RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun
For some reason, I couldn't edit the Xwork Interceptors page so I added it to http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2+Interceptors instead (down the bottom). It _seriously_ needs fleshing out so i'll take you up on that offer: http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Chaining+Interceptor Anyone who can help, feel free to chip in :) -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 December 2003 16:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun Umm.. Probably on the Xwork Interceptors page... If you want to start it, that would be great. I'll flesh out any details that need to be added. -Original Message- From: Ben Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:48 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun Having spent some time wrestling with this myself, this sort of info would be nice to be added to the Wiki somewhere :) What's the best place for it and i'll add it ? -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 December 2003 15:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun Oops... That last one should be Interceptor-stack A after -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun Action chaining works like this: Interceptors-stack A before Action A Interceptor-stack B before Action B Action B result Interceptor-stack B after Interceptor-stack B after If you want callbacks before the results are executed (for instance the chaining result or Action B's result) you can have your Interceptors register instances of com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.PreResultListener with the ActionInvocation using addPreResultListener(PreResultListener listener) and it will get called after the Action has executed and before the result is executed. Jason -Original Message- From: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AW: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun That chains them, but it is not the behavior I am looking for. Ideally, if i had action A interceptor-stack A and action B with interceptor-stack B, this would happen interceptor-stack A before action A interceptor-stack A after interceptor-stack B before action B interceptor-stack B after And somehow get a property from action A to action B. This is a moot point right now, I've already found a way to work around the issue. I would like to knwo if it's possible though. Anoop On Dec 4, 2003, at 3:51 AM, Patrick Holzmann wrote: Hi Anoop, all you have to do is have a getter/setter for the parameter in both actions (+ same name for variable). Then you include the chaining interceptor (interceptor-ref name=chain/) to your interceptor stack in xwork.xml: interceptor-stack name=myStack interceptor-ref name=component/ interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/ interceptor-ref name=chain/ /interceptors ... Then you chain both actions together: action name=forward_somewhere class=... interceptor-ref name=myStack/ result name=success type=chain param name=actionNameshow/param /result /action action name=show_something class=... interceptor-ref name=myStack/ result name=success type=dispatcher param name=location/some.jsp/param /result /action Basically that's all - Xowrk does the rest for you. The set method in the second action will be called passing the parameter automatically. Hope this helps. Cheers P -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 21:08 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [OS-webwork] action chaining fun I'm looking to somehow implement chain-like behaviour. I'd like to perform one action completely, with all it's interceptors, and then perform another action completely with all it's interceptors. The catch is that I want some parameters passed between them. Any ideas? Anoop --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___
[OS-webwork] Small exception problem
Can someone add a space to throw new XworkException(Action class + actionClass.getClass().getName() + does not implement + Action.class.getName(), e); Before 'does not implement' at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.createAction(DefaultActionInv ocation.java:212) Thanks, Mathias --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Xwork and hot redeploy
Hi, I have encountered what is to me a serious usability issue with XWork. I am using it deployed in a .war in Jboss, where hot redeploy greatly reduces update times during the development process. To reduce the size of the created .war files, I store the xwork/webwork jars in the JBoss server lib configuration. The problem I have encountered is that Xwork seems to store its configuration information from xwork.xml in as static attribute in a class. Thus, if this class is not redeployed, the configuration does not change. The only way to get around this is to include the xwork jar, the webwork jar and the velocity jar in WEB-INF/lib for every .war I create. This boosts the size of each .war from a few kb to almost a Mb. It also seems rather wasteful, given that I try to componentize my webapp into several smaller .wars. Have I got this right? If so, and there's no workaround, I may have to go back to Struts. Great framework otherwise. Craig PS The static attribute seems to be configurationInstance in ConfigurationManager. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
The purpose is for each ActionInvocation to have its own ActionContext
which is only active while the ActionInvocation is being executed (as
managed by the ActionProxy).
If, for instance, you chain to another Action, that nested Action should
have its own ActionContext which is available while it is executing, and
which should be reset to the parent ActionInvocation's ActionContext
when the nested Action is done.
The problem you're seeing is probably due to not having gone through any
type of Dispatcher yet to set the request and response into the
ActionContext. The reason you're seeing 1 of 2 objects is probably
because your servlet container has just 2 execution threads which is
cycles through, and each one has a default ActionContext ThreadLocal
(which is probably never used, except for in your Sitemesh filters,
because a new one will be created and associated for the
ActionInvocation when it gets to the ServletDispatcher to execute an
Action, and then the default set back after it's done executing the
result, but before the Sitemesh filter activates).
I think the solution to your problem is to use the request directly in
your sitemesh code... I'll let Patrick comment more, since he was
refactoring the tags and stuff to work with Sitemesh.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats
the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-407
heres the method, whats the purpose of nestedContext?
-
public String execute() throws Exception {
ActionContext nestedContext = ActionContext.getContext();
ActionContext.setContext(invocation.getInvocationContext());
String retCode = null;
try {
retCode = invocation.invoke();
} finally {
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
}
return retCode;
}
--
the problems im having and described and shown in the app
attached for WW-407 go away after i comment out the line:
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
another thing i've noticed is that with
ActionContext.getContext always returns either one of two
objects, always
alternating for every request (this is when used inside a
sitemesh decorator)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Small exception problem
OK... Will do, thanks. -Original Message- From: BOGAERT Mathias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Small exception problem Can someone add a space to throw new XworkException(Action class + actionClass.getClass().getName() + does not implement + Action.class.getName(), e); Before 'does not implement' at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.createAction(De faultActionInv ocation.java:212) Thanks, Mathias --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: Spam:[OS-webwork] Xwork and hot redeploy
You can set webwork.configuration.xml.reload=true In your webwork.properties to tell it to check and automatically reload XML configuration files (this includes the xwork.xml file and any other included xwork configuration files, validation.xml files, and type conversion .properties files right now). As far as being able to have the one Xwork.jar and have multiple configurations, that's a good idea... Please add a Jira issue. I've always hated that Singleton, so we can look at how to get rid of it. In the meantime, is it possible to have the one xwork.jar file and have Jboss load it individually in the classloader of each web app (instead of just once in the server classloader)? Also, any hints on how Struts implements this? I know how I'd like to implement it (refactor all of our internal pieces into IoC components instead of having singletons for each other to look up), but this would be a major undertaking. Jason -Original Message- From: Craig Raw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spam:[OS-webwork] Xwork and hot redeploy Hi, I have encountered what is to me a serious usability issue with XWork. I am using it deployed in a .war in Jboss, where hot redeploy greatly reduces update times during the development process. To reduce the size of the created .war files, I store the xwork/webwork jars in the JBoss server lib configuration. The problem I have encountered is that Xwork seems to store its configuration information from xwork.xml in as static attribute in a class. Thus, if this class is not redeployed, the configuration does not change. The only way to get around this is to include the xwork jar, the webwork jar and the velocity jar in WEB-INF/lib for every .war I create. This boosts the size of each .war from a few kb to almost a Mb. It also seems rather wasteful, given that I try to componentize my webapp into several smaller .wars. Have I got this right? If so, and there's no workaround, I may have to go back to Struts. Great framework otherwise. Craig PS The static attribute seems to be configurationInstance in ConfigurationManager. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the tags work fine in sitemesh decorators as it stands, but the problem is that i need
to use
ActionContext.getContext().getSession() and that returns null when used inside of a
sitemesh decorator
Im using ActionContext.getContext().getSession() inside the decorator to do the typical checking of the session to see
if theres a user logged in or not and display the appropriate links ie: login, register or logout, edit profile
all of this checking of the user is implemented as a method getLoggedInUser in my BaseAction, this is what I was using
before I started using sitemesh and using ugly includes.
Jason Carreira wrote:
The purpose is for each ActionInvocation to have its own ActionContext
which is only active while the ActionInvocation is being executed (as
managed by the ActionProxy).
If, for instance, you chain to another Action, that nested Action should
have its own ActionContext which is available while it is executing, and
which should be reset to the parent ActionInvocation's ActionContext
when the nested Action is done.
The problem you're seeing is probably due to not having gone through any
type of Dispatcher yet to set the request and response into the
ActionContext. The reason you're seeing 1 of 2 objects is probably
because your servlet container has just 2 execution threads which is
cycles through, and each one has a default ActionContext ThreadLocal
(which is probably never used, except for in your Sitemesh filters,
because a new one will be created and associated for the
ActionInvocation when it gets to the ServletDispatcher to execute an
Action, and then the default set back after it's done executing the
result, but before the Sitemesh filter activates).
I think the solution to your problem is to use the request directly in
your sitemesh code... I'll let Patrick comment more, since he was
refactoring the tags and stuff to work with Sitemesh.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats
the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-407
heres the method, whats the purpose of nestedContext?
-
public String execute() throws Exception {
ActionContext nestedContext = ActionContext.getContext();
ActionContext.setContext(invocation.getInvocationContext());
String retCode = null;
try {
retCode = invocation.invoke();
} finally {
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
}
return retCode;
}
--
the problems im having and described and shown in the app
attached for WW-407 go away after i comment out the line:
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
another thing i've noticed is that with
ActionContext.getContext always returns either one of two
objects, always
alternating for every request (this is when used inside a
sitemesh decorator)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
You could have it populate this boolean during execution, or pull this
into an Interceptor. I don't think leaving around leftover state in a
ThreadLocal is the way to go, though...
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute()
whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the tags work fine in sitemesh decorators as it stands, but
the problem is that i need to use
ActionContext.getContext().getSession() and that returns null
when used inside of a sitemesh decorator
Im using ActionContext.getContext().getSession() inside the
decorator to do the typical checking of the session to see
if theres a user logged in or not and display the appropriate
links ie: login, register or logout, edit profile
all of this checking of the user is implemented as a method
getLoggedInUser in my BaseAction, this is what I was using
before I started using sitemesh and using ugly includes.
Jason Carreira wrote:
The purpose is for each ActionInvocation to have its own
ActionContext
which is only active while the ActionInvocation is being
executed (as
managed by the ActionProxy).
If, for instance, you chain to another Action, that nested Action
should have its own ActionContext which is available while it is
executing, and which should be reset to the parent
ActionInvocation's
ActionContext when the nested Action is done.
The problem you're seeing is probably due to not having
gone through
any type of Dispatcher yet to set the request and response into the
ActionContext. The reason you're seeing 1 of 2 objects is probably
because your servlet container has just 2 execution threads
which is
cycles through, and each one has a default ActionContext
ThreadLocal
(which is probably never used, except for in your Sitemesh filters,
because a new one will be created and associated for the
ActionInvocation when it gets to the ServletDispatcher to
execute an
Action, and then the default set back after it's done executing the
result, but before the Sitemesh filter activates).
I think the solution to your problem is to use the request
directly in
your sitemesh code... I'll let Patrick comment more, since he was
refactoring the tags and stuff to work with Sitemesh.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats
the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-407
heres the method, whats the purpose of nestedContext?
-
public String execute() throws Exception {
ActionContext nestedContext = ActionContext.getContext();
ActionContext.setContext(invocation.getInvocationContext());
String retCode = null;
try {
retCode = invocation.invoke();
} finally {
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
}
return retCode;
}
--
the problems im having and described and shown in the app
attached for WW-407 go away after i comment out the line:
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
another thing i've noticed is that with
ActionContext.getContext always returns either one of two
objects, always
alternating for every request (this is when used inside a
sitemesh decorator)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does
SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help
you create
better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:
http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
Re: Spam:[OS-webwork] Xwork and hot redeploy
Jason Carreira wrote:
webwork.configuration.xml.reload=true
In your webwork.properties to tell it to check and automatically reload
XML configuration files (this includes the xwork.xml file and any other
included xwork configuration files, validation.xml files, and type
conversion .properties files right now).
As far as being able to have the one Xwork.jar and have multiple
configurations, that's a good idea... Please add a Jira issue. I've
always hated that Singleton, so we can look at how to get rid of it. In
the meantime, is it possible to have the one xwork.jar file and have
Jboss load it individually in the classloader of each web app (instead
of just once in the server classloader)?
No, but you can have it appear as one singleton while it really is many
by doing a classloader switch internally.
E.g.:
Map clSettings = new HashMap();
String getFoo(String bar)
{
Map settings =
(Map)clSettings.get(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassloader());
if (settings == null)
...
return (String)settings.get(bar);
}
This at least gives you one singleton per deployment. If you use a
WeakHashmap for clSettings you can even have the stated be garbage
collected properly.
/Rickard
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
I like that idea actually, moving this logic into an interceptor, but i still think
ActionContext.getContext().getSession() should not be returning null when used in a sitemesh decorator.
Jason Carreira wrote:
You could have it populate this boolean during execution, or pull this
into an Interceptor. I don't think leaving around leftover state in a
ThreadLocal is the way to go, though...
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute()
whats the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the tags work fine in sitemesh decorators as it stands, but
the problem is that i need to use
ActionContext.getContext().getSession() and that returns null
when used inside of a sitemesh decorator
Im using ActionContext.getContext().getSession() inside the
decorator to do the typical checking of the session to see
if theres a user logged in or not and display the appropriate
links ie: login, register or logout, edit profile
all of this checking of the user is implemented as a method
getLoggedInUser in my BaseAction, this is what I was using
before I started using sitemesh and using ugly includes.
Jason Carreira wrote:
The purpose is for each ActionInvocation to have its own
ActionContext
which is only active while the ActionInvocation is being
executed (as
managed by the ActionProxy).
If, for instance, you chain to another Action, that nested Action
should have its own ActionContext which is available while it is
executing, and which should be reset to the parent
ActionInvocation's
ActionContext when the nested Action is done.
The problem you're seeing is probably due to not having
gone through
any type of Dispatcher yet to set the request and response into the
ActionContext. The reason you're seeing 1 of 2 objects is probably
because your servlet container has just 2 execution threads
which is
cycles through, and each one has a default ActionContext
ThreadLocal
(which is probably never used, except for in your Sitemesh filters,
because a new one will be created and associated for the
ActionInvocation when it gets to the ServletDispatcher to
execute an
Action, and then the default set back after it's done executing the
result, but before the Sitemesh filter activates).
I think the solution to your problem is to use the request
directly in
your sitemesh code... I'll let Patrick comment more, since he was
refactoring the tags and stuff to work with Sitemesh.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] in DefaultActionProxy.execute() whats
the purpose of the nestedContext and WW-407?
the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-407
heres the method, whats the purpose of nestedContext?
-
public String execute() throws Exception {
ActionContext nestedContext = ActionContext.getContext();
ActionContext.setContext(invocation.getInvocationContext());
String retCode = null;
try {
retCode = invocation.invoke();
} finally {
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
}
return retCode;
}
--
the problems im having and described and shown in the app
attached for WW-407 go away after i comment out the line:
ActionContext.setContext(nestedContext);
another thing i've noticed is that with
ActionContext.getContext always returns either one of two
objects, always
alternating for every request (this is when used inside a
sitemesh decorator)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does
SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help
you create
better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:
http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us
help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
