Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-21 Thread Aaron Kulkis

Mike Diehl wrote:



[top-posting stupidity moved to bottom]

On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:10:32 am Carlos E. R. wrote:

The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote:

On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote:

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign wrote:

This is email. There is no thread.

Either you simply forgot a smiley or I don't get it. Of cause there
are
mail threads. What do you think In-Reply-To and References in the mail
header were invented for?

Yes, there are those wannabe MUAs such as Outlook, Groupwise and Notes
that constantly ignore the existence of In-Reply-To, but that's a
different story.

My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail.

All decent mail programs do thread. Thunderbird, Mozilla, Kmail, even text
only clients like Pine or mutt. Gmail web client does thread, but it calls
it conversations.

And the archive is threaded.

Even Outlook does thread:

   X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
   Thread-Index: AchZxUFbeX4hpExoQh2zru0l/TqnbgAAC2AA

Although being Microsoft, it uses something else instead of the standard.
 I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic 

of email
 threading than there were for the original question.

You'll notice that when he started a thread with
that topic, he got answers to his question.

Whereas in this hijacked branch, he got NO answers
to his question.


 I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted.

Since you deliberately, to act stupid, I'll bet you're right.

 Can't we cut each other some slack?

In short - No.

Mail list rules are needed.  Even as far back as 30 years
ago, experience shows that even when the entire membership
consists of highly competent doctorate level computer
engineers and scientists, without such rules, the list
falls rather quickly into complete chaos.





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread M. Skiba
Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 17:48:34 schrieb PerfectReign:
 My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail.

 I have it turned off.   I do the same in KNode and Pan, but forgot you
 can thread in email.
It's not just Kmail :)
it is actually a standard and part of RFC 822: 4.6.1  4.6.2.

Greetings
Michael
P.S.: Sorry for PM - my bad :/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread Carlos E. R.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote:


On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote:

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign wrote:


This is email. There is no thread.


Either you simply forgot a smiley or I don't get it. Of cause there
are
mail threads. What do you think In-Reply-To and References in the mail
header were invented for?

Yes, there are those wannabe MUAs such as Outlook, Groupwise and Notes
that constantly ignore the existence of In-Reply-To, but that's a
different story.


My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail.


All decent mail programs do thread. Thunderbird, Mozilla, Kmail, even text 
only clients like Pine or mutt. Gmail web client does thread, but it calls 
it conversations.


And the archive is threaded.

Even Outlook does thread:

  X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
  Thread-Index: AchZxUFbeX4hpExoQh2zru0l/TqnbgAAC2AA

Although being Microsoft, it uses something else instead of the standard.



- -- 
Cheers,

   Carlos E. R.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHki8LtTMYHG2NR9URAlI9AJ9pTELVoIL2nNY0l9FZ301TFyOi/gCfWIwh
ljMwYa/ojbGffQDiOGNV2Kw=
=Yd7a
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread Mike Diehl
I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email 
threading than there were for the original question.

I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted.  Can't we cut each 
other some slack?

On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:10:32 am Carlos E. R. wrote:
 The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote:
  On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote:
  On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign wrote:
  This is email. There is no thread.
 
  Either you simply forgot a smiley or I don't get it. Of cause there
  are
  mail threads. What do you think In-Reply-To and References in the mail
  header were invented for?
 
  Yes, there are those wannabe MUAs such as Outlook, Groupwise and Notes
  that constantly ignore the existence of In-Reply-To, but that's a
  different story.
 
  My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail.

 All decent mail programs do thread. Thunderbird, Mozilla, Kmail, even text
 only clients like Pine or mutt. Gmail web client does thread, but it calls
 it conversations.

 And the archive is threaded.

 Even Outlook does thread:

X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AchZxUFbeX4hpExoQh2zru0l/TqnbgAAC2AA

 Although being Microsoft, it uses something else instead of the standard.



 --
 Cheers,
 Carlos E. R.



-- 
Mike Diehl

---

-- 
Mike Diehl
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread Rajko M.
On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:21:14 pm Mike Diehl wrote:
 I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email
 threading than there were for the original question.

 I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted.  Can't we cut each
 other some slack?

We can, but than we have to change 
  http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_mailing_list_netiquette

We had discussions in a few very long threads on what is acceptable and what 
not. The article is merely describing common ground that most of the users 
find comfortable. 

You will understand that some guys use accessability features of openSUSE 
software, like screen reader and magnifier. Threading and bottom posting is 
sorting emails and makes reading effortless. 

-- 
Regards,
Rajko
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread Bryen

On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 20:54 -0600, Rajko M. wrote:
 On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:21:14 pm Mike Diehl wrote:
  I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email
  threading than there were for the original question.
 
  I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted.  Can't we cut each
  other some slack?
 
 We can, but than we have to change 
   http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_mailing_list_netiquette
 
 We had discussions in a few very long threads on what is acceptable and what 
 not. The article is merely describing common ground that most of the users 
 find comfortable. 
 
 You will understand that some guys use accessability features of openSUSE 
 software, like screen reader and magnifier. Threading and bottom posting is 
 sorting emails and makes reading effortless. 
 
Interesting you should say that.  I'm a low-vision user myself.  Over on
blind-user mailing lists, like the GNOME Orca mailing list, they choose
top-posting.  I've never seen one email over there that was
bottom-posted.  And these people use devices such as braille readers,
audio screen readers, etc.

I'm always making a conscious decision.  If I'm posting on openSUSE...
follow the rules and bottom-post.  If I'm on the other mailing lists,
top-post.  :-)

-- 
---Bryen---

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email Threading (WAS: Re: [opensuse] encrypting your home partition)

2008-01-19 Thread Rajko M.

Interesting. 
I don't have accessibility needs (if you don't count slow typing).

I just imagined that sorted mail in thread and text in chronological order 
will make use of audio screen readers easier. Though, now I know that it is 
easier to have last mail at the top and just jump from one mail to the other. 

-- 
Regards,
Rajko

On Saturday 19 January 2008 09:36:54 pm Bryen wrote:
  You will understand that some guys use accessability features of openSUSE
  software, like screen reader and magnifier. Threading and bottom posting
  is sorting emails and makes reading effortless.

 Interesting you should say that.  I'm a low-vision user myself.  Over on
 blind-user mailing lists, like the GNOME Orca mailing list, they choose
 top-posting.  I've never seen one email over there that was
 bottom-posted.  And these people use devices such as braille readers,
 audio screen readers, etc.

 I'm always making a conscious decision.  If I'm posting on openSUSE...
 follow the rules and bottom-post.  If I'm on the other mailing lists,
 top-post.  :-)

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]