user) system.

-- mdc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Anders Johansson
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 11:33, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> But Eberhard lists the files. Are these files which he lists beta versions
> or what?

Eberhard listed the files from /pub/projects, but nothing in there is 
officially supported, and is installed on your own risk only. It won't be 
official until it hits Online Update

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] kdm refuses to start after apt upgrade

2005-10-25 Thread Kyek, Andreas, VF-DE
Kyek, Andreas, VF-DE wrote:
> 
> I just did an "apt upgrade" to my installed SuSE 10.0
> and now kdm refuses to start.
> 
> apt upgraded lots of packages (including kde and xorg 
> packages)
> 
> The xorg configuration seems to be OK, because a startx
> provides a running fvwm2 session with the desired 
> resolution. The xorg config File was not changed.
> 
> But kdm refuses to start. /var/log/kdm.log shows at its end:
> 
> [...]
> KCrash: Application 'kdmgreet' crashing...
> Unable to start Dr. Konqi
> krootimage: Fatal IO error: client killed
> 
> and I see the prompt again.
> 
> What's going on here?
> 

I answer myself: I was a victim of the already discussed 
fontconfig update from suse-people repository.

I just downgraded to the version from update and I'm fine 
again.

Andreas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Shriramana Sharma
Tuesday 25 Oct 2005 13:30 samaye Adrian Schroeter alekhiit:

> It will become available via YOU 

I've been having problems with YOU and could never get it to work. So till 
today I have been downloading everything and installing myself.

> after passing our testing (and maybe 
> adding further fixes).

But Eberhard lists the files. Are these files which he lists beta versions or 
what?

Shriramana.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] kdm refuses to start after apt upgrade

2005-10-25 Thread Kyek, Andreas, VF-DE
Hi,

I just did an "apt upgrade" to my installed SuSE 10.0
and now kdm refuses to start.

apt upgraded lots of packages (including kde and xorg 
packages)

The xorg configuration seems to be OK, because a startx
provides a running fvwm2 session with the desired 
resolution. The xorg config File was not changed.

But kdm refuses to start. /var/log/kdm.log shows at its end:

[...]
KCrash: Application 'kdmgreet' crashing...
Unable to start Dr. Konqi
krootimage: Fatal IO error: client killed

and I see the prompt again.

What's going on here?

(I allready deleted everything concerning kde, dcop etc.
in /tmp; that did not help)

Any ideas?

Andreas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] gcc 3.2

2005-10-25 Thread Anders Johansson
On Monday 24 October 2005 23:06, Christian Boltz wrote:
> There are even qemu RPMs on the SUSE Linux 10.0 DVD (and the FTP
> servers). Why don't you use just these? ;-)
>
> BTW: If it needed patches to compie, you will find them in the source
> RPM.

You didn't look at it, did you. The qemu source package includes gcc 3.3.5, 
and it first builds it, then uses it to compile qemu

Like I said, there are patches floating around to make qemu work with gcc4, 
but they're not used in the 10.0 package

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] qemu with kqemu howto

2005-10-25 Thread Damian Mihai Liviu
Hi all,

For those of you who want/need qemu with kqemu kernel module support and don't 
have much experience with compiling software I made an article available at 
[1].

[1]http://www.opensuse.org/Qemu_with_kqemu_kernel_module_support

Yours faithfully,
-- 
Damian Mihai Liviu
Phone: +40741226993
URL: http://liviudm.blogspot.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Problem with EOS 20D

2005-10-25 Thread Steven Lamb

Marcus Meissner wrote:


On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:24:14AM +1000, Steven Lamb wrote:
 


Hi,
I have installed Suse 10.0 on my toshiba A70 laptop but I noticed that 
the camera is not being detected via the USB2 port. I have other devices 
which are being detected fine via USB2. 
   



Is it detected on the USB 1 port (if you have any)?

What is the "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" output with the camera attached?

Can you switch the camera mode between Normal and PTP (to PTP if possible).

 

I think it's running in normal mode. I will test tonight see what the 
outcome is.

Thanks

Steve

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.0

2005-10-25 Thread Clayton
> Adding workarounds usually leads to the fact that the bug never gets fixed, 
> so 
> we avoid this usually and better keep the bug visible.
> 
> fc-cache -f would also increase the runtime of SuSEconfig.fonts heavily.

Fair enough... that makes sense, but... then that makes me ask... why
was the broken fontconfig released to the apt repositories then?  Has it
been pulled?  If not it should be... and right away.

I can deal with removing a buggy/broken fontconfig, or if I know I need
to, manually running fc-cache, but... what about all the new users?  On
the SLE list a guy ran into this, and all of his X apps were crashing
(like mine were) and he was so frustrated he is at the point where he is
ready to throw in the proverbial towel and return to Windows.  I've
replied to his posting and pasted in Kaus' workaround solution... but...
this is a pretty significant bug considering that it crashes all X
applications.  I can only wonder how many new users tried out apt, did
an update, figured they trashed their install... and either have to
reinstall (because they don't know to run fc-cache) or they return to
Windows :-(

C.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Re:[opensuse]Wireless Problem in 10.0]

2005-10-25 Thread Reinhard Gimbel


Hi all !

Jim wrote:


BOOTPROTO='dhcp'
MTU=''
REMOTE_IPADDR=''
STARTMODE='auto'
NAME='Intel PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter'
UNIQUE='JNkJ.x2u1_foDyv7'
USERCONTROL='yes'
WIRELESS='yes'
WIRELESS_AP='2WIRE783'
WIRELESS_AUTH_MODE='open'
WIRELESS_BITRATE='auto'
WIRELESS_CHANNEL=''
WIRELESS_ESSID='2WIRE783'
WIRELESS_FREQUENCY=''
WIRELESS_KEY='h:8956-2310-64 open'
WIRELESS_KEY_1=''
WIRELESS_KEY_2=''
WIRELESS_KEY_3=''
WIRELESS_KEY_LENGTH='64'
WIRELESS_MODE='Managed'
WIRELESS_NICK=''
WIRELESS_NWID=''
WIRELESS_POWER='no'
WIRELESS_WPA_PSK=''
_nm_name='bus-pci-:02:03.0'
BROADCAST=''
IPADDR=''
NETMASK=''
NETWORK=''
WIRELESS_CA_CERT=''
WIRELESS_CLIENT_CERT=''
WIRELESS_WPA_IDENTITY=''
WIRELESS_WPA_PASSWORD=''


First off all: My notebook is equipped with an IPW2200BG WLAN port, I'm 
using WPA-PSK instead of WEP and I'm not using "netgo" at this time (I'm 
planning to do that in the future).


My config has some differences:

"USERCONTROL" is set to "no" (I'm not using netgo ?)
"WIRELESS" is not present (no idea ...)
"WIRELESS_AP" is not present (no idea ...)
"WIRELESS_AUTH_MODE" is set to "psk" (I'm using WPA-PSK)
"WIRELESS_KEY" is empty (related to WEP ?)
"WIRELESS_KEY0" is present (empty)
"WIRELESS_POWER" is set to "yes"
"_nm_name" is set to "eth1" (changed that with YaST)

Because of the differences in using WEP and WPA-PSK I don't know which 
of the settings might cause the problems you are experiencing. The 
easiest change in your config could be just to change "_nm_name" to 
"eth1". Give it a try ...


Never give up !

Best regards,
Reinhard.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Problem with EOS 20D

2005-10-25 Thread jdd

Steven Lamb wrote:

Hi,
I have installed Suse 10.0 on my toshiba A70 laptop but I noticed that 
the camera is not being detected via the USB2 port. I have other devices 
which are being detected fine via USB2.

Any help is appreciated.


same with EOS350D, but I tested this only for this answer, 
usually I use a CFreader (danelec) without problem

jdd


--
pour m'écrire, aller sur:
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.net
http://arvamip.free.fr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Missing compress in SUSE10?

2005-10-25 Thread Rasmus Plewe
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:33:39PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 23:27, Per Jessen wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > ...
> >
> > > If it mattered to me, I'd probably just put a symlink in my ~/bin
> > > directory.
> >
> > Or even straight into /usr/bin. It seems odd that the script is
> > there, but the symlink isn't.
> 
> As to putting the symlink into a central bin directory, I don't like 
> altering the system itself.

I think the ideologically correct place for the symlink would be in
/usr/local/bin, since you created the symlink yourself and it was not
put there by the system(-vendor). 


Rasmus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Anders Johansson wrote:

On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:47, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:



Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should
watch to catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes
available?


YaST Online Update. :)


No. It is only under /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.


If Marcus says they will publish Open Office in Online Update then I think we
should take his word for it.

It's true that it's not there yet though. The word was that it would take
around two weeks


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2 09:57:23 /mirr/bin > dir 
/pub/suse/../projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/
insgesamt 1024736
drwxr-xr-x  2 emoenke ftp  4096 2005-10-24 14:28 .
drwxr-xr-x  3 emoenke ftp  4096 2005-10-24 15:23 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp 102868346 2005-10-24 14:26 
OpenOffice_org-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp 245861545 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-2.0.0-0.1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2240042 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-af-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2254911 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-ar-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2261718 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-be-BY-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12567791 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-bg-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2264165 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-ca-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12565193 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-cs-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12177391 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-cy-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12600851 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-da-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  13409143 2005-10-24 14:27 
OpenOffice_org-de-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp 347872342 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-debuginfo-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12227171 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-el-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12281754 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-en-GB-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12844272 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-es-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12767555 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-et-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12251241 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-fi-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12998302 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-fr-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   5955007 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-galleries-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp181291 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-gnome-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2282823 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-gu-IN-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12421368 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-hr-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2329426 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-hu-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp115041 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-hunspell-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12776829 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-it-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  13313040 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-ja-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp182278 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-kde-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12646760 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-ko-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp258312 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-mono-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12192918 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-nb-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2189159 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-nl-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2269354 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-nn-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp 71494 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-officebean-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2250196 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-pa-IN-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12429482 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-pl-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2150387 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-pt-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12811948 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-pt-BR-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  13182224 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-ru-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12639856 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-sk-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2231807 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-sl-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12632163 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-sv-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12298295 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-tr-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12193164 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-vi-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp   2306760 2005-10-24 14:28 
OpenOffice_org-xh-2.0.0-0.1.i586.rpm
-rw-r--r--  1 emoenke ftp  12521605 2005-10-24 

Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Adrian Schroeter
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:47, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> >> Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should
> >> watch to catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes
> >> available?
> >
> > YaST Online Update. :)
>
> No. It is only under /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.

for now.

It will become available via YOU after passing our testing (and maybe adding 
further fixes).

bye
adrian

-- 

Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH,  Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.0

2005-10-25 Thread Adrian Schroeter
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:46, Clayton wrote:
> > Well, if you want to stay with fontconfig-2.3.91 you have to run fc-cache
> > -f after installing fonts, as there is some bug in fontconfig. Its
> > symptom is crashing every X application. As far as I know, OpenOffice 2.0
> > installs some fonts, therefore you should run fc-cache afterwords.
>
> Ahhh... that would explain why everyone is having problems with the
> latest fontconfig update from apt.  Not knowing that you should run
> fc-cache is a HUGE handicap though.  There will be a lot of people with
> broken GUIs in the next couple of days. :-(
>
> Can't this fc-cache -f be included as part of the RPM the same way
> config is done when you install a kernel RPM?  Wonder if the maintainer
> of fontconfig could add that in?  (I don't know enough about how RPMs
> work to know if this is possible... just asking)

Adding workarounds usually leads to the fact that the bug never gets fixed, so 
we avoid this usually and better keep the bug visible.

fc-cache -f would also increase the runtime of SuSEconfig.fonts heavily.

bye
adrian


-- 

Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH,  Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Sommer
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> 
> > > Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should
> > > watch to
> > > catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes available?
> >
> > YaST Online Update. :)
> 
> No. It is only under /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.
> 

But it will appear in YOU very soon.

M.

-- 
Dr. Martin Sommer Product Manager Consumer Products
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, D-90409 Nürnberg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Anders Johansson
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:47, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> >> Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should
> >> watch to catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes
> >> available?
> >
> > YaST Online Update. :)
>
> No. It is only under /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.

If Marcus says they will publish Open Office in Online Update then I think we 
should take his word for it.

It's true that it's not there yet though. The word was that it would take 
around two weeks 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] thunderbird

2005-10-25 Thread Francesco Scaglioni
You are correct sir.  I had an old thunderbird in ~/bin ( copied
over from a previous install from backup ).  Deleted it and all
fine.  Seems as if ~/bin was being looked at prior to the shared
bin.

Thanks for that

Regards

F


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg

Hi,

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:



Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should watch to
catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes available?


YaST Online Update. :)


No. It is only under /projects/OpenOffice.org/10.0-i386/2.0.0-0.1/.

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Re:[opensuse]Wireless Problem in 10.0]

2005-10-25 Thread Francesco Scaglioni
try maybe setting both start modes to manual and then typing 

` netgo "profilename" ` at the command prompt.  Choose profilename to
suit where you are.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.0

2005-10-25 Thread Clayton
> Well, if you want to stay with fontconfig-2.3.91 you have to run fc-cache -f 
> after installing fonts, as there is some bug in fontconfig. Its symptom is 
> crashing every X application. As far as I know, OpenOffice 2.0 installs some 
> fonts, therefore you should run fc-cache afterwords.

Ahhh... that would explain why everyone is having problems with the
latest fontconfig update from apt.  Not knowing that you should run
fc-cache is a HUGE handicap though.  There will be a lot of people with
broken GUIs in the next couple of days. :-(

Can't this fc-cache -f be included as part of the RPM the same way
config is done when you install a kernel RPM?  Wonder if the maintainer
of fontconfig could add that in?  (I don't know enough about how RPMs
work to know if this is possible... just asking)

C.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice 2.0

2005-10-25 Thread Klaus Hartmann
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 07:49 schrieb Clayton:
> ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Today i tried to install OpenOffice 2.0. I use the apt (Synaptic). I got
> > one warning about libs and i ignore. After installation i run KDE but
> > there were no screen. I heard a sound, mouse works but i got just a gray
> > screen. Anybody has a same problem? Is this official OpenOffice from
> > SuSE?
>
> I had the same on 3 different machines - unrelated to OpenOffice though
> (I was already running the latest OOo long before this started
> happening).  I rolled things back to the DVD versions, and the problem
> didn't go away until I reset all of KDE (including qt) back to 3.4.3,
> and fontconfig back to 2.3.2.
>
> If you drop to init 3, and then as user run startx, you'll see loads and
> loads of errors scrolling by.  Problems with kded, and other core KDE
> components.
>
> My suggestion (based on my own experience) is to try rolling font config
> back to 2.3.2, and if that doesn't help, do the same for qt and KDE.

Well, if you want to stay with fontconfig-2.3.91 you have to run fc-cache -f 
after installing fonts, as there is some bug in fontconfig. Its symptom is 
crashing every X application. As far as I know, OpenOffice 2.0 installs some 
fonts, therefore you should run fc-cache afterwords.

Klaus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Problem with EOS 20D

2005-10-25 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:24:14AM +1000, Steven Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed Suse 10.0 on my toshiba A70 laptop but I noticed that 
> the camera is not being detected via the USB2 port. I have other devices 
> which are being detected fine via USB2. 

Is it detected on the USB 1 port (if you have any)?

What is the "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" output with the camera attached?

Can you switch the camera mode between Normal and PTP (to PTP if possible).

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Where to look for SUSE 10.0 OOo 2_00 when it's available?

2005-10-25 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Can the SUSE developers please tell me what place on the web I should watch 
> to 
> catch the SUSE 10.0 version of OOo 2_00 when it becomes available?

YaST Online Update. :)

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]