Re: [opensuse] kde 4
See: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE4 If you also want to do some developer testing: You can also install 11.0 Alpha0 but then you need to do a factory update or the foctory install of KDE4 as mentioned on the link above. As KDE4 of alpha doesn't work yet. http://software.opensuse.org/developer William Biggs wrote: > I would like to know how it install kde 4 > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Bye all
Hello Aniruddha, I don't know if ever been at the fosdem in Belgium: http://www.fosdem.org/ . There have been quite a few discussions how to handle the buildservice tree. I think it would be very good if you'd come to the fosdem, as i assume de openSuSE people will also been there. The people at openSuSE are very open to improvements. I'd say come to the fosdem. You'll also be able to meet up with gentoo people as they are also there at least last year. By the way i think it's impossible to give security guaranties for tries that are maintained by maintainers who are doing it in their space time. Also because some packages might be maintained by one person. If the person is not able to build the fixed package, for what ever reason, after a fixed security bug you end up with a potentially dangerous package. I cant imagine this doesn't apply for gentoo. By the way I'm very happy with and thankful for the people who use the spare time building and maintaining packages and doing other work for openSuSE. Regards, Joop. Aniruddha wrote: > I would like to say goodbye. During an discussion on the Packman mailing > list about the security policy of the Packman repo (see > http://schiffbauer.net/pipermail/packman/2007-November/thread.html ) I > realized openSUSE isn't what I looking for. To be honest this has also > something to do with the rude manner in which my questions were > answered. > > I really liked openSUSE 10.3 and the roadmap that lays ahead. I wish you > all good luck and thanks for helping me with all my questions. For now > I'll restore my Gentoo image and I will concentrate on building a Gentoo > distribution. > > @About The Dutch Mailing List > Unfortunately this also means I can't continue my support for the Dutch > mailing list. I hope you understand and sorry for the inconvenience. > > > @Freek > I am really sorry but this means I won't be able to help out with the > Dutch wiki. > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Ext3 vs Reiser FS
David C. Rankin wrote: > Daniel Bauer wrote: > >> On Monday 10 September 2007, Kai Ponte wrote: >> >>> On Monday 10 September 2007 07:05, Frank Fiene wrote: >>> On Montag, 10. September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am about to install openSuSE 10.2 on two new computers and see that > the 10.2 default file system is ext3 and not Reiser. I'd like some > advice as whether to accept the ext3 default or to go with Reiser as > I have in the past. > reiserfs is dead! > > Not entirely, Reiserfs 3x is finished and is not going to receive > further development. Reiserfs 4x is not complete, *but* the jury is > still out on whether, and how much, development is currently taking place. > > see http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html and > http://www.namesys.com/install_v4.html > > >>> No, his wife is. >>> >>> >> Maybe. Maybe not. Nobody (of us) knows. >> >> Having good (well: a lot of) expertise in media I don't believe a single >> word >> I read or hear in the news. >> >> Regarding reiserfs: >> >> I still use it, it survived several sudden power-downs, I'm happy with it, >> having countless text, photo and tar.gz files from some Kilobytes up to >> hundreds of MB's. Don't know, if that's very efficient, but it's fast and it >> works reliably (knock on wood). >> >> > > Me too. I would add 'at least 100' sudden power-downs and I have never > lost a single file. Additional Me Too of (knock on wood) > > >> I'm just confused by the discussions I read here on this list. But apart >> from >> personal beliefs I havn't read a lot of helpful postings in this regard >> here, >> regrettably. It sometimes reminds me of the Win-Linux discussions (mine is >> better than yours, nyaaah nyaaah nyaaah) >> >> Well, some were serious, I must admit... >> >> Daniel >> >> > > see also: http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html on the large/small > file advantages/disadvantages. > This another great Link: http://linuxgazette.net/122/piszcz.html > I have used both and for my use I have no complaints about either.. > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Ext3 vs Reiser FS
Hello Buddy, This is a link with descriptions of Linux file systems by Novell/SuSE it's not recent but still valid. http://www.novell.com/documentation/suse91/suselinux-adminguide/html/apas02.html Regards, Joop Boonen. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am about to install openSuSE 10.2 on two new computers and see that the > 10.2 default file system is ext3 and not Reiser. I'd like some advice as > whether to accept the ext3 default or to go with Reiser as I have in the > past. > > I have two 500 GB SATA II drives. My programs do lots of file I/O and can > generate files as large as 15-20 GB in some of my scientific applications. > > Any advice you could give is greatly appreciated. > > Buddy Coffey > Applied Research Associates > Computational and Applied Electromagnetics > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Autopackage ?
Hello All, It seems an autopackage system exists. I'd like to know how people especially the people @ Novell/SuSE think about this? Will it be added to openSuSE? http://autopackage.org/ An article about packing systems. http://polishlinux.org/linux/the-future-of-packaging-software-in-linux/ Regards, Joop Boonen. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Opensuse is not free
Maybe it's best to inform http://www.zegeniestudios.net/ . That the info on their site isn't correct? Regards, Joop Boonen. On Mon, October 23, 2006 11:37 pm, Marcel Mourguiart wrote: > 2006/10/23, Joop Boonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I think the reason why the say it's not free. Is because they think de >> boxed version is also openSuSE. Even tough it's called "SUSE(r) Linux >> 10.1". >> I don't think it's openSuSE. It's based on openSuSE with additional >> packages like: >> Also included in SUSE Linux 10.1 are proprietary software packages such >> as >> Adobe* Reader, RealPlayer*, Macromedia* Flash Player and Java*, plus a >> variety of features that simplify Windows-to-Linux migration. Users can >> replace their existing operating system with Linux or install Linux >> alongside it to experience Linux in a "trial" setting, without affecting >> their existing software installations. > > SUSE Linux 10.1 = openSUSE 10.1 > > Is the same thing, the "GM" CDs are exactly the same ones you found in > the BOX, you can found there real player, java, etc. > > Here you can download Suse Linux 10.1 for free ( gratis ): > http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/SL-10.1/iso/ > > You can download from here the DVD with full non-free software but > completely gratis. > http://mirrors.kernel.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/non-oss-dvd-iso/ > > What you buy with the box is not the software, but the media and the > support. > > What is different is the _Novell enterprise_ version " SUSE Linux > Enterprise 10", wish is based on Suse Linux 10.1 > > -- > Marcel Mourguiart > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Opensuse is not free
I think the reason why the say it's not free. Is because they think de boxed version is also openSuSE. Even tough it's called "SUSE® Linux 10.1". I don't think it's openSuSE. It's based on openSuSE with additional packages like: Also included in SUSE Linux 10.1 are proprietary software packages such as Adobe* Reader, RealPlayer*, Macromedia* Flash Player and Java*, plus a variety of features that simplify Windows-to-Linux migration. Users can replace their existing operating system with Linux or install Linux alongside it to experience Linux in a trial setting, without affecting their existing software installations. quote from the questionnaire: In addition, we found these matches, sorted by how well they match: OpenSuSE The openSUSE project is a community program sponsored by Novell. Promoting the use of Linux everywhere, this program provides free, easy access to the world's most usable Linux distribution, SUSE Linux. OpenSUSE delivers everything that Linux developers and enthusiasts need to get started with Linux. Hosted at opensuse.org, the project features easy access to builds and releases. It also offers extensive community development programs for open access to the development process used to create SUSE Linux. Visit OpenSuSE at: http://www.opensuse.org/Failed these criteria: # The full version is not free (gratis) Regards, Joop Boonen. On Mon, October 23, 2006 12:54 am, Marcel Mourguiart wrote: > Acording to this test, wish i run for fun, full version of opensuse is > not free ( gratis ) > http://www.zegeniestudios.net/ldc/index.php?firsttime=true > > Maybe somebody from suse could send a email to Daniel Andre, to explain > this. > > -- > Marcel Mourguiart > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Opensuse is not free
I think the reason why the say it's not free. Is because they think de boxed version is also openSuSE. Even tough it's called "SUSE® Linux 10.1". I don't think it's openSuSE. quote from the questionnaire: In addition, we found these matches, sorted by how well they match: OpenSuSE The openSUSE project is a community program sponsored by Novell. Promoting the use of Linux everywhere, this program provides free, easy access to the world's most usable Linux distribution, SUSE Linux. OpenSUSE delivers everything that Linux developers and enthusiasts need to get started with Linux. Hosted at opensuse.org, the project features easy access to builds and releases. It also offers extensive community development programs for open access to the development process used to create SUSE Linux. Visit OpenSuSE at: http://www.opensuse.org/ Failed these criteria: # The full version is not free (gratis) Regards, Joop Boonen. On Mon, October 23, 2006 12:54 am, Marcel Mourguiart wrote: > Acording to this test, wish i run for fun, full version of opensuse is > not free ( gratis ) > http://www.zegeniestudios.net/ldc/index.php?firsttime=true > > Maybe somebody from suse could send a email to Daniel Andre, to explain > this. > > -- > Marcel Mourguiart > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Upstart (Ubuntu)
All, I've read that Ubuntu is going to use Upstart ( http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ ). I'm wondering how openSuSE is thinking about Upstart? If openSuSE and/or other distributions are staying with sysv init or moving to upstart? (Some in the sysv camp and others in upstart camp). Will it break the LSB? Regards, Joop. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] experiences with sataII hardware raid
All, I want to buy a main board with sataII raid. Does someone have any experience in this field. Which controllers/main board work will in hardware raid? In combination with OpenSuSE? Regrads, Joop Boonen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] SuSE ON slashdot (Easy way to write drivers)
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/17/1611231.shtml http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060517/sfw026.html?.v=53 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] backup question to y'all
houghi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:45:29PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote: > >> Of course, you should have a SSH key (passphrase protection recommended) >> to allow passwordless login to the server you want to backup - and the >> public key on the server's ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file. >> > > How to do that can be seen on http://houghi.org/ssh > A complete explanation is given there. > > May be it's also usefull to put some information about the ssh-agent in this like? > houghi > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] SUSE version naming
houghi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:46:08PM +0200, Joop Boonen wrote: > >> I think it's the numbering is very logical. Only for 10.x it was a bit out >> of tune. >> >> X.0 is the pre new kernel version. >> 8.0 was pre 2.4 kernel (2.4 was test kernel) 8.1 was 2.4 kernel >> 9.0 was pre 2.6 kernel (2.6 was test kernel) 9.1 was 2.6 kernel >> > > Please do not toppost. > It is incorrect. 8.0 was 2.4.18 and 7.3 was 2.4.9., 7.1 was 2.2 as was 6.4 > Then 10.0 should have been called 8.3 or even lower as 4.3 > It also is very illogical. 0 should never be the last, it should be the > first. > > > I've already dsent a correction. 7.0 was pre 2.4. I think 7.0 would have been 2.4 and 9.0 would have been 2.6. But the finale release didn't match the planned date. So this would have persponed the release. >> I personally prefer numbers as the dat or some wierd name doesn't mean >> anything to me. x.1 id newer than x.0. That is very clear. Look the latest >> version up on the internet. >> > > I also would not like a name. Or at least not ONLY a name. It should be > someting that identifies the date. > > >> I hope SuSE will never move to NT, 2000, XP, Vista etc. Instead of 4.0, >> 4.1, 5 and 5.1? >> > > 2000 is OK as a name if you publish it in 2000 and it is the only version > coming out that year. > > What is the advantage of numbering with the year? Only M$ uses names. I haven't heart any objections for Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, Netware, MAC OS X. >> (May be an option might be an odd and even sceam like with the kernel, odd >> is test/unstable even is stable?) >> > > That is not the case anymore. > > Oh! Another way of numbering could be using the first few digits of the > Unix time. :-) Just see wich ones are needed to determine the month or > period of the month and have the rest asued to be filled with 0. > > houghi > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] SUSE version naming
Correction 8.x should be 7.x (kernel 2.4) 8.0 was because of kde 3.0 Regards, Joop. On Sun, April 16, 2006 4:46 pm, Joop Boonen wrote: > I think it's the numbering is very logical. Only for 10.x it was a bit out > of tune. > > X.0 is the pre new kernel version. > 8.0 was pre 2.4 kernel (2.4 was test kernel) 8.1 was 2.4 kernel > 9.0 was pre 2.6 kernel (2.6 was test kernel) 9.1 was 2.6 kernel > > My opion 10.0 was pre red carpet and other novell tools 10.1 has al this > inside. An ofcourse the market made them move to 10. Solaris 10, Mandriva > 10, Redhat 10 etc. > > I personally prefer numbers as the dat or some wierd name doesn't mean > anything to me. x.1 id newer than x.0. That is very clear. Look the latest > version up on the internet. > > I hope SuSE will never move to NT, 2000, XP, Vista etc. Instead of 4.0, > 4.1, 5 and 5.1? > > (May be an option might be an odd and even sceam like with the kernel, odd > is test/unstable even is stable?) > > Regards, > > Joop. > > > > On Sun, April 16, 2006 1:00 pm, houghi wrote: >> I am curious how SUSE decides when a version goes from X.0 to Y.0. >> e.g. SUSE 9.0 was more, I think a buniness decision. SUSE 10.0 was due >> to >> the step to openSUSE. >> >> I can see no real technical reasons (anymore) to keep this up. I also >> believe that it might confuse people. Some people say that they stay >> with >> 9.3, till 10.1 comes out, because they do not trust .0 releases. >> >> I think that 10.0 is closer to 9.3 then 10.1 is to 10.0 and that 10.1 is >> more of a new line then 10.0 was. >> >> So will SUSE keep these version numbers and if so what are the decisions >> to go to 11 (It goes to eleven :-) >> >> I personally would drop the numbers and go with dates. e.g. `SUSE 2005 >> Spring` instead of SUSE 10.1. >> >> houghi >> -- >> Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es >> ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk >> und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun >> - Johannes Müller-Elmau >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] SUSE version naming
I think it's the numbering is very logical. Only for 10.x it was a bit out of tune. X.0 is the pre new kernel version. 8.0 was pre 2.4 kernel (2.4 was test kernel) 8.1 was 2.4 kernel 9.0 was pre 2.6 kernel (2.6 was test kernel) 9.1 was 2.6 kernel My opion 10.0 was pre red carpet and other novell tools 10.1 has al this inside. An ofcourse the market made them move to 10. Solaris 10, Mandriva 10, Redhat 10 etc. I personally prefer numbers as the dat or some wierd name doesn't mean anything to me. x.1 id newer than x.0. That is very clear. Look the latest version up on the internet. I hope SuSE will never move to NT, 2000, XP, Vista etc. Instead of 4.0, 4.1, 5 and 5.1? (May be an option might be an odd and even sceam like with the kernel, odd is test/unstable even is stable?) Regards, Joop. On Sun, April 16, 2006 1:00 pm, houghi wrote: > I am curious how SUSE decides when a version goes from X.0 to Y.0. > e.g. SUSE 9.0 was more, I think a buniness decision. SUSE 10.0 was due to > the step to openSUSE. > > I can see no real technical reasons (anymore) to keep this up. I also > believe that it might confuse people. Some people say that they stay with > 9.3, till 10.1 comes out, because they do not trust .0 releases. > > I think that 10.0 is closer to 9.3 then 10.1 is to 10.0 and that 10.1 is > more of a new line then 10.0 was. > > So will SUSE keep these version numbers and if so what are the decisions > to go to 11 (It goes to eleven :-) > > I personally would drop the numbers and go with dates. e.g. `SUSE 2005 > Spring` instead of SUSE 10.1. > > houghi > -- > Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es > ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk > und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun > - Johannes Müller-Elmau > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] IPV6
Hello All, Has someone set-up ipv6 over ipv4 with opensuse. Do you need freenet6 for this. Or can you get a ipv6 also elsewhere so you get an assigned slice? Regards, Joop Boonen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] 2006-03-07 status meeting
Hello All, I see this item: CDB/HCL - hardware database efforts --the_dude (?) didnt happen on 2006-02-07 - but it shouldn't be forgotten ;-) On: http://en.opensuse.org/2006-03-07-status-meeting Can someone please enlighten this? Is it related to a hardware database of beta testers? Regards, Joop. On Thu, March 2, 2006 11:29 pm, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > I just put some points to the agenda of the > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-03-07-status-meeting > > I also checked the old meeting minutes for open action items. Here's > what seems to be still open (I added some comments in "[...]"): > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-01-24-status-meeting > > Mailinglists: > Action Item skh, henne: [on hold till after 10.1 launch] > - Prepare and announcement for list migration to the internal SUSE > lists. > - risk assesment for the internal packagers list. > Action Item adrian: > - check again with IS&T about searchable archives. [nearly running] > > FOSDEM: > Action Item cthiel, pascal: > - evaluate our FOSDEM participation after FOSDEM > > Build Service: > Action Item everybody: > - Discuss Trust/Rating system at FOSDEM > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-07-status-meeting > > Mirrors > Action Item henne: > - Discuss mirror situation in opensuse@opensuse.org [ongoing/done?] > - Involve [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the discussion > Action Item schiele: [2006-02-21: Discuss this at FOSDEM] > - discuss how we can make the drpmsync service better > - help in the documentation process, extending > http://en.opensuse.org/How_to_setup_a_drpmsync_server > Action Item notlocalhorst: > - upload final 10.1 torrents to the wiki [just for the records, can't > be done yet obviously ;-) ] > > opensuse.org frontpage redesign > Action Item michl: > - discuss front page redesign on opensuse-wiki > > Forum discussion > Action Item Viras: > - take the discussion to the forum people in suselinuxsupport.de forum > Action item skh: > - talk to suse internal people to see about resources, etc if the forum > idea goes ok > Action Item StormX: > - invite the other forum maintainers to the suselinuxsupport.de > opensuse-forum category > > subfs discussion > Action Item henne: > - write SDB article about alternatives of subfs > [ > -> http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-21-status-meeting > Action item skh > - Add to the task force page > ] > > LinuxTag > [not an action item, but open questions:] > - status of community booth? > - really no "commercial" Novell booth? > > SDB migration to wiki > Action Item notlocalhorst: > - write HOWTO style-guide [2006-02-21: ongoing] > - communicate that we want to keep SDB clean of HOWTO like writings > [2006-02-21: unclear] > > 10.1 status > Action Item notlocalhorst: [+ garloff] > - write documentation about the end user part of the KMP switch > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-21-status-meeting > > Status 10.1 > Action Item AJaeger > - add info about all the small YaST tools to the libzypp Wiki page > Action Item skh / AJaeger > - explain "Feature Freeze" on Factory and write something about the > development model to Factory > > Status mailinglists > Action Item henne/Klaus > - find out if we can help heiko with the postfix rewrites for the new > list server > [additionally, a short status update would be a good idea] > > Creation of a Community Task from Meetings > Action Item skh > - create the Tasks Wiki page > Action Item darix > - take care of Bugzilla->Wiki piping for that page > > Wiki > old Action Item henne: > - Rework download page to match the new media layout > -> Action item skh > - Put on the task page > old Action item michl: > - Discuss front page redesign on opensuse-wiki > -> Action item shk > - Put on the task page > > > I hope I did not miss anything and also didn't list things that are done > already ;-) - feel free to correct me. > > > > While doing this list, I thought about a wiki page to manage open > "action items" which could be a good method to avoid that things are > forgotten. > > Proposed handling: > - create a page "open action items" > - after every meeting, collect all action items on that page > (yes, that duplicates that information. But on the other hand, it > avoids that you have to scan all meeting minutes - it needs more time, > trust me ;-) > - when an item is done, simply remove it from the "open action items" > page (or: mark them as done, remove them two weeks later after the > next meeting) > > Do you think this would be a good idea? If yes, I will create the "Open > Action Items" page and add the listed items there. > > > Regards, > > Christian Boltz > -- >>... Bücher sind ein grässliches Medium ... > Ich schätze daran die leichte Portierbarkeit vom Sofa ins Bett. > [Bjoern Hoehrmann und Peter Bieling in dciwam] > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---
[opensuse] syntax for: SaX2 batch modus
All, I'm looking for extra information for the SaX2 batch modus file. Maybe i looked wrongly. But i cant find any inforation on the internet / opensuse webpage. Regards, Joop. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] EU patents questionair
All, The EU patents questionair can be found here: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/consult_en.pdf Regards, Joop. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [opensuse] Licensing
All, I think i asked my question wrongly. I wanted to know which additional certification would be usefull. (Not an alternative to to NCLP and NCLE). Regards, Joop. On Wed, January 11, 2006 8:50 pm, Mike Dzikowski wrote: > > RHCE, RHCT > > > -Original Message----- > From: Joop Boonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:32 PM > To: opensuse@opensuse.org > Subject: [opensuse] Licensing > > All, > > I have a question. This might not be the right mailing list. > > I'm going to do the certification program NCLE en NCLP. I would like to > know what another good certification might be? > > Regards, > > Joop. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Licensing
All, I have a question. This might not be the right mailing list. I'm going to do the certification program NCLE en NCLP. I would like to know what another good certification might be? Regards, Joop. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] Re: New Nvidia drivers available
All, This is the link for the IA32 driver. http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_1.0-8174.html Regards, Joop. On Wed, December 7, 2005 9:54 am, Joop Boonen wrote: > All, > > Especially for the people who use a 6100/6150 main board. The new driver > supports this main board. > > Regards, > > Joop. > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_amd64_1.0-8174.html > > Release Highlights > > Fixed GeForce 7800 GTX clocking problem that affected 3D performance. > Added support for NVIDIA SLI. Please see the README for details. > Added a new utility 'nvidia-xconfig', which is a commandline tool for > updating X configuration files. > Added support for new GeForce 6100, GeForce 6150 and GeForce 7800 GTX 512. > Added manpages for 'nvidia-xconfig', 'nvidia-settings', and > 'nvidia-installer'. > Made UseEdidFreqs "on" by default; the NVIDIA X driver will use the valid > HorizSync and VertRefresh frequency ranges from the EDID whenever > possible. > Added support for Stereo Digital Flat Panels such as the SeeReal and > Sharp3D DFPs. > Added HTML version of the README. > Added support for static Rotation; see the "Rotate" X config option in the > README. > Improved stability on 64-bit Linux 2.6 kernels. > Fixed driver installation when SELinux is enabled. > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] New Nvidia drivers available
All, Especially for the people who use a 6100/6150 main board. The new driver supports this main board. Regards, Joop. http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_amd64_1.0-8174.html Release Highlights Fixed GeForce 7800 GTX clocking problem that affected 3D performance. Added support for NVIDIA SLI. Please see the README for details. Added a new utility 'nvidia-xconfig', which is a commandline tool for updating X configuration files. Added support for new GeForce 6100, GeForce 6150 and GeForce 7800 GTX 512. Added manpages for 'nvidia-xconfig', 'nvidia-settings', and 'nvidia-installer'. Made UseEdidFreqs "on" by default; the NVIDIA X driver will use the valid HorizSync and VertRefresh frequency ranges from the EDID whenever possible. Added support for Stereo Digital Flat Panels such as the SeeReal and Sharp3D DFPs. Added HTML version of the README. Added support for static Rotation; see the "Rotate" X config option in the README. Improved stability on 64-bit Linux 2.6 kernels. Fixed driver installation when SELinux is enabled. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
