Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Med, Good point. Omitting the IE would work as well. Regards, Benoit From:mohamed.boucadair To:Thomas.Graf ;jgs Cc:The IESG ;draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh ;opsawg-chairs ;opsawg Date:2023-05-25 21:05:58 Subject:RE: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Hi Thomas, Why sending a zero length array is needed especially that the decompression is done at the data collector? Shouldn't this just work if srhIPv6Section is omitted when there is no SRH? Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : thomas.g...@swisscom.com > Envoyé : mercredi 24 mai 2023 18:05 > À : j...@juniper.net > Cc : i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > > Objet : Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6- > srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Dear John, > > My apology. Your assumption is correct. > > In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 > destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not > being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. > > Best wishes > Thomas > > > On 24 May 2023, at 17:32, John Scudder wrote: > > > > Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > > > >> On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > >> > >> And what > >> of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare > cSID, would > >> it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? > > > > Regards, > > > > —John > > ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Thomas, Why sending a zero length array is needed especially that the decompression is done at the data collector? Shouldn't this just work if srhIPv6Section is omitted when there is no SRH? Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : thomas.g...@swisscom.com > Envoyé : mercredi 24 mai 2023 18:05 > À : j...@juniper.net > Cc : i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > > Objet : Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6- > srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Dear John, > > My apology. Your assumption is correct. > > In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 > destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not > being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. > > Best wishes > Thomas > > > On 24 May 2023, at 17:32, John Scudder wrote: > > > > Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > > > >> On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > >> > >> And what > >> of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare > cSID, would > >> it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? > > > > Regards, > > > > —John > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Dear John, My apology. Your assumption is correct. In case when the compressed SID container is only used in the IPv6 destination address of the provider data plane and the SRH is not being present at all, it would be a zero lenght array. Best wishes Thomas > On 24 May 2023, at 17:32, John Scudder wrote: > > Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > >> On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: >> >> And what >> of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare cSID, would >> it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? > > Regards, > > —John > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thanks, Thomas. I think this part isn’t answered yet? > On May 24, 2023, at 1:03 AM, thomas.g...@swisscom.com wrote: > > And what > of srhIPv6Section? Would it just be omitted in the case of a bare cSID, would > it be a zero-length octetArray, ...? Regards, —John ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
