Re: [OGD] ... Jesus himself often quoted from the Old Testament, therefore I believe it is safe to assume that he believed it, literally!

2004-12-15 Thread marianne.fleurimont
QUOTE:

The Being (I think it much, much to limiting to say He or She
and especially It) posses(ed)(es) - all at the same time -
perfect/whole/complete Knowledge. The Being gifted this created but formless
universe with a set of rules. Some choose to call them the Natural Law but I
like to think of them as The Master 'Do-It-Yourself/Put-It-Together' Manual.
An assembly manual so complete; but, at the same time imaginative and
flexible, that the universe was, in time and over time, free to form all
sorts of things/creatures. Things and creatures that we (The Arrogant Human)
can only guess about. I find this concept TRULY awesome and APPROPRIATELY
respectful of the sublime limitlessness of The Being. The whole idea is
exciting!  Talk about WISDOM.

 Jerry in Indiana

Thanks Jerry, that's great.  Mr. Ikea of Sweden would be greatly touched,
and I, as his handmaid who constructed some of his masterplans in my own
living room this weekend(out of the constraints of a student budget) owe him
much worship and devotion.  Actually, he owes me quite a bit of money... and
the rest of the world, too.

But hey... those willy orchids got all the benefit: now they have gotten
themselves more habitat.

M




___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] ... Jesus himself often quoted from the Old Testament, therefore I believe it is safe to assume that he believed it, literally!

2004-12-14 Thread Gerald H Fisher
For days I struggled to say out of (Theistic or No) Evolution/Creation 
(Creationism) but +7 oz of wine makes for great profundity, verbosity of 
style and a presumption that the orchid - this world's most complete of all 
plants - is one damn fine expression of creation reality and yes, Faith (not 
religion).   If anyone wants to discuss the difference between Faith (Caps) 
and religion (lowercase) please feel free to go off OGD.  Be 
warned/informed -

Credentials seem very important with some in this group so:  I attended 17 
years of Catholic schools to include taking (except 6 hours in 'Sacramental 
Practicum' - or how we used to say - How to do 'the Magic.') all the 
required ordination courses at a Seminary. Formal Catholic training by Nuns, 
Brothers and Priests would be a couple years more but Dad was stationed in 
Germany following W.W.II and my tutor was more interested in 'bartering' 
cigarettes with my mother than offering wisdom in Catholicism ... or math 
for that matter. Added comment:  Don't know why - but it seemed very 
important to a 'Village Priest in the middle of Indiana' who didn't find it 
necessary for me to attend Pre-Marriage Instruction - I was 'privately' 
confirmed by the Cardinal of Vienna.  Hopefully everyone is impressed --- or 
as President Bush says, In shock and awe.

Sharon,
Don't mean to 'pick on' you.  Your comment just offered the springboard for 
what has been building.  I invite anyone who does not accept my belief in 
some form of a Supreme Force to go off-line.  I have no illusion that either 
of us will change our beliefs but I will gain from you comments.  As to the 
rest and I do mean 'THE REST'   ...   isn't it really 'just 
religion' rather than Faith?

I often quote from 'Through the Looking Glass'  by Lewis Carroll but I don't 
literally believe everything that is in it.

   'The time has come,' the Walrus said,
   'To talk of many things:
   Of shoes - and ships - and sealing-wax -
   Of cabbages - and kings -
   And why the sea is boiling hot -
   And whether pigs have wings.'
Why is it safe to assume that he (Jesus) believed it (the OT), literally 
simply because He quoted from it?  A logical(?) extension, There were many 
things in the OT that Jesus did not literally believe because he did not 
quote them.

'Assume' - possibly the most dangerous of words and also a most fun ---  
'What do you call it when you break it down into its parts?'

Creation    Evolution???  (Note that I do not say Creationism which I 
consider to be a religious term which may or may not be valid but some find 
of great value.)

Creation    Evolution???  Creation IS so that evolution MAY BE. 
Consider:

An intelligent Being/Force imaged a physical universe and it formed - was - 
came to be.  The Being (I think it much, much to limiting to say He or She 
and especially It) posses(ed)(es) - all at the same time - 
perfect/whole/complete Knowledge. The Being gifted this created but formless 
universe with a set of rules. Some choose to call them the Natural Law but I 
like to think of them as The Master 'Do-It-Yourself/Put-It-Together' Manual. 
An assembly manual so complete; but, at the same time imaginative and 
flexible, that the universe was, in time and over time, free to form all 
sorts of things/creatures. Things and creatures that we (The Arrogant Human) 
can only guess about. I find this concept TRULY awesome and APPROPRIATELY 
respectful of the sublime limitlessness of The Being. The whole idea is 
exciting!  Talk about WISDOM.

Please don't see this as in anyway limiting the significance of God directly 
acting in forming The Man, Adam. It is so much more. God KNEW!!  Knew what 
was to be and billions of years ago set Knowledge into motion.  A 
'System --- The PLAN' that would one day allow for the gradual forming of 
the human   AND ALLOWED FOR THE GRADUAL FORMING OF WHAT IS TO COME AT 
SOME FUTURE TIME.  I think to say otherwise simply expresses human pride and 
insults the Being because in our arrogance we presume to place limits on 
Limitless Imagination. Scary and exciting and sort of fun -- all at the 
same time.  What is to be???

One of the creatures that 'formed  -  evolved' from this imaged original 
plan is uniquely gifted.  Unique in that it is the only one (so far known in 
all others) that has this gift/skill.  The gift is the ability to choose to 
say Yes to the Creator's gratuitous (we did not earn it) offer of 
relationship. Sadly, some humans reject the gift and say No to this 
sublime invitation of relationship. Some religions (including the one to 
which I am a member) choose to label this 'Sin' but I see it more as waste - 
something that is the antithesis of the plan of the Creating Being ---  
something not in 'appropriate' balance with The Plan.

Each creature was/is/to be from the Mind-Will-Love of the Creator. As the 
result of this gift the human is more complex BUT does not have greater 
value than any one of the