Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Try running it from the terminal, do you get any errors? Ringo arshad wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 12:00 -0400, Faraaz Damji wrote: >> If that matches, make sure your version of tar is un-gzipping before >> un-tarring (try 'tar -xzvf FILE.tar.gz', or 'gzip -dc FILE.tar.gz | >> tar >> -xv') >> > thanks it extracted. > but when i click on the executable script nothing is happening. even > setting permission to 777 doesn't make any difference. > any idea? > > thank you very much. > > *** > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with > unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuu/GIACgkQETpif9i/srojHgCfcyCfdHkNCTi62kW8WktAVAXI v4IAn2PYABavrlNUefL7YkryLyIa6bRT =7Er6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 12:00 -0400, Faraaz Damji wrote: > If that matches, make sure your version of tar is un-gzipping before > un-tarring (try 'tar -xzvf FILE.tar.gz', or 'gzip -dc FILE.tar.gz | > tar > -xv') > thanks it extracted. but when i click on the executable script nothing is happening. even setting permission to 777 doesn't make any difference. any idea? thank you very much. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: How does TOR deal with mac addresses
On 10-03-27 8:03 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:00:44PM +0530, emigrant wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:48 +0100, Marco Predicatori wrote: If you use Tor correctly, he can't figure out what site you are connecting to, and that's the whole point. thanks for the reply, what do you mean by using Tor correctly? If Tor is not correctly used you can still leak information regarding your identity. See this link on the main Tor page: https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en#Warning Since "he" in Marco's original post referred to the client's ISP, just to clarify, your ISP can't even see "leaked" data sent through Tor. It would be encrypted before being sent through the Tor network. Leaked data may compromise your anonymity if sniffed by an exit node, or by any intermediate router on the internet between the exit node and the destination. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Erinn Clark (er...@torproject.org): > >> Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux is now available for x86 and x86_64 >> architectures in 12 languages. >> >> The bundle comes with the following software: >> >> * NoScript 1.9.9.57 >> * BetterPrivacy 1.4.7 > > I want to point out that this is the first bundle we are shipping with > NoScript and BetterPrivacy. We've decided to attempt this as a trial > in Linux TBB for a few reasons. After the remote font exploit of Any idea when this will be released for Windows? - -- The best way to get past my spam filter is to sign or encrypt your email to me. My PGP KeyId: 0x84D46604 http://blogdoofus.com http://tinfoilchef.com http://www.domaincarryout.com Un-official Freenet 0.5 alternative download http://peculiarplace.com/freenet/ Mixminion Message Sender, Windows GUI Frontend for Mixminion http://peculiarplace.com/mixminion-message-sender/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBS67DGXV+YnyE1GYEAQhW7Af/TypLX7QT4Dd6TQ/MljEzWMMV823jBxTN RkQGhjQxvcHv2z9dqKteE6yuKzNczpyTV++y+49wQ9Hm0c/Z0LWeJ0IcrDLsv8ae txjWxAioYHJ3/efBxW8kjDPL7QIyMz8Fu/WukWt+B6rCpDd+mFa/4N+rZdlV+KiB pH6QeJgMHZZLOyLk7pyqo6j5u5iZc9yvKClMNGFkwpOUIMNaMaHBZEIH4TcZaCK5 QgLfvGtfgjYTVtaVXigMT1CkWRwsDyxXGjb7WZPKeI8y8L0NtUwhhKKtLiwNBy2z GenXDnlazxxy517iKYz3EwQSuow9s5CKcy1g3mDsXDyhLFXLEATLNg== =zuyz -END PGP SIGNATURE- *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:00:47PM -0400, lis...@frazzydee.ca wrote 0.8K bytes in 28 lines about: > Check the md5 signatures of your files against the .sig file. The sig files are gpg signatures, not md5 hashes. -- Andrew Lewman The Tor Project pgp 0x31B0974B Website: https://www.torproject.org/ Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/ Identi.ca: torproject *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: How does TOR deal with mac addresses
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:00:44PM +0530, emigrant wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:48 +0100, Marco Predicatori wrote: >> If you use Tor correctly, he can't figure out what site you >> are connecting to, and that's the whole point. > > thanks for the reply, > what do you mean by using Tor correctly? If Tor is not correctly used you can still leak information regarding your identity. See this link on the main Tor page: https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en#Warning Hope this helps, Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 pgpuPYcRxxqie.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
Thus spake coderman (coder...@gmail.com): > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > > ... we've come to the conclusion that we need to do a bit more to > > protect our users against Firefox... > > > > In addition, we've decided to try to deploy a list of popular sites > > that have insecure https functionality that can be secured by > > NoScript... > > certlock add-on would be useful too... even better if seeded with > perspectives like validated cert details for the popular targets, like > those you listed above. Yeah, this will make a fine addition to the beta TBB builds once it is released. We will need help seeding it and the NoScript list most likely. Also, for those of you who want to try the NoScript config without downloading the whole bundle, you can import it here: https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torbrowser/trunk/build-scripts/config/noscriptconfig.json Note that a couple bugs have been fixed for config importing in the noscript devel versions. You may want to consider using those too: http://noscript.net/getit#devel -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs pgpHtOxmwsYu1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > ... we've come to the conclusion that we need to do a bit more to > protect our users against Firefox... > > In addition, we've decided to try to deploy a list of popular sites > that have insecure https functionality that can be secured by > NoScript... certlock add-on would be useful too... even better if seeded with perspectives like validated cert details for the popular targets, like those you listed above. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On 10-03-27 11:26 AM, arshad wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 21:33 -0700, Erinn Clark wrote: http://www.torproject.org/torbrowser/ i downloaded both English (en-US): i386 (sig) | x86_64 (sig) and i get this error when extracting: tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors downloaded sizes: 21.4, 21.6 respectively (in mb) Works for me. Check the md5 signatures of your files against the .sig file. If that matches, make sure your version of tar is un-gzipping before un-tarring (try 'tar -xzvf FILE.gz', or 'gzip -dc FILE.gz | tar -xv') -Faraaz *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On 10-03-27 11:26 AM, arshad wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 21:33 -0700, Erinn Clark wrote: http://www.torproject.org/torbrowser/ i downloaded both English (en-US): i386 (sig) | x86_64 (sig) and i get this error when extracting: tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors downloaded sizes: 21.4, 21.6 respectively (in mb) Works for me. Check the md5 signatures of your files against the .sig file. If that matches, make sure your version of tar is un-gzipping before un-tarring (try 'tar -xzvf FILE.tar.gz', or 'gzip -dc FILE.tar.gz | tar -xv') -Faraaz *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 21:33 -0700, Erinn Clark wrote: > http://www.torproject.org/torbrowser/ i downloaded both English (en-US): i386 (sig) | x86_64 (sig) and i get this error when extracting: tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors downloaded sizes: 21.4, 21.6 respectively (in mb) *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: How does TOR deal with mac addresses
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:48 +0100, Marco Predicatori wrote: > If you use Tor correctly, he can't figure out what site you > are connecting to, and that's the whole point. > thanks for the reply, what do you mean by using Tor correctly? *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Is it possible to use eDonkey clients with the Tor?
- Original Message > From: Marco Bonetti > To: "or-talk@freehaven.net" > Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 1:18:07 PM > Subject: Re: Is it possible to use eDonkey clients with the Tor? > > Actually, you can use a donkey client with tor but it will be useless: you'll > end up as a leech with no one being able to connect to your real ip > address. On a side note, I'm not too sure about the burden of a torified > donkey client: leeches get really slow download speeds. Couldn't someone pretend to be many leeches until the pipe was full of really slow download connections? I thought that that was the main problem with Bittorrent. Regards, *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Is it possible to use eDonkey clients with the Tor?
Actually, you can use a donkey client with tor but it will be useless: you'll end up as a leech with no one being able to connect to your real ip address. On a side note, I'm not too sure about the burden of a torified donkey client: leeches get really slow download speeds. -- Sent from my iPwn On 27/mar/2010, at 09.52, starslights wrote: Hi James, Tor are not made for Bitorrent, E2DK etc you will overload the network and don't will have any speed. So please look about I2P or Bitblinder project for such things *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: BIND down, weird IPs pop up on tor.log
Thanks downie! Briefly, I've found out that I have the "weird IPs" in the tor log each time BIND has some temporary failure. This started happening when I moved BIND to another pc in my LAN. It never happened when BIND was running on the same pc as Tor. downie -, on 03/23/2010 06:20 PM, wrote: > I assume you have a fixed IP and an Address line in your torrc? I have this line: Address something.dyndns.org When my IP really changes, I can see correct entries in the log. The problem doesn't seem correlated to my real IP changes. > Would restarting BIND make Tor try to guess its IP? In that case > you could have triggered the bug in 0.2.1.23/24 which gave some > of us with dynamic IPs severe problems - the IP guessed was > random contents of memory changing every few seconds. It's fixed > in 0.2.1.25 I'm still running 0.2.1.24. Have I missed it, or there's been no announcement going around for .25? I can see it now at http://www.torproject.org/dist/tor-0.2.1.25.tar.gz -- http://www.predicatori.it/marco/ *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux 1.0.0 Released
Thus spake Erinn Clark (er...@torproject.org): > Tor Browser Bundle for GNU/Linux is now available for x86 and x86_64 > architectures in 12 languages. > > The bundle comes with the following software: > > * NoScript 1.9.9.57 > * BetterPrivacy 1.4.7 I want to point out that this is the first bundle we are shipping with NoScript and BetterPrivacy. We've decided to attempt this as a trial in Linux TBB for a few reasons. After the remote font exploit of Firefox 3.6 and the apparent ~2 month delay between exploit code and fix, we've come to the conclusion that we need to do a bit more to protect our users against Firefox 0day being held by the underground and aboveground exploit markets. See: http://hackademix.net/2010/03/24/why-noscript-blocks-web-fonts/ http://hackademix.net/2010/03/22/firefox-36s-0-day-and-you/ https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=1328 We also want to provide at least some way for people to view YouTube videos and other flash content without completely sacrificing their privacy and anonymity while viewing all websites. Our plan is to make it so that people who insist on viewing flash content can simply uncheck "Disable plugins for Tor usage", and only be at risk when they actually decide to load a plugin (possibly GnashPlayer) by clicking on its NoScript Placeholder. Basically, we would like to replace this long FAQ entry with a much simpler one that still has an appropriate warning: https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/faq.html.en#noflash In addition, we've decided to try to deploy a list of popular sites that have insecure https functionality that can be secured by NoScript. Right now, we are attempting to secure *twitter.com *facebook.com blog.torproject.org www.torproject.org docs.google.com addons.mozilla.org www.stumbleupon.com. We are open to any suggestions for additions to this list, and what we might do about any problems that arise. The Noscript config shipped with the bundle has the following additional general properties: 1. It disables the redirect to noscript.net on updates. 2. It simplifies the context menu down to just enable/disable javascript 3. It sets Javascript to be enabled by default. 4. It replaces most common media types and plugins with placeholders We're open to any suggestions or comments about this approach. I am also discussing usability issues with Giorgio to try to help make NoScript a bit easier to use in general. > This is a beta version, so please test it and file bugs! > https://bugs.torproject.org/ -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs pgpSfnZiFWwZZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Is it possible to use eDonkey clients with the Tor?
Hi James, Tor are not made for Bitorrent, E2DK etc you will overload the network and don't will have any speed. So please look about I2P or Bitblinder project for such things signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
