Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution.

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I’ve added a figure to chapter 2.4, 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.
Please check and comment: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/17919/

@Fathemeh: I could not find you in the gerrit users list, sorry for that.

Br,
Gerg0

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:37 AM
To: Georg Kunz ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution.


Hi Georg,

Sorry for answering too late;

As you mentioned, I reviewed requirement’s document and I think the following 
points should be considered:

1. In sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3.1 , 2.4, I think  a picture could make descriptions 
more clear.

2. In sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, I think two high level architeture pictures 
could show how instances or clouds's networks would be seprated.)
( as a sample: 
docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html)



I’m working on finding a good example for your suggested part (2.4.2),

I think these scenarios are not bad : 
http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html , 
http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html , 
but actually I’m not sure;

So I’m digging into Neutron provider and tenant networks in openstack to give 
you a good example.



P.S. I have direct access to Gerrit and  indirect access to opnfv requirement’s 
doc (using VPN), but we want to have direct access because the sanctions 
against Iran were lifted.:)



> Hi Fathemeh,
>
> Great. Gergely (in CC) is the main author of those use cases, so you can
> contact him or we discuss this on the upcoming NetReady call.
>
> Regarding your access restrictions, what does this mean in practice? Can
> you access the OPNFV Gerrit?
>
> Best regards
> Georg
>
>
From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Fatemeh
> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 1:24 PM
> To: 
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for
> contribution.
>
> Hi Georg,
>
> Your response to my question was encouraging. Thank you for spending time
> to point out all available options. I'd taken a look at the latest version
> of the requirements doc and backlogs in jira. I found these use cases
> interesting in requirements doc : "2.4.2. Connection between different
> OpenStack regions or cloud instances" , "2.3. Programmable Provisioning of
> Provider networks"
> I think the first one would be my better choice for start point!
>
> I hope, our combined efforts will give us a good coordination and great
> result.
>
> P.S: I'm from Iran. Although the sanctions against Iran were lifted, We
> don't have any direct access to the latest version of requirements doc.
>
> Kindest regards,
> Fatemeh Abdollahei
> On ۱۶/۰۶/۳۰ 12:32, Georg Kunz wrote:
> Hi Fatemeh,
>
> sorry for the late reply. Well, yes, we have a few items in our backlog in
> Jira that nobody has picked up yet. Currently, we are working towards a
> first version of our requirements document. The goal is to get a stable
> version with a small selection of use cases which we can then discuss with
> the OpenStack Neutron developers.
>
> I basically see three ways of contributing to the project:
>
> i) support the ongoing effort of stabilizing the current version of the
> requirements doc. You can have a look at the latest version here [1]. If
> you find one of the use cases interesting, just let us know and we can
> coordinate further.
>
> ii) you have a networking use case on your mind which is challenging to
> realize based on the currently available features in OpenStack or which is
> basically missing at all. If so, feel free to bring it up here or in our
> weekly meeting and we can discuss it.
>
> iii) have a look at our backlog in Jira. If you find a particular use
> case interesting, let's discuss it and see if you want to add it to the
> requirements doc. Please note, however, that the Jira backlog is currently
> not well managed I have to admit. (Note to myself: clean up Jira!)
>
> I hope, this overview helps you a bit. You are very welcome to join the
> project and join the weekly meetings.
>
> [1] http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html
>
> Best regards
> Georg
>
>
>
From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
> f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:06 AM
> To: 
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution.
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
> I've just taken a look at NetReady project and now

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution.

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Tanks for the research. Some comments inline.

From: Fatemeh [mailto:f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:28 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution.


Hi,

As you said, I've searched and found 3 examples that makes part 2.4 more clear:
 (Since in some of the others part of requirement's doc examples of mitaka have 
been used, since requirements document has gave examples of mitaka in some 
parts, I've provided two examples from mitaka's documentation.)

1.creating provider networks using open Vswitch. :
http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html

[G0]: This is our problem: “Unlike other scenarios, only administrators can 
manage provider networks because they require configuration of physical network 
infrastructure.”. Current OpenStack can not differentiate between cloud 
administrator and network administrator roles.

2.creating provider networks using Linux bridge. : 
http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html

[G0]: Same as for 1.

3.my own offered scenario, using group-based policy in openstack: I think by 
using GBP in openstack , supported by neutron, we could define policy since The 
GBP model also supports a redirect operation that makes complex network service 
chains and graphs easy to abstract and consume. Network service chaining is a 
mechanism for connecting multiple Layer 4 through 7 services such as load 
balancers and firewalls.
Simply by becoming a member of a group, a virtual machine in each network 
inherits all of the group’s policies, allowing developers to easily automate 
scaling, both up and down.
[G0]: GBP is new for me. I’ve just checked a whitepaper [1] about it.
Isn’t it so that VM-s can be added to GBP-s and not users? For me it seems that 
that GBP-s build on top of existing network constructs and they do not change 
the user priviliges needed to configure them.
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/a/aa/Group-BasedPolicyWhitePaper_v3.pdf
Br,
Gerg0

On ۱۶/۰۸/۰۴ 01:02, f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir<mailto:f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir> 
wrote:

Hi.

I've checked the images, they were good.
but I couldn't find any where to mark them as verified.

Kind regards,
Fatemeh

> Hi,
>
> I’ve added a figure to chapter 2.4, 2.5.1 and 2.5.2.
> Please check and comment: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/17919/
>
> @Fathemeh: I could not find you in the gerrit users list, sorry for that.
>
> Br,
> Gerg0
>
>
From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
> f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir<mailto:f.abdolla...@itrc.ac.ir>
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:37 AM
> To: Georg Kunz ; 
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for
> contribution.
>
>
> Hi Georg,
>
> Sorry for answering too late;
>
> As you mentioned, I reviewed requirement’s document and I think the
> following points should be considered:
>
> 1. In sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3.1 , 2.4, I think a picture could make
> descriptions more clear.
>
> 2. In sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, I think two high level architeture
> pictures could show how instances or clouds's networks would be
> seprated.)
> ( as a sample:
> docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html)
>
>
>
> I’m working on finding a good example for your suggested part (2.4.2),
>
> I think these scenarios are not bad :
> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html
> ,
> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html
> , but actually I’m not sure;
>
> So I’m digging into Neutron provider and tenant networks in openstack to
> give you a good example.
>
>
>
> P.S. I have direct access to Gerrit and indirect access to opnfv
> requirement’s doc (using VPN), but we want to have direct access because
> the sanctions against Iran were lifted.:)
>
>
>
>> Hi Fathemeh,
>>
>> Great. Gergely (in CC) is the main author of those use cases, so you
>> can
>> contact him or we discuss this on the upcoming NetReady call.
>>
>> Regarding your access restrictions, what does this mean in practice?
>> Can
>> you access the OPNFV Gerrit?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Georg
>>
>>
>
From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
>> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
>> Fatemeh
>> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 201

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready]: Use cases clarifications

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I would have some clarification questions to the use cases from the Jira:
*   
NETREADY-7:
 Document networking requirements for Edge Computing use cases
o   Can someone elaborate, the high level use case behind this and the 
concrete networking requirements?
*   
NETREADY-13:
 Document networking requirements for ECMP to VMs
o   Is really multipath into the VPN is requested here or I just misread 
something
Thanks,
Gerg0

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready]: Tricircle is now an official OpenStack project

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Tricircle [1] become an official OpenStack project. This project targets 
similar use cases as the Georedundancy use cases [2] from the requirements 
document.

[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Use_Cases
[2]: 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html#georedundancy

Br,
Gerg0
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Okay, you were faster and I process my mails in FILO :)

Br,
Gerg0

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of joehuang
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:50 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is one 
of OpenStack Big-Tent project

Hi,

Just for your information, Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project. 
The following mail provides a short description.

There are some issues in multi-region openstack cloud we discussed in these 
threads:

https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011513.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011444.html


From: joehuang
Sent: 16 November 2016 14:39
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev][all][tricircle][neutron]Tricircle now is one of 
OpenStack Big-Tent project
Hi all,

Tricircle was officially accepted yesterday as a big-tent project.

The purpose of the Tricircle project is to provide networking automation
across Neutron in multi-region OpenStack clouds deployment.

Use cases for the Tricircle are described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Use_Cases.

A brief introduction of Tricircle is provided here:

Each OpenStack cloud includes its own Nova, Cinder and Neutron, the
Neutron servers in these OpenStack clouds are called local Neuron
servers, all these local Neutron servers will be configured with the
Tricircle Local Neutron Plugin. A seperate Neutron server will be
installed and run standalone as the coordinator of networking automation
across local Neutron servers, this Neutron server will be configured
with the Tricircle Central Neutron Plugin, and is called central
Neutron server.

Leverage the Tricircle Central Neutron Plugin and the Tricircle Local
Neutron Plugin configured in these Neutron servers, the Tricircle can
ensure the IP address pool, IP/MAC address allocation and network
segment allocation being managed globally without conflict, and the
Tricircle handles tenant oriented data link layer(Layer2) or network
layer(Layer3) networking automation across local Neutron servers,
resources like VMs, bare metal or containers of the tenant can
communicate with each other via Layer2 or Layer3, no matter in which
OpenStack cloud these resources are running on.

How to start in Tricircle:
1. The best entry point for the Tricircle project is its wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle. Source code repository is
https://github.com/openstack/tricircle.

2. You can play it through devstack:
https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/doc/source/multi-node-installation-devstack.rst

3. The design blueprint provides general overview on the ongoing discussion
on the design:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zcxwl8xMEpxVCqLTce2-dUOtB-ObmzJTbV1uSQ6qTsY/edit#

We are trying to tackle common use cases and challenges in OpenStack
multi-region cloud area, We welcome new contributors who wish to join our
effort.

We are holding a weekly IRC meeting:
Weekly on Wednesdays at 1300 UTC, IRC channel: #openstack-meeting
Project IRC channel and other resources could be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Resources.

And everyone is welcome.

(Neutron subject is also included in the mail title, inter-communication
and collaboration between Neutron and Tricircle is greatly welcome)

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Correct :)

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:26 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss 
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is 
one of OpenStack Big-Tent project

Hi, Gerg0,

Thank you too. You are fast enough, but my time is UTC+8, the earth helps me my 
time is earlier than you :)

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 16 November 2016 16:20
To: joehuang; opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is 
one of OpenStack Big-Tent project
Hi,

Okay, you were faster and I process my mails in FILO :)

Br,
Gerg0

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of joehuang
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:50 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is one 
of OpenStack Big-Tent project

Hi,

Just for your information, Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project. 
The following mail provides a short description.

There are some issues in multi-region openstack cloud we discussed in these 
threads:

https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011513.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011444.html


From: joehuang
Sent: 16 November 2016 14:39
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev][all][tricircle][neutron]Tricircle now is one of 
OpenStack Big-Tent project
Hi all,

Tricircle was officially accepted yesterday as a big-tent project.

The purpose of the Tricircle project is to provide networking automation
across Neutron in multi-region OpenStack clouds deployment.

Use cases for the Tricircle are described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Use_Cases.

A brief introduction of Tricircle is provided here:

Each OpenStack cloud includes its own Nova, Cinder and Neutron, the
Neutron servers in these OpenStack clouds are called local Neuron
servers, all these local Neutron servers will be configured with the
Tricircle Local Neutron Plugin. A seperate Neutron server will be
installed and run standalone as the coordinator of networking automation
across local Neutron servers, this Neutron server will be configured
with the Tricircle Central Neutron Plugin, and is called central
Neutron server.

Leverage the Tricircle Central Neutron Plugin and the Tricircle Local
Neutron Plugin configured in these Neutron servers, the Tricircle can
ensure the IP address pool, IP/MAC address allocation and network
segment allocation being managed globally without conflict, and the
Tricircle handles tenant oriented data link layer(Layer2) or network
layer(Layer3) networking automation across local Neutron servers,
resources like VMs, bare metal or containers of the tenant can
communicate with each other via Layer2 or Layer3, no matter in which
OpenStack cloud these resources are running on.

How to start in Tricircle:
1. The best entry point for the Tricircle project is its wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle. Source code repository is
https://github.com/openstack/tricircle.

2. You can play it through devstack:
https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/doc/source/multi-node-installation-devstack.rst

3. The design blueprint provides general overview on the ongoing discussion
on the design:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zcxwl8xMEpxVCqLTce2-dUOtB-ObmzJTbV1uSQ6qTsY/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zcxwl8xMEpxVCqLTce2-dUOtB-ObmzJTbV1uSQ6qTsY/edit>

We are trying to tackle common use cases and challenges in OpenStack
multi-region cloud area, We welcome new contributors who wish to join our
effort.

We are holding a weekly IRC meeting:
Weekly on Wednesdays at 1300 UTC, IRC channel: #openstack-meeting
Project IRC channel and other resources could be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Resources.

And everyone is welcome.

(Neutron subject is also included in the mail title, inter-communication
and collaboration between Neutron and Tricircle is greatly welcome)

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Would it be possible to move this meeting to Monday or Wednesday, same time?

Thanks,
Gerg0

-Original Appointment-
From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 7:02 PM
To: Georg Kunz; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting
When: 2016. november 22. 18:00-19:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, 
Stockholm, Vienna.
Where: GTM


Hi,

This is the current GTM link to the NetReady meeting.

Regards
Georg

* IRC: #opnfv-netready
* GTM: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/402230893

You can also dial in using your phone.
United States +1 (312) 757-3119

Access Code: 279-546-453

More phone numbers
Australia (Long distance): +61 2 9091 7603
Austria (Long distance): +43 7 2088 0716
Belgium (Long distance): +32 (0) 28 08 4372
Canada (Long distance): +1 (647) 497-9380
Denmark (Long distance): +45 69 91 84 58
Finland (Long distance): +358 (0) 931 58 1773
France (Long distance): +33 (0) 170 950 590
Germany (Long distance): +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
Ireland (Long distance): +353 (0) 15 360 756
Italy (Long distance): +39 0 699 26 68 65
Netherlands (Long distance): +31 (0) 208 080 759
New Zealand (Long distance): +64 9 974 9579
Norway (Long distance): +47 21 04 30 59
Spain (Long distance): +34 931 76 1534
Sweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 852 500 691
Switzerland (Long distance): +41 (0) 435 0026 89
United Kingdom (Long distance): +44 (0) 20 3713 5011


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Okay, thank you.
Let's see tomorow morining.

My question was general for the future meetings.

Br,
Gerg0

From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:25 PM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

Hi Gerg0,

Moving the meeting to Wednesday would help me too, honestly, as Tuesday is 
pretty packed this week. Our colleagues from the US will anyway not join this 
week due to thanksgiving.

So, if nobody objects by tomorrow morning, I'll move the meeting to Wednesday.

Best regards
Georg

From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) [mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:10 AM
To: Georg Kunz mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

Hi,

Would it be possible to move this meeting to Monday or Wednesday, same time?

Thanks,
Gerg0

-Original Appointment-
From: Georg Kunz [mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 7:02 PM
To: Georg Kunz; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting
When: 2016. november 22. 18:00-19:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, 
Stockholm, Vienna.
Where: GTM


Hi,

This is the current GTM link to the NetReady meeting.

Regards
Georg

* IRC: #opnfv-netready
* GTM: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/402230893

You can also dial in using your phone.
United States +1 (312) 757-3119

Access Code: 279-546-453

More phone numbers
Australia (Long distance): +61 2 9091 7603
Austria (Long distance): +43 7 2088 0716
Belgium (Long distance): +32 (0) 28 08 4372
Canada (Long distance): +1 (647) 497-9380
Denmark (Long distance): +45 69 91 84 58
Finland (Long distance): +358 (0) 931 58 1773
France (Long distance): +33 (0) 170 950 590
Germany (Long distance): +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
Ireland (Long distance): +353 (0) 15 360 756
Italy (Long distance): +39 0 699 26 68 65
Netherlands (Long distance): +31 (0) 208 080 759
New Zealand (Long distance): +64 9 974 9579
Norway (Long distance): +47 21 04 30 59
Spain (Long distance): +34 931 76 1534
Sweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 852 500 691
Switzerland (Long distance): +41 (0) 435 0026 89
United Kingdom (Long distance): +44 (0) 20 3713 5011


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.16. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Resending my mail in the hope that it gets into the top of your after holiday 
mail pile.

Br,
GErg0

From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 9:53 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Hi,

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.16. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Now I resend it to correct an actual mistake in my original mail.

The deadline for application is 26th of January.

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.26. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Thanks for the quick analyzis.
The target of the current call for experts is only to identify the gaps. We are 
not looking to one-to-one match for each information element and each operation 
of IFA005 and 006 but looking for the same functionality provided by OpenStack.

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:59 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Hello,

I go through the IFA 005 & IFA 006. The difference between API defined in IFA 
005/IFA 006 and OpenStack API is very huge, it seems that there must be some 
wrapper layer above OpenStack API.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Csatari, Gergely 
(Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 2:41
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Now I resend it to correct an actual mistake in my original mail.

The deadline for application is 26th of January.

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.26. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Exactly. We limit OpenStack to the projects with tc:approved-release tag and 
the functionality should be accessible via a NB API (not an API designed for 
communication between OpenStack components).

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:29 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Ok. If IFA005/IFA006 is not defined as the API interface syntax, just for 
functionality description, I think the gap is not so huge.

So only need to check for each interface defined in IFA005/IFA006 whether this 
interface's function could be supported by OpenStack.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 16:09
To: joehuang; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Thanks for the quick analyzis.
The target of the current call for experts is only to identify the gaps. We are 
not looking to one-to-one match for each information element and each operation 
of IFA005 and 006 but looking for the same functionality provided by OpenStack.

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:59 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Hello,

I go through the IFA 005 & IFA 006. The difference between API defined in IFA 
005/IFA 006 and OpenStack API is very huge, it seems that there must be some 
wrapper layer above OpenStack API.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 [opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Csatari, Gergely 
(Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 2:41
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Now I resend it to correct an actual mistake in my original mail.

The deadline for application is 26th of January.

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.26. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ha][netready]: Networking HA requirements

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I'm working on the netready requirements related to the HA of VIM networking.
I've created a patch to collect the requirements to the netready requirements 
document: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28283/

I have trouble to identify the gaps to the current OpenStack solution.
Is it really so, that all Neutron functionality is available after a failover? 
I've checked the HA Requirements 
doc
 and the Gap analyzis 
documents
 and based on these I could not find any missing thing. Is the situation really 
this good or am I overlooking something?

Some comments to HA people:

1)  On the wiki the link to "High availability scenario analysis doc" 
points to releases_brahmaputra_ha_requirement.pdf

2)  In releases_brahmaputra_ha_requirement.pdf Chapter 6.1.2 there is a 
typo in the link, so it renders badly

Thanks,
Gerg0
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] Agenda for weekly meeting on March 8

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Sorry I need to skip again.

Br,
Gerg0

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:43 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] Agenda for weekly meeting on March 8

Hi all,

This is the agenda for today's NetReady meeting:

* Documentation
* PoC for OpenStack summit
* Requirements document update
* AOB

Best regards
Georg
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs][openretriever]: openretriever directory into docs/submodules

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I have a build job error [1] complaining about that the openretriever directory 
is not available under docs/submodules.
What need I do to have the directory there?

[1]: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/docs-verify-rtd-master/956/console

Thanks,
Gerg0
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [containter4nfv]Vote for nominating JackChen as a commiter forContainer4NFV

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

+1

From: yu.pen...@zte.com.cn [mailto:yu.pen...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:44 AM
To: ruijing@intel.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
jiax...@chinamobile.com
Cc: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
akapa...@aarnanetworks.com; chenjiank...@huawei.com; srupanagu...@gmail.com; 
wassim.had...@ericsson.com
Subject: 答复: RE: [containter4nfv]Vote for nominating JackChen as a commiter 
forContainer4NFV




+1



Best Regards

Peng
原始邮件
发件人： mailto:ruijing@intel.com>>;
收件人： mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com>>; 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>;
抄送人： mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>>;余鹏10129462; 
mailto:akapa...@aarnanetworks.com>>; 
mailto:chenjiank...@huawei.com>>; 
mailto:srupanagu...@gmail.com>>; 
mailto:wassim.had...@ericsson.com>>;
日 期 ：2017年08月24日 10:08
主 题 ：RE: [containter4nfv]Vote for nominating JackChen as a commiter 
forContainer4NFV


+1

From: 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:59 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Cc: 'Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)' 
mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>>; 
yu.pen...@zte.com.cn<mailto:yu.pen...@zte.com.cn>; 
jiax...@chinamobile.com<mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com>; Guo, Ruijing 
mailto:ruijing@intel.com>>; 'Amar Kapadia' 
mailto:akapa...@aarnanetworks.com>>; 'chenjiankun' 
mailto:chenjiank...@huawei.com>>; 'Sriram  
Rupanagunta' mailto:srupanagu...@gmail.com>>; 'Wassim 
Haddad' mailto:wassim.had...@ericsson.com>>
Subject: [containter4nfv]Vote for nominating JackChen as a commiter for 
Container4NFV

Hi all:
   As JackChen (chenjiank...@huawei.com<mailto:chenjiank...@huawei.com>) do 
a huge help for container4nfv , and finish two jira tasks. Then our project can 
pass MS5 in E release, that’s important step for our project:

  1.  https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/CONTAINER-18 Create ping test case(k8s) in 
yardstick
  2.  https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/CONTAINER-17 Add kubernetes context in 
yardstick

Another thing is JackChen can attend weekly meeting every week. He is so active 
in our project. So please kindly give your vote for nominating JackChen as a 
commiter for Container4NFV.

My vote is : +1 .

Thanks

Xuan Jia
Project Manager
Big Data & IT Technology Research Center China Mobile Research Institute
32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng Distirct, Beijing 100032, China
Mobile: (+86) 13811000575
E-mail: jiax...@chinamobile.com<mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com>





___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [container4nfv]: Wiki restructuring 1: the start page

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

As we discussed in the meeting I plan to collect the architecture options to a 
wiki page, but I could not resist to rewrite a bit the project starting page.

Here are the changes: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=8688978&selectedPageVersions=34&selectedPageVersions=33

In case of any comments just comment it to the page itself or mail me.

Br,
Gerg0
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [container4nfv]Need your action in F release

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Well, I will be able to work only in the architecture section of the wiki, so 
I’m okay to be moved from committer to contributor.

Br,
Gerg0

From: 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 1:12 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
lijun_1...@126.com; 'Wassim Haddad' ; 'Heikki 
Mahkonen' ; 'Amar Kapadia' 
; 'Sriram Rupanagunta' ; 
yu.pen...@zte.com.cn; 'Guo, Ruijing' ; 'chenjiankun' 
; jiax...@chinamobile.com; 'Bin Lu' ; 
'Trevor Tao' ; 'Trinath Somanchi' 
; prasad.go...@nxp.com
Subject: [container4nfv]Need your action in F release

Hi Container4NFVer:
   I am glad we have released E release, Thanks for you hard work, 
especially Ruijing and JackChan. In addition, thanks amar’s contribution for 
NGVS.
   In the F release, I need to know how you can take participate in 
container4nfv if you didn’t attend the weekly meeting. Please reply this email. 
Tell me your thought.
   The initial F plan is https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/container4nfv :

VPP-DPDK+CI(Vagrant Installer)(ARM)
Joid-ovs-dpdk (Intel)
OCI gap (China Mobile)
Finaize the and actualize the architecture ananlzis (Nokia)
Tacker support  (China Mobile)
Containerized VNF (China Mobile)
Yardstick (JackChen)

   BTW, as the principle of 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Committer+Removal , if there’s no record in 
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/project:container4nfv  or the related 
container things on yardstick or functest in the last 6 month.. I am sorry we 
may start to remove the inactive committer.
   Thanks

Xuan Jia
Project Manager
Big Data & IT Technology Research Center China Mobile Research Institute
32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng Distirct, Beijing 100032, China
Mobile: (+86) 13811000575
E-mail: jiax...@chinamobile.com<mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com>

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Fwd: FW: Docs hacking event this Thursday!

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I plan to do some work ont he documentation of architecture options of 
Container4NFV. This is ~80% wiki editing and only the rest is docs, butI 
promised this a long time ago, so it is timet o start doing something 😊
If anyone is willing to join from Budapest I’m ready to reserve a room (even 
one which is accessible for non Nokia people).

Br,
Gerg0

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 6:55 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Fwd: FW: Docs hacking event this Thursday!

FYI.  Forwarding as Sofia's message/reminder earlier today seems to be stuck

From: Sofia Wallin mailto:sofia.wal...@ericsson.com>>
Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 13:49
To: OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Docs hacking event this Thursday!

Hi everyone,
This is a reminder that the Docs hacking event is this Thursday!

Please add your location to allow others nearby to join. Also, please add any 
wanted topics to facilitate the discussion.
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Docs+Hacking

Thanks,
Sofia


From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>>
 on behalf of Raymond Paik 
mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Date: Tuesday, 16 January 2018 at 18:07
To: OPNFV 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Docs hacking wiki page

All,

As discussed during the TSC call earlier, I just created a wiki page for the 
Docs hacking event on February 1st at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Docs+Hacking

Sofia/Tapio: could you add relevant information for your sites and agenda 
topics on the page?

Thanks,

Ray

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] pre-ONS summit

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

I'll arrive Sunday early afternoon and would be happy to join forces to keep me 
awake for a while.

Br,
Gerg0

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Juvonen, Tomi 
(Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:14 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] pre-ONS summit


This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to 
be. Learn about spoofing

Feedback

Hi,

Is anybody in Los Angeles like early before ONS. I will be there already 
Thursday afternoon as coming straight form OCP, so if interested to go some 
place or have a dinner. At least I heard some people are around in the Saturday 
evening if have more folks together.

Br,
Tomi

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Edge cloud discussion during ONS

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,

Etherpad: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/edge_cloud_discussion_in_ONS2018

Br,
Gerg0


From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Fu Qiao
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 11:42 AM
To: 'Tim Irnich' ; 'Georg Kunz' 
; 'jean.gaoliang' ; 'Wenjing 
Chu' ; 'Chigang (Justin)' ; 
zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn; cristina.pa...@enea.com; 'Tina Tsou' 
; 'Bob Monkman' ; 
morgan.richo...@orange.com; ian.jolli...@windriver.com; 'Waines, Greg' 
; jamil.cha...@orange.com; 
morgan.richo...@orange.com; 'Ryota Mibu' ; 'Cooper, 
Trevor' ; 'Tim Rozet' ; Tallgren, 
Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; bryan.sulli...@att.com; 
'Rossella Sblendido' ; fbroc...@cisco.com
Cc: '王路' ; '赵奇慧' ; 
'opnfv-tech-discuss' 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Edge cloud discussion during ONS

Hi, all. We will use the round table in K-town for the edge cloud discussion.
It will begin on 11:40am


发件人: Fu Qiao [mailto:fuq...@chinamobile.com]
发送时间: 2018年3月23日 11:16
收件人: 'Tim Irnich' mailto:tim.irn...@ericsson.com>>; 
'Georg Kunz' mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>>; 
'jean.gaoliang' mailto:jean.gaoli...@huawei.com>>; 
'Wenjing Chu' mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>>; 'Chigang 
(Justin)' mailto:chig...@huawei.com>>; 
'zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn' 
mailto:zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn>>; 
'cristina.pa...@enea.com' 
mailto:cristina.pa...@enea.com>>; 'Tina Tsou' 
mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>>; 'Bob Monkman' 
mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>>; 'morgan.richo...@orange.com' 
mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com>>; 
'ian.jolli...@windriver.com' 
mailto:ian.jolli...@windriver.com>>; 'Waines, Greg' 
mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com>>; 
'jamil.cha...@orange.com' 
mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com>>; 
'morgan.richo...@orange.com' 
mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com>>; 'Ryota Mibu' 
mailto:r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com>>; 'Cooper, Trevor' 
mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 'Tim Rozet' 
mailto:tro...@redhat.com>>; 'tapio.tallg...@nokia.com' 
mailto:tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>>; 
'bryan.sulli...@att.com' 
mailto:bryan.sulli...@att.com>>; 'Rossella Sblendido' 
mailto:rsblend...@suse.com>>; 'fbroc...@cisco.com' 
mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com>>
抄送: 'Yamei' mailto:fanya...@chinamobile.com>>; 
'opnfv-tech-discuss' 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>;
 '赵奇慧' mailto:zhaoqi...@chinamobile.com>>; '王路' 
mailto:wan...@chinamobile.com>>; 'zhanghao' 
mailto:zhang...@chinamobile.com>>
主题: Edge cloud discussion during ONS

Hi, all. We plan to organize an edge cloud related discussion during next 
week’s ONS. You are welcome to join us in interested.
Location: K-town
Time: 11:30-12:30, Tue. Mar. 27
Agenda:

1, Usecase for edge
2, Edge cloud strategy for Operators
3, Progress of upstreams on edge cloud
4, Open Questions for edge
5, Project proposal for edge cloud in OPNFV

Attached is the slides we should like to share during the meeting.
I have also create etherpad page for the discussion. Please also add your name 
if you are intended to participate.
Looking forward to seeing you all next week.
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/edge_cloud_discussion_in_ONS2018

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tech-discussion][Edge Cloud] minutes for weekly meeting on May 30th

[Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)]

Hi,


I’ve already started to have a discussion with Keystone people in the Vancouver 
Summit about the related requirements [3]. The notes from and before the 
meeting are put to [1] and I put the conclusions to [2].

Is there anything OPNFV Edge Cloud related what is missing on top of these?

Br,
Gerg0

[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-edge-keystone-brainstorming
[2]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Keystone_edge_architectures
[3]: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack_Edge_Discussions_Dublin_PTG#Requirements


From: Yamei [mailto:fanya...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 7:26 PM
To: 'fuqiao' ; 'Beth Cohen' ; 
Peret, Adrian (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ; julien...@gmail.com; 
haojin...@huawei.com; Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
; ild...@openstack.org; 'Paul-Andre Raymond' 
; trevor.coo...@intel.com; 'Cristina Pauna' 
; 'Xiaohua Zhang' ; 'Bob 
Monkman' ; 's, deepak' ; 
pvaan...@redhat.com; asay...@redhat.com; 'Tina Tsou' ; '王路' 
; 'opnfv-tech-discuss' 

Cc: 'zhaoqihui' 
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tech-discussion][Edge Cloud] minutes for 
weekly meeting on May 30th

Hi Team,

Since Qihui is out of office, I helped her mark down the minutes of the meeting 
this week.

Minutes for meeting on May 30th:
Minutes：

* last week's OpenStack summit recap

* Move the requirement etherpad to gerrit

* Pasi suggested that describe each service briefly

* Other edge site descriptions and SDN controller comparison are 
welcome to add to the requirement document

Actions:

* Schedule a private meeting with OPNFV Phraos team and OpenStack 
EC/Keystone/... team to have a deep cooperation

* Qihui will build a patch to move the requirement document to gerrit

* You are welcome to add comments or suggestions on the comparison of 
available SDN controllers

Next week’s meeting will be a F2F meeting due to OPNFV plugefest and the ZOOM 
is also available. The exact time is next Monday.  June 4, UTC 14:30-15:30.
Qiao will be there and she give more introduction about edge cloud project.


Best Regards!
Yamei Fan
China Mobile Research Institute
E-mail:fanya...@chinamobile.com
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss