Re: [opensuse-factory] security update policy
Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer: > > What Factory are you looking at? I have 2.0.0.10 here > > No, you are looking at Firefox ;-) That's right, yes. Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] Radeon Xpress 1250 resolution problems
I have a Acer TravelMate 7520 which has the above video on board. After
installing 11.0 Alpha0 (since upgraded to latest Factory) and I can only
get 800x600 with the fbdev driver that was done as part of the install.
I've since installed ati-driver-installer-8.443.1-x86.x86_64.run, but it
hangs at the cursor {*} after switching to kdm.
# /.../
# SaX generated X11 config file
# Created on: 2008-01-11T00:27:37+.
#
# Version: 8.1
# Contact: Marcus Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2005
# Contact: SaX-User list
#
# Automatically generated by [ISaX] (8.1)
# PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE!
#
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Layout[all]"
Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]" 0 0
InputDevice"Keyboard[0]" "CoreKeyboard"
InputDevice"Mouse[1]" "CorePointer"
InputDevice"Mouse[3]" "SendCoreEvents"
Option "Clone" "off"
Option "Xinerama" "off"
EndSection
Section "Files"
InputDevices "/dev/gpmdata"
InputDevices "/dev/input/mice"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/local"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/URW"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/PEX"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/latin2/misc:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/latin2/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/latin2/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/latin2/Type1"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/latin7/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/japanese:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/kwintv"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/truetype"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/uni:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/CID"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/ucs/misc:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/ucs/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/ucs/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/hellas/misc:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/hellas/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/hellas/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/hellas/Type1"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc/sgi:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/xtest"
FontPath "/opt/kde3/share/fonts"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
Load "type1"
Load "freetype"
Load "extmod"
Load "glx"
EndSection
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "AllowMouseOpenFail" "on"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Keyboard[0]"
Driver "kbd"
Option "Protocol" "Standard"
Option "XkbLayout" "gb"
Option "XkbModel" "microsoftpro"
Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse[1]"
Driver "synaptics"
Option "Buttons" "5"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "on"
Option "HorizScrollDelta" "0"
Option "InputFashion" "Mouse"
Option "Name" "Synaptics;Touchpad"
Option "Protocol" "explorerps/2"
Option "SHMConfig" "on"
Option "Vendor" "Sysp"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Mouse[3]"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Buttons" "5"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "Name" "ImPS/2 Generic Wheel Mouse"
Option "Protocol" "explorerps/2"
Option "Vendor" "Sysp"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
EndSection
Section "Modes"
Identifier "Modes[0]"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]"
Driver "fglrx"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]"
Device "aticonfig-Device[0]"
Monitor"aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "DRI"
Group"video"
Mode 0660
EndSection
Help appreciated.
Regards
Sid.
--
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support
Speci
Re: [opensuse-factory] security update policy
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:50:46PM +0100, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security > updates for Factory? > I just found an example what shouldn't happen: > > MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's > still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory. > Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's > still old in Factory. > I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at > around the same time. Yes, this should be the case. Ciao, Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] security update policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Rosenauer schreef: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security > updates for Factory? > I just found an example what shouldn't happen: > > MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's > still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory. > Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's > still old in Factory. > I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at > around the same time. > > Wolfgang Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; nl; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SUSE/2.0.0.11-1.7 Firefox/2.0.0.11 is the current factory, if mozilla repo is used.. ;-) (had to add it to solve problems with factory Thunderbird, which is also too old: invalid message-filters..) - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 "release 31" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhnRxX5/X5X6LpDgRApC7AKDRXi3kjiVJe+u62K/cfmP7QFlwGgCeJP6F h4MGCTc0EUWO21xGUg7ZJX4= =qVjn -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] security update policy
Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer: Hi, I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security updates for Factory? I just found an example what shouldn't happen: MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory. Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's still old in Factory. I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at around the same time. What Factory are you looking at? I have 2.0.0.10 here No, you are looking at Firefox ;-) And even that is old, so what. Wolfgang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] security update policy
Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security > updates for Factory? > I just found an example what shouldn't happen: > > MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's > still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory. > Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's > still old in Factory. > I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at > around the same time. > What Factory are you looking at? I have 2.0.0.10 here Greetings, Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] security update policy
Hi, I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security updates for Factory? I just found an example what shouldn't happen: MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory. Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's still old in Factory. I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at around the same time. Wolfgang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] status report distribution week 2
Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Keith Goggin: > On Thursday 10 January 2008 23:54:25 Stephan Kulow wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Keith Goggin: > > > The openSUSE 10.3 detailed roadmap made it clear that beta1 would > > > provide a "Feature and version freeze for the complete distribution > > > (exception: patchlevel update of leaf packages until Aug 17)" further > > > beta3 would provide that "only blocker and bug fixes [would be] > > > allowed" from then on. Yet the Factory News for 10.3 lists a number of > > > changes post beta3 that do not appear to comply with either of these > > > limitations. > > > > You disagree with making exceptions and want openSUSE to follow a strict > > rule written 6 months forehand without being flexible? > > No, not necessarily, It would depend on the circumstances. For me it would > be a matter of balancing currency and stability. But change at the last > moment simply to include the very latest package and in the absence of any > other extenuating circumstances probably yes. > > If I recall correctly you took over after the roadmap was released. Can I > ask you, did you agreed with its general intention? Yes, I did. And every single package update was acknowledged by me. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] status report distribution week 2
On Thursday 10 January 2008 23:54:25 Stephan Kulow wrote: > Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Keith Goggin: > > The openSUSE 10.3 detailed roadmap made it clear that beta1 would provide > > a "Feature and version freeze for the complete distribution (exception: > > patchlevel update of leaf packages until Aug 17)" further beta3 would > > provide that "only blocker and bug fixes [would be] allowed" from then > > on. Yet the Factory News for 10.3 lists a number of changes post beta3 > > that do not appear to comply with either of these limitations. > > You disagree with making exceptions and want openSUSE to follow a strict > rule written 6 months forehand without being flexible? No, not necessarily, It would depend on the circumstances. For me it would be a matter of balancing currency and stability. But change at the last moment simply to include the very latest package and in the absence of any other extenuating circumstances probably yes. If I recall correctly you took over after the roadmap was released. Can I ask you, did you agreed with its general intention? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] status report distribution week 2
Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Keith Goggin: > > The openSUSE 10.3 detailed roadmap made it clear that beta1 would provide > a "Feature and version freeze for the complete distribution (exception: > patchlevel update of leaf packages until Aug 17)" further beta3 would > provide that "only blocker and bug fixes [would be] allowed" from then on. > Yet the Factory News for 10.3 lists a number of changes post beta3 that do > not appear to comply with either of these limitations. You disagree with making exceptions and want openSUSE to follow a strict rule written 6 months forehand without being flexible? Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] What is npvieuwer.bin?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cristian Rodríguez schreef: > M9. escribió: >> Hi, >> >> This '?' eats some resources (not much), but can not be found. >> Not by Beagle, and not by kfind. > > Does it segfaults for you ? I know of it existance due to the pure fact > that crashes repeatedly and the event is logged... ;P No, that is not the case here, i just noticed it in my monitor, (npvieuwer?, vieuws what?) and wanted to know what it was. When i could not find it, i thought: spyware?, and asked here, that's all.;-) Now i know that 'N', stands for 'netscape', and 'p', for plugin, it is obvious.. But what if NP stood for No Problem vieuwer? Than it could mean anything, i paranoidly thought.. :-) - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 "release 31" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhflNX5/X5X6LpDgRAtbTAJ0VKKf3DqdpiBdnfWxm/jLDbuTD7ACg3y0M x8ATKJ8cs2b+5/XZm7US7g4= =3uzF -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] What is npvieuwer.bin?
M9. escribió: > Hi, > > This '?' eats some resources (not much), but can not be found. > Not by Beagle, and not by kfind. Does it segfaults for you ? I know of it existance due to the pure fact that crashes repeatedly and the event is logged... ;P "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." - Albert Einstein Cristian Rodríguez R. Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development http://www.opensuse.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] What is npvieuwer.bin?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dominique Leuenberger schreef: > On 10-01-2008 at 11:14, "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> This '?' eats some resources (not much), but can not be found. >> Not by Beagle, and not by kfind. >> Anybody a clue? >> > > Hi, > > npviewer.bin is the binary of nspluginwrapper. Most likely you're on a 64bit > machine with Firefox, exactly! > then the flash plugin will run with the nspluginwrapper. Ok, thnx that's the info i need.. :-) > > Dominique > - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 "release 31" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHheTsX5/X5X6LpDgRAtAFAKCZQ0qxxumm5uRrwHvLNcSA+LmTnACfakar wnP6+ElhfNLdywdpKYZUk58= =J9aq -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] What is npvieuwer.bin?
>>> On 10-01-2008 at 11:14, "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > This '?' eats some resources (not much), but can not be found. > Not by Beagle, and not by kfind. > Anybody a clue? > Hi, npviewer.bin is the binary of nspluginwrapper. Most likely you're on a 64bit machine with Firefox, then the flash plugin will run with the nspluginwrapper. Dominique -- TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 77 offices in 60 countries and over 2,500 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [opensuse-factory] The new Slab for openSUSE 11.0
On Jan 10, 2008 2:44 PM, Igor Jagec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw you had plans to implement the new Slab for the upcoming openSUSE > 11.0. When you will push it into Factory? I can't wait to see it and > test it, so I'm asking :) > Have a look at these: http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Main_menu_bug_week http://slabme.wordpress.com/ Ciao -J - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] What is npvieuwer.bin?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This '?' eats some resources (not much), but can not be found. Not by Beagle, and not by kfind. Anybody a clue? 29799 monkey9 20 0 48832 13m 6184 R 2.0 0.9 0:19.14 npviewer.bin - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 "release 31" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHheIPX5/X5X6LpDgRAj7xAJ9HeZbDCTcwn5oAxo7Jl1nNkwBZnQCgjcWI d2qq+ew85TfkUtnD0p6y9Hk= =VMqV -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[opensuse-factory] The new Slab for openSUSE 11.0
I saw you had plans to implement the new Slab for the upcoming openSUSE 11.0. When you will push it into Factory? I can't wait to see it and test it, so I'm asking :) Cheers! -- Igor Jagec signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
