[opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call
All, A few things after our call on Monday First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting. I will go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th. (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th). Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings Second, I started a test cases page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases. I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just a skeleton. I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming Plugfest. Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of OPNFV. You can register at https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017 Thanks, Ray ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call
Hi Ray and Plugtesters, Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility, but makes attending some meetings impossible). Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of testing has been decided, and whether a *performance-oriented* test case might be entertained this time? This topic has been out of scope in the previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK. It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now. regards, Al From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call All, A few things after our call on Monday First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting. I will go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th. (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th). Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k&e=> Second, I started a test cases page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw&e=>. I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just a skeleton. I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming Plugfest. Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of OPNFV. You can register at https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8&e=> Thanks, Ray ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call
Al, I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in OPNFV Plugfests. A number of projects like Storperf participated in past two Plugfests. Of course we can't get into things like Storperf results were better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why performance testing can't be done during the Plugfest. Thanks, Ray On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > Hi Ray and Plugtesters, > > > > Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting > > (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility, > > but makes attending some meetings impossible). > > > > Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of > > testing has been decided, and whether a > > **performance-oriented** test case might be entertained > > this time? This topic has been out of scope in the > > previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK. > > > > It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now. > > > > regards, > > Al > > > > *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: > opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Raymond Paik > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM > *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest > planning call > > > > All, > > > > A few things after our call on Monday > > > > First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for > Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting. I will > go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on > March 13th. (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th). > Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. > at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest- > DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k&e=> > > > > Second, I started a test cases page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/ > display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw&e=>. > I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's > just a skeleton. I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call > yesterday) to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for > the upcoming Plugfest. > > > > Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & > non-members of OPNFV. You can register at https://www.regonline.com/ > OPNFVPlugfestApril2017 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8&e=> > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ray > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call
I support Al’s suggestion. As a goal for the Danube Plugfest I think we should define at least one performance oriented test that we run using different deployments / configurations … with an objective to define a range of good vs bad performance in order to get started with performance as a dimension of CVP. Plugfest is a good opportunity for accelerating this IMO … we can discuss it in the Test Working Group and try to make an initial proposal. /Trevor From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:36 PM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call Al, I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in OPNFV Plugfests. A number of projects like Storperf participated in past two Plugfests. Of course we can't get into things like Storperf results were better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why performance testing can't be done during the Plugfest. Thanks, Ray On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote: Hi Ray and Plugtesters, Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility, but makes attending some meetings impossible). Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of testing has been decided, and whether a *performance-oriented* test case might be entertained this time? This topic has been out of scope in the previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK. It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now. regards, Al From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call All, A few things after our call on Monday First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting. I will go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th. (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th). Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k&e=> Second, I started a test cases page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw&e=>. I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just a skeleton. I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming Plugfest. Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of OPNFV. You can register at https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8&e=> Thanks, Ray ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call
Gabriel and Kubi made an update recently on 2 stress tests that should be defined/available/documented for Danube https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf?preview=/2926539/9568872/Stress%20Testing%20Update.pptx https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf?preview=/2926539/9569090/stress.mp4 I think we could imagine to run such tests during the plugfest for E we should elaborate a stress / robustness tests (with long duration tests) on the test working group /Morgan Le 02/03/2017 à 00:16, Cooper, Trevor a écrit : > > I support Al’s suggestion. As a goal for the Danube Plugfest I think > we should define at least one performance oriented test that we run > using different deployments / configurations … with an objective to > define a range of good vs bad performance in order to get started with > performance as a dimension of CVP. Plugfest is a good opportunity for > accelerating this IMO … we can discuss it in the Test Working Group > and try to make an initial proposal. > > > > /Trevor > > > > > > > > *From:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of > *Raymond Paik > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:36 PM > *To:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest > planning call > > > > Al, > > > > I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in > OPNFV Plugfests. A number of projects like Storperf participated in > past two Plugfests. Of course we can't get into things like Storperf > results were better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why > performance testing can't be done during the Plugfest. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ray > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote: > > Hi Ray and Plugtesters, > > > > Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting > > (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility, > > but makes attending some meetings impossible). > > > > Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of > > testing has been decided, and whether a > > **performance-oriented** test case might be entertained > > this time? This topic has been out of scope in the > > previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK. > > > > It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now. > > > > regards, > > Al > > > > *From:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of > *Raymond Paik > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM > *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest > planning call > > > > All, > > > > A few things after our call on Monday > > > > First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting > for Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly > meeting. I will go ahead and cancel the current series and start > a new one that starts on March 13th. (so the upcoming meetings > are March 13/27 plus April 10th). Apologies for the thrash, but > you can also find the upcoming meeting info. > at > https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k&e=> > > > > Second, I started a test cases page > at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM&s=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw&e=>. > > I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see > it's just a skeleton. I encourage everyone (esp. tho