[ozmidwifery] Kathleen Fahy article in Weekend Australian...

2005-08-21 Thread Tania Smallwood








Unfortunately not available electronically, but titled Midwifery
is safe, and access a right what a wonderful comment on womens
rights and the sad state of affairs here in Australia where most midwives do
not, and are not allowed to work truly as midwives, encompassing the full
extent of our legislated practice guidelines. She challenges Doctors to
provide research evidence from randomized controlled trials to prove that
midwifery care is not safe, and states that doctors shouldnt have a
government mandated monopoly on provision of care for pregnant women. She
goes on to say that women should be free to choose their maternity care
providers without financial penalty, and that as professional, midwives should
have the right to provide maternity care to the full legal scope of their
practice. 



Three cheers for Kathleen Fahy!



Tania








Re: [ozmidwifery] Kathleen Fahy article in Weekend Australian...

2005-08-21 Thread Alphia Possamai-Inesedy


Here is a copy of it.
take care
Alphia
August 20, 2005 Saturday Travel Edition

SECTION: REVIEW; Health; Pg.
29
LENGTH: 891 words
HEADLINE: Midwifery is safe,
and access a right
SOURCE: MATP
BYLINE: KATHLEEN FAHY
BODY:
ALICIA (not her real name) wanted to give birth in a private and
safe environment attended by a known midwife. She is young and
healthy. This makes her an ideal candidate for one-to-one
midwifery care where a known midwife provides all maternity care
for Alicia and her family. Midwives are qualified and licensed to provide
antenatal, labour and post-birth care on their own responsibility.
Normal, healthy women who have straightforward pregnancies do not need to
be under the care of doctors.
But Alicia and her partner, Paul, couldn't find a midwife to provide her
care either at home or in a hospital. 
Why not?
Because women who want to claim maternity care as a Medicare rebate must
use a doctor. Thanks to this monopoly, virtually all pregnancies are
managed by doctors, even though this is completely unnecessary. Another
reason that Alicia couldn't hire a midwife is that midwives have been
excluded from the network of taxpayer subsidies and safety nets provided
by the federal Government for doctors' professional indemnity cover. The
issue of Medicare rebates and indemnity insurance cover for midwives are
matters of professional competition.
It can be safely predicted that doctors will resist midwives being given
access to Medicare. Doctors will claim, or imply, that somehow
midwives are unsafe. As a midwifery researcher, however, I know
that midwifery care is safe, and I know doctors cannot
produce research evidence from randomised controlled trials to the
contrary.
Why did Alice and Paul want a midwife as their maternity care provider?
According to them, it was because they wanted to feel in control of what
happened to Alicia and the baby. They disagreed with the medical model of
birth that thinks in terms of the bodies of women and babies. In the
medical metaphor, the womb, pelvis and baby are thought of as either
inert or mechanical. For doctors, the body is thought of as able to
function independently of the brains and emotions of women and babies;
but Alicia knows that this is not true.
Alicia and her partner understand that giving birth is a deeply private,
even a sexual function. That is why other primates birth in private. The
medicalised environment is full of strangers who come and go and touch
the woman. The birth environment that medicine creates is dominated by
stainless steel, artificial light, airconditioning, hard floors, surgical
lights and a hospital bed with a rubber-covered mattress. Machines are
frequently attached to the woman to constantly monitor the baby's heart.
This immediately suggests that maybe something is or will go wrong in a
perfectly normal process; thus fear is created. In this environment, the
woman needs to lie still so the machines that are attached to her work
well. Not surprisingly, the woman becomes uncomfortable, is fearful of
strangers and fearful for the baby, she is scared to make a noise and
scared to make trouble.
Women cope by using an epidural anaesthetic to block sensation below the
waist. The outcome of such labours is frequently complications for the
woman and the baby (BMJ 2000;321:137-141). Women who have surgical
interventions and who don't get to actually give birth have higher rates
of depression, guilt, regret, loss of self-esteem, feelings of violation,
and dissatisfaction with care -- sometimes to the point of outright
hostility.
Midwives pay a lot of attention to creating the right environment for
birth. It is crucial to understand that birthing where the woman and
midwife know each other helps the women feel emotionally safe
enough to be uninhibited in labour. When women choose to birth unaided
they usually experience a great sense of their own strength and
empowerment.
Labouring without feeling safe is like driving a car with one foot
on the pedal and one on the brake; thus fear leads to prolonged labour
and unnecessary medical interventions. Fear is damaging to labour because
adrenalin is produced and that disrupts the normal hormonal regulation of
the process.
Is midwifery care safe? Should the government allow
access to Medicare for midwifery managed birth?
Yes, absolutely!
All women are entitled to financial support to cover the costs of
childbirth and doctors shouldn't have a government-mandated monopoly. In
terms of safety, the research demonstrates that midwifery-managed
care, for women who are healthy and have straightforward pregnancies,
there is no statistically significant difference in the outcomes for the
babies. Research shows, however, that midwifery-managed birth is
safer for women than birth under the direction of doctors (Cochrane,
2001, 2005).
The Australian Medical Association and the Royal Australian College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists both oppose independent occupational
status for midwives. 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Kathleen Fahy article in Weekend Australian...

2005-08-21 Thread Judy Chapman
Thanks
Judy


--- Alphia Possamai-Inesedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Here is a copy of it.
 
 take care
 Alphia
 
 August 20, 2005 Saturday Travel Edition
 
 SECTION: REVIEW; Health; Pg. 29
 
 LENGTH: 891 words
 
 HEADLINE: Midwifery is safe,  and access a right
 
 SOURCE: MATP
 
 BYLINE: KATHLEEN  FAHY
 
 BODY:
 ALICIA (not her real name) wanted to give birth in a private
 and safe 
 environment attended by a known midwife. She is young and
 healthy. This 
 makes her an ideal candidate for one-to-one midwifery care
 where a known 
 midwife provides all maternity care for Alicia and her family.
 Midwives are 
 qualified and licensed to provide antenatal, labour and
 post-birth care on 
 their own responsibility. Normal, healthy women who have
 straightforward 
 pregnancies do not need to be under the care of doctors.
 
 But Alicia and her partner, Paul, couldn't find a midwife to
 provide her 
 care either at home or in a hospital.
 
 Why not?
 
 Because women who want to claim maternity care as a Medicare
 rebate must 
 use a doctor. Thanks to this monopoly, virtually all
 pregnancies are 
 managed by doctors, even though this is completely
 unnecessary. Another 
 reason that Alicia couldn't hire a midwife is that midwives
 have been 
 excluded from the network of taxpayer subsidies and safety
 nets provided by 
 the federal Government for doctors' professional indemnity
 cover. The issue 
 of Medicare rebates and indemnity insurance cover for midwives
 are matters 
 of professional competition.
 
 It can be safely predicted that doctors will resist midwives
 being given 
 access to Medicare. Doctors will claim, or imply, that somehow
 midwives are 
 unsafe. As a midwifery researcher, however, I know that
 midwifery care is 
 safe, and I know doctors cannot produce research evidence from
 randomised 
 controlled trials to the contrary.
 
 Why did Alice and Paul want a midwife as their maternity care
 provider? 
 According to them, it was because they wanted to feel in
 control of what 
 happened to Alicia and the baby. They disagreed with the
 medical model of 
 birth that thinks in terms of the bodies of women and babies.
 In the 
 medical metaphor, the womb, pelvis and baby are thought of as
 either inert 
 or mechanical. For doctors, the body is thought of as able to
 function 
 independently of the brains and emotions of women and babies;
 but Alicia 
 knows that this is not true.
 
 Alicia and her partner understand that giving birth is a
 deeply private, 
 even a sexual function. That is why other primates birth in
 private. The 
 medicalised environment is full of strangers who come and go
 and touch the 
 woman. The birth environment that medicine creates is
 dominated by 
 stainless steel, artificial light, airconditioning, hard
 floors, surgical 
 lights and a hospital bed with a rubber-covered mattress.
 Machines are 
 frequently attached to the woman to constantly monitor the
 baby's heart. 
 This immediately suggests that maybe something is or will go
 wrong in a 
 perfectly normal process; thus fear is created. In this
 environment, the 
 woman needs to lie still so the machines that are attached to
 her work 
 well. Not surprisingly, the woman becomes uncomfortable, is
 fearful of 
 strangers and fearful for the baby, she is scared to make a
 noise and 
 scared to make trouble.
 
 Women cope by using an epidural anaesthetic to block sensation
 below the 
 waist. The outcome of such labours is frequently complications
 for the 
 woman and the baby (BMJ 2000;321:137-141). Women who have
 surgical 
 interventions and who don't get to actually give birth have
 higher rates of 
 depression, guilt, regret, loss of self-esteem, feelings of
 violation, and 
 dissatisfaction with care -- sometimes to the point of
 outright hostility.
 
 Midwives pay a lot of attention to creating the right
 environment for 
 birth. It is crucial to understand that birthing where the
 woman and 
 midwife know each other helps the women feel emotionally safe
 enough to be 
 uninhibited in labour. When women choose to birth unaided they
 usually 
 experience a great sense of their own strength and
 empowerment.
 
 Labouring without feeling safe is like driving a car with one
 foot on the 
 pedal and one on the brake; thus fear leads to prolonged
 labour and 
 unnecessary medical interventions. Fear is damaging to labour
 because 
 adrenalin is produced and that disrupts the normal hormonal
 regulation of 
 the process.
 
 Is midwifery care safe? Should the government allow access to
 Medicare for 
 midwifery managed birth?
 
 Yes, absolutely!
 
 All women are entitled to financial support to cover the costs
 of 
 childbirth and doctors shouldn't have a government-mandated
 monopoly. In 
 terms of safety, the research demonstrates that
 midwifery-managed care, for 
 women who are healthy and have straightforward pregnancies,
 there is no 
 statistically significant difference in the outcomes for the
 babies. 
 Research