[ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy

2006-12-04 Thread Päivi
Hi,

Looking for advise again...
A friend of mine is pregnant, but unfortunately there is no fetus. (Can't think 
of the term in english now). Her options are to wait until week 12, when the 
pregnancy will terminate or to have an abortion now. Sorry, this is not 
something I am familiar with, and just wanted to ask for any advise. Is it 
better to wait and let nature take it's corse, or go the medical way... I guess 
they would give her cytotec. What kind of risks should she be aware of? Any 
good links for websites?

Thank again,

Päivi

[ozmidwifery] testing

2006-12-04 Thread Mary Murphy
Haven't had an email for a while.. am I on?  MM



Re: [ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy

2006-12-04 Thread D. Morgan
Paivi, These pregnancies generally terminate themselves anytime up to 12 weeks, 
as hormone levels aren't conduicive to the pregnancy continuing. It depends on 
the Drs as to whether they do a DC  afterwards. Most times there is no need.
Cheers
Di M

Re: [ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy

2006-12-04 Thread Päivi
Hi Di,

And thanks for your response. I guess it would be quite unpleasant to remain 
pregnant and wait for the spontanious abortion, but do you suggest, that it 
would be better that way? Are the risks of induced abortion to do with cytotec 
mainly or are there other things to consider also?

Päivi
  - Original Message - 
  From: D. Morgan 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:50 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy


  Paivi, These pregnancies generally terminate themselves anytime up to 12 
weeks, as hormone levels aren't conduicive to the pregnancy continuing. It 
depends on the Drs as to whether they do a DC  afterwards. Most times there is 
no need.
  Cheers
  Di M

Re: [ozmidwifery] testing

2006-12-04 Thread Honey Acharya
Hi Mary
Your email came through, there have been a few emails on the list over the past 
few days.
I've emailed this to your email privately as well as to the list to see if it 
comes through for you.

Honey
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mary Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:18 AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] testing


  Haven't had an email for a while.. am I on?  MM


Re: Re: [ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy

2006-12-04 Thread abby_toby
Hi,

Many women I know who have experienced a dc and naturally miscarried have said 
that the overall experience ie. physical, emotional and spiritual, was much 
better when it was natural. They felt like it was easier on their body and gave 
their body and mind time to adjust.

Love Abby 



 Päivi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi Di,
 
 And thanks for your response. I guess it would be quite unpleasant to 
 remain pregnant and wait for the spontanious abortion, but do you 
 suggest, that it would be better that way? Are the risks of induced 
 abortion to do with cytotec mainly or are there other things to consider 
 also?
 
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] testing

2006-12-04 Thread Andrea Robertson

Hi Mary,

I can tell that you are hooked on the ozmid list - as soon as it is 
quiet for a day or two, you worry we have forgotten you!


You are still with us..

Andrea



At 02:18 AM 5/12/2006, you wrote:

Haven't had an email for a while.. am I on?  MM


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] independent midwifery/national standards

2006-12-04 Thread Sue Cookson
I was just wondering if there had been any responses to the discussion 
of national standards etc?? I haven't received anything at all,


Sue


An interesting discussion.
Brings me to the assignment I've just completed on the variation in 
education, regulation and registration of midwives and competency 
assessments that occur across our wide brown land.
And these will be the things that bring us to be either supportive or 
not of hospital birthing. South Australia maternity system is 
definitely much better organised and funded than the New South Wales 
one. Can't speak for any other. I've done clinical placements in both 
states and working in environments with new equipment, standard spa 
baths, and midwives who collectively practice evidence-based midwifery 
with supportive services is delightful compared with the other - 
outdated equipment, tired midwives and outdated policies and protocols.
I've also attended many years of homebirth and as Tania says, there is 
simply no comparison in experience or outcome when working with 
families you know and trust. I am still and alwys will be in awe of 
what midwives can do when working with women they don't know.
I always believe however that even when entering an institution that 
may be outdated and tired with the odds of normal birth against us, 
that my presence can always make a difference to a woman who has 
invited me to assist her. So I also offer hospital 'supports' because 
I believe and do make a difference.


The NSW area where I live and work has limited midwife antenatal 
clinics even, and midwifery group practices just don't exist. Birth 
practices are disjointed and outdated but they are changing and the 
last five births I attended in the capacity of a final year student 
were simply great within the limited scope of practice that exists in 
this neck of the woods.


I guess we can all try and see the good that each area/service/midwife 
can bring to the women we all serve and help to create change where 
needed.
Perhaps standardisation of education, registration and competency 
assessments through nationalising maternity service (like in NZ and 
other OECD countries) would be for the best for women and midwives - 
may create a more predictable, evidence based active group of 
committed midwives.

???

Sue




Absolutely agree Jo that it is the women who are perhaps at higher 
risk
that would most benefit from the continuity of care from a known 
midwife,
the outcomes at the Women's and Children's in Adelaide have clearly 
shown
that the women who are in high risk groups going through the MGP are 
having
better outcomes, less intervention and more normal births, than the 
low risk

women going through the medical model of care. Definitely food for
thought...goes to show that the research is indeed right.

I feel that it's the right place here to put in my 2c worth too, 
about IPM's
and homebirth. Please remember that IPM's, while at times appearing 
to be
superhuman - and I say that from my experience as a consumer of IPM 
care,
they are also human. Building up a rapport with a woman over the 
space of a
shift is indeed an art, and something I am amazed that my colleagues 
can do,
day in day out. Really knowing a woman, having a relationship with 
her and
her whole family that spans months, and sometimes years, having an 
emotional
investment in helping her to achieve the best birth possible, is 
something

that simply can't be compared with working on a shift by shift basis.
If you have never stood by, and watched a woman be lied to, or 
coerced with

untruths, or half truths, if you have never been treated appallingly by
those who are your equals, but feel you are beneath them, if you have 
never
seen the look of defeat in a woman's face as all the positive energy 
leaves
the room and someone calls her stupid and naïve for trying to have 
her baby
without intervention, then you have no idea about the pain that is 
felt, and
the helplessness, and even the feeling of betrayal you feel because 
you can
no longer protect or hold the space, for that woman. I have been in 
these

situations, and I can really understand why some midwives prefer not to
provide care to women choosing to birth in the hospital system. There 
is an

element of self preservation about it too, let's not forget that.
Sometimes, it's just too painful to go willingly and knowingly into a
situation that you know is not going to go the way the woman wants.
Transferring in for an obstetric need is of course, something completely
different...
And that's not to say that the care you provide Sharon, in the 
hospital in
which you work, is not the best you can do, with the circumstances 
you have.

What we all know is that it is not the best thing for all women, and
according to the research, it's actually not the best thing for most
women...just because it's all that's on offer doesn't mean we 
shouldn’t be

looking to improve it, and one midwife one woman care is just the

[ozmidwifery] How childbirth went industrial

2006-12-04 Thread EKS

Two fascinating articles I saw on a blog today - I've exerpted at my
blog (http://midwiferyiscatching.blogsome.com/) but the articles are
at 
http://www.mothering.com/articles/pregnancy_birth/birth_preparation/childbirth-went-industrial.html
and http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/061009fa_fact.

Emma
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] retained placenta PPH

2006-12-04 Thread Kristin Beckedahl
Hi all,
Was chatting to a woman y'day re her first birth. She has very fast labour "woke up and was 6cm!", laboured for another 2.5hrs, reached 10cm "then they gave me the epidural"(which I am still wonderingabout?!?) Bub was posterior so "this allowed him to turn otherwise he wouldnt have come out or it would have been very messy!!". (again wondering about the messages this woman received or perceived..)
Anyway, she went on to have a retained placenta (I'm presuming she had synto for 3rd stage) and began bleeding quite badly.
How is a retained placenta and PPH related, or is it? I thought a retained placenta had come off the uterine and was caught behind closed/closing cervix? Please correct me if I am wrong...
Anyway, her Ob has suggested an elective CS for her next baby (due May) to avoid this happening again - what the?! ggrrr
Kristin
CBE  NaturopathAdvertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @   Lavalife - Click here  

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Inductions brought forward to attend medical conferences

2006-12-04 Thread Helen and Graham
Births induced early
Adam Cresswell, Health editor
05dec06

OBSTETRICIANS are inducing women to give birth early so they can attend medical 
conferences held when birthrates are at their highest.

An analysis has found the typical Australian obstetrics conference, lasting 
several days, causes 4 per cent of the expected births to be shifted, in most 
cases bringing it forward by a few days. 
In Australia, say the study's authors - from the Australian National University 
and Melbourne Business School - this means 116 babies are born on a different 
date than nature intended, while in the US 755 births a year are affected. 

They say it is plausible this may increase the risk of birth complications. 

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 
president Christine Tippett said: They've done a lot of work looking at it, 
but I'm a bit sceptical. 

If there was some need to change, of course we'd look at it very seriously - 
but I would need to have some better data.




 
  privacy   terms  © The Australian 



Re: [ozmidwifery] terminating pregnancy

2006-12-04 Thread D. Morgan
I'm not sure about cytotec but it is always better to wait for nature to take 
it's course etc.
I had one years ago and it all happened within a few days of my finding out 
that it was a blighted ovum, no different to any other miscarriage really.
Cheers
Di M

[ozmidwifery] Perinatal Loss Co-ordinator vacancy Brisbane

2006-12-04 Thread Anne Moore

Perinatal Loss Coordinator, Education and Support Services - 18 month
position commencing January 2007, Mater Mothers' Hospital

Job Code07NM21
Job CategoryNursing
Position Status Full-time
DurationTemporary
Hours of Work   76 hours per fortnight (Monday to Friday)
Salary  $2,246 - $2,406.30 per fortnight
Classification  Nursing Officer Level 2


The Mater Mothers’ Hospital has received funding from the Mater Foundation
to implement and evaluate an evidence based multi disciplinary perinatal
loss service.  The main focus of the service will be to implement the PSANZ
Perinatal Mortality Audit Guidelines into clinical practice and evaluate the
success of this intervention.  The Perinatal Loss coordinator’s role will
include a significant amount of staff education and support as well as
contact with bereaved families.

The Perinatal Loss Coordinator will be supported by and report to the
Midwifery Unit Manager of Parent Education and Support Services.  This
department provides a variety of support services for parents accessing the
Mater Mothers’ Hospitals.  This includes a perinatal loss service, lactation
services, antenatal workshops, natural fertility support, private
preadmission service, and access to evidence based written information and
an education network channel.

The successful applicants should possess:

• An active interest in perinatal loss support
• Excellent communication and interpersonal skills
• Demonstrated ability to promote evidenced based maternity care
• Project management skills
• An ability to work with minimal supervision and function as a member of a
diverse health service delivery team.

Qualifications:  Current registration with the Queensland Nursing Council
and midwifery endorsement.

Application Packages:  Application Packages are available at
www.mater.org.au

Applications should be submitted on-line at www.mater.org.au and include a
cover letter and resume (please include a facsimile number or email address
for two referees).  If you have difficulty downloading an application
package or uploading your application on-line, please contact Marian Glynn
on 3840 8934.

For further information please visit www.mater.org.au or contact Katie
Waters on 07 3840 8009 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] retained placenta PPH

2006-12-04 Thread Andrea Quanchi
The relationship between retained placenta and PPH  is that the  
uterus that is not empty can not clamp down sufficiently to prevent  
bleeding from the placental site.  Imagine that the placental site is  
about the size of a bread and butter plate and that this is  
characterised by masses of bleeding vessels that have sheared off as  
the placenta seperates. (Much like a huge graze that has had the skin  
sheared off bleeds) The wall of the uterus is full of fibres which  
surround these vessels and as the uterus becomes smaller they clamp  
off the bleeding vessels thus preventing haemorrhaging.  While the  
seperated  placenta remains in the uterus the vessels are free to  
bleed and the uterus can not clamp down sufficiently to prevent it.


An elective casearean is not the answer as it may not happen again if  
the person attending her stops fiddling and leaves things alone. She  
needs to read up on  3rd stage choices

Andrea Quanchi
On 05/12/2006, at 3:28 PM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:


Hi all,

Was chatting to a woman y'day re her first birth.  She has very  
fast labour woke up and was 6cm!, laboured for another 2.5hrs,  
reached 10cm then they gave me the epidural(which I am still  
wondering about?!?)  Bub was posterior so this allowed him to turn  
otherwise he wouldnt have come out or it would have been very  
messy!!. (again wondering about the messages this woman received  
or perceived..)


Anyway, she went on to have a retained placenta (I'm presuming she  
had synto for 3rd stage) and began bleeding quite badly.


How is a retained placenta and PPH related, or is it? I thought a  
retained placenta had come off the uterine and was caught behind  
closed/closing cervix?  Please correct me if I am wrong...


Anyway, her Ob has suggested an elective CS for her next baby (due  
May) to avoid this happening again - what the?! ggrrr


Kristin

CBE  Naturopath



Advertisement: Meet Sexy Singles Today @ Lavalife - Click here --  
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe  
or unsubscribe.