[opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could use. I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be made available for Auto's CI jobs? Regards, Trevor Bramwell P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on that. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21501): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21501 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run). Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… Thanks Alec From: on behalf of Trevor Bramwell Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM To: Cc: , , , Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could use. I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be made available for Auto's CI jobs? Regards, Trevor Bramwell P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on that. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21502): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21502 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Hi Alec, Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the PODs at Intel are being used for development work. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We > can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. > The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare > metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. > pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI > jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable > openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after > each run). > > Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and > 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… > > Thanks > > Alec > > > > From: on behalf of Trevor Bramwell > > Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM > To: > Cc: , , > , > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project > > Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, > > The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and > I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could > use. > > I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and > Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be > made available for Auto's CI jobs? > > Regards, > Trevor Bramwell > > P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 > for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on > that. > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21505): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21505 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Wutianwei, Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI purposes? Thank you, Joe Kidder Auto Project > On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell > wrote: > > Hi Alec, > > Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the > PODs at Intel are being used for development work. > > Regards, > Trevor Bramwell > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: >> please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. >> We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. >> The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare >> metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. >> pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI >> jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable >> openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after >> each run). >> >> Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and >> 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… >> >> Thanks >> >> Alec >> >> >> >> From: on behalf of Trevor Bramwell >> >> Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM >> To: >> Cc: , , >> , >> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project >> >> Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, >> >> The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and >> I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could >> use. >> >> I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and >> Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be >> made available for Auto's CI jobs? >> >> Regards, >> Trevor Bramwell >> >> P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 >> for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on >> that. >> >> >> >> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21506): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21506 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
What about intel-pod18 or huawei-pod12. They currently run Joid jobs, but with Fraser release done and development for Joid stopped, maybe one of these can be repurposed. Cristina From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org On Behalf Of Joe Kidder Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:05 AM To: wutianw...@huawei.com Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; timothy.gres...@intel.com; trevor.coo...@intel.com; tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Wutianwei, Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI purposes? Thank you, Joe Kidder Auto Project On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Alec, Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the PODs at Intel are being used for development work. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run). Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… Thanks Alec From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM To: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com>>, mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>>, mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could use. I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be made available for Auto's CI jobs? Regards, Trevor Bramwell P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on that. This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone who communicates with us by email accepts these risks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21511): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21511 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Hello Trevor, I don't see the point about development. As already explained during Release meetings and Weekly Technical meetings (+mail Tue, 19 Jun 2018), Functest team wants to introduce Functional Gating which is mandatory for our development. We do stop linking the test frameworks gating and the installers one (see the Releng model). It's also the first step towards a possible rolling release We are fine to share it with other test projects as long as we don't get false results (Workflow). This topic is even more crucial at the beginning of the release because of the Installer updates and then the lack of results even if MS3.1 is reached. Cédric On lun., 2018-07-02 at 14:13 -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote: > Hi Alec, > > Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of > the > PODs at Intel are being used for development work. > > Regards, > Trevor Bramwell > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) > wrote: > > please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing > > projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. > > The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a > > stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on > > test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing > > installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what > > “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack > > running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after > > each run). > > > > Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used > > (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… > > > > Thanks > > > > Alec > > > > > > > > From: on behalf of Trevor > > Bramwell > > Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM > > To: > > Cc: , , > oo...@intel.com>, > > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project > > > > Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, > > > > The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on > > and > > I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they > > could > > use. > > > > I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), > > and > > Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other > > PODs be > > made available for Auto's CI jobs? > > > > Regards, > > Trevor Bramwell > > > > P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using > > POD 19 > > for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision > > on > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21516): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21516 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Hi Cedric, I merely meant of the PODs listed in Intel's Lab[1], the majority of them are not devoted to CI but development work (5 out of 12); That comment is unrelated to the use of POD19. :) Definitely agree that Functest needs a place to run apart from scenario CI deployments in order to validate itself and use functional gating. Regards, Trevor Bramwell [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+Lab On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:14:12PM +0200, ollivier.ced...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello Trevor, > > I don't see the point about development. > As already explained during Release meetings and Weekly Technical > meetings (+mail Tue, 19 Jun 2018), Functest team wants to introduce > Functional Gating which is mandatory for our development. > > We do stop linking the test frameworks gating and the installers one > (see the Releng model). It's also the first step towards a possible > rolling release > > We are fine to share it with other test projects as long as we don't > get false results (Workflow). > > This topic is even more crucial at the beginning of the release because > of the Installer updates and then the lack of results even if MS3.1 is > reached. > > Cédric > > On lun., 2018-07-02 at 14:13 -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote: > > Hi Alec, > > > > Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of > > the > > PODs at Intel are being used for development work. > > > > Regards, > > Trevor Bramwell > > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) > > wrote: > > > please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing > > > projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. > > > The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a > > > stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on > > > test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing > > > installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what > > > “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack > > > running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after > > > each run). > > > > > > Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used > > > (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Alec > > > > > > > > > > > > From: on behalf of Trevor > > > Bramwell > > > Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM > > > To: > > > Cc: , , > > oo...@intel.com>, > > > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project > > > > > > Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, > > > > > > The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on > > > and > > > I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they > > > could > > > use. > > > > > > I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), > > > and > > > Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other > > > PODs be > > > made available for Auto's CI jobs? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Trevor Bramwell > > > > > > P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using > > > POD 19 > > > for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision > > > on > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21527): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21527 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
Hi Cristina, I will contact with joid team. If they don’t use huawei-pod12 anymore, Auto project can run on huawei-pod12 Thanks Tianwei Wu 发件人: Cristina Pauna [mailto:cristina.pa...@enea.com] 发送时间: 2018年7月3日 16:31 收件人: Joe Kidder ; wutianwei 抄送: Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; timothy.gres...@intel.com; trevor.coo...@intel.com; tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell 主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project What about intel-pod18 or huawei-pod12. They currently run Joid jobs, but with Fraser release done and development for Joid stopped, maybe one of these can be repurposed. Cristina From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> On Behalf Of Joe Kidder Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:05 AM To: wutianw...@huawei.com<mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com> Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; timothy.gres...@intel.com<mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>; trevor.coo...@intel.com<mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>; tina.t...@arm.com<mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>; Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Wutianwei, Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI purposes? Thank you, Joe Kidder Auto Project On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Alec, Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the PODs at Intel are being used for development work. Regards, Trevor Bramwell On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use. The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run). Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods… Thanks Alec From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Trevor Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM To: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com>>, mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>>, mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners, The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could use. I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be made available for Auto's CI jobs? Regards, Trevor Bramwell P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19 for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on that. This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone who communicates with us by email accepts these risks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21512): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21512 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23022389/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
