Re: [opensuse] RC2_RC3 update: package validation failed.
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:33:31AM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I had installed 10.1 RC2 from scratch. Then yesterday I updated to RC3, > using the DVD made from the five CDs. > Does any of this ring a bell? Yes. makeSUSEdvd does not work with RC3. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] RC2_RC3 update: package validation failed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I had installed 10.1 RC2 from scratch. Then yesterday I updated to RC3,
using the DVD made from the five CDs. At the start of the package
installation (dvd phase), I got this message in a pop up message box:
(X) Validation Check Failed
File content
is signed with the following GnuPG key, but the integrity check failed:
ID: A84EDAE89C800ACA
Fingerprint: 79C1 79B2 E1C8 20C1 890F 9994 A84E DAE8 9C80 0ACA
Name: SuSE package Signing Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This means that the file has been changed by accident or by an attacker
since the repository creator signed it. Using it is a big risk
for the integrity ans security of your system.
Use it anyway?
I clicked "yes", but I don't know which exact rpm is the wrong one.
Looking now at the yast logs (which I saved), I find messages related to
the incident:
2006-04-29 12:36:37 <0> linux(2913) [zypp]
ExternalProgram.cc(start_program):280 pid 3215 launched
2006-04-29 12:36:37 <1> linux(2913) [zypp::KeyRing] KeyRing.cc(publicKeys):431
Found key [A84EDAE89C800ACA] [SuSE Package Signing Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
[79C179B2E1C820C1890F9994A84EDAE89C800ACA]
...
2006-04-29 12:36:37 <0> linux(2913) [zypp]
ExternalProgram.cc(start_program):170 Executing 'gpg' '--quiet' '--no-tty'
'--no-greeting' '--no-permission-warning' '--batch' '--homedir'
'/var/tmp/TmpDir.qMTSDH' '-a' '--export' 'A84EDAE89C800ACA'
...
2006-04-29 12:36:37 <1> linux(2913) [zypp::KeyRing]
KeyRing.cc(verifyFileSignatureWorkflow):255 Key A84EDAE89C800ACA SuSE Package
Signing Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is trusted
the messages repeats several times. In fact, I got the the pop message box
at least twice during the phase running from the CD, and 3 or 4 times more
later when it booted and continued the install from the HD.
At the online update phase of the install, I got another error; this one I
could not copy to a png file, beacue print screen key did not work on this
phase, so I had to copy by hand:
Dependency conflict
patch zypp-1285-0.noarch [20060429-201531] can not be installed due to a
missing...
(out of screen, couldn't see the rest)
there are no providers of zmd==7.0.1.0-12 for patch zypp
I selected "ignore" and it continued; but next time I looked back it was
asking the same thing, with two identical conflicts. I ignored again. This
time I watched the screen and I noticed that it said that yast has been
updated and needed to be restarted, so it did and looped back to the
online update, this time with a conflict of three identical packages! So
this time I canceled and continued the install.
I keep full logs of the incidents.
/var/log/YaST2/badlist:
2 packages failed
patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[20060429-201531] cannot be installed due to missing
dependencies
patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/linux/suse.com/suse/update/10.1/]
cannot be installed due to missing dependencies
/var/log/YaST2/y2log-1
2006-04-29 20:15:31 <1> earendil(3977) [zypp::SourceManager]
SourceManager.cc(sourceTableAdd):106 SourceManager add
Source[4|YUM|20060429-201531]{http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/linux/suse.com/suse/update/10.1/(/)}
...
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver]
QueueItemRequire.cc(process):586 Unfulfilled requirement '[atom] (namedcap)
libzypp-zmd-backend == 7.1.1.0-17'. trying different solution
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver]
ResolverQueue.cc(processOnce):269 did something: 3 qitems
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver] ResolverQueue.cc(spew):416
Resolver Queue:
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver] ResolverQueue.cc(spew):424
[Uninstall: UITh_[patch]zypp-1285-0.noarch (unsatisfied dependency), Triggered
By [atom] (namedcap) libzypp-zmd-backend == 7.1.1.0-17]
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver] ResolverQueue.cc(spew):424
[Uninstall: UITh_[patch]zypp-1285-0.noarch (unsatisfied dependency), Triggered
By [atom] (namedcap) libzypp == 0.0.8-105]
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <0> earendil(3977) [solver] ResolverQueue.cc(spew):424
[Uninstall: UITh_[patch]zypp-1285-0.noarch (unsatisfied dependency), Triggered
By [atom] (namedcap) zmd == 7.1.1.0-12]
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <2> earendil(3977) [solver]
ResolverContext.cc(addError):1161 Error: ResolverInfo
patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[20060429-201531] Error!>>There are no installable
providers of zmd == 7.1.1.0-12 for patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[20060429-201531]<<,
Trigger: none
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <2> earendil(3977) [solver]
ResolverContext.cc(addError):1161
2006-04-29 20:16:51 <2> earendil(3977) [solver]
ResolverContext.cc(addError):1161 Error: ResolverInfo
patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[20060429-201531] Error!>>There are no installable
providers of libzypp == 0.0.8-105 for
patch:zypp-1285-0.noarch[20060429-201531]<<, Trigger: none
Does any of this ring a bell?
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made wi
Re: [opensuse] Error with Yast2 module answering machine
Am Sonntag, 30. April 2006 23:03 schrieb J Sloan:
> Thomas Ohms wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > New to this list let me say "Hello" to everybody and bring forward my
> > problem.
> >
> > To figure out if it is a bug or my fault here is what I have recognized:
> >
> > When starting the module answering_machine of Yast2 in console, I get the
> > following error twice a time:
> >
> > Can't exec "ypcat": Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden (<--means "file
> > or directory could not be found) at
> > /usr/lib/YaST2/servers_non_y2/ag_nis line 83, line 1 (#1)
> > (W exec) A system(), exec(), or piped open call could not execute the
> > named program for the indicated reason. Typical reasons include: the
> > permissions were wrong on the file, the file wasn't found in
> > $ENV{PATH}, the executable in question was compiled for another
> > architecture, or the #! line in a script points to an interpreter
> > that can't be run for similar reasons. (Or maybe your system doesn't
> > support #! at all.)
> >
> > I am using SuSE 10.0.
> > So is there something I have done wrong or is it bug I could report?
>
> Is the yp-tools package installed? (odd that answering_machine would need
> it)
>
> Joe
Yes, it is! Any idea?
pgpAtY03OcIfl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [opensuse] Error with Yast2 module answering machine
Thomas Ohms wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> New to this list let me say "Hello" to everybody and bring forward my problem.
>
> To figure out if it is a bug or my fault here is what I have recognized:
>
> When starting the module answering_machine of Yast2 in console, I get the
> following error twice a time:
>
> Can't exec "ypcat": Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden (<--means "file or
> directory could not be found) at
> /usr/lib/YaST2/servers_non_y2/ag_nis line 83, line 1 (#1)
> (W exec) A system(), exec(), or piped open call could not execute the
> named program for the indicated reason. Typical reasons include: the
> permissions were wrong on the file, the file wasn't found in
> $ENV{PATH}, the executable in question was compiled for another
> architecture, or the #! line in a script points to an interpreter that
> can't be run for similar reasons. (Or maybe your system doesn't support
> #! at all.)
>
> I am using SuSE 10.0.
> So is there something I have done wrong or is it bug I could report?
Is the yp-tools package installed? (odd that answering_machine would need it)
Joe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Error with Yast2 module answering machine
Hi there!
New to this list let me say "Hello" to everybody and bring forward my problem.
To figure out if it is a bug or my fault here is what I have recognized:
When starting the module answering_machine of Yast2 in console, I get the
following error twice a time:
Can't exec "ypcat": Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden (<--means "file or
directory could not be found) at
/usr/lib/YaST2/servers_non_y2/ag_nis line 83, line 1 (#1)
(W exec) A system(), exec(), or piped open call could not execute the
named program for the indicated reason. Typical reasons include: the
permissions were wrong on the file, the file wasn't found in
$ENV{PATH}, the executable in question was compiled for another
architecture, or the #! line in a script points to an interpreter that
can't be run for similar reasons. (Or maybe your system doesn't support
#! at all.)
I am using SuSE 10.0.
So is there something I have done wrong or is it bug I could report?
Greets
Thomas
pgpODv4rt2uks.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[opensuse] want to run an acucobol aplication in SuSE 10.0
Hi everyone I want to know if there exists an iBCS for SuSE 10.0 and where to find it. I'm trying to run an aplication compiled using acucobol in SuSE 10.0. I had used acucobol without any difficulty from SuSE 7.3 until SuSE 9.0 and I want to move my aplication to SuSE 10.0. Thanks in advance...! __ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] problems with ncurses in SuSE 10.0
Hi everyone: I'm having problems with ncurses and the encoding of SuSE 10.0. When I compile any program using ncurses it mess up all the screen and I can't see the right characters are supposed to be shown when I run the program as it used to be in SuSE 9.0. I tried "export LANG=us_US" and some other possible solutions to this issue but none of them worked out. Please, if some body can help me, I'll be endlessly glad of it. __ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] openSUSE @ Google Summer of Code 2006
Ooh, I just thought of one. Actually, I didn't so much think of it now as a while ago in my blog[1]. Is it too late to suggest ideas? A GTK+ frontend to YaST would be very cool. [1] http://rubberturnip.org.uk/index.cgi/2006/04/22#20060422 -- James Ogley [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://usr-local-bin.org Packages for SUSE: http://usr-local-bin.org/rpms Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/imin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User Restrictions (not Child Protection).
Am So 30.04.2006 03:05 schrieb Peter Flodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In a Microsoft Windows domain there is something called Global Policy, > which means on a per user and per machine, I could lock down all sort > of settings. eg I could hide control panels, Internet Explorer, > ability to get to a command line, various system rights etc by just > checking boxes. And it would apply to my selection of users and/or > computers in the network. > > I am well aware that many of these restriction can be setup in Linux, > but there is no central tool (that I am aware of) that I can use to do > this. eg define these group of settings, restrictions, application > settings and apply them to these Users. Yes! This is pretty much exactly what I meant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Giving up on Nvidia fx5500 - what other pci vid card has good drivers?
Am Sonntag, 30. April 2006 13:54 schrieb Clayton: > I honestly have yet to see (personally) a single case of an ATI > card actually working correctly in Linux (and this is over 8 years > of full time Linux use and support). does a 5 years old atri rage mobility m3 count? basically the laptop version of a rage128, 8megs ram, 3d support (within the limits of what that chip can do) is working flawlessly. but as soon as we're talking radeon, I agree 110%. bye, MH - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Giving up on Nvidia fx5500 - what other pci vid card has good drivers?
And my experience has been just the opposite Clayton. The NVidia cards have been a nightmare for me This is cannot understand... no really I can't, at least not in the last... say... 1 or 2 years since SUSE has been providing the nVidia driver in YOU. Setting up an nVdida card for basic use (ie single monitor with 3GL enabled) has been a no brainer on install. I have done it dozens of times on dozens of machines. In contrast, ATI has been a total nightmare. We used to use ATI where I work - a 100% Linux company. Not one of the developers was able to get the ATI card to set up correctly. We are not talking a bunch of Linux newbies here... this is a team of highly skilled developers that know their Linux inside and out. One lucky guy in the team got an nVidia card by mistake (IT dept ordered it instead of ATI for some reason). He fired up his new computer and installed Linux... and was up and running within a hour from a bare machine. Meanwhile the rest of us poor sods with ATI were still figting the broken ATI installer, wading our way though crap documentation from ATI.. swearing a lot. We finally did get the ATI machines working, but only barely, and they are so fragile it is ridiculous. Every time you make the slightest change to the system.. bam, you're down to run level 3 until you figure out why the video has broken. Everyone finally got so fed up with the ATI cards they were all tossed in the trash and nVidias were installed. 2 minutes after boot, all systems were up and running with full 3GL and no video problems at all anymore. I honestly have yet to see (personally) a single case of an ATI card actually working correctly in Linux (and this is over 8 years of full time Linux use and support). doubt there has been a single nVidia card user or very few that hasn't had to get help on the suse-e list. This may be true from 3 years or more ago, but now...?? It's a rare person with problems with nVidia. C. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] openSUSE @ Google Summer of Code 2006
On Thursday 27 April 2006 20:59, Christoph Thiel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > openSUSE has just been accepted at Google Summer of Code 2006! > > We are now looking for ideas, proposals, projects, etc. around openSUSE > and SUSE Linux, that could be worked on in Google Summer of Code. As the > period of application for SoC is already very short, we need to get our > proposals for project online May 1st, 2006, at the latest. > > So, for example, if you are missing a certain YaST module, or a special > feature in the distribution, speak up now! > > Our proposals will be publish on http://en.opensuse.org/SoC2006 shortly. > > > Regards > Christoph > Late Proposal I propose SUSE Firewall 3. The purpose of this module would be to allow an advanced user to move onto a more advanced firewall system with out having to resort to iptables directly. This module will work with the SUSE FW2 definitions, But offer an additional GUI to define advanced (to professional) firewall configuration settings. My proposal is that to incorporate www.FWBuilder.org to do this. FWBuilder has one of the best gui's for building firewall available. It is often compared to SyncPoint (Mega $ closed source system, defacto standard). Additionally, FWBuilder has a momentum, (ie. a large group of Firewall / security experts who are constantly improving and checking the "Rule generators"). I've mentioned this in the FWBuilder developer lists, (as a prove of concept). They seam to approve of the Idea, and immediately started thinking about changes to FWBuilder that would make it work better for the project. Here the jist of our discusions: Proposal build a interface between YAST fw definitions and FWBuilder: > Can you use all FWBuilder functions via the API? >> No. >> ... >> You can also look at the fwbedit utility in the fwbuilder 2.1, we've >> added ability to create objects in it so one could do this just by >> calling this simple command line tool. You need to check the latest >> code out of cvs to look at 2.1 code. > fwbedit sounds like just what I need... >> but you still need to add rules ... Fwbedit does not do that, it was >> intended as a simple command-line tool to manage objects. There were >> requests from users for a way to add objects in bulk, say, from a >> spreadsheet or some configuration file they could parse. > Okay, but I think I can get around that as follows: > > The firewall will be pre-configured with rules. The configuration > is done by > using the pre-defined rules based the following service groups: > > Service Group Description > Ext2Srv Services (ports) Allowed From Internet to Server > Ext2Lcl Services (ports) allowed from Internet to Local Network > Lcl2Ext Services (ports) allowed from Local network to Internet > Lcl2Srv Services (ports) allowed from Local Network to Server > Client2Srv Serives (ports) allowed from Client Pc's to Server > Srv2Ext Services (ports) allowed from Server to Internet > Srv2Lcl Services (ports) allowed from Server to Local Network > > > Then with fwbedit I can just need to add the ports to the correct > predefined > group, and recompile... > > Does this sound feasible? > >> yes, absolutely. Good idea. >> do not forget about an option "Ignore empty groups". The thing is, if >> any of these groups becomes empty, you do not want the rule to treat >> it as "any". > Note: This is not meant to replace the fwbuilder gui, but as a > method of > transition from the SUSE firewall definitions to fwbuilder... > > I still ain't figured out how SUSE yast will work with fwbuilder > after the > transition, but, one step at a time... > >> may be yast does not have to work with it after all. You can start >> with preconfigured set of standard rules in the policy and make your >> code recognize them and put objects in the groups you listed above. >> The rest of the policy can be managed by fwbuilder GUI outside of >> yast should user want to expand it. The user will be able to add >> rules before or after your rules. There is a risk of user deleting >> rules used by yast, for now you can only put some scary comment and >> color them red or something to make it clear they are used by yast. I >> wonder if I should expand the scope of the attribute "read-only" to >> rules... >>vk That's my proposal folks... Jerry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] openSUSE @ Google Summer of Code 2006
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, James Ogley wrote: > > How about a YaST-module for configuring/setting up Xgl? > > That would seem to make more sense integrated into SaX2 rather than > YaST... Well, it' actually there already -- have you guys tried "gnome-xgl-settings" from the latests compiz package? I just found it by accident while preparing my laptop for LinuxTag and I have to admit, I liked it a lot! Regards Christoph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Giving up on Nvidia fx5500 - what other pci vid card has good drivers?
Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 22:34 schrieb M.Blackmore: > I've given up on trying to make a nvidia fx5500 work with Suse 10.0, > can't even get it to complete installation using the graphics installer, > and can't get it to start X even when using fx86config to try and set up > a basic. > > What other video card chipset has a good driver support with suse? There > was an ATI Radeon something there, but I recall ATI has had a reputation > for poor support. Has this improved? (My wife dropped by the shop on a > trip into town but can't remember the exact model). > > Almost all that seem to be in the local shop are using that super pci > wotsit, but I'm about 3yrs out of date with my motherboard and haven't > been keeping up with developments (so can't even remember the name of > the new slot standard...) I have on my machines here: nVidia GeForce Ti4600 - no problems, automatically recognised, automatically set-up and automatic download of nVidia drivers through YOU nVidia GeForce FX5700LE - no problems, automatically recognised, automatically set-up and automatic download of nVidia drivers through YOU nVidia GeForce FX5900XT - no problems, automatically recognised, automatically set-up and automatic download of nVidia drivers through YOU nVidia GeForce FX6600GT - no problems, automatically recognised, automatically set-up and automatic download of nVidia drivers through YOU SiS laptop chipset circa 2000 - no problems, automatically recognised, automatically set-up. ATi Mobility X700 - automatically recognised, doesn't set-up to a usable configuration, must download and install ATi drivers before any graphics environment can be used, need to manually re-install display driver after Kernel updates, no 3D support, a total PITA... Thinking of throwing away a perfectly good laptop and replacing it with either a nVidia based laptop or a MacBook Pro... -- "I got to go figure," the tenant said. "We all got to figure. There's some way to stop this. It's not like lightning or earthquakes. We've got a bad thing made by men, and by God that's something we can change." - The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] openSUSE @ Google Summer of Code 2006
Op vrijdag 28 april 2006 10:43, schreef Christoph Thiel: > > We are now looking for ideas, proposals, projects, etc. around openSUSE > > and SUSE Linux, that could be worked on in Google Summer of Code. As the > > period of application for SoC is already very short, we need to get our > > proposals for project online May 1st, 2006, at the latest. > > > > So, for example, if you are missing a certain YaST module, or a special > > feature in the distribution, speak up now! > > I know quite some people are using the SMART Package Manager these days: > So, I'm going to propose some extensions to SMART to handle the new > rpm-md+ based update channels for SUSE Linux, including deltarpm support, > etc. Maybe a QT GUI for SMART would be a nice feature as well, eh? Is > there anything else that you are missing in SMART that could be addressed > by a SoC project? What about a repodata enabled _repository_ I really mean repository and not a bunch of directories scattered around a server, like it is now. Have a look at my apt (repodata enabled) sources.list file: repomd ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/kolab suse-10.1 repomd ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/ suse repomd ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/suse/update 10.1 repomd ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/suse/install/10.1/SUSE-Linux10.1-RC2-Extra suse repomd ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/apt4rpm rpmkeys It's a big mess. It's not the apt way of doing with all components in 1 place, like e.g: rpm ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/ SuSE/10.1-i386 packman usr-local-bin When will there be a centralized package repository for suse (including 3rd party contributred packages). The repository should provide a list of all packages and files in the repository (including on the not subscribed channels/components). -- Richard Bos Without a home the journey is endless - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
