Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Weedy
Linkodas wrote:
> Weedy wrote:
>> Linkodas wrote:
>>> Hi list/community,
>>>
>>> we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.
>> Sweet
>>
>>> This board is referenced to low-cost and low-power solutions.
>> Sweet^2
>>
>>> Below are preliminary specifications:
>>>
>>> PCB form factor: Pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm, fanless)
>>>
>>> Onboard CPU: Cortina Systems CS3516 (300Mhz ARM9 Core)
>> 300 feels slow, but arm9 is supposed to be quite efficient right?
> 
> 400 MIPS according to specs. There is also dual core version of this chip.
Dual core sounds VERY cool.

>>> Onboard DDR SDRAM: 128Mb 333Mhz 32bit
>> I would make this a SODIMM, 128 is low if I'm going to buy a board
> 
> Since our memory bus is 32-bit it is a little bit problematic with
> SODIMM. There is 32-bit SODIMMs, but they are rare and expensive...
Dual channel? If you can't make it user upgradeable try and make it
256MB please. With 400mhz and possibly dual core 128 is kinda crappy. It
means we need to swap on the rom if we try and do anything interesting.

>>> Onboard NAND FLASH: 128Mb (or more)
>> Related to above: Too much, go for 32Mb and solder on more ram if you
>> can't make it a SODIMM
>>
>>> Onboard LAN: 2x 10/100Mbps Ethernet
>> Last year I would have said "WHY NOT GIGABIT" but since I've switched to
>> a high quality gigabit switch plugged into my WRT I don't need more then
>> 2 ports on the router device. (Not like we have gigabit internet yet :/)
> 
> It can be Gigabit! We considered 10/100, because of hardware price and
> it is unlikely that CPU will generate such traffic... Although it is
> capable
> of doing hardware NAT at Gigabit between Ethernet ports.
As I said Gigabit on a 2 port router (one WAN one LAN) is useless, keep
it cheap.

>>> Onboard SATA: 2x SATA
>> This is why you don't need more then 32mb on-board. There are plenty of
>> CF <-> SATA adaptors you can buy for $10 off DX. (Also raid0 SDcard <->
>> SATA)
>>
>>> Onboard connectors: 2x SATA, 2x mini-PCI slots, 1x mini-PCI Express
>>> (with USB 2.0 interface), 1x UART, 1x Pico-ITX power, 1x JTAG, GPIO
>>> ports
>> So the miniPCIE runs in usb mode? Or both USB and native?
> 
> Only USB. There is no PCIe controller on this CPU.
:( thems the breaks. I will agree with the other emails. CF slot built
in would be awesome.

> 
>>> Back panel connectors: 2x RJ-45 LAN, 2x USB 2.0, 3x antenna (GSM, 3G,
>>> Wifi, Wimax, other), 1x RS232
>> :O GSM
>>
>>> Management: Watch Dog Timer, Brown-out Reset, RTC with battery
>> Battery backed RTC \o/
>>
>> What is the target price? depending how close to $100 this stays this
>> could kick some serious ass. (if it comes with a case and power supply
>> then I guess it can cost more, but a naked board should be close to $100
>> or be insanely over-powered and like $300)
> 
> We think 100$ is realistic for naked board.
Nice.

> Thank you very much for all comments.
No problem.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:45:45PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:
> I don't want to believe that CF is connected to GPIO - too many signals.
> CF = IDE so I think that their CPU just has IDE.

You are right, i took a second look on the IDE driver code and
it seems that there is a IDE controller.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Ondrej Zajicek wrote:

On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:42:49PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:

I would suggest to add bootable CF or SD card connector (or two).
There are two use cases for such cards:

 - Installation of Debian Linux (or another 'normal' Linux
   distribution compiled for ARM). It is much simpler to install
   such distribution on CF or SD card than on internal NAND flash.

 - Persistent storage of system logs and other runtime writable
   data.

I agree it is good idea. SATA/USB to CF or SD is best solution IMO.


It should be possible to implement CF or SD card slot using
a couple of GPIOs.

It will be very ssslllooowww... and will use a lot of CPU resources.
At least comparing to SATA converter or even USB adapter.


AFAIK Mikrotik Routerboard 532 has CF card slot connected in such way
and it is sufficient for these purposes. External devices on USB or SATA
are viable alternative (especially USB flash memory), but they are
often less convenient than internal card slot.


I don't want to believe that CF is connected to GPIO - too many signals.
CF = IDE so I think that their CPU just has IDE.
Our CPU also has IDE, but it is hard to use it since its pins are muxed
with NAND flash pins...
IMO the best option is to use USB<->MMC/SD chip with internal connector.

Thanks for comments.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Markus Wigge wrote:

Hi,


* SIM card slot for mini-PCI express would be great!
* Gigabit ethernet instead of FE.
* SDHC-slot or CF-Slot

to complete the list for our needs:
* the case should be DIN rail mountable
* Powersupply should accept 24V for industrial usage
* the SIM Reader should be accessible through a slot
  in the enclosure. I don't like the idea to open the
  case just for switching the SIM.
* For the Alix.6b2 board we need 4 antenna holes
  2x UMTS, 2x WLAN each with main and aux

The idea of SATA-CF adapters is crap. For commercial use you need a
ready-to-go device where you don't have to build in such stuff manually.

Ideally I'd like to order it, plug in a CF card and boot it.


It seems for me that your needs are pretty specific.
Currently our goal is general purpose board for other companies/integrators
to make final product. We plan to make money from customizations.


bye,
Markus


___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:42:49PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:
>> I would suggest to add bootable CF or SD card connector (or two).
>> There are two use cases for such cards:
>>
>>  - Installation of Debian Linux (or another 'normal' Linux
>>distribution compiled for ARM). It is much simpler to install
>>such distribution on CF or SD card than on internal NAND flash.
>>
>>  - Persistent storage of system logs and other runtime writable
>>data.
>
> I agree it is good idea. SATA/USB to CF or SD is best solution IMO.
>
>> It should be possible to implement CF or SD card slot using
>> a couple of GPIOs.
>
> It will be very ssslllooowww... and will use a lot of CPU resources.
> At least comparing to SATA converter or even USB adapter.

AFAIK Mikrotik Routerboard 532 has CF card slot connected in such way
and it is sufficient for these purposes. External devices on USB or SATA
are viable alternative (especially USB flash memory), but they are
often less convenient than internal card slot.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Dirk Nehring wrote:

On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:27:26PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:

Hi list/community,

we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.
It is only in development stage and we are looking for community opinion
regarding its features and possibilities. There still currently a chance
to change something and take into community response.
This board is referenced to low-cost and low-power solutions.
Any comments and opinions are very welcome!

Below are preliminary specifications:

PCB form factor: Pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm, fanless)

Onboard CPU: Cortina Systems CS3516 (300Mhz ARM9 Core)
Onboard DDR SDRAM: 128Mb 333Mhz 32bit
Onboard NAND FLASH: 128Mb (or more)
Onboard LAN: 2x 10/100Mbps Ethernet
Onboard SATA: 2x SATA

Onboard connectors: 2x SATA, 2x mini-PCI slots, 1x mini-PCI Express
(with USB 2.0 interface), 1x UART, 1x Pico-ITX power, 1x JTAG, GPIO ports

Back panel connectors: 2x RJ-45 LAN, 2x USB 2.0, 3x antenna (GSM, 3G,
Wifi, Wimax, other), 1x RS232

Management: Watch Dog Timer, Brown-out Reset, RTC with battery

Operating system: OpenWRT with newest 2.6 Linux Kernel.
Bootloader: U-boot


Sounds great.

My wishlist:

* SIM card slot for mini-PCI express would be great!


Definitely


* Gigabit ethernet instead of FE.


Still considering... There is a chance for Gigabit.
Please see my comments on other post about GE.


* SDHC-slot or CF-Slot


Please see my other comments.


Dirk


Thank you for comments.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Deneen
Linkodas wrote:
> RHS Linux User wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 1. GPIO -> SPI/Serial to peripheral(s) with or without their own
>> processor
>>MMC/SD (of course)
>>
>>BIG DDR - Suggest 256MB min.  DDR
>> module plug-in?
>
> Please see my previous comment on GPIO usage.
>
Even if it is slow, MMC would be nice to store configuration on.  How
expensive is a card holder in quantity?  The spring loaded ones are a
little pricey, but the simple ones are ~ 1USD / quantity 100.  RoHS too.

http://www.mouser.com/Search/Refine.aspx?Keyword=94352-5007

Mark
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Gregers Petersen wrote:

Dear Linkedas Team

Linkodas wrote:

Hi list/community,



It is always interesting and positive to read that OpenWrt makes new
hardware do tricks :)

Your questions are somewhat difficult to answer without having access to
the hardware in question - so, feel free to donate a couple of these
devices to OpenWrt.org?


Currently we don't have any real hardware. It is in early development stage.
I hope we will be able to donate couple boards when we will have them.



In as much as you'r asking for community comments and support for your
development work it will require more information, involvement - and,
not least a person(s) to talk to.


We are used and willing to work with community!

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

RHS Linux User wrote:

Hi,

   New Router board VERY good idea


We hope so.


   I AM willing to get envolved to help with whatever (BSE(EE),MSEE,
etc.).


Sorry, but I don't understand what you want to say here...


   Features I need:

VERY cheap basic unit available. 

Good OEM package. 


I hope this is what we will be able to offer.


Full sources for whole design.
  OEM engineers available.
  Copies of current engineering package for PCBs, VHDL, Code, etc.
  Design available in form suitable for use with open source tools!!


Not very likely... If we were CPU manufacturers then I understand that
providing whole design is good idea. Currently our business model is to
provide customization services and sell sub-products/components like this
board.


Provision for add on modules: Piggy back or plug-in feature modules.

And the usual feature set you probably already have identified.

1. GPIO -> SPI/Serial to peripheral(s) with or without their own
processor
   MMC/SD (of course)

   BIG DDR - Suggest 256MB min. 
 DDR module plug-in?


Please see my previous comment on GPIO usage.


2. I TOO see NO NEED for large on PCB flash. Just boot flash with rest
of load on plug-in MMC card

warm regards to all,
Wiz (pen name)


Thank you very much for comments.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Ondrej Zajicek wrote:

On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:27:26PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:

Hi list/community,

we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.
It is only in development stage and we are looking for community opinion  
regarding its features and possibilities. There still currently a chance  
to change something and take into community response.


I would suggest to add bootable CF or SD card connector (or two).
There are two use cases for such cards:

 - Installation of Debian Linux (or another 'normal' Linux
   distribution compiled for ARM). It is much simpler to install
   such distribution on CF or SD card than on internal NAND flash.

 - Persistent storage of system logs and other runtime writable
   data.


I agree it is good idea. SATA/USB to CF or SD is best solution IMO.


It should be possible to implement CF or SD card slot using
a couple of GPIOs.


It will be very ssslllooowww... and will use a lot of CPU resources.
At least comparing to SATA converter or even USB adapter.


A nice and useful feature is also onboard piezobuzzer like one on
newer Mikrotik Routerboards.


Since our board will have GPIO on standard header it should be no
problem to connect such custom devices.

Thank you very much for your comments.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Linkodas

Weedy wrote:

Linkodas wrote:

Hi list/community,

we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.

Sweet


This board is referenced to low-cost and low-power solutions.

Sweet^2


Below are preliminary specifications:

PCB form factor: Pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm, fanless)

Onboard CPU: Cortina Systems CS3516 (300Mhz ARM9 Core)

300 feels slow, but arm9 is supposed to be quite efficient right?


400 MIPS according to specs. There is also dual core version of this chip.


Onboard DDR SDRAM: 128Mb 333Mhz 32bit

I would make this a SODIMM, 128 is low if I'm going to buy a board


Since our memory bus is 32-bit it is a little bit problematic with
SODIMM. There is 32-bit SODIMMs, but they are rare and expensive...


Onboard NAND FLASH: 128Mb (or more)

Related to above: Too much, go for 32Mb and solder on more ram if you
can't make it a SODIMM


Onboard LAN: 2x 10/100Mbps Ethernet

Last year I would have said "WHY NOT GIGABIT" but since I've switched to
a high quality gigabit switch plugged into my WRT I don't need more then
2 ports on the router device. (Not like we have gigabit internet yet :/)


It can be Gigabit! We considered 10/100, because of hardware price and
it is unlikely that CPU will generate such traffic... Although it is capable
of doing hardware NAT at Gigabit between Ethernet ports.


Onboard SATA: 2x SATA

This is why you don't need more then 32mb on-board. There are plenty of
CF <-> SATA adaptors you can buy for $10 off DX. (Also raid0 SDcard <->
SATA)


Onboard connectors: 2x SATA, 2x mini-PCI slots, 1x mini-PCI Express
(with USB 2.0 interface), 1x UART, 1x Pico-ITX power, 1x JTAG, GPIO ports

So the miniPCIE runs in usb mode? Or both USB and native?


Only USB. There is no PCIe controller on this CPU.


Back panel connectors: 2x RJ-45 LAN, 2x USB 2.0, 3x antenna (GSM, 3G,
Wifi, Wimax, other), 1x RS232

:O GSM


Management: Watch Dog Timer, Brown-out Reset, RTC with battery

Battery backed RTC \o/

What is the target price? depending how close to $100 this stays this
could kick some serious ass. (if it comes with a case and power supply
then I guess it can cost more, but a naked board should be close to $100
or be insanely over-powered and like $300)


We think 100$ is realistic for naked board.

Thank you very much for all comments.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread RHS Linux User

Hi,

   New Router board VERY good idea

   I AM willing to get envolved to help with whatever (BSE(EE),MSEE,
etc.).

   Features I need:

VERY cheap basic unit available. 

Good OEM package. 

Full sources for whole design.
  OEM engineers available.
  Copies of current engineering package for PCBs, VHDL, Code, etc.
  Design available in form suitable for use with open source tools!!

Provision for add on modules: Piggy back or plug-in feature modules.

And the usual feature set you probably already have identified.

1. GPIO -> SPI/Serial to peripheral(s) with or without their own
processor
   MMC/SD (of course)

   BIG DDR - Suggest 256MB min. 
 DDR module plug-in?

2. I TOO see NO NEED for large on PCB flash. Just boot flash with rest
of load on plug-in MMC card

warm regards to all,
Wiz (pen name)


On Tue, 5 May 2009, Weedy wrote:

> Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:27:26PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:
> >> Hi list/community,
> >>
> >> we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.
> >> It is only in development stage and we are looking for community opinion  
> >> regarding its features and possibilities. There still currently a chance  
> >> to change something and take into community response.
> > 
> > I would suggest to add bootable CF or SD card connector (or two).
> > There are two use cases for such cards:
> > 
> >  - Installation of Debian Linux (or another 'normal' Linux
> >distribution compiled for ARM). It is much simpler to install
> >such distribution on CF or SD card than on internal NAND flash.
> > 
> >  - Persistent storage of system logs and other runtime writable
> >data.
> > 
> > It should be possible to implement CF or SD card slot using
> > a couple of GPIOs.
> > 
> > A nice and useful feature is also onboard piezobuzzer like one on
> > newer Mikrotik Routerboards.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > openwrt-devel mailing list
> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 
> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.11164
> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.19904
> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.15665
> http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.17790
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Markus Wigge
Hi,

> * SIM card slot for mini-PCI express would be great!
> * Gigabit ethernet instead of FE.
> * SDHC-slot or CF-Slot
to complete the list for our needs:
* the case should be DIN rail mountable
* Powersupply should accept 24V for industrial usage
* the SIM Reader should be accessible through a slot
  in the enclosure. I don't like the idea to open the
  case just for switching the SIM.
* For the Alix.6b2 board we need 4 antenna holes
  2x UMTS, 2x WLAN each with main and aux

The idea of SATA-CF adapters is crap. For commercial use you need a
ready-to-go device where you don't have to build in such stuff manually.

Ideally I'd like to order it, plug in a CF card and boot it.

bye,
Markus
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introduce new router board

2009-05-06 Thread Dirk Nehring
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:27:26PM +0300, Linkodas wrote:
> Hi list/community,
>
> we would like to introduce new router supporting OpenWRT.
> It is only in development stage and we are looking for community opinion
> regarding its features and possibilities. There still currently a chance
> to change something and take into community response.
> This board is referenced to low-cost and low-power solutions.
> Any comments and opinions are very welcome!
>
> Below are preliminary specifications:
>
> PCB form factor: Pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm, fanless)
>
> Onboard CPU: Cortina Systems CS3516 (300Mhz ARM9 Core)
> Onboard DDR SDRAM: 128Mb 333Mhz 32bit
> Onboard NAND FLASH: 128Mb (or more)
> Onboard LAN: 2x 10/100Mbps Ethernet
> Onboard SATA: 2x SATA
>
> Onboard connectors: 2x SATA, 2x mini-PCI slots, 1x mini-PCI Express
> (with USB 2.0 interface), 1x UART, 1x Pico-ITX power, 1x JTAG, GPIO ports
>
> Back panel connectors: 2x RJ-45 LAN, 2x USB 2.0, 3x antenna (GSM, 3G,
> Wifi, Wimax, other), 1x RS232
>
> Management: Watch Dog Timer, Brown-out Reset, RTC with battery
>
> Operating system: OpenWRT with newest 2.6 Linux Kernel.
> Bootloader: U-boot

Sounds great.

My wishlist:

* SIM card slot for mini-PCI express would be great!
* Gigabit ethernet instead of FE.
* SDHC-slot or CF-Slot

Dirk
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel