Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread Mary Alice Cafiero
I completely agree about the benefits and importance of social  
interaction. I definitely don't think it has to be a specific goal to  
be effective. I also think that you can uncover a world of problems or  
issues by observing a patient interacting with staff, peers, family,  
etc. Might end up finding new areas that need to be addressed.


Therapeutic use of self and using real world activities are completely  
OT!

Mary Alice

Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
m...@mac.com
972-757-3733
Fax 888-708-8683

This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
message from your system.






On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:16 PM, bbh1...@comcast.net wrote:

If someone is going to be using a reacher for the foreseeable future  
after D/C because of medically established precautions against trunk  
flexion, etc. then
this kind of practice with a reacher is medically beneficial. Call  
it whatever perjorative name you like, patients enjoy activities  
that are entertaining as well as
medically necessary/useful/goal-directed. I am certainly not going  
to sit with a patient and make him/her take her pants on and off  
interminably just because that
is how the goal is worded - LB ADL Indep using AE... Come on,  
people. Lighten up!


And as far as social interaction is concerned, there is NOTHING that  
is more conducive to helping patients progress, especially those in  
SNFs, than interaction with the therapist or with other patients.  
You don't need a goal. It is ALWAYS a factor, hence it is  
therapeutic to the goals you are working on. Just today, I had a  
patient who more easily lost his balance because of laughter. He is  
a funny guy and likes to joke around. Because I engaged with him, I  
was able to observe this phenonmenon directly. I then
suggested that we should have him watch funny videos standing so  
that he can practice his dynamic balance. This was a direct result  
of social interaction. Social interaction
is an integral part of any occupation, and I mean that in the broad  
OT sense of the word. Well, I guess not for hermits, or possibly  
accountants and others whose goals are impeded by interaction. But  
you get the drift.


Thanks for your suggestion, Barbara. I may try this with appropriate  
patients. I have a few on my caseload with precautions like these. I  
find that competitive games are very
helpful in supporting patients by giving them tangible evidence that  
they are not the only person in the world struggling to recover/ 
adapt to a new medical condition.


Barb Howard

- Original Message -
From: "Neal Luther" 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:33:02 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada  
Eastern

Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

Could not agree more. In addition, this just simply sounds  
juvenile...pediatric. Neal C. Luther,OTR/L Advanced Home Care,  
Burlington Office 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672  
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org Home Care is our Business...Caring is  
our Specialty The information contained in this electronic document  
from Advanced Home Care is privileged and confidential information  
intended for the sole use of otl...@otnow.com. If the reader of this  
communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or  
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you  
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying  
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received  
this communication in error, please immediately notify the person  
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-  
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On  
Behalf Of Ron Carson Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:50 AM To:  
Barbara H. Hale Subject: Re:
[OTlist] Game using reacher I don't want to sound negative, but I  
can't help wondering what patient's think about using what should be  
medically necessary equipment to play "games". What "message" might  
this send to patients, other professionals and payers? Finally,  
should social interaction only be considered as therapeutic if it's  
an actual goal? Just some random questions. Thanks, Ron -- Ron  
Carson MHS, OT www.OTnow.com - Original Message - From:  
Barbara H. Hale Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 To: OTlist@OTnow.com  
Subj: [OTlist] Game using reacher BHH> I have a bean bag tic tac toe  
game that I use for a reacher training BHH> activity. The grid for  
the game is painted on a fabric square that I place BHH> within  
reach on the floor. Each bean bag has an X or an O painted on it.  
All BHH> the items fit into a tote bag and I usually hold the bag  
for the patient to BHH> clean up our game at the end by placing

Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread cmnahrwold
As long as the patient knows why they are practicing a specific skill then I am 
all for it.? In my experience it usually takes the cognitively intact clients a 
few activities to understand how to use a reacher, not an entire session.? They 
then can borrow a reacher to use in their room so they can practice for real, 
and then ask questions when issues arise.? Now for the cognitively impaired 
(primarily moderate to severe dementia) the practice of a reacher is a waste of 
time because patients at that level have the inability to learn new 
information.? The emphasis of treatment should at that point be on family 
training and maximizing their physical abilities, not on cognitive 
restoration.? Cognitive compensation might be an option, but don't count on it. 
For the mildly impaired I think practice in this area is critical, especially 
if they are going to be living by themsolves or not receiving 24 hour 
supervision.

What I see in practice is therapists completing? non?therapeutic games and 
splinter skills that have no relevance except to capture minutes for a higher 
payment level.?Do not get me wrong, ?I am all for activities that promote 
social interaction and higher level balance improvement, those activities 
sounded outstanding.? In fact I might steal that one for clinical use, since it 
deals with dual task challenges, which is supported in the research.? 

The grim reality is this: if our profession as a whole continues to complete 
treatment interventions that have no relevance to the patients' improvement, 
then through the very nature of cost containment we will be phased out.? Pick 
up a new book in OT, read a new research article, go to a course, by all means 
do all you can to provide relevance to the patient's care and improvement.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR


-Original Message-
From: Diane Randall 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 7:10 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher



Very well said!!!

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com]on
Behalf Of bbh1...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 18:16
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher


If someone is going to be using a reacher for the foreseeable future after
D/C because of medically established precautions against trunk flexion, etc.
then
this kind of practice with a reacher is medically beneficial. Call it
whatever perjorative name you like, patients enjoy activities that are
entertaining as well as
medically necessary/useful/goal-directed. I am certainly not going to sit
with a patient and make him/her take her pants on and off interminably just
because that
is how the goal is worded - LB ADL Indep using AE... Come on, people.
Lighten up!

And as far as social interaction is concerned, there is NOTHING that is more
conducive to helping patients progress, especially those in SNFs, than
interaction with the therapist or with other patients. You don't need a
goal. It is ALWAYS a factor, hence it is therapeutic to the goals you are
working on. Just today, I had a patient who more easily lost his balance
because of laughter. He is a funny guy and likes to joke around. Because I
engaged with him, I was able to observe this phenonmenon directly. I then
suggested that we should have him watch funny videos standing so that he can
practice his dynamic balance. This was a direct result of social
interaction. Social interaction
is an integral part of any occupation, and I mean that in the broad OT sense
of the word. Well, I guess not for hermits, or possibly accountants and
others whose goals are impeded by interaction. But you get the drift.

Thanks for your suggestion, Barbara. I may try this with appropriate
patients. I have a few on my caseload with precautions like these. I find
that competitive games are very
helpful in supporting patients by giving them tangible evidence that they
are not the only person in the world struggling to recover/adapt to a ne
w
medical condition.

Barb Howard

- Original Message -
From: "Neal Luther" 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:33:02 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

Could not agree more. In addition, this just simply sounds
juvenile...pediatric. Neal C. Luther,OTR/L Advanced Home Care, Burlington
Office 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672 neal.lut...@advhomecare.org Home Care is our
Business...Caring is our Specialty The information contained in this
electronic document from Advanced Home Care is privileged and confidential
information intended for the sole use of otl...@otnow.com. If the reader of
this communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed ab

Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread Diane Randall
Very well said!!!

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com]on
Behalf Of bbh1...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 18:16
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher


If someone is going to be using a reacher for the foreseeable future after
D/C because of medically established precautions against trunk flexion, etc.
then
this kind of practice with a reacher is medically beneficial. Call it
whatever perjorative name you like, patients enjoy activities that are
entertaining as well as
medically necessary/useful/goal-directed. I am certainly not going to sit
with a patient and make him/her take her pants on and off interminably just
because that
is how the goal is worded - LB ADL Indep using AE... Come on, people.
Lighten up!

And as far as social interaction is concerned, there is NOTHING that is more
conducive to helping patients progress, especially those in SNFs, than
interaction with the therapist or with other patients. You don't need a
goal. It is ALWAYS a factor, hence it is therapeutic to the goals you are
working on. Just today, I had a patient who more easily lost his balance
because of laughter. He is a funny guy and likes to joke around. Because I
engaged with him, I was able to observe this phenonmenon directly. I then
suggested that we should have him watch funny videos standing so that he can
practice his dynamic balance. This was a direct result of social
interaction. Social interaction
is an integral part of any occupation, and I mean that in the broad OT sense
of the word. Well, I guess not for hermits, or possibly accountants and
others whose goals are impeded by interaction. But you get the drift.

Thanks for your suggestion, Barbara. I may try this with appropriate
patients. I have a few on my caseload with precautions like these. I find
that competitive games are very
helpful in supporting patients by giving them tangible evidence that they
are not the only person in the world struggling to recover/adapt to a new
medical condition.

Barb Howard

- Original Message -
From: "Neal Luther" 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:33:02 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

Could not agree more. In addition, this just simply sounds
juvenile...pediatric. Neal C. Luther,OTR/L Advanced Home Care, Burlington
Office 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672 neal.lut...@advhomecare.org Home Care is our
Business...Caring is our Specialty The information contained in this
electronic document from Advanced Home Care is privileged and confidential
information intended for the sole use of otl...@otnow.com. If the reader of
this communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the person listed above
and discard the original.-Original Message- From:
otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of Ron
Carson Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:50 AM To: Barbara H. Hale Subject:
R!
e: [OTlist] Game using reacher I don't want to sound negative, but I can't
help wondering what patient's think about using what should be medically
necessary equipment to play "games". What "message" might this send to
patients, other professionals and payers? Finally, should social interaction
only be considered as therapeutic if it's an actual goal? Just some random
questions. Thanks, Ron -- Ron Carson MHS, OT www.OTnow.com - Original
Message - From: Barbara H. Hale Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 To:
OTlist@OTnow.com Subj: [OTlist] Game using reacher BHH> I have a bean bag
tic tac toe game that I use for a reacher training BHH> activity. The grid
for the game is painted on a fabric square that I place BHH> within reach on
the floor. Each bean bag has an X or an O painted on it. All BHH> the items
fit into a tote bag and I usually hold the bag for the patient to BHH> clean
up our game at the end by placing the bean bags in the tote bag. BHH> It is
engaging for the pa!
tient and I can use it for social interaction BHH> also. BHH> -- BHH>
Options? BHH> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com BHH> Archive?
BHH> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com -- Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
-- Options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread bbh1015
If someone is going to be using a reacher for the foreseeable future after D/C 
because of medically established precautions against trunk flexion, etc. then 
this kind of practice with a reacher is medically beneficial. Call it whatever 
perjorative name you like, patients enjoy activities that are entertaining as 
well as 
medically necessary/useful/goal-directed. I am certainly not going to sit with 
a patient and make him/her take her pants on and off interminably just because 
that 
is how the goal is worded - LB ADL Indep using AE... Come on, people. Lighten 
up! 

And as far as social interaction is concerned, there is NOTHING that is more 
conducive to helping patients progress, especially those in SNFs, than 
interaction with the therapist or with other patients. You don't need a goal. 
It is ALWAYS a factor, hence it is therapeutic to the goals you are working on. 
Just today, I had a patient who more easily lost his balance because of 
laughter. He is a funny guy and likes to joke around. Because I engaged with 
him, I was able to observe this phenonmenon directly. I then 
suggested that we should have him watch funny videos standing so that he can 
practice his dynamic balance. This was a direct result of social interaction. 
Social interaction 
is an integral part of any occupation, and I mean that in the broad OT sense of 
the word. Well, I guess not for hermits, or possibly accountants and others 
whose goals are impeded by interaction. But you get the drift. 

Thanks for your suggestion, Barbara. I may try this with appropriate patients. 
I have a few on my caseload with precautions like these. I find that 
competitive games are very 
helpful in supporting patients by giving them tangible evidence that they are 
not the only person in the world struggling to recover/adapt to a new medical 
condition. 

Barb Howard 

- Original Message - 
From: "Neal Luther"  
To: OTlist@OTnow.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:33:02 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher 

Could not agree more. In addition, this just simply sounds 
juvenile...pediatric. Neal C. Luther,OTR/L Advanced Home Care, Burlington 
Office 1-336-538-1194, xt 6672 neal.lut...@advhomecare.org Home Care is our 
Business...Caring is our Specialty The information contained in this electronic 
document from Advanced Home Care is privileged and confidential information 
intended for the sole use of otl...@otnow.com. If the reader of this 
communication is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please immediately notify the person listed above and discard the 
original.-Original Message- From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com 
[mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of Ron Carson Sent: Tuesday, 
February 03, 2009 5:50 AM To: Barbara H. Hale Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using 
reacher I don't want to sound negative, but I can't help wondering what 
patient's think about using what should be medically necessary equipment to 
play "games". What "message" might this send to patients, other professionals 
and payers? Finally, should social interaction only be considered as 
therapeutic if it's an actual goal? Just some random questions. Thanks, Ron -- 
Ron Carson MHS, OT www.OTnow.com - Original Message - From: Barbara H. 
Hale Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 To: OTlist@OTnow.com Subj: [OTlist] Game 
using reacher BHH> I have a bean bag tic tac toe game that I use for a reacher 
training BHH> activity. The grid for the game is painted on a fabric square 
that I place BHH> within reach on the floor. Each bean bag has an X or an O 
painted on it. All BHH> the items fit into a tote bag and I usually hold the 
bag for the patient to BHH> clean up our game at the end by placing the bean 
bags in the tote bag. BHH> It is engaging for the patient and I can use it for 
social interaction BHH> also. BHH> -- BHH> Options? BHH> 
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com BHH> Archive? BHH> 
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com -- Options? 
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? 
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com 
-- Options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? 
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers

2009-02-04 Thread cmnahrwold
I second that motion.


-Original Message-
From: Lehman, David 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com 
Sent: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:57 pm
Subject: Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers



I say combine the professions of PT and OT thus ending the territory issue and 
what we can and cannot do.  I see what you described as exactly what I would do 
as a PTbut, I know you are just as competent and good at is as I am, Ron

So, lets combine the 2 professions.

David A. Lehman, PhD, PT

Associate Professor

Tennessee State University

Department of Physical Therapy

3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.

Nashville, TN 37209

615-963-5946

dleh...@tnstate.edu

Visit my website:  http://www.tnstate.edu/interior.asp?mid=2410&ptid=1

 

This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential 
information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is 
addressed. If you receive this correspondence in error, please notify the 
sender 
and delete the email from your system. Do not disclose its contents with others.
 

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of 
cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:50 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers

Bravo!!!? I believe that is task analysis at its absolute best.? Taking the 
foundational skills and working up the ladder towards her occupational goal.

I view hand therapy and stroke rehabilitation in the same light. Working on the 
foundational skills in order to work towards an occupatioanal goal.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR


-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40 pm
Subject: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers



A  while  back  on  an  AOTA  forum,  I  was "criticized" for working on
mobility  when  there  were not obvious occupational forms present (i.e.
toilet,  shower, chairs, etc). At least one person's contention was that
working  on mobility in the absence of an occupational form is not OT. I
want  to  share a quick case study which highlights why I take exception
with  the person's comments.

For  the  sake  of  brevity,  I'll keep "Jan
e's" case study as simple as
possible.



Jane  has  a  spinal  condition leaving her with partial lower extremity
paralysis. The patient's initial goals are of course to walk but also to
transfer  to  her  toilet,  shower, etc. Again for brevity, she wants to
learn "skills for the job of living".

Initially,  the  patient  was  unable  to  stand, so we began working on
standing.  This required maximum, and I mean max, assistance x1. At this
early stage, the patient was unable to use a walker. After a week or so,
I  progressed  the  patient  to  a  walker,  but she still required knee
blocking  to  stand.  Eventually,  the patient was able to stand without
knee blocking and finally began taking steps. After she was able to walk
10-15  feet with a rolling walker, we tried transfers from wheelchair to
wheelchair.  This  was  very difficult and required continuing practice.

After  approximately  6  weeks  of  almost  daily OT, TODAY, the patient
transferred  from  her  w/c  to  her toilet using a walker. She required
assistance  with  sit  to  stand  and cuing with the transfer but it was
essentially  her  doing  the transfer. This is a huge milestone for this
patient  and  made her VERY happy and optimistic that her life was going
to again have some semblance of "normal".

##

Now,  in my opinion, I have been working on occupation from day ONE! The
patient  had occupation-related deficits, her barriers were identified I
was  competent  to  address  thos
e  barriers  and  the  patient had good
potential to make significant progress towards her goals.

So  what  do  you  think?  Should  OT work on mobility/ambulation in the
immediate absence of occupational forms? Should OT address mobility from
the very beginning, if mobility is a barrier to occupational goals?

I'm interested to hear what other's say!

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mail
man/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers

2009-02-04 Thread Lehman, David
I say combine the professions of PT and OT thus ending the territory issue and 
what we can and cannot do.  I see what you described as exactly what I would do 
as a PTbut, I know you are just as competent and good at is as I am, Ron

So, lets combine the 2 professions.

David A. Lehman, PhD, PT

Associate Professor

Tennessee State University

Department of Physical Therapy

3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.

Nashville, TN 37209

615-963-5946

dleh...@tnstate.edu

Visit my website:  http://www.tnstate.edu/interior.asp?mid=2410&ptid=1

 

This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential 
information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is 
addressed. If you receive this correspondence in error, please notify the 
sender and delete the email from your system. Do not disclose its contents with 
others.
 

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On Behalf Of 
cmnahrw...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:50 AM
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Subject: Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers

Bravo!!!? I believe that is task analysis at its absolute best.? Taking the 
foundational skills and working up the ladder towards her occupational goal.

I view hand therapy and stroke rehabilitation in the same light. Working on the 
foundational skills in order to work towards an occupatioanal goal.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR


-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40 pm
Subject: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers



A  while  back  on  an  AOTA  forum,  I  was "criticized" for working on
mobility  when  there  were not obvious occupational forms present (i.e.
toilet,  shower, chairs, etc). At least one person's contention was that
working  on mobility in the absence of an occupational form is not OT. I
want  to  share a quick case study which highlights why I take exception
with  the person's comments.

For  the  sake  of  brevity,  I'll keep "Jane's" case study as simple as
possible.



Jane  has  a  spinal  condition leaving her with partial lower extremity
paralysis. The patient's initial goals are of course to walk but also to
transfer  to  her  toilet,  shower, etc. Again for brevity, she wants to
learn "skills for the job of living".

Initially,  the  patient  was  unable  to  stand, so we began working on
standing.  This required maximum, and I mean max, assistance x1. At this
early stage, the patient was unable to use a walker. After a week or so,
I  progressed  the  patient  to  a  walker,  but she still required knee
blocking  to  stand.  Eventually,  the patient was able to stand without
knee blocking and finally began taking steps. After she was able to walk
10-15  feet with a rolling walker, we tried transfers from wheelchair to
wheelchair.  This  was  very difficult and required continuing practice.

After  approximately  6  weeks  of  almost  daily OT, TODAY, the patient
transferred  from  her  w/c  to  her toilet using a walker. She required
assistance  with  sit  to  stand  and cuing with the transfer but it was
essentially  her  doing  the transfer. This is a huge milestone for this
patient  and  made her VERY happy and optimistic that her life was going
to again have some semblance of "normal".

##

Now,  in my opinion, I have been working on occupation from day ONE! The
patient  had occupation-related deficits, her barriers were identified I
was  competent  to  address  thos
e  barriers  and  the  patient had good
potential to make significant progress towards her goals.

So  what  do  you  think?  Should  OT work on mobility/ambulation in the
immediate absence of occupational forms? Should OT address mobility from
the very beginning, if mobility is a barrier to occupational goals?

I'm interested to hear what other's say!

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers

2009-02-04 Thread cmnahrwold
Bravo!!!? I believe that is task analysis at its absolute best.? Taking the 
foundational skills and working up the ladder towards her occupational goal.

I view hand therapy and stroke rehabilitation in the same light. Working on the 
foundational skills in order to work towards an occupatioanal goal.

Chris Nahrwold MS, OTR


-Original Message-
From: Ron Carson 
To: OTlist@OTnow.com
Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40 pm
Subject: [OTlist] From Standing to Toilet Transfers



A  while  back  on  an  AOTA  forum,  I  was "criticized" for working on
mobility  when  there  were not obvious occupational forms present (i.e.
toilet,  shower, chairs, etc). At least one person's contention was that
working  on mobility in the absence of an occupational form is not OT. I
want  to  share a quick case study which highlights why I take exception
with  the person's comments.

For  the  sake  of  brevity,  I'll keep "Jane's" case study as simple as
possible.



Jane  has  a  spinal  condition leaving her with partial lower extremity
paralysis. The patient's initial goals are of course to walk but also to
transfer  to  her  toilet,  shower, etc. Again for brevity, she wants to
learn "skills for the job of living".

Initially,  the  patient  was  unable  to  stand, so we began working on
standing.  This required maximum, and I mean max, assistance x1. At this
early stage, the patient was unable to use a walker. After a week or so,
I  progressed  the  patient  to  a  walker,  but she still required knee
blocking  to  stand.  Eventually,  the patient was able to stand without
knee blocking and finally began taking steps. After she was able to walk
10-15  feet with a rolling walker, we tried transfers from wheelchair to
wheelchair.  This  was  very difficult and required continuing practice.

After  approximately  6  weeks  of  almost  daily OT, TODAY, the patient
transferred  from  her  w/c  to  her toilet using a walker. She required
assistance  with  sit  to  stand  and cuing with the transfer but it was
essentially  her  doing  the transfer. This is a huge milestone for this
patient  and  made her VERY happy and optimistic that her life was going
to again have some semblance of "normal".

##

Now,  in my opinion, I have been working on occupation from day ONE! The
patient  had occupation-related deficits, her barriers were identified I
was  competent  to  address  thos
e  barriers  and  the  patient had good
potential to make significant progress towards her goals.

So  what  do  you  think?  Should  OT work on mobility/ambulation in the
immediate absence of occupational forms? Should OT address mobility from
the very beginning, if mobility is a barrier to occupational goals?

I'm interested to hear what other's say!

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread Neal Luther
Could not agree more.  In addition, this just simply sounds
juvenile...pediatric. 


Neal C. Luther,OTR/L
Advanced Home Care, Burlington Office
1-336-538-1194, xt 6672
neal.lut...@advhomecare.org

Home Care is our Business...Caring is our Specialty



The information contained in this electronic document from Advanced Home Care 
is privileged and confidential information intended for the sole use of 
otl...@otnow.com.  If the reader of this communication is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the person 
listed above and discard the original.-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:50 AM
To: Barbara H. Hale
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

I  don't  want  to  sound  negative,  but  I  can't  help wondering what
patient's think about using what should be medically necessary equipment
to  play  "games".  What  "message"  might  this send to patients, other
professionals  and  payers?  Finally,  should social interaction only be
considered as therapeutic if it's an actual goal?

Just some random questions.

Thanks,

Ron

--
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com

- Original Message -
From: Barbara H. Hale 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Game using reacher

BHH> I have a bean bag tic tac toe game that I use for a reacher
training 
BHH> activity. The grid for the game is painted on a fabric square that
I  place
BHH> within reach on the floor. Each bean bag has an X or an O painted
on it. All
BHH> the items fit into a tote bag and I usually hold the bag for the
patient to
BHH> clean up our game at the end by placing the bean bags in the tote
bag.
BHH>  It is engaging for the patient and I can use it for social
interaction 
BHH> also. 


BHH> --
BHH> Options?
BHH> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BHH> Archive?
BHH> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com
--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher

2009-02-04 Thread Diane Randall
I don't think using a reacher is something most need "continued" training
for but Hip Fx pts need to initially learn to use it. You would be suprised
at some who have a hard time. We put pennies. paper , magazines and a
variety of househols items on the floor to pick up. Some automatically want
to reach down to pick items up. Training with the reacher forces them to
learn to use it rather than to use thier own body and break hip precautions.
It is especially necessary for those with impaired cognition. I am one who
believe something can be fun and functional.

-Original Message-
From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com]on
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 23:20
To: Barbara H. Hale
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Game using reacher


Hello Barbara:

Thanks for writing back.

I'm  still  kind  of  stuck  because  using  a  reacher  is well, pretty
mindless.  Heck,  you can buy them at Home Depot and they are advertised
on  TV.  So,  I  guess  I  just don't see where OT skills are needed for
continued training on how to pick something up with a reacher.

I  agree  that  use  of self, what Carl Rogers might call a "therapeutic
relationship", is CRITICAL to achieving outcomes. But, I whole-heartedly
believe   that   relationships   should   be  formed  while  engaged  in
medically-necessary therapy. And no, that doesn't mean that every minute
of every session is 100% therapy, but in my mind, if a treatment session
is  spent  on  playing  "reacher  games", that's sort of wasted time and
dollars.

Based  on  my education, social interaction is not an occupation. Social
interaction  is broad category that includes such occupations as playing
cards, playing bingo, going to church, etc.

Lastly,  I have interactions with people all day long. Sometimes, I feel
like  a  whole person, sometimes like a 1/2 person and sometimes I just
feel  like  I  don't  matter.  So,  I'm  not  sure that I agree with the
statement:

"Having  an  interaction with some one is allowing the person to
be recognized for their ability to be a thinking whole person."

I've  also  seen  many therapist and patient interactions leave patients
with feelings of helplessness, confusion, disrespect, etc.

By the way, these are great topics for discussion and I hope others will
join in.

S

- Original Message -
From: Barbara H. Hale 
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com 
Subj: [OTlist] Game using reacher

BHH> I understand what you are saying Ron.  However, I would much rather
play a
BHH> game with the reacher to get a pt. to demonstrate they have the skills
to
BHH> use it.  To dump out a container of blocks and have the patient pick
them up
BHH> and put them back into the same container is a mindless thing.  Having
an
BHH> interaction with some one is allowing the person to be recognized for
their
BHH> ability to be a thinking whole person. Attention from a therapist while
BHH> building a relationship will make a huge difference in the outcome,
"use of
BHH> self" was important in my training. Social interaction is in my view an
BHH> occupation, important for providing a sense of accomplishment, trust in
BHH> another person, a few laughs, making life a little more enjoyable. I
cannot
BHH> imagine it would be a negative to payers, professionals, or patients.
Is
BHH> everyone supposed to sit around and look depressed because it is a
medically
BHH> necessary piece of equipment? I believe the therapist is able to make a
BHH> decision about the appropriate use of a game with a patient vs.
practice of
BHH> a skill. Just my opinion!


BHH> --
BHH> Options?
BHH> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BHH> Archive?
BHH> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com