RE: CQWP: page fields and list fields
I would suggest using 4 separate web parts and then grouping them into a single tab group using jQuery and other solutions out there. What RTF is the “free text” coming from? Do you mean list fields? Regards, Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ajay Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:19 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP: page fields and list fields Hi Guys, SharePoint 2013 on premise. I have to create a CQWP with four tabs. Three tabs will have free text, coming from Rich text field, apart from one tab which will come from custom list. Client has existing SharePoint list of pricing which we want to use in one the tabs which is pricing tab. Now, my question is, if I add three TextBoxes on the page which has CQWP in the edit panel and in query for CQWP point it to pricing list, Will the XSL able to read from in page fields and also the values coming from the query? Will it work? Ideally we would not like to add columns of type Publishing HTML in the pricing list. Thanks, Ajay __ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com __ The content of this email is confidential to the intended recipient at the email address to which it has been addressed. It may not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please contact the author and then delete the message from your system. Please note that neither Keller Australia nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and attachments (if any). Visit http://www.keller.com.au/ for more information. This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal ___ Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - http://www.infotext.com/ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
CQWP: page fields and list fields
Hi Guys, SharePoint 2013 on premise. I have to create a CQWP with four tabs. Three tabs will have free text, coming from Rich text field, apart from one tab which will come from custom list. Client has existing SharePoint list of pricing which we want to use in one the tabs which is pricing tab. Now, my question is, if I add three TextBoxes on the page which has CQWP in the edit panel and in query for CQWP point it to pricing list, Will the XSL able to read from in page fields and also the values coming from the query? Will it work? Ideally we would not like to add columns of type Publishing HTML in the pricing list. Thanks, Ajay ___ Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - http://www.infotext.com/ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: CQWP
Hi Nigel,
Thanks, i was getting extra characters fp-tablecell etc on dev environment
few days back.
It's interesting to know that it works well for you, I will check that
again.
Cheers
Ajay
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Nigel Witherdin wrote:
> What's the junk that gets added if you have the html outside of the
> xsl:text tags?
>
> I don't think I see any extra stuff in my CQWPs - underneath the div for
> the webpart (class=ms-WPBody) I just see the html defined in my main,
> header and item xsl files
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 9 Jan 2015, at 12:17 pm, Ajay wrote:
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> > Hope you had and are having good break.
> >
> > I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values
> coming from the roll-up pages.
> >
> > If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and
> if I wrap it in than it does not change my markup which is ideal.
> >
> > I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below..
> or is there a better way
> >
> >
> >
> > src="{substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src="'),
> '"')}"
> >
> >
> > I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and
> client wants to use CQWP only.
> >
> > ___
> > Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
> http://www.infotext.com/
> > ozmoss mailing list
> > ozmoss@ozmoss.com
> > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
> ___
> Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
> http://www.infotext.com/
> ozmoss mailing list
> ozmoss@ozmoss.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
>
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: CQWP
What's the junk that gets added if you have the html outside of the xsl:text
tags?
I don't think I see any extra stuff in my CQWPs - underneath the div for the
webpart (class=ms-WPBody) I just see the html defined in my main, header and
item xsl files
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Jan 2015, at 12:17 pm, Ajay wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
> Hope you had and are having good break.
>
> I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values
> coming from the roll-up pages.
>
> If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and if I
> wrap it in than it does not change my markup which is ideal.
>
> I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below.. or is
> there a better way
>
>
>
> src="{substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src="'),
> '"')}"
>
>
> I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and
> client wants to use CQWP only.
>
> ___
> Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
> http://www.infotext.com/
> ozmoss mailing list
> ozmoss@ozmoss.com
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
CQWP
Hi Guys,
Hope you had and are having good break.
I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values
coming from the roll-up pages.
If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and if I
wrap it in than it does not change my markup which is ideal.
I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below.. or
is there a better way
src="{substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src="'),
'"')}"
I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and
client wants to use CQWP only.
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Site template with CQWP
True you are right, web template will be the correct approach; as this will move from dev to uat to prod. I think save site as template, does not even show up for publishing site. Your help/comments are much appreciated. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Ishai Sagi wrote: > It works fine until it doesn’t. also, when you move between farms, or if > you uninstall a feature in the farm, it will stop working. Also – Microsoft > states that you are not supposed to save site as template for publishing > sites. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD > Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect > 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | > @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> > | MVP Profile <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> > > ** ** > > *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On > Behalf Of *Ajay > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 8:38 AM > *To:* ozMOSS > *Subject:* Re: Site template with CQWP > > ** ** > > Thanks guys, will follow the web-template approach. as this is a big > project and want to do things the right way. > > ** ** > > I remember some time back, I created a workflow activity provisioning of > project sites at a client, and they gave me saved site as template, which > I referenced in code, the new site which were getting created by workflow, > worked fine. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Cheers Paul, will be great to have your samples, once I start on this, > will ping you. > > ** ** > > Thanks,, > > Ajay > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Web Admin > wrote: > > Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature > receiver. > > ** ** > > I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out > how to properly configure that wretched web part. :) > > ** ** > > On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi wrote: > > NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, > and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement > custom features. > > > > > > **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD > Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect > 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | > @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> > | MVP Profile <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> > > > > *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On > Behalf Of *Ajay > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM > *To:* ozMOSS > *Subject:* Site template with CQWP > > > > On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want > to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. > > > > CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other > approach. will be better > > > > I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go > will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use > that template for all new sites.. ? > > ** ** > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > > > > > ** ** > > -- > > Regards, > > ** ** > > Paul Noone > > ** ** > > SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer > Infrastructure Team > CEO Sydney > > p: (02) 9568 8461 > f: (02) 9568 8483 > e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au > w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ > > ** ** > > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > ** ** > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > <><>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Site template with CQWP
It works fine until it doesn't. also, when you move between farms, or if you uninstall a feature in the farm, it will stop working. Also - Microsoft states that you are not supposed to save site as template for publishing sites. [Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au<mailto:is...@exd.com.au> | www.sharepoint-tips.com<http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/> | @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> | MVP Profile<https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ajay Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 8:38 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Site template with CQWP Thanks guys, will follow the web-template approach. as this is a big project and want to do things the right way. I remember some time back, I created a workflow activity provisioning of project sites at a client, and they gave me saved site as template, which I referenced in code, the new site which were getting created by workflow, worked fine. Cheers Paul, will be great to have your samples, once I start on this, will ping you. Thanks,, Ajay On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Web Admin mailto:web.ad...@syd.catholic.edu.au>> wrote: Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature receiver. I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out how to properly configure that wretched web part. :) On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi mailto:is...@exd.com.au>> wrote: NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement custom features. [Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au<mailto:is...@exd.com.au> | www.sharepoint-tips.com<http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/> | @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> | MVP Profile<https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com> [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com>] On Behalf Of Ajay Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Site template with CQWP On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other approach. will be better I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use that template for all new sites.. ? ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss -- Regards, Paul Noone SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer Infrastructure Team CEO Sydney p: (02) 9568 8461 f: (02) 9568 8483 e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au<mailto:paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au> w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss <><><>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Site template with CQWP
Thanks guys, will follow the web-template approach. as this is a big project and want to do things the right way. I remember some time back, I created a workflow activity provisioning of project sites at a client, and they gave me saved site as template, which I referenced in code, the new site which were getting created by workflow, worked fine. Cheers Paul, will be great to have your samples, once I start on this, will ping you. Thanks,, Ajay On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Web Admin wrote: > Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature > receiver. > > I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out > how to properly configure that wretched web part. :) > > > On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi wrote: > >> NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, >> and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement >> custom features. >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD >> Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect >> 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | >> @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> >> | MVP Profile <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Ajay >> *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM >> *To:* ozMOSS >> *Subject:* Site template with CQWP >> >> ** ** >> >> On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want >> to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. >> >> ** ** >> >> CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other >> approach. will be better >> >> ** ** >> >> I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go >> will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use >> that template for all new sites.. ? >> >> ___ >> ozmoss mailing list >> ozmoss@ozmoss.com >> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Paul Noone > > SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer > Infrastructure Team > CEO Sydney > > p: (02) 9568 8461 > f: (02) 9568 8483 > e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au > w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ > > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: Site template with CQWP
Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature receiver. I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out how to properly configure that wretched web part. :) On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi wrote: > NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, > and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement > custom features. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD > Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect > 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | > @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> > | MVP Profile <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> > > ** ** > > *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On > Behalf Of *Ajay > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM > *To:* ozMOSS > *Subject:* Site template with CQWP > > ** ** > > On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want > to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. > > ** ** > > CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other > approach. will be better > > ** ** > > I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go > will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use > that template for all new sites.. ? > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > -- Regards, Paul Noone SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer Infrastructure Team CEO Sydney p: (02) 9568 8461 f: (02) 9568 8483 e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Site template with CQWP
NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement custom features. [Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au<mailto:is...@exd.com.au> | www.sharepoint-tips.com<http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/> | @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> | MVP Profile<https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ajay Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Site template with CQWP On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other approach. will be better I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use that template for all new sites.. ? <><>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Site template with CQWP
On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to display the pages (filtered on content type) and sub-sites. CQWP will be way to go? Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other approach. will be better I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use that template for all new sites.. ? ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in "Save Site As Template"
Yep - its not there. Other custom web parts I have added are. I am starting to wonder if I should just have an ootb web part on the page, and change its properties dynamically to reference my XSL. Seems like a bit of a hassle. the strange thing is if I add the web part manually to the site, it works fine Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:31:34 +1100 Subject: Re: CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in "Save Site As Template" From: web.ad...@syd.catholic.edu.au To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Have you opened the page in web part maintenance view to see if it's present at all? On 20 November 2012 10:31, Nigel Witherdin wrote: Hi All, I have created a few CQWP custom styles, that are packaged as part of a solution where the XSL's are deployed to the /Style Library/XSL Style Sheets/, and a modified .webpart file is deployed to the web part gallery referencing these styles. All this works great, and I now have a nice jQuery slider and a jQuery accordion. However, when I add this web part to a page, and then save the site as template (including content), this customized CQWP is not created on the pages on the newly created site - even when the site is created within the same site colleciton (i.e. so there can be no doubt the web parts exist in the gallery with the expected IDs etc.). I have exported the site template WSP to Studio and had a look at the "SitePages" elements.xml, and I can see the webpart is referenced correctly: Does anyone have any ideas why the webpart is not being created on the page? Many thanks Nigel ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss -- Regards, Paul Noone SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer Infrastructure Team CEO Sydney p: (02) 9568 8461 f: (02) 9568 8483 e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Re: CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in "Save Site As Template"
Have you opened the page in web part maintenance view to see if it's present at all? On 20 November 2012 10:31, Nigel Witherdin wrote: > Hi All, > > I have created a few CQWP custom styles, that are packaged as part of a > solution where the XSL's are deployed to the /Style Library/XSL Style > Sheets/, and a modified .webpart file is deployed to the web part > gallery referencing these styles. All this works great, and I now have a > nice jQuery slider and a jQuery accordion. > > However, when I add this web part to a page, and then save the site as > template (including content), this customized CQWP is not created on the > pages on the newly created site - even when the site is created within the > same site colleciton (i.e. so there can be no doubt the web parts exist in > the gallery with the expected IDs etc.). > > I have exported the site template WSP to Studio and had a look at the > "SitePages" elements.xml, and I can see the webpart is referenced correctly: > > ID="g_82de79b2_c4a3_4546_9d57_72ae552e3c1b"> > > > > Does anyone have any ideas why the webpart is not being created on the > page? > > Many thanks > > Nigel > > > ___ > ozmoss mailing list > ozmoss@ozmoss.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > -- Regards, Paul Noone SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer Infrastructure Team CEO Sydney p: (02) 9568 8461 f: (02) 9568 8483 e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in "Save Site As Template"
Hi All, I have created a few CQWP custom styles, that are packaged as part of a solution where the XSL's are deployed to the /Style Library/XSL Style Sheets/, and a modified .webpart file is deployed to the web part gallery referencing these styles. All this works great, and I now have a nice jQuery slider and a jQuery accordion. However, when I add this web part to a page, and then save the site as template (including content), this customized CQWP is not created on the pages on the newly created site - even when the site is created within the same site colleciton (i.e. so there can be no doubt the web parts exist in the gallery with the expected IDs etc.). I have exported the site template WSP to Studio and had a look at the "SitePages" elements.xml, and I can see the webpart is referenced correctly: Does anyone have any ideas why the webpart is not being created on the page? Many thanks Nigel ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Looks like the xslt is using the value of the URL field, which consists of the URL and the title, separated by a coma and a space. I have on my blog somewhere an example on how to teach the CQWP to show links properly- by changing the XSL - so you can use that. [Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au<mailto:is...@exd.com.au> | www.sharepoint-tips.com<http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/> | @ishaisagi<http://twitter.com/ishaisagi> | MVP Profile<https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai> From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Specker, Caroline Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2012 10:57 To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] [Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg] I have come across an issue either with SharePoint 2010 or my brain and am not convinced which one has the problem. I have a simple links list with URL and Notes columns. I am displaying the items in this list in a CQWP and in Fields to Display I have Link set to "URL [Custom Columns]" and Title set to "Notes". This works as expected on the page but the RSS feed renders the link as the url AND the description, eg www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au<http://www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au>. Am I going mad or is it SharePoint? Anyone got a workaround that doesn't involve modifying the xslt (which I can do if I absolutely have to but would rather not)? Cheers, Caroline * The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read, forward, copy or retain any of the information. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return e-mail or telephone. The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or any other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. The security of emails transmitted in an unencrypted environment cannot be guaranteed. By forwarding or replying to this email, you acknowledge and accept these risks. * <><>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I have come across an issue either with SharePoint 2010 or my brain and am not convinced which one has the problem. I have a simple links list with URL and Notes columns. I am displaying the items in this list in a CQWP and in Fields to Display I have Link set to "URL [Custom Columns]" and Title set to "Notes". This works as expected on the page but the RSS feed renders the link as the url AND the description, eg www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au<http://www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au>. Am I going mad or is it SharePoint? Anyone got a workaround that doesn't involve modifying the xslt (which I can do if I absolutely have to but would rather not)? Cheers, Caroline * The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read, forward, copy or retain any of the information. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return e-mail or telephone. The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or any other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. The security of emails transmitted in an unencrypted environment cannot be guaranteed. By forwarding or replying to this email, you acknowledge and accept these risks. * ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
Hi Paul, What I am referring is the U2U WinForm app, not the webpart. Thanks for this, this is gold. Will install it and check it out. Cheers, etmilis From: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au.akapost.com [mailto:paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au.akapost.com] Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2010 8:47 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP U2U CAML Query feature handles recursion and also let's you specify a specific folder to search within. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 2:53 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hoi hoi, This may do the trick for recursion for you; spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = "Scope='Recursive'"; As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics. C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
U2U CAML Query feature handles recursion and also let's you specify a specific folder to search within. [cid:image002.jpg@01CAAFAD.CF4F8AA0] Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 2:53 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hoi hoi, This may do the trick for recursion for you; spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = "Scope='Recursive'"; As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics. C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
Hoi hoi, This may do the trick for recursion for you; spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = "Scope='Recursive'"; As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics. C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
>From memory I think if you set your logs to 'Verbose' it will be logged. Paul T. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 2:19 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
Yep. It's a friggin nightmare even when you are organised enough to specify a target DB for new site collections. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of mike_stringfel...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, 1 February 2010 9:37 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: CQWP in 2010 Search is quite different, but having said that Microsoft's recommendation to a large customer of mine was for a new site collection for pretty much everything, with the users not aware which content db they get under the hood. I understand some of the reasons in an environment of that scale, but it makes any sort of useful wider enterprise query and awareness pretty much impossible. Mike Stringfellow<mailto:mike.stringfel...@sevensigma.com.au?subject=sevensigma%20enquiry> IT Consultant - Σ Seven Sigma Business Solutions <http://www.sevensigma.com.au/> Σ From: Paul Noone<mailto:paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 10:10 AM To: ozMOSS<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com> Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 If the Search web parts can manage I don't see why CQWP should be any different. Perhaps scopes are the answer. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com> [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 12:52 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom development. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain le
Re: CQWP in 2010
Search is quite different, but having said that Microsoft's recommendation to a large customer of mine was for a new site collection for pretty much everything, with the users not aware which content db they get under the hood. I understand some of the reasons in an environment of that scale, but it makes any sort of useful wider enterprise query and awareness pretty much impossible. Mike Stringfellow IT Consultant - ? Seven Sigma Business Solutions ? From: Paul Noone Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 10:10 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 If the Search web parts can manage I don't see why CQWP should be any different. Perhaps scopes are the answer. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 12:52 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom development. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query.you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct.hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's r
RE: CQWP in 2010
If the Search web parts can manage I don't see why CQWP should be any different. Perhaps scopes are the answer. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 12:52 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom development. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom development. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' _ Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites & sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
Uh-huh. Even cross application. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:23 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 You mean cross-site collection?? Regards, Paul Turner Senior Solutions Specialist M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966 A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031 E: paul.tur...@dws.com.au<mailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au> W: www.dws.com.au [cid:image001.jpg@01CAA016.294FF0F0] ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of DWS Pty Ltd. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
You mean cross-site collection?? Regards, Paul Turner Senior Solutions Specialist M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966 A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031 E: paul.tur...@dws.com.au<mailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au> W: www.dws.com.au [cid:image001.jpg@01CAA010.60023A00] ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of DWS Pty Ltd. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney <>___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
CQWP in 2010
Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
