Re: [opensuse] Motorola V3 Razr +Bluetooth
Art Fore schrieb: > Have not been able to get the V3 Razr to work with my Dell Latitude D820 > running Suse 10.2. Here is the scenario > > Linux is running kblutoothd and the bluZ has been enabled in Yast with > default settings. > > My D820 can see a colleague's computer (Win XP) on bluetooth and is > shows up with bluetooth:/ in konqueror. > > I can connect and download the V3 on the colleague's computer after > doing the paring. > > My D820 does not see the V3 even in discovery mode. When you put the V3 > in discovery, it is supposed to be 6i0 secconds, but only last 5 or 10 > seconds as if it has been discovered, still nothing shows up in > kbluetooth. > > I try the handsfree, look for devices on the V3, it finds nothing during > its scan on my computer, on the other computer it says it found one > device. > > So, both computers are working and the v3 works with only one computer > (BRW, both are Dell Latitude, one a D820, the other D620). > > Searched the web and documentation, but did not find too much on the > kbluetooth as far as operating it. Does anyone have any suggestions? try to do a hcitool scan on commandline and to get info or connection via hcitool my Moto L2 worked after switching it visible several times till my MSI-SUSE10.2-Notebook asked for the Bluetooth-passkey which is default -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Can't update to new KDE3.5.6
Michael Nelson schrieb: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:02:21AM +0100, Luc Willems wrote: > >> I'm trying to install de KDE 3.5.6 update from the KDE: /KDE3 repository and >> always getting this error message : >> >> http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/KDE:/KDE3/openSUSE_10.2 >> Unknown Error: Downloading metadata failed (is YUM source?) or user did not >> accept remote source. Aborting > > It's not just you, I tried it just now and got the same error message. it is me too (at all of my 4 computers with SUSE 10.2) hi SUSE stuff, what is going on there on the repo or what is wrong with YOU from us 3 if i dont use software.opensuse.org but e.g. ftp.gwdg.de (didnt try another mirror!) it works -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Re: Help with Java installation on SuSE 10.3
Claude Fuhrer schrieb: > Roger Oberholtzer wrote: >> [...] >> Do you remember which one that was? My java 1.6 no longer works. It did >> for a bit and I could run, say, eclipse. But something messed it up and >> I do not think the java itself is installed correct. >> > On my computer, I had to reset all the java related links that where in > /etc/alternative solution 4 the last 2 Bugs i had: 1. resolves a Java-Bug: sed -i 's/XINERAMA/FAKEEXTN/g' /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so 2. corrects the links which Roger mentioned /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --auto javaplugin /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --auto javac /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --auto java But please give us the output if you type java on commandline! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice.org 2.2
Petr Mladek schrieb: > On Monday 21 May 2007 00:53, James Knott wrote: >> I just downloaded the latest 64 bit and noticed the splash screen is now >> green instead of the previous blue. Blue looks better. I guess I'd >> better file a bug report. ;-) > > The green one is for openSUSE-10.3. Unfortunately, we used splash screen > where > the exact OOo version was mentioned, so the older blue one is not longer > usable. I would get another bugs reports with it, e.g. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244914 > > I am sorry, I hope that you can live with the green one. I am getting to like > it ;-) i also like it, but think i can help: (yes i saw the smiley beneath your initial question ;-) ) give your konqui a URL of: /usr/lib/ooo-2.0/program/*.bmp and simply change the openintro_suse.bmp into the bmp of your choice kde-look.org offers a variety of Splash-Screens if you dont have the old one any more -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE repo
hi to all readers, i recognized the new repo OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE but there are no langugage packs like OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99-211-2.1.i586.rpm does anyone know or tried if the UNSTABLE packages could be used with lang ones of OpenOffice.org:/STABLE ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE repo
Petr Mladek schrieb: > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 11:44, Michael Riess wrote: >> hi to all readers, >> >> i recognized the new repo >> OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE >> >> but there are no langugage packs >> like >> OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99-211-2.1.i586.rpm > > I somewhat have tell the Build Service that there is also the second spec > file. > >> does anyone know or tried >> if the UNSTABLE packages could be used with lang ones of >> OpenOffice.org:/STABLE > > Hmm, I am afraid that it will not work because there is another version. You > might try the lang packages from FACTORY, e.g. from: > ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/noarch > > Please, be patient. We had the Hack Week. I have vacation the following > week... I will try to fix it within two weeks. OK, i was patient and recognized the update of /OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_10.2/noarch/ from 2007-07-14 Thanks 4 this, but the packages dont work because it installs into another folder(/usr/share) than the rest(/usr/lib) You have to do a rpm -Uvh --relocate=/usr/share=/usr/lib OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99.211-2.1.noarch.rpm after downloading it. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE repo
Petr Mladek schrieb: > On Wednesday 27 June 2007 11:44, Michael Riess wrote: >> hi to all readers, >> >> i recognized the new repo >> OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE >> >> but there are no langugage packs >> like >> OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99-211-2.1.i586.rpm > > I somewhat have tell the Build Service that there is also the second spec > file. > >> does anyone know or tried >> if the UNSTABLE packages could be used with lang ones of >> OpenOffice.org:/STABLE > > Hmm, I am afraid that it will not work because there is another version. You > might try the lang packages from FACTORY, e.g. from: > ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/noarch > > Please, be patient. We had the Hack Week. I have vacation the following > week... I will try to fix it within two weeks. OK, i was patient and recognized the update of /OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_10.2/noarch/ from 2007-07-14 Thanks 4 this, but the packages dont work because it installs into another folder(/usr/share) than the rest(/usr/lib) You have to do a rpm -Uvh --relocate=/usr/share=/usr/lib OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99.211-2.1.noarch.rpm after downloading it. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Printing photos easily.
Rui Santos schrieb: > pelibali wrote: >> Hi, > Hi, >> I'm new to linux and this evening attempted to print some of my >> photos... >> >> First I tried the newest Picasa under my openSUSE 10.0, but it >> resulted _draft_ quality _B/W_ prints, even that 1200 DPI has been >> setup generally for our HP DeskJet 5940. >> Picasa's template is generally OK, because could place easily e.g. >> four of my photos on a single A4 page, but the draft quality I >> couldn't overcome. Of course I tried the options (theoretically) >> resulting better quality printouts and also checked the printer's >> default settings, which was normal quality/color. >> Therefore have no idea, how to work around this, because Picasa has >> quite limited print setup options under Linux and search at Google >> didn't help at all. >> >> At the end we managed to print the above four images via an >> OpenOffice.org template my boyfriend prepared few months ago and like >> that we succeeded. With Gimp I had bad experience in the past, so >> this way was not tried now. >> >> Would you give me please any hints/ideas on your preference when >> printing photos; I would be quite interested to hear some possibili- >> ties. > > Try digiKam. > After you import all of your photos, go to: > Album -> Export -> Print Wizard. > > I find it excelent. > Hope it's what you wanted. yes, this is "KIPI Plugins" which are used by all newer picture viewers i personally prefer Gwenview ang KSquirrel which support both the KIPI Plugins too (KSquirrel is available on Packman repo) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE repo
Petr Mladek schrieb: > On Friday 20 July 2007 14:41, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> OK, i was patient and recognized the update of >>> /OpenOffice.org:/UNSTABLE/openSUSE_10.2/noarch/ >>> from 2007-07-14 >>> >>> Thanks 4 this, but the packages dont work because it installs into >>> another folder(/usr/share) than the rest(/usr/lib) >>> >>> You have to do a >>> >>> rpm -Uvh >>> --relocate=/usr/share=/usr/lib >>> OpenOffice_org-de-2.2.99.211-2.1.noarch.rpm >>> >>> after downloading it. >> Noarch packages must not include files below /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. I had >> to move them to a common place => /usr/share. >> >> There should be a %post install script to create the necessary compat >> symlinks. You can see it in the packages in Factory. From some strange >> reasons, the packages build in the Build Service does not include these >> scripts. I do not why. They are built from the exactly the same sources. >> I have to investigate it. > > Strange, I have just triggered a full rebuild and the new packages have > the %post scripts. They should work out of box now. the newest packages 2.2.99.222-2.1 are again without the language packs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] NO kernel sources in KOTD
hi kernel-repo-build gurus, the newer rpms in Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory are completely without sources and Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory/src is a version mix -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] SMP kernel
hi, talking about repo: Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory/ is there a reason or can anyone explain why there is a SMP kernel in i586 and no one in x86_64 is this a bug or is the default version in x86_64 the SMP version? (reason 4 my question: i am planning to upgrade to dualcore CPU and asking me what kernel to use) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] SMP kernel
Marcus Meissner schrieb: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Michael Riess wrote: >> hi, >> >> talking about repo: >> Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory/ >> >> is there a reason or can anyone explain >> why there is a SMP kernel in i586 >> and no one in x86_64 >> >> is this a bug or is the default version in x86_64 the SMP version? >> >> (reason 4 my question: i am planning to upgrade to dualcore CPU >> and asking me what kernel to use) > > kernel-default is already the SMP kernel. thanks only to fill my info-gap: why is i586 kernel divided into SMP and default? or: why the x68_64 is not? if the answer is too long, philosophical or technical: give me a link, please -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Latest Java Package??
Rick Friedman schrieb: > Does anyone know of a repository which has a package for the latest Sun > Java? Currently, I have, Java-1_5_0-sun version 1.5.0_07-1.1 installed. > I believe the latest version from Sun is version 1.5.0_09. I believed: the latest version from Sun is 1.5.0_10 cause i downloaded it 2006-11-16 both i586 and amd64 but only jre than i tried to get the link to download again for mailing it to the list but didnt find it i googled the full filename i downloaded and got http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=22&PartDetailId=jre-1.5.0_10-oth-JPR&SiteId=JSC&TransactionId=noreg which is the download site from sun isnt it?! i am a little bit confused by this does anyone know more about this and: what is the actual official Patch-Level -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] DVD disk image
Scott Jones schrieb: > On Thursday 30 November 2006 01:11, Mike McMullin wrote: > >> I'm trying to copy a data DVD (Debian Sarge actually)using the >> command: >> dd if=/dev/hdb of=debiansarge.iso >> >> and it is failing with the following error: >> File size limit exceeded >> >> df gives this info for the partition usage: >> /dev/hda2 19533504 4194320 15339184 >> 22% /mnt/unknownLinux >> it's a fat32 partition, unused except for my trying to create this file. > > FAT32 has a max filesize of 2GB. FAT16 has a max filesize of < 2GB. FAT32 has a max filesize of < 4GB http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table ___ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse] OpenOffice_org-de-2.1-17.1.x86_64.rpm missing
hi,
is there any reason for missing
OpenOffice_org-de-2.1-17.1.x86_64.rpm
in
http://software.opensuse.org/download/OpenOffice.org
("de" is the what i am missing)
or otherwise:
how do i know the author
of a repo in build-services
to contact?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse] Caching updates locally/Local update server
Prajjwal Devkota schrieb: > Based on the rsync script, the fact that patch, delta, and full rpms may ... > > If some installed packages are going to need new packages to be > installed during upgrade, thats up to the sysadmin to pull manually. I think this link could be usefull to generate a real local caching repository: http://en.opensuse.org/SDB%3AGenerating_YaST_Installation_Sources -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
