Re: Can someone please verify this for me?
- Original Message - I haven't tried using these before, but I do notice that your 'create role' syntax appears to be incorrect for this usage. Sorry for the late reply, folks. Rugby World Cup got in the way... :D Yeah, found out what the problem was after all. I assumed that authid definer was redundant (which was the case I was trying to get to work), so I left it out of the statement. That caused the 6565 error. Once I put authid current_user or authid definer back in the statement, all was well. It appears that a SET ROLE only works in a procedure, IF one explicitly indicates the authid clause in the procedure (or package) creation. Without that, it's 6565. With it, all works fine. Go figure... Thanks a lot for all the help from all the replies, too many for me to thank individually. Now, to make this work with a login trigger... Cheers Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Nuno Souto INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: any ever work with Use Cases to model a database?
- Original Message - What experiences have you had? If not what kind of requirements documents do you use? Im particularly interested in people who have worked on projects with relational back ends and object oriented front ends. It seems very difficult to get these two models to work together cohesively. We used RUP and URL models as well as their use cases. Worked quite well. Once the BAs finished their URL object model and use case models, it was a matter basically of the lead Java designer and the lead Oracle designer getting together and hacking out a preliminary logical data model into Designer. Then the Oracle guys went away for a few days to hack out the final design, which then got reviewed by the Java designers to make sure it did everything they expected. Then it was on to the usual entity-table antics of Designer... All the db interface was handled by PL/SQL packages, one per table or logical object. All access was through these, using object types as parameters. It works well with JDBC and is tremendously fast. Cheers Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Nuno Souto INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Importing LOB segments
Hi there, I have been importin 2gig of LOBs and it is extremely slow, is there any way how to speed up this process... rgds jbHöstrusk och grå moln - köp en resa till solen på Yahoo! Resor
CBO and cartesian product
Hi List, DB version - 8174. (Oracle Apps 11.5.4). One of the customized report started running very slowly. One query was taking more than 3 GB of TEMP tablespace for 'HASH' type segment and erroring out after 2 hours for a lack of space in TEMP. Tkprof showed that it is doing Cartesian Sort Merge Join. After running the same report under RBO, it is using Nested loops and report is completing in just 5 minutes. The stats were collected last week-end. I couldn't find any reason for this CBO's behavior ? Has anybody experienced this before ? Thanks, ~Dilip Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now ! -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Dilip INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Weblogic, thin driver and lob segments
Hi all, we are facing some serious problems with the following case: we have an application which stores quite a lot of documents to database (average document size is 2mb). Application loads document template from database and when we are having 100-200 hundred users there will be a queue on a weblogic server in order to wait to handle those documents and saving the updates to database. Do you have any ideas how to do this faster or is there something we haven't realized. TIA gbWant to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger
Re: Weblogic, thin driver and lob segments
Hi Gunnar, Can you please turn on event# 10046 at level 8 and trace some of your sessions? You can then run 9i tkprof on the trace files, to determine the most expensive SQL statements, from a resource consumption and wait perspective. I am sure there is enough expertise on this list to figure out where the problem may be, if you did post the tkprof output files. Cheers, Gaja --- Gunnar Berglund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, we are facing some serious problems with the following case: we have an application which stores quite a lot of documents to database (average document size is 2mb). Application loads document template from database and when we are having 100-200 hundred users there will be a queue on a weblogic server in order to wait to handle those documents and saving the updates to database. Do you have any ideas how to do this faster or is there something we haven't realized. TIA gb - Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!Messenger = Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha Principal Technical Product Manager, Application Performance Management, Veritas Corporation E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (650)-527-3180 Website: http://www.veritas.com __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: CBO and cartesian product
Here is the short answer: = * Set OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING to 90 * Make sure that DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT is not overly high * Also, consider gathering column-level statistics on some of the indexed columns involved, especially if the query in question uses literal data values on them Here is the long answer: Starting in the 8i timeframe, the CBO started borrowing some techniques from data warehouse STAR joins when confronted with any type of query that traversed two different entity-relationship heirarchies starting from the same table. Say you have three tables (to keep it simple). One table is a child entity to the other two tables, which are both parent entities in ERD terms. The CBO detects that both parent tables are much smaller than the child table. OK, so there is no relationship between the two parent tables -- they are both related only through the large child table. Now, think about what traditional join methods are possible: 1) start with one of the parent tables as the driving table, do a indexed nested-loop range-scan during the join to the child table, and then perform indexed nested-loop unique-scan during the final join to the other parent table 2) reverse the order of option #1. Start with the other parent table, join to the child, and then join up to the remaining parent 3) start with the child table and join up (via indexed unique-scans) to the two parent tables The weak point of both of these options is probably the access of the child table. Plain and simple, it is difficult to efficiently get rows from it. It is likely that the index supporting the foreign-key relationship from either parent table is not very efficient by itself, resulting in a very expensive range-scan, requiring a massive number of logical I/Os and cost calculated by the CBO. So, the CBO in 8i started utilizing another option, which initially blew my mind first time I saw it happen. It was the point which I realized that the CBO was _way_ smarter than humans... This additional option is to perform a cartesian join between the two parent tables, to come up with one result set. Then, using the filtered cartesian result set from that join, the CBO probes into the large child table using the _combined_ keys from both parent tables! Rather brilliant choice, in most cases. The cartesian join, despite everybody's visceral fear of it, is actually rather insignificant if the two parent tables are small. And it is even smaller if there are good filtering predicates on those tables in the WHERE clause. So, instead of having to retrieve rows from the large child table using one or the other of the relatively ineffective indexes supporting each foreign key, the CBO merges and uses both keys, resulting in a far more effective access method into the child table. So, chances are good that this is the situation you are facing. Is this correct? Can you verify the basic relationships between the tables involved? So, now the question is: why did the CBO make the wrong choice? First, the default setting of the OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING parameter (i.e. 0) represents a flaw in the basic costing algorithm used by the CBO. Setting the parameter to 90 or so fixes this flaw. For a more detailed explanation, please feel free to view my paper Search for Intelligent Life in the CBO, available online at http://www.EvDBT.com/papers.htm;. Changing that alone may cause the CBO to rethink its decision to go with the derived STAR-join scheme involving a cartesian join, and instead choose the indexed nested-loops scheme which is the __only__ possible choice by the RBO. By discounting the cost of index-based access methods, the CBO (which considers _all_ possible access methods and chooses the one with the lowest cost) may now choose the index-based plan. Once again, the RBO only considered the one plan, which in this case turned into a bit of luck for the RBO, making it look good. You can experiment with this parameter change using ALTER SESSION, if you like. This is one of the _few_ occasions on which changing a parameter actually has an impact on performance. There are some other parameter settings which may impact how the CBO costs this query. For example, if DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT is set higher than its default value of 8 or 16, then the CBO will think that access plans involving FULL table scans are cheaper than they are. Another possible cause for the CBO's bad decision is it's default assumption that data values in a column are evenly distributed. Gathering stats for indexed columns only gathers the number of distinct keys and the low/high values, by default. Therefore, the CBO has no choice except to assume an even distribution of data, that each distinct data value is used by an equal number of rows. Gathering column-level statistics creates histograms in the data dictionary that
Re: Weblogic, thin driver and lob segments
Gunnar Berglund wrote: Hi all, we are facing some serious problems with the following case: we have an application which stores quite a lot of documents to database (average document size is 2mb). Application loads document template from database and when we are having 100-200 hundred users there will be a queue on a weblogic server in order to wait to handle those documents and saving the updates to database. Do you have any ideas how to do this faster or is there something we haven't realized. TIA gb Is saving to database really the thing to do in such a case? Can't you just save pointers to the documents? Also, if I understand you well, in MSWord-speak people load a .dot and save a .doc; do you really have to save the formatted document? Couldn't you save something saying 'this is the model' and 'this is the associated data'? In other words, use a 'style-sheet' logic? The really useful data in a document is often something relatively small ... -- Regards, Stephane Faroult Oriole Software -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Stephane Faroult INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RAC and Standby Dr
Folks, A project team here is flirting with the idea of having standby databases for the two production RAC nodes. The two standy nodes will be at a DR site. Any gotchas with this configuration? Regards Raj -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: Optimizer related init parameters
Vivek and list, I don't think any reasonable person will be able to say with a high-level of certainty whether the values that you have suggested, are optimal for your environment. The answer is a huge - IT DEPENDS. Having said that, here are some things you may want to take into consideration: 1) From a functionality perspective OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING and OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ were meant to do the same thing. It just happened to end up as 2 different parameters with 2 different code paths, which pretty much do the same(similar) thing. So usually, it is enought to set either one or the other, although setting both in my experience has generated no harm. So, if you want to optimizer to show bias towards index scans, then setting OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING to a high value (90 or higher) will achieve that. Right now your value of 50, tells the optimizer that only 50% of the time, will it find index blocks in the DB buffer cache. This will affect the optimizer's decision making. Tim Gorman has a very simple formula to calculate the appropriate value on your system for OPTIMZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, stated in his paper Searching for intelligence in the Oracle Optimizer (or something to that effect) on his site http://www.evdbt.com. It basically calculates a ratio of the average time for db file sequential read/db file scattered read from v$system_event, for your system. On a related topic, I think it is relevant to mention here that to carte-blanche curtail full-table-scans, may not work to the long-term benefit of your applications. However, I will assume here that you are aware of the core point - amount of logical I/O to be the most important (if not only) determinant when deciding whether FTS is better than index scans. 2) John Kanagaraj did some work and testing to determine that setting OPTIMIZER_MAX_PERMUTATIONS to a low value (2000 if I remember right), has a positive impact on the plans that is generated, especially in an Oracle Apps environment. You should check it out. 3) Julian Dyke and Steve Adams have performed some good tests and research on OPTIMIZER_DYNAMIC_SAMPLING. But, I think the jury is still out on what the optimal value for this might be. I guess 4 is good enough. But, realize that this parameter is relevant when you have partial statistics in your schema. Otherwise, I don't think there is any impact of this parameter. Final notes: 1) All of these parameters can be set at the session level. I would urge you to perform extensive tests before making global init.ora changes. 2) At the end of the day, you should ask yourself, why you are embarking on this effort of changing these values. If you have enough trace data to warrant these changes, then by all means. Otherwise, you may be setting yourself up for surprises in the future. Cheers, Gaja --- VIVEK_SHARMA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How Good/advisable are the following 4 parameters' Values in a Hybrid Application? Are there any know ill-effects of the same? Application - Banking (Hybrid) Solaris 9 Oracle 9.2 optimizer_max_permutations=8000 optimizer_index_cost_adj=10 optimizer_index_caching=50 optimizer_dynamic_sampling=4 Some INFO :- Database has 6000 Concurrent Users accessing We do ONLY INDEX Scans with exceptional FTS . FTS if present occur only on SMALL Tables (a few Hundred Rows) FTS if unchecked greatly harm our performance Stripe Unit Size 64K Oracle Block Size 8K Will Give any info required Thanks = Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha Principal Technical Product Manager, Application Performance Management, Veritas Corporation E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (650)-527-3180 Website: http://www.veritas.com __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: A funny thing happened today on the way to OraPerf.com ...
Gaja, Anjo - The question was: Is the data that users have uploaded to OraPerf now available to Veritas? It's a fair question that deserves more than a no need for any concern answer :-).. Perhaps it would be good if Anjo explained why and how this happened. You know I love you, Gaja, but why the Hell should I suddenly contact you about Anjo's pet? Mogens Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha wrote: Hi Paul, Long time no talk/see. Hope things are well with you. I personally don't think there is any need for concern here. OraPerf still remains as a free analyzer, just the way it did when it was Anjo's site. OraPerf is now provided as a service, as part of the Veritas Architect Network. The same old good stuff, with more resources supporting the site. If you have any further concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Gaja --- Paul Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I ended up here: http://oraperf.veritas.com/index.html Hmm. so now Veritas has the statspack reports that I uploaded previously. I don't know what to think. Maybe they'll see the source code, and the sales staff will think - too far gone for any of our utils and leave me alone? Pd - Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search = Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha Principal Technical Product Manager, Application Performance Management, Veritas Corporation E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (650)-527-3180 Website: http://www.veritas.com __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mogens_N=F8rgaard?= INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: Desupport of RBO
I'm pretty sure that RBO is still there in 10g :-), but that it will not be enhanced, P2 and beyond issues won't be fixed, etc. But to be certain, I have asked Graham Wood. Mogens Cary Millsap wrote: I'm pretty sure that RBO is *gone* in 10g. If I understood correctly what I learned this week, there will be no more RBO, just one optimizer code path called the Oracle Query Optimizer. Also, if I understand correctly, the RULE hint will have exactly the same functionality as the HEY, DUDE hint: none. ...But I haven't tested it. Cary Millsap Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd. http://www.hotsos.com Upcoming events: - Performance Diagnosis 101: 10/28 Phoenix, 11/19 Sydney - Hotsos Symposium 2004: March 7-10 Dallas - Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details... -Original Message- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:49 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L i dont think they are totally removing the RBO from 10g. Ive seen conflicting reports. I think tom kyte hinted that it is gone, then I read somewhere else that its still going to be there. RBO is necessary if you use layered complex views. CBO often times doesnt hold up. Its a pretty bad design. But some people use it. I see it mostly with cross-platform apps. They tell you to always use RBO. if the RBO is totally gone they will need to totally re-architecture their products. So I dont know if Oracle will do this. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/07 Tue PM 02:04:31 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Desupport of RBO OK, dumb question. Does this mean the rule hint won't be possible? Application I support mostly uses CBO but there have been cases where we had to resort to RBO hint. 'course it'll be some time before we can consider v10... Kip |Hi Jared, |haven't seen it, too. But the fact |was spreaded over the newsgroups. |We still have some 3rd party apps that don't use |*any* feature above Oracle 7 (well, almost). Queries with |the RULE hint where it's not necessary. |But if we change a thing, support will be lost. |So we decided to rewrite the whole app. |Lucky me: enough work for the next years. |Greetings, |Guido | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07.10.2003 01.34 Uhr |First time I've seen this note: 189702.1 |Jared |-- |Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net |-- |Author: Guido Konsolke | INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com |San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services |- |To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message |to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in |the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L |(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may |also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mogens_N=F8rgaard?= INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: Using ' in Update statement
Tom has a small staff to help him answer the questions. I find the comment from Raj to be less than fair and intelligent - or we all misunderstood what he meant (including me). Mogens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know whether Tom does all of the asktom site on his own time, but I doubt it. His website doesn't do much to hurt sales of his book, so he also has a greater financial interest. Money is a good motivator. Tom is also a VP at Oracle, and does some pretty good PR for his employer via his web site. I imagine he is able to spend more time on the job answering questions than what would be practical for most people on this list. Many of us answer questions here for a variety of reasons. Here's my list of reasons: * it's an interesting topic * it's a topic that covers something I need to do * it's a topic that is not easily answered from the manuals, and the person posing the question could use some help. * it's a topic regarding something I have already learned to solve * I will learn something by participating The last one covers many more threads than I could possibly be involved in, so I try to limit it to those that will be of use to me somehow. Jared [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/10/2003 12:54 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Using ' in Update statement You guys are mean !! Tom Kyte would have given me 10 ways of writing the statement, would have traced every one of them under different versions and on different platforms, pointed out the number of logical reads, elapsed time, et all, and told me which one is better. Regards Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] disys.comTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using ' in Update statement ity.com 10/10/2003 01:54 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L What he said. Mladen Gogala [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:Multiple recipients of Sent by: list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Using ' in Update statement 10/10/2003 09:14 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Here is the reason for that: this list would not be useful to me if it was devoted to answering beginner's questions. List would get flooded, I would stop reading as would many other people. It has already happened. This list is a very valuable resource to me and I would hate to lose it to the people asking things like how to set prompt in sqlplus. Usenet groups are the proper place for that. People can learn the basics by reading books and manuals and I don't have much sympathy for the people who don't want to read but post their questions to this list instead. I am trying to help when I think that help is needed, but I am also trying to discourage trivial questions asked for 10th time. Don't get me wrong, I'm not apologizing for my actions, I'm just explaining them. This is my last reply in this thread because I don't intend to create a flame war on this list.
Re: FW: Oracle Performance Software from Veritas
It went very well. Gaja was flying, and it was good to see 15 members of the OakTable playing air guitar at the same time on stage. The girls were crazy with Gaja, and for good reasons. I have decided to make a musical next year, too. This massive mass of talent must not be wasted. Mogens PS: The whole thing was videoed, but I'm waiting for the stuff from the guy that did it. Rachel Carmichael wrote: and how WAS the musical? jgps, mp3 files please --- Mogens_Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May I just add that his real name is Gaja Vahatneyhatneyhatney. That is what I called him in BAARF. The Musical.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our good friend Gaja Vaidyanatha is now with Veritas, so this isn't really too surprising. :) Jared *David Wagoner [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/06/2003 01:59 PM Please respond to ORACLE-L To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:FW: Oracle Performance Software from Veritas Just got this email from Veritas...apparently they are getting into the database performance business for Oracle (and SQL Server too I think). Best regards, *David B. Wagoner* Database Administrator Arsenal Digital Solutions the most trusted source for STORAGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES The contents of this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this message or any attachment by you is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone (919-466-6700), and please delete this message and all attachments from your system. Thank you. -Original Message-* From:* VERITAS Software [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2003 3:40 PM* To:* David Wagoner* Subject:* Trial Software for Oracle environment /# *Do something about it.* *_Download_* http://www.veritas.com/offer?a_id=3851* a free trial of VERITAS Indepth(tm) for Oracle.* Easier said than done. Usually it's difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint the root cause of performance slowdowns. Countless hours are spent troubleshooting and analyzing applications with few results to show for it. *That's about to change. *With VERITAS Indepth for Oracle, you can identify specific application bottlenecks, resolve them faster, and maintain promised service levels to users. Download VERITAS Indepth for Oracle to see how you can: * *Monitor* the Oracle environment continuously and capture performance data for current, short term, and long-term performance analysis. * *Drill down and identify* a performance problem caused by a resource bottleneck or a poorly written SQL statement. * *Resolve performance problems* faster with detailed steps and displays statistics relevant to each step in the Oracle access path. *_Download Now_* http://www.veritas.com/offer?a_id=3851 Why we contacted you and how to opt-out: We know your time is valuable and that we (and others) are placing increasing demands on it. We contacted you about this news because we believe that the content of this message would be interesting and valuable to you. If you do not wish to receive future VERITAS notifications, please click on the link below, and send us the e-mail: _mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review our online _Privacy Policy_ http://www.veritas.com/privacypolicy/PolicyHome.jhtml and _Terms of Use_ http://www.veritas.com/privacypolicy/TermsOfUseHome.jhtml. © Copyright 2003 VERITAS Software. All rights reserved. VERITAS Software, 350 Ellis Street, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States. We welcome your comments. Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mogens_N=F8rgaard?= INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author:
