Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Thierry de Coulon
On Tuesday, 14. August 2007, Patrick Shanahan wrote:

> 22:51 wahoo:~/blank > locate libusb-0.1.so.4
> /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
> /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
> /usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4
> /usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
> 22:51 wahoo:~/blank > rpm -qf /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
> libusb-32bit-0.1.12-7
>
> vuescan v 8.3.74 (not registered)
> vuescan v 8.0.1  (not registered)

Thanks a lot. Seems you have more than I do, I'll take a look at that.

Thierry

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Thierry de Coulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-13-07 20:27]:
> Interesting. Here (SuSE 10.2, x86_64 Athlon 64 X2) I get an "error
> while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4

22:51 wahoo:~/blank > locate libusb-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
/usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
22:51 wahoo:~/blank > rpm -qf /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
libusb-32bit-0.1.12-7

vuescan v 8.3.74 (not registered)
vuescan v 8.0.1  (not registered)

openSUSE 10.1 x86_64 Athlon 64 x2 4200+


-- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Thierry de Coulon
On Tuesday, 14. August 2007, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > Well, anyway, Hamrick does not provide a 64 bit Linux version and the
> > 32 bit version stubbornly refuses to work on my 64 installs.
>
> Their 32bit version seem to run ok on my x86_64 amd 4200+ (openSUSE
> 10.1), but I don't care for their tk-type interface and their software
> is quite slow (as it was on my pIII 766 coppermine).

Interesting. Here (SuSE 10.2, x86_64 Athlon 64 X2) I get an "error while 
loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4

Thierry

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Simon Roberts
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:03:12 -0700, joe wrote:
>> 
>> > >I did say that linux64 is great for generic server roles on 
>> largish hardware,
>> > >where you can do everything using what ships from the linux 
>> vendor, and where
>> > >the hardware is big enough to benefit from the 64-bit OS.
>> 
>> Sorry, it's not only great on servers but on desktops/workstations as
>> well, *if* you choose the hardware wisely.
>
>I've got an off the shelf intel dual core with ATI graphics and 
>everything works just fine with OpenSuSE X86-64.

-- 
At the risk of propagating an ongoing "it works for me" "it doesn't for me" 
type of thread (of limited value, probably, to the average list member, I'd 
like to say that since I moved to 10.2 on a dual core 64 bit system, I've not 
been able to change graphics resolution. Any attempt causes the system to lock 
up solid to the point that I'm forced to hold the power button down to get the 
system back. Unfortunately, logging out causes this to happen (I can hibernate, 
perhaps strangely). Also, I find that running VMWare is highly suspect. It used 
to work fine, but now, it will work for a while, then just hangs the entire 
system (power button again) for no predictable reason.

Of course, I don't know what caused this, but I've been successful with 64bit 
before (my desktop runs 9.3 64 bit and is just dandy). However, something in 
10.2, or 64bit, or perhaps dual core, really doesn't seem right for me.

BTW, the system I have (and therefore recommend that Linux users stay away 
from!) is a Toshiba Satellite A105 4324.

Cheers,
Simon





   

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for 
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread joe


Billie Walsh wrote:

> I've got an off the shelf intel dual core with ATI graphics and
> everything works just fine with OpenSuSE X86-64.

That's great, go with what works for you! Far be it from me to discourage
users from linux64, on the contrary, the more people who can use it, the more
attention, bug fixes and app support it will get.

Joe
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Billie Walsh

On 08/13/2007 Philipp Thomas wrote:

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:03:12 -0700, joe wrote:

> >I did say that linux64 is great for generic server roles on 
largish hardware,
> >where you can do everything using what ships from the linux 
vendor, and where

> >the hardware is big enough to benefit from the 64-bit OS.

Sorry, it's not only great on servers but on desktops/workstations as
well, *if* you choose the hardware wisely.




I've got an off the shelf intel dual core with ATI graphics and 
everything works just fine with OpenSuSE X86-64.


--
Billie Walsh
The three best words in the English Language:
"I LOVE YOU"
Pass them on!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Thierry de Coulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-01-70 11:34]:
> That's not always true - or I don't know how to do it. I used to run a
> scanning software (VueScan) that is commercial and closed source but
> fairly good and has the advantage to be offered on Mac OS as well (and
> Windows, but that does not concern me). Plus it supports some scanner
> that sane does not support (in turn, it does not support a few scanner
> out of the box that sane does support...).
> 
> Well, anyway, Hamrick does not provide a 64 bit Linux version and the
> 32 bit version stubbornly refuses to work on my 64 installs.

Their 32bit version seem to run ok on my x86_64 amd 4200+ (openSUSE
10.1), but I don't care for their tk-type interface and their software
is quite slow (as it was on my pIII 766 coppermine).

-- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Philipp Thomas
[Let's keep this on the list, please]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:47:49 +0200, Thierry de Coulon wrote:

>That's not always true - or I don't know how to do it. I used to run a 
>scanning software (VueScan)
[...]
>Well, anyway, Hamrick does not provide a 64 bit Linux version and the 32 bit 
>version stubbornly refuses to work on my 64 installs.

Yes, that is a problem. Such software that's close to the hardware is
the exception. 

Philipp
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Thierry de Coulon
On Monday, 13. August 2007, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> >Many vendors make only a 32-bit version of their linux offerings,
>
> That shouldn't be a problem, as you can happily run 32bit apps an
> biarch platform such as AMD64/EM64T.
>
> Philipp

That's not always true - or I don't know how to do it. I used to run a 
scanning software (VueScan) that is commercial and closed source but fairly 
good and has the advantage to be offered on Mac OS as well (and Windows, but 
that does not concern me). Plus it supports some scanner that sane does not 
support (in turn, it does not support a few scanner out of the box that sane 
does support...).

Well, anyway, Hamrick does not provide a 64 bit Linux version and the 32 bit 
version stubbornly refuses to work on my 64 installs.

Thierry

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
> Sorry, it's not only great on servers but on desktops/workstations as
> well, *if* you choose the hardware wisely.

How do you do that?

I mean: Which graphics adapters are "safe"?

Which other adapters, devices, etc can cause problems?

Where is the _updated_ list of supported hardware?

-- 

Med venlig hilsen
Kaare Rasmussen, Jasonic

Jasonic Telefon: +45 3816 2582
Nordre Fasanvej 12
2000 Frederiksberg  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-13 Thread Philipp Thomas
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:03:12 -0700, joe wrote:

>I did say that linux64 is great for generic server roles on largish hardware,
>where you can do everything using what ships from the linux vendor, and where
>the hardware is big enough to benefit from the 64-bit OS.

Sorry, it's not only great on servers but on desktops/workstations as
well, *if* you choose the hardware wisely.

>Many vendors make only a 32-bit version of their linux offerings,

That shouldn't be a problem, as you can happily run 32bit apps an
biarch platform such as AMD64/EM64T.

Philipp
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread Michel Salim
On 13/08/07, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Philipp Thomas wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:43:53 -0700, joe wrote:
> >
> >> You're much more likely to have success resolving any driver issues
> >> on the 32-bit install.
> >
> > That's just not true! The only case where a 64 bit Linux can be a
> > problem is when you need to use a binary only driver and the
> > manufacturer doesn't supply it. My experience shows that open source
> > drivers are mostly just as bad or good on a 32 bit Linux as they are
> > on a 64 bit one.
>
> Hence my statement about "3rd party drivers or programs", which you snipped.
>
> I did say that linux64 is great for generic server roles on largish hardware,
> where you can do everything using what ships from the linux vendor, and where
> the hardware is big enough to benefit from the 64-bit OS.
>
> > So if a driver doesn't work under 64 bit Linux chances are very low
> > it'll suddenly start to work as a 32 bit version.
>
> Many vendors make only a 32-bit version of their linux offerings, or if they
> do make a 64-bit version, it's not well tested, and buggy. I speak from bitter
> experiences in the trenches, and can cite examples.
>
At least RPM supports multilib, meaning you can happily run 32- and
64-bit applications side-by-side.

The binary driver situation is all the more reason to support vendors
that have more enlightened driver policies. Or, failing that, those
that can provide reliable 64-bit drivers (grudging lift of the hat to
nVidia on this).

-- 
Michel
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread joe


Philipp Thomas wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:43:53 -0700, joe wrote:
> 
>> You're much more likely to have success resolving any driver issues
>> on the 32-bit install.
> 
> That's just not true! The only case where a 64 bit Linux can be a
> problem is when you need to use a binary only driver and the
> manufacturer doesn't supply it. My experience shows that open source
> drivers are mostly just as bad or good on a 32 bit Linux as they are
> on a 64 bit one.

Hence my statement about "3rd party drivers or programs", which you snipped.

I did say that linux64 is great for generic server roles on largish hardware,
where you can do everything using what ships from the linux vendor, and where
the hardware is big enough to benefit from the 64-bit OS.

> So if a driver doesn't work under 64 bit Linux chances are very low
> it'll suddenly start to work as a 32 bit version.

Many vendors make only a 32-bit version of their linux offerings, or if they
do make a 64-bit version, it's not well tested, and buggy. I speak from bitter
experiences in the trenches, and can cite examples.

Joe
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread kbboykin

 -- Original message --
From: Philipp Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:43:53 -0700, joe wrote:
> 
> >You're much more likely to have success resolving any driver issues
> > on the 32-bit install.
> 
> That's just not true! The only case where a 64 bit Linux can be a
> problem is when you need to use a binary only driver and the
> manufacturer doesn't supply it. My experience shows that open source
> drivers are mostly just as bad or good on a 32 bit Linux as they are
> on a 64 bit one.
> 
> So if a driver doesn't work under 64 bit Linux chances are very low
> it'll suddenly start to work as a 32 bit version.
> 
> Philipp
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Thanks to all who responded so far.  I really want to try 64 bit again in the 
future.  I dont know enough about it to tell the difference right now. I don't 
run a lot of media apps or high graphics apps. 

BTW, i "re-installed - ran make, make install for the RT61-  one more time and 
it came back. Something was suddenly interfering with it. I am now responding o 
this email under 10.2 using the ralink card so Phillip appears to be right.

I am just no sure if down the road, I will encounter issues.  I know everyone 
has an opinion, so let's not go there. I just think I want to go back to 32 
bit, as most of my experience has been with it.  I am not a techie by training, 
I am a physician,  so I'm not as savvy as most.

Again, thanks to all.

--Keith

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread Philipp Thomas
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:43:53 -0700, joe wrote:

>You're much more likely to have success resolving any driver issues
> on the 32-bit install.

That's just not true! The only case where a 64 bit Linux can be a
problem is when you need to use a binary only driver and the
manufacturer doesn't supply it. My experience shows that open source
drivers are mostly just as bad or good on a 32 bit Linux as they are
on a 64 bit one.

So if a driver doesn't work under 64 bit Linux chances are very low
it'll suddenly start to work as a 32 bit version.

Philipp
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread kbboykin
Thanks,  since I don't have much to loose, I agree, go back to clean install of 
32 bit.  I know I can use atheros card without problem.  I already have a box 
with a card based on it.  I choose the ralink for reported 64 bit usage.

Thanks,

--Keith
 -- Original message --
From: joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 64-bit installs are great for generic server roles, on largish hardware. For
> desktop use, or any situation where you need to worry about 3rd party software
> or drivers, linux/32 is the way to go, based on my education in the school of
> hard knocks.
> 
> There's no easy way to convert a 64-bit install to 32-bit. Just save off the
> important stuff somewhere, and do a clean install. You're much more likely to
> have success resolving any driver issues on the 32-bit install.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > The title kinda sez it all.  I installed openSuSE 64 bit on a "homebrew"
> > with a 3.2 GHz P4  ECS P4M800PRO-M MB with 2 GB of ram, 80 G SATA drive.
> > It was installed as dualboot witth Vista Home premium.  I have used SuSE
> > since 6.4 off and on and used it heavily from 7.1 to 9.3.  Then work forced
> > me back to learn WinXP Pro and now Vista. I have installed 10.0, 10.2 on
> > other machines prior to installing 10.2 default on this box.  Originally I
> > was using the on-board Realtek NIC, wired.  I rarely used 10.2 and it
> > sailed along effortless. I moved to a new residence and had to go wireless.
> > My researched suggested RaLink RT2561 as compatible with both Linux and
> > Vista, so I bought a card based on that chipset.  Vista worked right away.
> > It took some time to get it working under Linux. Then on Friday, I decided
> > to try Linspire 2.0 LiveCD which failed on this box.  Every since then the
> > RaLink wireless PCI appears removed to the Linux network under 10.2.  If I
> > run lspci -v  the card is there, so it is seen by the kernel.  I decided to
> > go with driverloader and it helps but no cigar.
> > 
> > A long story to ask this simple question.   I want to go back to 32 bit.
> > How?  Wipe it clean and start from scratch, realizing I still will have the
> > Ralink PCI card  (RT61), and can the 64bit be downgraded to 32 bit?  Much
> > help appreciated.  If this has already been answered in a thread somewhere,
> > please forgive me.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > 
> > --Keith
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread joe
64-bit installs are great for generic server roles, on largish hardware. For
desktop use, or any situation where you need to worry about 3rd party software
or drivers, linux/32 is the way to go, based on my education in the school of
hard knocks.

There's no easy way to convert a 64-bit install to 32-bit. Just save off the
important stuff somewhere, and do a clean install. You're much more likely to
have success resolving any driver issues on the 32-bit install.

Joe


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> The title kinda sez it all.  I installed openSuSE 64 bit on a "homebrew"
> with a 3.2 GHz P4  ECS P4M800PRO-M MB with 2 GB of ram, 80 G SATA drive.
> It was installed as dualboot witth Vista Home premium.  I have used SuSE
> since 6.4 off and on and used it heavily from 7.1 to 9.3.  Then work forced
> me back to learn WinXP Pro and now Vista. I have installed 10.0, 10.2 on
> other machines prior to installing 10.2 default on this box.  Originally I
> was using the on-board Realtek NIC, wired.  I rarely used 10.2 and it
> sailed along effortless. I moved to a new residence and had to go wireless.
> My researched suggested RaLink RT2561 as compatible with both Linux and
> Vista, so I bought a card based on that chipset.  Vista worked right away.
> It took some time to get it working under Linux. Then on Friday, I decided
> to try Linspire 2.0 LiveCD which failed on this box.  Every since then the
> RaLink wireless PCI appears removed to the Linux network under 10.2.  If I
> run lspci -v  the card is there, so it is seen by the kernel.  I decided to
> go with driverloader and it helps but no cigar.
> 
> A long story to ask this simple question.   I want to go back to 32 bit.
> How?  Wipe it clean and start from scratch, realizing I still will have the
> Ralink PCI card  (RT61), and can the 64bit be downgraded to 32 bit?  Much
> help appreciated.  If this has already been answered in a thread somewhere,
> please forgive me.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> --Keith
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse] 64bit gone sour, downgrade to 32bit, how?

2007-08-12 Thread kbboykin
Hello All,

The title kinda sez it all.  I installed openSuSE 64 bit on a "homebrew"  with 
a 3.2 GHz P4  ECS P4M800PRO-M MB with 2 GB of ram, 80 G SATA drive.  It was 
installed as dualboot witth Vista Home premium.  I have used SuSE since 6.4 off 
and on and used it heavily from 7.1 to 9.3.  Then work forced me back to learn 
WinXP Pro and now Vista. I have installed 10.0, 10.2 on other machines prior to 
installing 10.2 default on this box.  Originally I was using the on-board 
Realtek NIC, wired.  I rarely used 10.2 and it sailed along effortless. I moved 
to a new residence and had to go wireless. My researched suggested RaLink 
RT2561 as compatible with both Linux and Vista, so I bought a card based on 
that chipset.  Vista worked right away.  It took some time to get it working 
under Linux. Then on Friday, I decided to try Linspire 2.0 LiveCD which failed 
on this box.  Every since then the RaLink wireless PCI appears removed to the 
Linux network under 10.2.  If I run lspci -v  the card is 
 there,
 so it is seen by the kernel.  I decided to go with driverloader and it helps 
but no cigar.

A long story to ask this simple question.   I want to go back to 32 bit.  How?  
Wipe it clean and start from scratch, realizing I still will have the Ralink 
PCI card  (RT61), and can the 64bit be downgraded to 32 bit?  Much help 
appreciated.  If this has already been answered in a thread somewhere, please 
forgive me.

Thanks in advance, 

--Keith
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]