RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-02 Thread Henry Poras
No little minds at this place, maybe just hobgoblins. Certainly no
consistency. I tried again this morning and everything worked. (of course I
don't know what has changed behind the scenes:Oracle patches, OS
patches???). Jane, stop this crazy thing.

Thanks for the suggestions. Next time I'll spool my commands immediately so
they'll be some record.

Henry


-Original Message-
Cary Millsap
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 6:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


If you exited the Oracle session without deactivating the trace, then
you should probably see a XCTEND as well, right? If you see the XCTEND
but no STAT lines, then I think you've found a bug.


Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com

Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 10/28 Phoenix, 11/19 Sydney
- Hotsos Symposium 2004: March 7-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...


-Original Message-
Henry Poras
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Wolfgang,

I'll give level 9 a try. Yes I get PARSE, EXEC, FETCH, WAIT. My platform
is
AIX 5.1

For now I've run sql_trace = true and 10046 level 8 and looked at two
seperate trace files. I've had this working before, but I can't remember
if
it was on 5.1 or when we still were at AIX 4.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Henry


-Original Message-
Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Do you get the PARSE, EXEC and FETCH entries for the sql?

You gave us your Oracle version, but what is your platform?
Would you care to try the following: since sql_trace = true corresponds
to
event 10046, level 1, why not set event 10046 at level 9. Maybe
that'll
do the trick.

At 12:59 PM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
Tried that. Also queried on open_cursors in a parallel session.

Henry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel Fink
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: STAT from trace

Henry,

What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest?
(something like select 1 from dual;) STAT should be emitted when the
cursor is closed.

Daniel


Henry Poras wrote:
  Thanks. I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the
session.
 No luck with 10046, just sql_trace.Henry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of
Jamadagni, Rajendra
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: STAT from trace

I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure you
wither
close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines
will
be written to the file.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace

I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row
source'
information after running tkprof.

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name
context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT
entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.

Everything else was identical.

What's up?

Henry

Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like

RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: STAT from trace





I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure you wither close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines will be written to the file.

Raj


-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace



I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).


When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row source'
information after running tkprof.


When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.


Everything else was identical.


What's up?


Henry



This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2


Re: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Tanel Poder
Hi!

This is the problem, that everything else was identical. If you executed
exactly the same query again, it didn't get hard parsed anymore, thus no
STAT lines were generated. Either flush shared pool or just add some bogus
comment using /* */ into your query to get parsing and STAT lines.

Tanel.
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:34 PM


 I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
 problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).

 When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
 8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row source'
 information after running tkprof.

 When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name
context
 forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries
 for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.

 Everything else was identical.

 What's up?

 Henry

 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 -- 
 Author: Henry Poras
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Tanel Poder
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Henry Poras
Title: RE: STAT from trace



Thanks. I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the session. 
No luck with 10046, just sql_trace.

Henry

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jamadagni, 
  RajendraSent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 AMTo: 
  Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: STAT from 
  trace
  I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure 
  you wither close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines 
  will be written to the file.
  Raj 
  -Original Message- From: Henry 
  Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: STAT from trace 
  I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one 
  of these problems that shows up occasionally (then I 
  forget about it). 
  When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true 
  (sqlplus; 8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace 
  and the associated 'row source' information after 
  running tkprof. 
  When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 
  trace name context forever, level 8' (or with 
  dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries for my 
  query. There were some for some of the recursive queries. 
  Everything else was identical. 
  What's up? 
  Henry 


Re: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Daniel Fink


Henry,
What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest?
(something like "select 1 from dual;") STATshould be emitted when
the cursor is closed.
Daniel

Henry Poras wrote:
Thanks.
I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the session. No luck
with 10046, just sql_trace.Henry

-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jamadagni, Rajendra
Sent: Wednesday, October 01,
2003 10:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: STAT from trace

I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure
you wither close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT
lines will be written to the file.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace
I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across
one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about
it).
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true
(sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated
'row source'
information after running tkprof.
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046
trace name context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there
were no STAT entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive
queries.
Everything else was identical.
What's up?
Henry


begin:vcard 
n:Fink;Daniel
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.
adr:;;
version:2.1
title:Lead, Database Services
x-mozilla-cpt:;9168
fn:Daniel  W. Fink
end:vcard


Re: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
That's not true. The STAT lines in the 10046 trace have nothing to do with 
parsing. But you must close the cursor for them to be written to the trace. 
If you are using sqlplus, either close the trace or the session, otherwise 
sqlplus keeps the cursor for the most recent sql open.

Here is an exctract from a trace where I execute the same sql twice in a 
row. You can even see the alter session command.

PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=84 dep=0 uid=31 oct=3 lid=31 tim=926359 
hv=1785040157 ad='313afe4'
select t1.d1, t1.d2, t2.d1, t2.d2
from t1, t2
where t2.fk1=t1.pk1
  and t2.d2 = 499
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=200,e=258,p=25,cr=401,cu=6,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926361
EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926362
FETCH #1:c=0,e=2,p=2,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926364
STAT #1 id=1 cnt=0 pid=0 pos=0 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN '
STAT #1 id=2 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=1 obj=134295 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T2 '
STAT #1 id=3 cnt=1 pid=2 pos=1 obj=134372 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN '
STAT #1 id=4 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=2 obj=134293 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 '
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=926366 
hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926367
APPNAME mod='SQL*Plus' mh=3669949024 act='' ah=4029777240
EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=926368
*** 2003-10-01 09:39:52.448
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=69 dep=0 uid=31 oct=42 lid=31 tim=928350 
hv=589283212 ad='30f70b8'
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 8'
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=928351
EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=928351
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
*** 2003-10-01 09:40:02.682
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 1021 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=929375 
hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929376
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
APPNAME mod='01@ c:\tmp\tst.sql' mh=764572216 act='' ah=4029777240
EXEC #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=929377
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=84 dep=0 uid=31 oct=3 lid=31 tim=929380 
hv=1785040157 ad='313afe4'
select t1.d1, t1.d2, t2.d1, t2.d2
from t1, t2
where t2.fk1=t1.pk1
  and t2.d2 = 499
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=3,e=3,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929382
EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929383
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
FETCH #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929384
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
STAT #1 id=1 cnt=0 pid=0 pos=0 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN '
STAT #1 id=2 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=1 obj=134295 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T2 '
STAT #1 id=3 cnt=1 pid=2 pos=1 obj=134372 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN '
STAT #1 id=4 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=2 obj=134293 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 '
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=929388 
hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929389
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
APPNAME mod='SQL*Plus' mh=3669949024 act='' ah=4029777240
EXEC #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=929391
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
*** 2003-10-01 09:40:14.219
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 1135 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=57 dep=0 uid=31 oct=42 lid=31 tim=930528 
hv=1975444627 ad='30f59a0'
 alter session set events '10046 trace name context off'
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=930530
EXEC 

RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Henry Poras



Tried 
that. Also queried on open_cursors in a parallel session.

Henry


  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Daniel FinkSent: 
  Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list 
  ORACLE-LSubject: Re: STAT from traceHenry, 
  What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest? 
  (something like "select 1 from dual;") STATshould be emitted when the 
  cursor is closed. 
  Daniel  
  Henry Poras wrote: 
  Thanks. I tried both disabling 
the trace and quitting from the session. No luck with 10046, just 
sql_trace.Henry 

  -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On 
  Behalf Of Jamadagni, Rajendra Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 
  AM To: Multiple 
  recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: STAT from trace 
  I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the 
  trace. Make sure you wither close the session or stop the trace so that 
  all pending STAT lines will be written to the file. 
  Raj 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Henry Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM 
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
  Subject: STAT from trace 
  I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across 
  one of these problems that shows up occasionally 
  (then I forget about it). 
  When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET 
  sql_trace=true (sqlplus; 8.1.7.4), I got the STAT 
  line in the trace and the associated 'row source' information after running tkprof. 
  When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 
  trace name context forever, level 8' (or with 
  dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries for my query. There were some for some of the recursive 
  queries. 
  Everything else was identical. 
  What's up? 
  Henry


RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
Do you get the PARSE, EXEC and FETCH entries for the sql?

You gave us your Oracle version, but what is your platform?
Would you care to try the following: since sql_trace = true corresponds to 
event 10046, level 1, why not set event 10046 at level 9. Maybe that'll 
do the trick.

At 12:59 PM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
Tried that. Also queried on open_cursors in a parallel session.

Henry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Daniel Fink
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: STAT from trace

Henry,

What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest? 
(something like select 1 from dual;) STAT should be emitted when the 
cursor is closed.

Daniel

Henry Poras wrote:
 Thanks. I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the session. 
No luck with 10046, just sql_trace.Henry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Jamadagni, Rajendra
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: STAT from trace

I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure you wither 
close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines will 
be written to the file.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace
I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row source'
information after running tkprof.
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.
Everything else was identical.

What's up?

Henry
Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com 


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Vladimir Begun
Tanel, that's not correct. 10046  10053. To get the STATs lines the
trace buffer has to be flushed i.e. the cursor has to be closed and
the next statement is processed (or user closes the session) -- depends
on the nature of the application, types of opened cursors and
instance/session settings.
--
Vladimir Begun
The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and
do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation.
Tanel Poder wrote:
Hi!

This is the problem, that everything else was identical. If you executed
exactly the same query again, it didn't get hard parsed anymore, thus no
STAT lines were generated. Either flush shared pool or just add some bogus
comment using /* */ into your query to get parsing and STAT lines.
Tanel.
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:34 PM

I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row source'
information after running tkprof.
When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name
context

forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.
Everything else was identical.

What's up?

Henry


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Vladimir Begun
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Tanel Poder
Wolfgang, Vladimir,
Thanks for pointing this out, I must have been thinking with some other part
of my body than head.

If it would depend on hard parsing, it wouldn't be so simple to get
execution plans for sql for a session in instance that has been running for
a while (assuming bind variables are used, of course).

So, I understand the STAT information is written to trace on cursor close?

Tanel.

- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:49 PM


 That's not true. The STAT lines in the 10046 trace have nothing to do with
 parsing. But you must close the cursor for them to be written to the
trace.
 If you are using sqlplus, either close the trace or the session, otherwise
 sqlplus keeps the cursor for the most recent sql open.

 Here is an exctract from a trace where I execute the same sql twice in a
 row. You can even see the alter session command.

 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=84 dep=0 uid=31 oct=3 lid=31 tim=926359
 hv=1785040157 ad='313afe4'
 select t1.d1, t1.d2, t2.d1, t2.d2
 from t1, t2
 where t2.fk1=t1.pk1
and t2.d2 = 499
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=200,e=258,p=25,cr=401,cu=6,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926361
 EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926362
 FETCH #1:c=0,e=2,p=2,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926364
 STAT #1 id=1 cnt=0 pid=0 pos=0 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN '
 STAT #1 id=2 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=1 obj=134295 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
T2 '
 STAT #1 id=3 cnt=1 pid=2 pos=1 obj=134372 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN '
 STAT #1 id=4 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=2 obj=134293 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 '
 =
 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=926366
 hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
 BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=926367
 APPNAME mod='SQL*Plus' mh=3669949024 act='' ah=4029777240
 EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=926368
 *** 2003-10-01 09:39:52.448
 =
 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=69 dep=0 uid=31 oct=42 lid=31 tim=928350
 hv=589283212 ad='30f70b8'
 alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 8'
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=928351
 EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=928351
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 *** 2003-10-01 09:40:02.682
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 1021 p1=1413697536 p2=1
p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 =
 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=929375
 hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
 BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929376
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 APPNAME mod='01@ c:\tmp\tst.sql' mh=764572216 act='' ah=4029777240
 EXEC #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=929377
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 =
 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=84 dep=0 uid=31 oct=3 lid=31 tim=929380
 hv=1785040157 ad='313afe4'
 select t1.d1, t1.d2, t2.d1, t2.d2
 from t1, t2
 where t2.fk1=t1.pk1
and t2.d2 = 499
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=3,e=3,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929382
 EXEC #1:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929383
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 FETCH #1:c=1,e=1,p=0,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929384
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 STAT #1 id=1 cnt=0 pid=0 pos=0 obj=0 op='HASH JOIN '
 STAT #1 id=2 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=1 obj=134295 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
T2 '
 STAT #1 id=3 cnt=1 pid=2 pos=1 obj=134372 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN '
 STAT #1 id=4 cnt=0 pid=1 pos=2 obj=134293 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL T1 '
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 =
 PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=53 dep=0 uid=31 oct=47 lid=31 tim=929388
 hv=3759542639 ad='316aac4'
 BEGIN DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.SET_MODULE(:1,NULL); END;
 END OF STMT
 PARSE #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=4,tim=929389
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
 APPNAME mod='SQL*Plus' mh=3669949024 act='' ah=4029777240
 EXEC #1:c=2,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=929391
 WAIT #1: 

RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Henry Poras
Wolfgang,

I'll give level 9 a try. Yes I get PARSE, EXEC, FETCH, WAIT. My platform is
AIX 5.1

For now I've run sql_trace = true and 10046 level 8 and looked at two
seperate trace files. I've had this working before, but I can't remember if
it was on 5.1 or when we still were at AIX 4.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Henry


-Original Message-
Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Do you get the PARSE, EXEC and FETCH entries for the sql?

You gave us your Oracle version, but what is your platform?
Would you care to try the following: since sql_trace = true corresponds to
event 10046, level 1, why not set event 10046 at level 9. Maybe that'll
do the trick.

At 12:59 PM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
Tried that. Also queried on open_cursors in a parallel session.

Henry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel Fink
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: STAT from trace

Henry,

What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest?
(something like select 1 from dual;) STAT should be emitted when the
cursor is closed.

Daniel


Henry Poras wrote:
  Thanks. I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the session.
 No luck with 10046, just sql_trace.Henry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jamadagni, Rajendra
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: STAT from trace

I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure you wither
close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines will
be written to the file.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace

I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row source'
information after running tkprof.

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name
context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.

Everything else was identical.

What's up?

Henry

Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: STAT from trace

2003-10-01 Thread Cary Millsap
If you exited the Oracle session without deactivating the trace, then
you should probably see a XCTEND as well, right? If you see the XCTEND
but no STAT lines, then I think you've found a bug.


Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com

Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 10/28 Phoenix, 11/19 Sydney
- Hotsos Symposium 2004: March 7-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...


-Original Message-
Henry Poras
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Wolfgang,

I'll give level 9 a try. Yes I get PARSE, EXEC, FETCH, WAIT. My platform
is
AIX 5.1

For now I've run sql_trace = true and 10046 level 8 and looked at two
seperate trace files. I've had this working before, but I can't remember
if
it was on 5.1 or when we still were at AIX 4.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Henry


-Original Message-
Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Do you get the PARSE, EXEC and FETCH entries for the sql?

You gave us your Oracle version, but what is your platform?
Would you care to try the following: since sql_trace = true corresponds
to
event 10046, level 1, why not set event 10046 at level 9. Maybe
that'll
do the trick.

At 12:59 PM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
Tried that. Also queried on open_cursors in a parallel session.

Henry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel Fink
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: STAT from trace

Henry,

What happens if you issue another query after the query of interest?
(something like select 1 from dual;) STAT should be emitted when the
cursor is closed.

Daniel


Henry Poras wrote:
  Thanks. I tried both disabling the trace and quitting from the
session.
 No luck with 10046, just sql_trace.Henry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of
Jamadagni, Rajendra
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: STAT from trace

I get STAT lines no matter how I enable the trace. Make sure you
wither
close the session or stop the trace so that all pending STAT lines
will
be written to the file.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Henry Poras
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: STAT from trace

I was creating some trace files yesterday and came across one of these
problems that shows up occasionally (then I forget about it).

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=true (sqlplus;
8.1.7.4), I got the STAT line in the trace and the associated 'row
source'
information after running tkprof.

When I ran my query using ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name
context
forever, level 8' (or with dbms_system.set_ev), there were no STAT
entries
for my query. There were some for some of the recursive queries.

Everything else was identical.

What's up?

Henry

Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Wolfgang Breitling
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Cary Millsap
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message