0) Why is this document still kicking around the WG?
(Too bad it doesn't have the word "mud" in the filename.)
1) I find the title confusing.
2) I don't think that AUGMENT does what you want, because YANG is not
extensible in the way we are used to doing with IANA.
3) I think that you have to revise the MUD specification itself.
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt is now available. It is a work
item
> of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the
IETF.
> Title: Ownership and licensing statements in YANG
> Authors: Eliot Lear
> Carsten Bormann
> Name:draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.txt
> Pages: 8
> Dates: 2024-04-18
> Abstract:
> This memo provides for an extension to RFC 8520 that allows MUD file
> authors to specify ownership and licensing of MUD files themselves.
> This memo updates RFC 8520. However, it can also be used for
> purposes outside of MUD, and the grouping is structured as such.
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ol/
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05.html
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ol-05
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> ___
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
