Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 support
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Peter Naulls pe...@chocky.org wrote: On 12/28/2011 11:09 AM, Victor Khimenko wrote: [Try and retain attributions if you can] For anyone who's not been following, this means that WZR-HP-G300NH, WZR-HP-G300NH2 and WZR-HP-AG300N are supported in a single image. How is it supposed to work? I've just spent about six hours trying to revive my WZR-HP-AG300N after upgrade. Took so much time because upgrade simultaneously broke login (because it introduced /etc/shadow so ssh become useless) and broke failsafe mode so I was forced to learn to flash via tftp (easy and simple to do if you have everything ready and don't need to ask around for borrowable switch). All these are unrelated. My AG300N is broken too with recent changes, for reasons I haven't investigated closely, and could well be fixed by now. But I promise it's nothing to do with my patch. Despite the size of the patch, all it does it choose the machine setup based upon what the SoC is. Well, I hoped your patch will actually fix AG300N. It was broken in trunk the same way. Now it's fixed in trunk and I'm to lazy too check if it works with your patch. If you are having problems with AG300N, then certainly avoid my patch and use unmodified trunk until that is resolved. Then everything I've done will work just fine. __**_ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.**org openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/**mailman/listinfo/openwrt-develhttps://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 support
For anyone who's not been following, this means that WZR-HP-G300NH, WZR-HP-G300NH2 and WZR-HP-AG300N are supported in a single image. How is it supposed to work? I've just spent about six hours trying to revive my WZR-HP-AG300N after upgrade. Took so much time because upgrade simultaneously broke login (because it introduced /etc/shadow so ssh become useless) and broke failsafe mode so I was forced to learn to flash via tftp (easy and simple to do if you have everything ready and don't need to ask around for borrowable switch). Basically at all comes down to the fact that with latest trunk ( http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/openwrt-ar71xx-generic-wzr-hp-ag300h-squashfs-tftp.bin) /proc/cpuinfo contains the following: system type : Atheros AR7161 rev 2 machine : Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 processor : 0 cpu model : MIPS 24Kc V7.4 BogoMIPS: 452.19 wait instruction: yes microsecond timers : yes tlb_entries : 16 extra interrupt vector : yes hardware watchpoint : yes, count: 4, address/irw mask: [0x0ffc, 0x0ffc, 0x0ffb, 0x0ffb] ASEs implemented: mips16 shadow register sets: 1 kscratch registers : 0 core: 0 VCED exceptions : not available VCEI exceptions : not available Older version (I only had version from Oct27) reports different values: system type : Atheros AR7161 rev 2 machine : Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H processor : 0 cpu model : MIPS 24Kc V7.4 BogoMIPS: 452.19 wait instruction: yes microsecond timers : yes tlb_entries : 16 extra interrupt vector : yes hardware watchpoint : yes, count: 4, address/irw mask: [0x, 0x0ff8, 0x0ff8, 0x0ff8] ASEs implemented: mips16 shadow register sets: 1 kscratch registers : 0 core: 0 It also shows some leds in /sys/class/leds/ (while latest version has nothing there and can not find wireless interfaces either). So if are supported by in a single image is supposed to mean you can use them as wired router using single image then it's probably correct, but I like WiFi for some reason... ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 support
On 12/28/2011 11:09 AM, Victor Khimenko wrote: [Try and retain attributions if you can] For anyone who's not been following, this means that WZR-HP-G300NH, WZR-HP-G300NH2 and WZR-HP-AG300N are supported in a single image. How is it supposed to work? I've just spent about six hours trying to revive my WZR-HP-AG300N after upgrade. Took so much time because upgrade simultaneously broke login (because it introduced /etc/shadow so ssh become useless) and broke failsafe mode so I was forced to learn to flash via tftp (easy and simple to do if you have everything ready and don't need to ask around for borrowable switch). All these are unrelated. My AG300N is broken too with recent changes, for reasons I haven't investigated closely, and could well be fixed by now. But I promise it's nothing to do with my patch. Despite the size of the patch, all it does it choose the machine setup based upon what the SoC is. If you are having problems with AG300N, then certainly avoid my patch and use unmodified trunk until that is resolved. Then everything I've done will work just fine. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On 12/14/2011 12:52 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which
concat two partitions together, can we get this applied?
I recently moved the mtd concat code so that it can be shared. I also
added support for registering LEDs from ath9k (based on platform data,
see wzr-hp-g450h). Please update your patch to make use of this, and
I'll make sure it gets merged.
First cut. There are obviously further changes to remove the ag300h
as an explicit target in image generation. But this is the core
arch file change.
Index: files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-wzr-hp-g300nh.c
===
--- files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-wzr-hp-g300nh.c (revision 29529)
+++ files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-wzr-hp-g300nh.c (working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
/*
* Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH board support
+ * Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH2 board support
+ * Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H board support
*
* Copyright (C) 2010 Gabor Juhos juh...@openwrt.org
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Mark Deneen mden...@gmail.com
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Peter Naulls pe...@chocky.org
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
@@ -11,8 +16,11 @@
#include linux/platform_device.h
#include linux/mtd/mtd.h
#include linux/mtd/partitions.h
+#include linux/mtd/concat.h
+
#include linux/nxp_74hc153.h
#include linux/rtl8366.h
+#include asm/mach-ar71xx/gpio.h
#include asm/mips_machine.h
#include asm/mach-ar71xx/ar71xx.h
@@ -20,10 +28,13 @@
#include machtype.h
#include devices.h
+#include dev-ap94-pci.h
#include dev-ar9xxx-wmac.h
#include dev-gpio-buttons.h
#include dev-leds-gpio.h
#include dev-usb.h
+#include dev-ap91-pci.h
+#include dev-m25p80.h
#define WZRHPG300NH_GPIO_LED_USB 0
#define WZRHPG300NH_GPIO_LED_DIAG 1
@@ -53,6 +64,18 @@
#define WZRHPG300NH_MAC_OFFSET 0x20c
+
+#define WZRHPG300NH2_MAC_OFFSET 0x20c
+#define WZRHPG300NH2_KEYS_POLL_INTERVAL 20 /* msecs */
+#define WZRHPG300NH2_KEYS_DEBOUNCE_INTERVAL (3 * WZRHPG300NH2_KEYS_POLL_INTERVAL)
+
+
+#define WZRHPAG300H_MAC_OFFSET0x20c
+#define WZRHPAG300H_KEYS_POLL_INTERVAL 20 /* msecs */
+#define WZRHPAG300H_KEYS_DEBOUNCE_INTERVAL (3 * WZRHPAG300H_KEYS_POLL_INTERVAL)
+
+
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
static struct mtd_partition wzrhpg300nh_flash_partitions[] = {
{
@@ -89,6 +112,47 @@
.size = 0x1f6,
}
};
+
+
+/* AG300H and G300NH2 use identical flash layouts */
+
+static struct mtd_partition wzrhpg300nh2_flash_partitions[] = {
+ {
+ .name = u-boot,
+ .offset = 0,
+ .size = 0x004,
+ .mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE,
+ }, {
+ .name = u-boot-env,
+ .offset = 0x004,
+ .size = 0x001,
+ .mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE,
+ }, {
+ .name = art,
+ .offset = 0x005,
+ .size = 0x001,
+ .mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE,
+ }, {
+ .name = kernel,
+ .offset = 0x006,
+ .size = 0x010,
+ }, {
+ .name = rootfs,
+ .offset = 0x016,
+ .size = 0x1e9,
+ }, {
+ .name = user_property,
+ .offset = 0x1ff,
+ .size = 0x001,
+ .mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE,
+ }, {
+ .name = firmware,
+ .offset = 0x006,
+ .size = 0x1f9,
+ }
+};
+
+
#endif /* CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS */
static struct ar91xx_flash_platform_data wzrhpg300nh_flash_data = {
@@ -99,6 +163,16 @@
#endif
};
+
+static struct flash_platform_data wzrhpg300nh2_flash_data = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
+ .parts = wzrhpg300nh2_flash_partitions,
+ .nr_parts = ARRAY_SIZE(wzrhpg300nh2_flash_partitions),
+#endif
+};
+
+
+
#define WZRHPG300NH_FLASH_BASE 0x1e00
#define WZRHPG300NH_FLASH_SIZE (32 * 1024 * 1024)
@@ -120,6 +194,7 @@
}
};
+
static struct gpio_led wzrhpg300nh_leds_gpio[] __initdata = {
{
.name = buffalo:orange:security,
@@ -144,6 +219,24 @@
}
};
+/* There are more of these, but they must be accessed through ath9k */
+static struct gpio_led wzrhpg300nh2_leds_gpio[] __initdata = {
+ {
+ .name = wzr-hp-g300nh2:red:diag,
+ .gpio = 16,
+ .active_low = 1,
+ },
+};
+
+
+static struct gpio_led wzrhpag300h_leds_gpio[] __initdata = {
+ {
+.name = buffalo:red:diag,
+.gpio = 1,
+.active_low = 1,
+ },
+};
+
static struct gpio_keys_button wzrhpg300nh_gpio_keys[] __initdata = {
{
.desc = reset,
@@ -197,6 +290,78 @@
}
};
+/* The AOSS button is likely also behind ath9k */
+static struct gpio_keys_button wzrhpg300nh2_gpio_keys[] __initdata = {
+ {
+ .desc = reset,
+ .type = EV_KEY,
+ .code = KEY_RESTART,
+ .debounce_interval = WZRHPG300NH2_KEYS_DEBOUNCE_INTERVAL,
+ .gpio = 1,
+ .active_low = 1,
+ }, {
+ .desc = usb,
+ .type = EV_KEY,
+ .code = BTN_2,
+ .debounce_interval = WZRHPG300NH2_KEYS_DEBOUNCE_INTERVAL,
+ .gpio = 7,
+ .active_low = 1,
+ }, {
+ .desc = qos,
+ .type = EV_KEY,
+ .code = BTN_3,
+
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: On 2011-11-10 5:13 PM, Mark Deneen wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Naulls pe...@chocky.org wrote: On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote: I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html We have been using these patches for months on many devices. See my addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2. I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can justify the time to do it myself right now. If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which concat two partitions together, can we get this applied? I recently moved the mtd concat code so that it can be shared. I also added support for registering LEDs from ath9k (based on platform data, see wzr-hp-g450h). Please update your patch to make use of this, and I'll make sure it gets merged. Just a quick note -- I have all of the LEDs working except for the USB LED. I can't seem to find it anywhere. I am also missing the AOSS button, which is a GPIO off of the wmac similar to the way the LEDs were handled. I need to study the mtd concat code, because I was taking a different route in my tree. I guess it is a safe assumption that we'll only have 2 flash devices to concat? -M ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
That's great Peter, any ideas when you would be able to get the patches into trunk? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Peter Naulls Sent: 17 November 2011 00:24 To: OpenWrt Development List Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2 On 11/10/2011 08:21 AM, Peter Naulls wrote: I'll test any such patches of course. As an additional note, we're going to need the same thing on a300gh, since I'm getting one of those in next few days. I'll submit any work on that here, even if it's Now done. It's a mess right now, so not suitable for posting, but in short, the wzr-hp-g300nh, wzr-hp-g300nh2 and wzr-hp-ag300h all use different SoC models, so choosing the right init code based on that is easy. The setup for the g300ng2 and ag300h is 80% similar, so that code could be combined more than I've done. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On 11/17/2011 12:37 AM, Matt Redfearn wrote: That's great Peter, any ideas when you would be able to get the patches into trunk? Did you read my previous posts? Probably never. The developers have expressed a desire to not combine images. Why? I remain unsure. There's an argument to be had about extra logic for yet unknown devices, but that seems a bit disingenuous. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On 11/10/2011 08:21 AM, Peter Naulls wrote: I'll test any such patches of course. As an additional note, we're going to need the same thing on a300gh, since I'm getting one of those in next few days. I'll submit any work on that here, even if it's Now done. It's a mess right now, so not suitable for posting, but in short, the wzr-hp-g300nh, wzr-hp-g300nh2 and wzr-hp-ag300h all use different SoC models, so choosing the right init code based on that is easy. The setup for the g300ng2 and ag300h is 80% similar, so that code could be combined more than I've done. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
Hi all, I have one of these routers, but there is no support in openWRT trunk or seemingly in DD-WRT, even though it ships with that installed. The wiki (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wzr-hp-g300nh2) suggests that support is work in progress - please could you tell me if it is being worked on and when support may get into the trunk? Thanks, Matt ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html Ben On 11/10/2011 3:39 AM, Matt Redfearn wrote: Hi all, I have one of these routers, but there is no support in openWRT trunk or seemingly in DD-WRT, even though it ships with that installed. The wiki (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wzr-hp-g300nh2) suggests that support is work in progress – please could you tell me if it is being worked on and when support may get into the trunk? Thanks, Matt ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote: I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html We have been using these patches for months on many devices. See my addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2. I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can justify the time to do it myself right now. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Naulls pe...@chocky.org wrote: On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote: I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html We have been using these patches for months on many devices. See my addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2. I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can justify the time to do it myself right now. If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which concat two partitions together, can we get this applied? -M ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
On 11/10/2011 08:13 AM, Mark Deneen wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Naullspe...@chocky.org wrote: On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote: I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html We have been using these patches for months on many devices. See my addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2. I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can justify the time to do it myself right now. If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which concat two partitions together, can we get this applied? I'll test any such patches of course. As an additional note, we're going to need the same thing on a300gh, since I'm getting one of those in next few days. I'll submit any work on that here, even if it's decided not to use it. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2
Great - this is good news :-) I will of course test these patches, and if there is anything I can do to help get them into the trunk then I will do so. Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Peter Naulls Sent: 10 November 2011 16:21 To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh2 On 11/10/2011 08:13 AM, Mark Deneen wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Naullspe...@chocky.org wrote: On 11/10/2011 05:59 AM, Ben Pfountz wrote: I would like to see support in trunk as well. In the meantime I have been using the patch Mark Deneen created, which adds support for everything except some of the LEDs and switches, see his email and thread for more info... https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/011901.html We have been using these patches for months on many devices. See my addition patch to allow the same kernel to work on both the nh and nh2. I'd like to see the additional LED support too, but not sure I can justify the time to do it myself right now. If I clean up the common mtd code between the various boards which concat two partitions together, can we get this applied? I'll test any such patches of course. As an additional note, we're going to need the same thing on a300gh, since I'm getting one of those in next few days. I'll submit any work on that here, even if it's decided not to use it. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
