Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-11-03 Thread Liam McLennan
I like Github better that Bitbucket but they are both good. There is also
Assembla and Unfuddle.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Corneliu I. Tusnea
corne...@acorns.com.auwrote:

 BitBucke +1 :)


 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thank you I'll look at BitBucket again.


 On 18 October 2011 01:51, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 bitbucket has issue tracking.

 Although I prefer mercurial git seems to work for me, and a number of
 other people, on Windows.

 Joseph


 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I
 mentioned. Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows
 support.

 But thank you for the suggestions.


 On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Other than github and bitbucket?

 On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue
 tracking and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future
 but my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up
 and go quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --

 w: http://jcooney.net
 t: @josephcooney




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland





-- 
Liam McLennan.

l...@eclipsewebsolutions.com.au
http://www.eclipsewebsolutions.com.au


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-11-03 Thread David Connors
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Liam McLennan liam.mclen...@gmail.comwrote:

 I like Github better that Bitbucket but they are both good. There is also
 Assembla and Unfuddle.


We're using Redmine with GIT integration for a startup I am working with at
the moment. Early days but it looks pretty promising.

-- 
*David Connors* | da...@codify.com | www.codify.com
Codify Pty Ltd
Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417
189 363
V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-30 Thread Corneliu I. Tusnea
BitBucke +1 :)

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thank you I'll look at BitBucket again.


 On 18 October 2011 01:51, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 bitbucket has issue tracking.

 Although I prefer mercurial git seems to work for me, and a number of
 other people, on Windows.

 Joseph


 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I
 mentioned. Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows
 support.

 But thank you for the suggestions.


 On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Other than github and bitbucket?

 On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue
 tracking and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future
 but my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up
 and go quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --

 w: http://jcooney.net
 t: @josephcooney




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland



Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-17 Thread Joseph Cooney
Other than github and bitbucket?

On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys, 
 
 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue tracking 
 and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.
 
 We're currently looking at:
 Hosted TFS
 Fogbuz/Kiln
 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future but my 
 my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and go 
 quickly solution for them
 
 -- 
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-17 Thread Preet Sangha
Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I mentioned.
Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows support.

But thank you for the suggestions.

On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Other than github and bitbucket?

 On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue tracking
 and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future but
 my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and go
 quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




-- 
regards,
Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-17 Thread Joseph Cooney
bitbucket has issue tracking.

Although I prefer mercurial git seems to work for me, and a number of other
people, on Windows.

Joseph

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I mentioned.
 Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows support.

 But thank you for the suggestions.


 On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Other than github and bitbucket?

 On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue tracking
 and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future but
 my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and go
 quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




-- 

w: http://jcooney.net
t: @josephcooney


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-17 Thread Preet Sangha
Thank you I'll look at BitBucket again.

On 18 October 2011 01:51, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 bitbucket has issue tracking.

 Although I prefer mercurial git seems to work for me, and a number of other
 people, on Windows.

 Joseph


 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.comwrote:

 Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I mentioned.
 Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows support.

 But thank you for the suggestions.


 On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney joseph.coo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Other than github and bitbucket?

 On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue
 tracking and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future
 but my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and
 go quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland




 --

 w: http://jcooney.net
 t: @josephcooney




-- 
regards,
Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland


RE: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-16 Thread Grant Holliday
Preet,

Hosted TFS comes in two forms at the moment:


1)  Team Foundation Server 2010, hosted by a hosting partner. E.g. 
http://DiscountASP.net/tfs, Full list: 
http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions/team-foundation-server/hosting

a.   This is the same released version of TFS that you get on MSDN, they 
just run it for you.

b.  You pay on a per user/per month basis. Because they are different 
providers, some have more/less flexibility with what you can do based upon how 
much you pay.



2)  Visual Studio Team Foundation Service, hosted by Microsoft. 
http://tfspreview.com/

a.   This is the next version of TFS. It includes the new product backlog, 
taskboard and other team features.

b.  It's in an invitation-only preview phase at the moment, with a 
best-effort SLA. I've been using it for some personal projects for a few months 
now, and it works really well. (let me know off-list if you need an invite code)

c.   It will be RTW at some point in the future. Pricing TBD.

d.  It's running on the Windows Azure platform and uses SQL Azure + blobs 
as it's data store.

e.  Microsoft is investing heavily in it and has indicated that new 
features will ship in the service before they ship for the on-premises version.


Grant

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Preet Sangha
Sent: Monday, 17 October 2011 2:10 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

Guys,

I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue tracking and 
was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

We're currently looking at:

  *   Hosted TFS
  *   Fogbuz/Kiln
I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future but my 
my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and go 
quickly solution for them

--
regards,
Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland


Re: Hosted Source Control/Issue Tracking recommendations

2011-10-16 Thread Matt Siebert
I'm using FogBugz hosted.  At the moment the development team consists of
just me and a product manager (not a developer) but it's been good for
recording issues that I'll need to deal with down the track.  It's also good
for breaking tasks down into sub-tasks, it has a backlog plugin and you can
have per-project and global milestones with dependencies between milestones
but not between tasks.

We've also recently started using Trello http://trello.com which is pretty
cool but obviously no substitute for an issue tracker.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue tracking
 and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations.

 We're currently looking at:

- Hosted TFS
- Fogbuz/Kiln

 I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future but
 my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up and go
 quickly solution for them

 --
 regards,
 Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland