[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovn4nfv] Project kickoff meeting

[Vikram Dham]

Hi,

Welcome to the first meeting of the project ovn4nfv.

1. Current state of OVN (Russell Bryant)
2. State of OVN based SFC (John McDowall)
3. Long term requirements for OPNFV (Vikram Dham)
4. Logistics
5. Installers, Documentation, Test cases, Deployments

Let me know if you would like to add anything else to the agenda

Thanks,

Vikram Dham 

Weekly on Friday at 16:00 - 17:00 UTC
IRC channel: #ovn4nfv-meeting
Chaired by vikramdham_ (Vikram Dham)
Goto Meeting:

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/819733085 


You can also dial in using your phone. 
United States +1 (312) 757-3126

Access Code: 819-733-085

More phone numbers 
Australia +61 2 8355 1040 
Austria +43 7 2088 0034 
Belgium +32 (0) 28 93 7018 
Canada +1 (647) 497-9350 
Denmark +45 69 91 88 64 
Finland +358 (0) 923 17 0568 
France +33 (0) 170 950 592 
Germany +49 (0) 692 5736 7211 
Ireland +353 (0) 15 360 728 
Italy +39 0 247 92 13 01 
Netherlands +31 (0) 208 080 219 
New Zealand +64 9 280 6302 
Norway +47 75 80 32 07 
Spain +34 911 82 9906 
Sweden +46 (0) 853 527 836 
Switzerland +41 (0) 435 0167 13 
United Kingdom +44 (0) 330 221 0086___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV

[Yujun Zhang (ZTE)]

Hi, Donald

It would be my pleasure to join the project. Signed as contributor on the
wiki page :-)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM Donald Hunter (donaldh) 
wrote:

> Hi Yujun,
>
>
>
> Yes, the Bamboo project’s goal is to use a PNDA instance to sink data from
> the various OPNFV testing projects. The first phase would involve getting a
> PNDA instance deployed and then integrating data from sources such as QTIP.
>
>
>
> The next step for us is to solicit input from project leads and hopefully
> encourage people like yourself to get involved. So your email is very
> timely. If you’d like to add your name to the contributors on the project
> proposal, that would be fantastic:
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Donald.
>
>
>
> *From: *"Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" 
> *Date: *Friday, 24 February 2017 at 23:27
> *To: *"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" , "
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
> *Cc: *"Koren Lev (korlev)" , "John Evans (joevans)" <
> joev...@cisco.com>, "Donald Hunter (donaldh)" 
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding
> analytics to OPNFV
>
>
>
> As QTIP PTL, I am particularly interested in Bamboo project.
>
>
>
> If I understand it correctly, it could be used to develop or deploy (not
> sure about the way of integration yet) the benchmark hub in QTIP
> architecture[1].
>
>
>
> The benchmark hub is supposed to be a sink of all data produced by QTIP.
>
>
>
> [1]: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/qtip/Architecture
>
>
>
> Excuse me for late response, but better than never.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:56 AM Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <
> fbroc...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi OPNFV,
>
>
>
> over the past few weeks we’ve distilled two proposals to add analytics and
> more diagnostic capabilities to OPNFV and OPNFV scenarios. We’ve published
> the two new project proposals on the wiki:
>
> ·   Bamboo:
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal
>
> ·   VINA: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vina/VINA+Project+Proposal
>
>
>
> Bamboo is to introduce the analytics infrastructure provided by PNDA.io to
> OPNFV. VINA is to offer discovery and system health status for VIMs. Both
> projects are to work and in hand and are expected to integrate with both
> Barometer, VES, Qtip, etc. – as well as integrate with the testresults
> post-processing that we already do.
>
>
>
> We’re hoping for a discussion in the technical community meeting on
> Feb/23, and are also asking for an official TSC review post the technical
> community review. Target would be the TSC call on March/7.
>
>
>
> Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks much, Frank
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
> --
>
> Yujun Zhang
>
-- 
Yujun Zhang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] POD 12 booking for VSPERF

[Cooper, Trevor]

VSPERF committers and contributors ...

A calendar for booking POD 12 has been setup here ... there is a link on the 
VSPERF Wiki page under project links https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Pod+12+Booking+Calendar

Thanks

Trevor (VSPERF PTL)
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] Danube stable branch date and time

[David McBride]

Yes, that's correct.  Of course, there is significant overhead in
cherry-picking changes, so it's in your interest to complete as many bug
fixes as possible before you branch.

David

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Georg Kunz  wrote:

> Hi David,
>
>
>
> I suppose you mean closing the window for cutting the stable branch. The
> branch itself will remain open for bug fixes, right?
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Georg
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *David McBride
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 25, 2017 5:26 AM
> *To:* opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; Tapio Tallgren <
> tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>; Raymond Paik 
> *Subject:* [opnfv-project-leads] [release] Danube stable branch date and
> time
>
>
>
> Team,
>
>
>
> I took an action at the last release meeting to specify a specific time
> for closing the stable branch on March 10.  We will close the stable branch
> at 12 p.m. (noon PST) on March 10.
>
>
>
> Note that I have another action that is in process to update the stable
> branch instructions for Danube.  I will email the team when those
> instructions are available.
>
>
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
>
> *David McBride*
>
> Release Manager, OPNFV
>
> Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
>
> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
>
> Skype: davidjmcbride1
>
> IRC: dmcbride
>



-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] VOTE on generating VSPERF Stable branch for Danube

[Cooper, Trevor]

VSPERF committers and contributors ...

The deadline for creating the stable branch of VSPERF for Danube is 10th March

There are currently are no outstanding patches waiting for review or commit

PLEASE RESPOND WITH +1, 0, -1 to indicated your agreement/disagreement with 
generating the stable branch. We will check on the consensus at our weekly 
meeting this week (Wednesday) before the final decision to proceed.

Thanks

Trevor (VSPERF PTL)
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV

[Donald Hunter (donaldh)]

Hi Yujun,

Yes, the Bamboo project’s goal is to use a PNDA instance to sink data from the 
various OPNFV testing projects. The first phase would involve getting a PNDA 
instance deployed and then integrating data from sources such as QTIP.

The next step for us is to solicit input from project leads and hopefully 
encourage people like yourself to get involved. So your email is very timely. 
If you’d like to add your name to the contributors on the project proposal, 
that would be fantastic: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal

Many thanks,
Donald.

From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" 
Date: Friday, 24 February 2017 at 23:27
To: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" , 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
Cc: "Koren Lev (korlev)" , "John Evans (joevans)" 
, "Donald Hunter (donaldh)" 
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to 
OPNFV

As QTIP PTL, I am particularly interested in Bamboo project.

If I understand it correctly, it could be used to develop or deploy (not sure 
about the way of integration yet) the benchmark hub in QTIP architecture[1].

The benchmark hub is supposed to be a sink of all data produced by QTIP.

[1]: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/qtip/Architecture

Excuse me for late response, but better than never.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:56 AM Frank Brockners (fbrockne) 
mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi OPNFV,

over the past few weeks we’ve distilled two proposals to add analytics and more 
diagnostic capabilities to OPNFV and OPNFV scenarios. We’ve published the two 
new project proposals on the wiki:

•   Bamboo: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal

•   VINA: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vina/VINA+Project+Proposal

Bamboo is to introduce the analytics infrastructure provided by PNDA.io to 
OPNFV. VINA is to offer discovery and system health status for VIMs. Both 
projects are to work and in hand and are expected to integrate with both 
Barometer, VES, Qtip, etc. – as well as integrate with the testresults 
post-processing that we already do.

We’re hoping for a discussion in the technical community meeting on Feb/23, and 
are also asking for an official TSC review post the technical community review. 
Target would be the TSC call on March/7.

Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated.

Thanks much, Frank

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
--
Yujun Zhang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [JOID] Can JOID Installer run in a VM?

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

Hi Narinder and other JOID project members:

In the Infra call today I took the action to check with you whether the JOID 
installer can be run in a VM on the jumphost. This is a goal of the Infra team 
so we can help ensure some strategic things for CI/CD:

-  Jumphosts are stable, i.e. installers do not pollute the jumphost 
(sometimes resulting in need to redeploy the jumphost)

-  Jumphosts are consistent, e.g. we can use a common Jumphost host OS 
(e.g. Ubuntu) and run all installer ISOs in VMs on the jumphost

-  We can migrate to dynamic POD allocation, given the two capabilities 
above

This is a key need of development lab users also, who probably don't have the 
automated tools for POD deployment such as OPNFV CI/CD uses, and who can spend 
a lot of time having to reinstall jumphosts to switch between OPNFV distros.

Does JOID support the installer ISO being booted:

1)  in a libvirt (qemu+kvm) VM

2)  on a generic jumphost (i.e. Ubuntu or Centos)


Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] 2017-Feb-27 Models Project Meeting #26 agenda

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

The Infra group has rescheduled their calls to conflict with the Models meeting 
so hopefully we won’t lose too many attendees. We will need to consider moving 
the Models meeting as I need also to attend the Infra meetings.

2017-Feb-27 Models Project Meeting #26
Agenda:

  *   stable/danube branch plan
 *   Plan to cut the stable/danube branch as soon as current baseline tests 
are updated (this week), with further work on master
  *   Hackfest planning: VNF demos/portability
 *   VNF portability testing as we had as a goal for the Colorado hackfest 
 (but which 
didn't happen apart from the Models project demos)
 *   OPNFV Danube-based
 *   What reference VNFs will be available?
*   updated Models 
tests: vHello_Tacker, 
vHello_3Node, vLamp, vHello_Cloudify (updated to Aria if possible)
   *   adding new/simple VNFs (if possible)
*   updated 
vHello_VES
*   Open-O ?
*   OSM ?
*   OpenBaton ?
  *   Planning for next Multi-SDO IM workshop has started
  *   Testing of modeled VNF capabilities from ONAP - 
maybe in E-release

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] Danube stable branch date and time

[Georg Kunz]

Hi David,

I suppose you mean closing the window for cutting the stable branch. The branch 
itself will remain open for bug fixes, right?

Best regards
Georg


From: opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of David McBride
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 5:26 AM
To: opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
; Tapio Tallgren 
; Raymond Paik 
Subject: [opnfv-project-leads] [release] Danube stable branch date and time

Team,

I took an action at the last release meeting to specify a specific time for 
closing the stable branch on March 10.  We will close the stable branch at 12 
p.m. (noon PST) on March 10.

Note that I have another action that is in process to update the stable branch 
instructions for Danube.  I will email the team when those instructions are 
available.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

David

--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

I have some updates to the script to merge and then the issues you seeing 
should be resolved. I'll merge these today, and we can followup on IRC as 
needed.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: Trinath Somanchi [mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 7:52 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 

Subject: RE: Models Weekly Meeting A

Hi Bryan-

I have installed Devstack Newton release with proposed local.conf.

When I run the tacker-setup.sh  as below, I get the following error.

stack@openstack-dev:/opt/tacker$ sudo bash tacker-setup.sh init
tacker-setup.sh: Sun Feb 26 21:31:26 IST 2017 Setup shared virtual folders and 
save this script there
mkdir: cannot create directory '/opt/tacker': File exists
cp: 'tacker-setup.sh' and '/opt/tacker/./tacker-setup.sh' are the same file
cp: cannot stat './tacker/tacker.conf.sample': No such file or directory
tacker-setup.sh: Sun Feb 26 21:31:26 IST 2017 Setup admin-openrc.sh
tacker-setup.sh: line 58: /opt/tacker/admin-openrc.sh: No such file or directory
tacker-setup.sh: Sun Feb 26 21:31:26 IST 2017 Test Failed!
tacker-setup.sh: Sun Feb 26 21:31:26 IST 2017 Duration = 0 seconds

Do I need any other openstack modules to be installed?

Please help me in this regard.


/ Trinath

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:18 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

(glaring error in my notes below, corrected!) You should be able to run these 
tests on Devstack (it previously say "should not" for some freudian reason).

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
_
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 8:53 AM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: RE: Models Weekly Meeting A


The patch I mentioned on the call (minutes: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/Models+Meetings)
 to the vHello_Tacker.sh script and related utilities has been merged: 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/27355/

You should be able to run this test on a devstack environment (OPNFV 
environment tests are pending). Some notes on that are included in the script 
header. Here are the other notes from the call about it:
· Devstack environment expectations
· stable/newton branch deployed
· Host config recommendations: i7 class CPU, 8-core, 16GB RAM, min 
500GB disk
· If running devstack in a VM: use VM parameters 8GB RAM, 20GB disk, 2 
cores, and base the Devstack install on a Newton-supporting OS version e.g. 
Ubuntu Xenial
· The local.conf I use has been merged as part of the patch: 
https://git.opnfv.org/models/tree/tests/utils/devstack/local.conf
· The vHello_Tacker.sh test has been updated to put the minimum 
expectations on the host from which you run the test (e.g. no Openstack python 
clients (OSC) need to be installed - all Openstack commands are executed in the 
docker container in which Tacker is running). If you want to run Openstack 
commands directly, you can use the commands:
· sudo docker attach tacker
· source /tmp/tacker/admin-openrc.sh (needs to be run only the first 
time you attach)
· run OSC commands. The clients pre-installed are 
python-openstackclient and python-neutronclient only, You can install others, 
just note that you may need to clone/checkout the stable/newton version, and 
follow the procedure to install as shown in the install_client  function of the 
tacker-setup.sh script 
(https://git.opnfv.org/models/tree/tests/utils/tacker-setup.sh)
· You can also run tests via the new utility I created to setup an 
OSC-based test environment using 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] : failed to deploy stack

[limingjiang]

Hi Divya,

I'm Rex from Yardstick team. Thank you very much for find this bug.
This is not a known issue. It's cool you debug and fix it. Great work.

Would you mind create a bug JIRA task for it?
https://jira.opnfv.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20YARDSTICK

Sincerely invite you to submit this patch into yardstick, it helps a lot.
If you're interested in yardstick, welcome to contribute in it.
Thanks again!

Best Regards,
Rex


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
divya.na...@wipro.com
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 7:31 PM
To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org'
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] yardstick: failed to deploy stack

Hi,

We are facing issue in running yardstick test cases,
i.e error: failed to deploy stack: ' can't be decoded'
Please find the attached file for more details about test case 
execution.
have exported EXTERNAL_NETWORK and keystone 
credentials(admin-openrc),
heat service is working fine with manual commands ( i.e heat stack-create -f 
 stack1)

when debugged and modified orchestrator heat.py code as below, it worked, is 
this known issue?

 def _get_heat_client(self):
 """returns a heat client instance"""
+  creds = op_utils.get_credentials()

 if self._heat_client is None:
 sess = op_utils.get_session()
 heat_endpoint = op_utils.get_endpoint(service_type='orchestration')
 self._heat_client = heatclient.client.Client(
 op_utils.get_heat_api_version(),
endpoint=heat_endpoint, session=sess,
+token = sess.get_token().encode("utf-8"),
+username=creds['username'], password = creds['password'])
 return self._heat_client

Thanks and Regards,
Divya.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [SDNVPN] Weekly meeting

[Tim Irnich]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:CANCEL
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:W. Europe Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T03
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Tim Irnich:MAILTO:tim.irn...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=Prem sank
 ar G:MAILTO:prem.sanka...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=MORIN Tho
 mas IMT/OLN (thomas.mo...@orange.com):MAILTO:thomas.mo...@orange.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=Jan Scheu
 rich:MAILTO:jan.scheur...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN="HU, BIN (
 bh5...@att.com)":MAILTO:bh5...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=Nikolas H
 ermanns:MAILTO:nikolas.herma...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=opnfv-tec
 h-disc...@lists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Babu Kot
 handaraman':MAILTO:babu.kothandara...@pfsw.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Mario To
 rrecillas Rodriguez':MAILTO:mario.rodrig...@arm.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Rashid K
 han':MAILTO:rk...@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=Christoph
 er Price:MAILTO:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Brian Br
 ooks':MAILTO:brian.bro...@arm.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Piyush S
 arwal':MAILTO:psar...@us.ibm.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN="'Lenrow, 
 Dave'":MAILTO:david.len...@hpe.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='iben rod
 riguez':MAILTO:iben.rodrig...@vmsec.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Bharat B
 hushan':MAILTO:bharat.bhus...@nxp.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN='Skip Boo
 th (ebooth)':MAILTO:ebo...@cisco.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN="'Bhattipr
 olu, Ravikumar'":MAILTO:ravikumar.bhattipr...@intel.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=BV Gurava
 reddy:MAILTO:bv.guravare...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=Pierre Ly
 nch:MAILTO:ply...@ixiacom.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:I see nothing particular to discuss today – le
 t’s use the time for other things.\nRegards\, Tim\nPlease be invited to 
 the weekly meeting of the SDN VPN project.\nSDN VPN project team meeting\n
 •   Weekly on Monday at 1600 UTC / 09:00 PDT\n•   IRC ch
 annel: #opnfv-sdnvpn\n•   Chaired by timirnich (Tim Irnich)\n•
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/584861637\n•   See meetings/s
 dnvpn for agenda\, details and pre
 vious meeting minutes\n\nPlease join my meeting from your computer\, table
 t or smartphone.\nhttps://global.gotomeeting.com/join/584861637\n\nYou can
  also dial in using your phone.\nUnited Kingdom : +44 (0) 330 221 0088\n\n
 Access Code: 584-861-637\n\n•   Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351\n•  
  France: +33 (0) 182 880 459\n•   United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 00
 86\n•   Australia: +61 2 8355 1024\n•   Netherlands: +31 (0) 2
 08 080 381\n•   New Zealand: +64 (0) 4 974 7214\n•   Denmark: 
 +45 (0) 69 91 88 64\n•   Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67\n•   United
  States: +1 (215) 383-1010\n•   Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 1403\n•   
 Belgium: +32 (0) 38 08 1856\n•   Sweden: +46 (0) 852 503 499\n
 •   Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210\n•   Switzerland: +41 (0) 4
 35 0167 09\n•   Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5780\n•   Spain: +34 
 955 32 0845\n•   Ireland: +353 (0) 14 845 978\n•   Norway: +47
  21 03 58 98\n\n\n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:Canceled: [SDNVPN] Weekly meeting
DTSTART;TZID=W. Europe Standard Time:20170227T17
DTEND;TZID=W. Europe Standard Time:20170227T18
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008508395E6DD22D101000
 01000DB07F58295505248A919E9E69780D988
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=W. Europe Standard Time:20170227T17
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:1
DTSTAMP:20170227T144836Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CANCELLED
SEQUENCE:22
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:Gotomeeting and IRC
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:22
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:1679013855
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE
X-MICROSOFT-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] yardstick: failed to deploy stack

[divya.na...@wipro.com]

Hi,

We are facing issue in running yardstick test cases,
i.e error: failed to deploy stack: ' can't be decoded'
Please find the attached file for more details about test case 
execution.
have exported EXTERNAL_NETWORK and keystone 
credentials(admin-openrc),
heat service is working fine with manual commands ( i.e heat stack-create -f 
 stack1)

when debugged and modified orchestrator heat.py code as below, it worked, is 
this known issue?

 def _get_heat_client(self):
 """returns a heat client instance"""
+  creds = op_utils.get_credentials()

 if self._heat_client is None:
 sess = op_utils.get_session()
 heat_endpoint = op_utils.get_endpoint(service_type='orchestration')
 self._heat_client = heatclient.client.Client(
 op_utils.get_heat_api_version(),
endpoint=heat_endpoint, session=sess,
+token = sess.get_token().encode("utf-8"),
+username=creds['username'], password = creds['password'])
 return self._heat_client

Thanks and Regards,
Divya.
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com


yardstick run.rtf
Description: yardstick run.rtf
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

[Frank Brockners (fbrockne)]

David,

for FDS, please see inline...

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of David McBride
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 21:30
To: opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 

Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Team,

I'd like to request that the PTLs for projects participating in Danube respond 
to the following questions, designed to assess compliance with MS6.

...FB: FDS does feature development (upstream), system integration and test – 
hence is a bit hard to fit into the below categories. Still, please find 
answers inline where they “kind of” fit.
Feature Projects
1. Please provide a list of commits for the following:
a. Enabling testing for your project in the Functest repo (or other test 
framework repo if you are not using functest)
b. Test case implementation in your project repo.
...FB: Tests were directly added to FuncTest for security groups testing: 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28883/
2. Please indicate whether the scenarios with which your project is 
integrated are visible on the Functest dashboard.  If not, why?
...FB: The above patch isn’t merged yet.
Test Framework Projects
1. Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests.
Preliminary Documentation Requirement
1. Please provide a link to the preliminary documentation for your project.
...FB: See
https://git.opnfv.org/fds/tree/docs/scenarios/os-odl_l2-fdio-ha
https://git.opnfv.org/fds/tree/docs/scenarios/os-odl_l3-fdio-noha


Let me know if you have any questions.

David

--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Danube testing group priorities status

[Yuyang (Gabriel)]

Hi Morgan,

Thanks a lot!
I will look into the solution discussed in the WIKI and feed back to you if 
there are further questions.

Best,
Gabriel

From: morgan.richo...@orange.com [mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 12:38 AM
To: Yuyang (Gabriel); rexlee8...@gmail.com; Gaoliang (kubi); Jose Lausuch; 
chenjiankun; kumar rishabh; feng.xiao...@zte.com.cn; Cooper, Trevor; Mark.Beierl
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [OPNFV] Danube testing group priorities status

Hi Gabriel

sorry for the late answer
see comments in the mail

/Morgan

Le 17/02/2017 à 03:53, Yuyang (Gabriel) a écrit :
Hi Morgan,

Currently, two stress testcases are under review for integrating into community 
CI pipeline.

  *   Gerrit: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28671/

 *   one testcase is the performance life-cyle for ping test while 
increasing the user number in parallel
 *   the other is the baseline test for dataplane traffic while increate 
the data size for a VM pair
One issue is that, we use kibana to show the results. However, in the currently 
Bottlenecks CI process, the docker for kibana is set up in community CI POD.
That is, no public access to the kibana. Could you gives us some suggestions or 
help on how to make the testing results and graphs publicly accessible?
regarding Kibana we decided to outsource the work to Bitergia (already in 
charge of code and infra reporting)
but they will be able to start working in H2 so it will be short for Danube
my reco would be to push your results in the database in the details sections 
of the testcase (so maybe create the testcase if it is not already the case)
you can copy/paster the preformated dataset you used for Kibana in local
so when ready, Bitergia could consume it directly through the test API and 
display it in https://opnfv.biterg.io

as the dataset is already kibana compatible, it could be one of the first 
implementation for bitergia
we initiated a wiki page to discuss with bitergia and give some examples, see 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Result+alignment+for+ELK+post-processing

it is a bit strange to have an intermediate Kibana => test results => kibana
but then everything is centralized (projects, cases, results)
and we plan to use also the DB to build a test case catalog...so a central 
point is needed

so that would be my option 1
option 2 would be the use of a Kibana on testresults.opnfv.org as we use to 
have but we got license issues for addons (also a reason we prefered to 
ousource this part of the work)





Thanks,
Gabriel

发件人: morgan.richo...@orange.com 
[morgan.richo...@orange.com]
发送时间: 2017年2月13日 17:15
收件人: rexlee8...@gmail.com; Gaoliang (kubi); Jose 
Lausuch; chenjiankun; kumar rishabh; 
feng.xiao...@zte.com.cn
抄送: Cooper, Trevor; Yuyang (Gabriel); 
feng.xiao...@zte.com.cn; 
test...@lists.opnfv.org
主题: [OPNFV] Danube testing group priorities status

Hi,

I recently sent a mail to Heather to give my view of the testing group 
priorities for Danube.

As mentioned in the mail, it was only my view and it was not consolidated => I 
added a slot for the next weekly meeting.

I will not be able to attend (I will be off from the 15th to the 22)

Heather asked for a global statement on this. My suggestion would be something 
like:

"The testing working group aimed to create more consistency accross the 
different test projects and extend the testing scope for Danube. The 
consistency deals with the creation of commons such as an umbrella 
documentation, a web landing page giving the scenario status at glance and a 
test case catalogue. The testing working group also defined stress tests to be 
run on the Danube solution in addition of the functional and qualification 
tests already provided."
Feel free to comment/modify/suggest somehting else as a statement to Heather on 
the behalf of the testing group



Regargind the status

1) Test consolidation
  - release testing landing page has been created but still work to do for a 
full integration (back-end/API + add scenario reporting from test project at 
the end of CI)
=> my estimation 50% chance to be ready for Danube on the 22 of March but not 
blocking for the release and could be achieved once we have something more 
stable + 1 or 2 weeks
@Serena: do you think we could create the scenario (I think so) and push 
results ater CI run now?

When it is OK on Functest (beta test) we could ask the other test project to 
use the API tu update the status

  - catalogue: the DB/test API is ready => work in progress on the front end
=> my estimation 70% for a basic catalogue (display cases/projects), 30% for 
the mechanism to customize test list

@jack, Rex: what is you view on this estimation

If nothing has been already started for th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

[Chigang (Justin)]

Hi David,

The patch of preliminary Documentation for Compass4NFV:

 https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/24789/

and Document link for it:

http://artifacts.opnfv.org/compass4nfv/docs/release_installation/index.html
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/compass4nfv/docs/release_FAQ/index.html
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/compass4nfv/docs/release_release-notes/index.html

Regards

Justin


在 2017/2/23 4:30, David McBride 写道:

Team,

I'd like to request that the PTLs for projects participating in Danube 
respond to the following questions, designed to assess compliance with 
MS6.



Feature Projects

 1. Please provide a list of commits for the following:
 1. Enabling testing for your project in the Functest repo (or
other test framework repo if you are not using functest)
 2. Test case implementation in your project repo.
 2. Please indicate whether the scenarios with which your project is
integrated are visible on the Functest dashboard.  If not, why?


Test Framework Projects

 1. Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests.


Preliminary Documentation Requirement

 1. Please provide a link to the preliminary documentation for your
project.



Let me know if you have any questions.

David

--
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org 


Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVSNFV] logging issues for Priority Data Path

[O Mahony, Billy]

Hi Chunghan,

When I started the priority path testing I was using a Phy-Virtual-Phy scenario 
(traffic ingressing via a physical NIC then routed to a VM which looped the 
traffic back on another vhostuser interface and out a different physical NIC 
back to the traffic generator).

This particular scenario was showing no improvement in latency characteristics 
for the priority-traffic. So while investigating I added some periodic debug 
trace which showed the distribution of reads from the ingress nic in terms of 
packet size. This extra debug caused no difference in maximum throughput. So 
when I moved to a simpler Phy-Phy scenario I kept the debug trace.

However as it turned out while the debug trace had no effect on throughput or 
latency in the PVP case it did have an effect in the Phy-phy case. So removing 
the trace showed that using a rx queue on the NIC for the priority traffic did 
indeed improve latency for the prioritized traffic. This is the ‘logging issue’ 
referred to.

Hope that helps - I can talk about this more on the call today if you need more 
info.

Regards,
/Billy

From: Lee, Chunghan [mailto:lee.chung...@jp.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:03 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: O Mahony, Billy 
Subject: [OVSNFV] logging issues for Priority Data Path

Hi Billy,

I didn’t understand the logging issues clearly.
Could you explain the issues ?

The original sentence is as follow.

14:37:05  #info However, logging issues caused test discrepancies. 
This has been resolved

Regards,
Chunghan Lee

--
Chunghan Lee
Cloud Network Project. Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.
4-1-1 Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku,
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 211-8588, Japan
E-mail： lee.chung...@jp.fujitsu.com
--

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Bottlenecks MS6 compliance assessment //RE: [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

[Yuyang (Gabriel)]

Hi David,

MS6 compliance assessment to Bottlenecks is list below.

Test Framework Projects
1.Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests.

-   https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/project:bottlenecks+posca

Preliminary Documentation Requirement
1.Please provide a link to the preliminary documentation for your project.

-   
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/bottlenecks/review/28819/user_guide/index.html

-   
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/bottlenecks/review/28819/platform_overview/index.html

-   
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/bottlenecks/review/28819/testing_guide/index.html

-   
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/bottlenecks/review/28819/release_notes/index.html


Best,
Gabriel

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Gaoliang (kubi)
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 12:26 PM
To: David McBride
Cc: opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 
compliance assessment

Hi David,

This is the reply for yardstick about MS6 compliance assessment
Test Framework Projects

  1.  Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests.

-   Yardstick has unit-test coverage gate included in the ci verify job, 
you can find most of the patches in the link below:

-   https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/project:yardstick+test+case

Preliminary Documentation Requirement

  1.  Please provide a link to the preliminary documentation for your project.

-   Below is the newest documentation for yardstick:

-   http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/docs/userguide/index.html
Best Regards,
kubi


发件人: 
opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [mailto:opnfv-project-leads-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 David McBride
发送时间: 2017年2月23日 4:30
收件人: 
opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org;
 TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
主题: [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Team,

I'd like to request that the PTLs for projects participating in Danube respond 
to the following questions, designed to assess compliance with MS6.
Feature Projects
1.Please provide a list of commits for the following:
a. Enabling testing for your project in the Functest repo (or other test 
framework repo if you are not using functest)
b.Test case implementation in your project repo.
2.Please indicate whether the scenarios with which your project is 
integrated are visible on the Functest dashboard.  If not, why?
Test Framework Projects
1.Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests.
Preliminary Documentation Requirement
1.Please provide a link to the preliminary documentation for your project.


Let me know if you have any questions.

David

--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: 
dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss