[Bug 588435] Review Request: rubygem-libxml-ruby - libxml support for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588435 --- Comment #15 from Matthew Kent 2010-05-26 02:24:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Mamoru, > > Sorry, I was expecting that Matthew would post a corrected SRPM. I'll rebuild > and post one later on today. Apologies for any confusion - yeah if you could steer this one home as I'm a bit short on time this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594481] Review Request: orion-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594481 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-26 02:09:02 EDT --- Hi Christian, I want to express my personal opinion on this issue. (In reply to comment #13) > I am certainly not to be hold responsible for any private fork of the code > base. Everybody is, of course, free to do so. IntelliJ IDEA, Hudson and DSSH > all have their proper reasons to use a private fork (btw: unfortunately, they > never came up with a feature request). The natural workflow for a OSS developer is: 1. find an issue in some project 2. checkout latest codebase to see whether it is not fixed 3. fix the problem for the latest codebase 4. send patch to the projects issue tracker (bugzilla, jira, mantis, whatever) Note that steps 2-4 are not possible for ganymed-ssh2. I know we can contact you in person and we have done that but I have to admit that these are things that will make a lot of people not consider it an opensource project resulting in them not trying to submit a feature request or patch. Please tell me if I'm wrong and I didn't managed to found these things on the site. > > Again, if there is any crucial feature missing in ganymed-ssh2 that is needed > by some package in the Redhat tree then I will happily add it to the stable > ganymed-ssh2 code base. As a packager I can show several things that are present in orion and missing in ganymed: * a source only tarballs - saves us the work to remove binaries from it * build files - saves us the work to compile manually * pom.xml file - saves us the work to come with our own for maven integration Don't take this as bashing ganymed I respect your work as the original author but the guys from orion has done the integration work to make trilead suitable and easy to use for bigger audience. In short everyone will win if you guys manage to join your efforts in one really opensource project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569366] Review Request: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2010-05-26 01:39:41 EDT --- Ah, didn't catch up the mail. that's ok without F-11 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569368] Review Request: ipa-ex-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569368 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2010-05-26 01:39:27 EDT --- Ah, didn't catch up the mail. that's ok without F-11 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594481] Review Request: orion-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594481 --- Comment #13 from christian.platt...@cleondris.ch 2010-05-26 01:30:36 EDT --- Namespaces were renamed only once, namely for the Trilead fork. The latest ganymed-ssh2 release is no fork and no re-brand, it is the direct continuation of the original ETH release (check the official homepage at ETH, http://www.ganymed.ethz.ch/ssh2, it points users to http://www.cleondris.ch/ssh2 and nowhere else). I am certainly not to be hold responsible for any private fork of the code base. Everybody is, of course, free to do so. IntelliJ IDEA, Hudson and DSSH all have their proper reasons to use a private fork (btw: unfortunately, they never came up with a feature request). I just downloaded the latest orion-ssh2 release "214" from Sourceforge. However, according to the included README.txt, this is supposed to be "213". According to the LICENCE.txt, this code includes improvements from third parties. Looking at the HISTORY.txt, no such features/fixes are listed - not surprising, since this seems to be the unchanged HISTORY.txt from some Trilead release. Who is making a mess here? Again, if there is any crucial feature missing in ganymed-ssh2 that is needed by some package in the Redhat tree then I will happily add it to the stable ganymed-ssh2 code base. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595993] New: Review Request: josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595993 Summary: Review Request: josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/josefinsansstd-light-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/josefinsansstd-light-fonts-1.000-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The idea for creating this typeface was to make it geometric, elegant and kind of vintage, especially for titling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595220] Review Request: buildnumber-maven-plugin - Build Number Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595220 --- Comment #2 from Weinan Li 2010-05-26 01:16:59 EDT --- Sorry the last link is incorrect. It does not contains necessary patches and depmap. This one is correct and checked with rpmlint: Package URL: http://weli.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedora-14/bmp/ Spec URL: http://weli.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedora-14/bmp/buildnumber-maven-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://weli.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedora-14/bmp/buildnumber-maven-plugin-1.0-0.1.b4.src.rpm Description: This mojo is designed to get a unique build number for each time you build your project. Note: - this needs to be built in the dist-f14-maven221 koji tag. Here is a successful koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2209827 - 'install' goal is disabled from 'integration-test' with a patch, because we need newer version of maven. - 'maven-scm-provider-svnjava' is removed from dependency because we don't have it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595994] Review Request: cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595994 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2010-05-26 01:18:47 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cardo_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595993] Review Request: josefinsansstd-light-fonts - This typeface was to made for geometric, elegant titling and kind of vintage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595993 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2010-05-26 01:18:37 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JosefinSansStd_Light_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595994] New: Review Request: cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595994 Summary: Review Request: cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/cardo-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/cardo-fonts-0.098-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Cardo is a large Unicode font specifically designed for the needs of classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, and linguists. Since it may be used to prepare materials for publication, it also contains features that are required for high-quality typography, such as ligatures, text figures (also known as old style numerals), true small capitals and a variety of punctuation and space characters. It may also be used to document and discuss the features of Unicode that are applicable to the these disciplines, as we work to help colleagues understand the value (and limitations) of Unicode. This font has been revived in modern times under several names (Bembo, Aetna, Aldine 401). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595269] Review Request: lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595269 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-26 01:12:37 EDT --- Looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592655] yelp-xsl XSL stylesheets for use with yelp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592655 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|methe...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #19 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-26 00:56:31 EDT --- Hi, I've discussed the issues with the MathMap maintainer, and we'll work on getting the -bestest patch upstream, and in the meantime getting MM working without this patch to libnoise...the patch is only needed for very specific use cases, and it's absence won't effect most users. So, another version, with a fixed license tag and no -bestest patch: http://www.norwoodfamily.info/rpms/libnoise.spec http://www.norwoodfamily.info/rpms/libnoise-1.0.0-4.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2209914 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595269] Review Request: lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595269 --- Comment #2 from Parag 2010-05-25 23:35:01 EDT --- Updated package but not bumped the release. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/lobster-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/lobster-fonts-1.3-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569368] Review Request: ipa-ex-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569368 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2010-05-25 23:19:09 EDT --- Thanks for review. Well, that priority setting are rquired to avoid overriding by 65-nonlatin.conf since it also contains some mincho-typeface fonts. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-ex-mincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-13 F-12 F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569366] Review Request: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2010-05-25 23:16:01 EDT --- Thanks for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-13 F-12 F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595268] Review Request: tangerine-fonts - Tangerine is a calligraphy font inspired by many italic chancery hands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595268 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-25 20:45:31 EDT --- Looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595269] Review Request: lobster-fonts - Hand written font with various ligatures for better connecting of letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595269 Daiki Ueno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||du...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno 2010-05-25 21:10:20 EDT --- I'll take this too :) 1. generic font-family in the fontconfig.conf is sans-serif It looks that this font is in cursive family: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#cursive while the fontconfig.conf marks it as sans-serif. 2. the fontconfig.conf prefix is 65 Since this font seems to contain only LGC glyphs (and some symbols), I think it should be 61-64: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Choosing_a_ruleset_numeral_prefix 3. locale-specific override without "lang" test IIUC, it works as if an inverted "Simple priority list" rule applies: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Locale-specific_overrides 2 & 3 are the same issues as of #595268. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584220] Review Request: python-gevent - A coroutine-based Python networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584220 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584220] Review Request: python-gevent - A coroutine-based Python networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584220 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 20:55:54 EDT --- python-gevent-0.12.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-gevent-0.12.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 584220] Review Request: python-gevent - A coroutine-based Python networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584220 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 20:55:49 EDT --- python-gevent-0.12.2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-gevent-0.12.2-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 20:02:51 EDT --- python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc12 |python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 --- Comment #13 from Ionuț Arțăriși 2010-05-25 18:31:33 EDT --- Hey, Maxim. I'd still like to package this, too, but I've been waiting for a reviewer. I'll try to update this to the latest version in the next few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593841] Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network connection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841 Bug 593841 depends on bug 593839, which changed state. Bug 593839 Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - Console user interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593839 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593839] Review Request: python-urwid - Console user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593839 David Cantrell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560176] Review Request: clpbar - Show information about a data transfer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560176 David Cantrell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #27 from David Hannequin 2010-05-25 17:05:22 EDT --- Hi, My new spec file and srpm : Spec URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/webinject/webinject-1.41-11.fc13.src.rpm Best regard Sorry for late... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591305] Review Request: apache-commons-digester - XML to Java object mapping module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591305 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 17:01:30 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 17:05:14 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560176] Review Request: clpbar - Show information about a data transfer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560176 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 17:00:47 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 David Hannequin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 581278] Review Request: erlang-etap - Erlang testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581278 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:55:54 EDT --- CVS Done except F-11 new branches are now closed for it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 587438] Review Request: rubygem-snmp - A Ruby implementation of SNMP (the Simple Network Management Protocol)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587438 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:59:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554530] Review Request: cdf - A colorized df
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554530 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:57:04 EDT --- CVS Done Except for F-11 which does not accept new branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561470] Review Request: beakerlib - shell-level integration testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561470 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:57:43 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577974] Review Request: glite-security-trustmanager - Java trustmanager interface supporting a GSI grid name space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577974 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:59:11 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593839] Review Request: python-urwid - Console user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593839 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:58:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594756] Review Request: apache-commons-beanutils - rename of jakarta-commons-beanutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594756 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:53:31 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595676] Review Request: apache-commons-el - rename of jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595676 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:54:08 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:54:42 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591222] Review Request: gtk3 - version 3 of GTK+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591222 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-25 16:52:33 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #2 from Louis Lagendijk 2010-05-25 16:12:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fazant.net/ffgtk/0.7.6-1/ffgtk.spec SRPM URL: http://fazant.net/ffgtk/0.7.6-1/ffgtk-0.7.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Rpmlint is almost silent, the remaining warning can be ignored I think: [lo...@travel ffgtk]$ rpmlint ffgtk.spec ~/rpm/SRPMS/ffgtk-0.7.6-1.fc12.src.rpm ~/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/ffgtk-0.7.6-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ~/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/ffgtk-*0.7.6* ffgtk-plugin-capifax.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libcapifax ffgtk-plugin-capifax.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcapifax ffgtk-plugin-capifax.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffgtk-plugin-evolution.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. The plugins are split out in order to avoid dependency bloat, both plugins are optional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 Maxim Burgerhout changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@wzzrd.com --- Comment #12 from Maxim Burgerhout 2010-05-25 15:31:54 EDT --- With the current traction NoSQL is gaining in the web developer community, Fedora kinda needs this package bad. I think it is preferable to have native packages in our own repositories instead of telling our users to go to mongodb.org and use theirs. Having Fedora built packages would make them carry Fedora GPG signatures, would be much more convenient for our users and would make them available for more archs and Fedora releases than there are now. Even though I'm not a real big MongoDB user, nor a C++ guru, I'm volunteering some of my time to package MongoDB for Fedora. I see Ionuț hasn't responded to this thread for over half a year, so I'd say this bug is *STALLED* [1]. (But then again, I don't even see a real, full review attached to this review request.) Ionuț, please respond to this bug. I'm willing to take this over if you cannot pursue MongoDB's inclusion in Fedora anymore. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588142] Review Request: maven-release - Release a project updating the POM and tagging in the SCM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 15:01:06 EDT --- Thanks a lot Guido! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590680] Review Request: maven-license-plugin - Maven plugin to update header licenses of source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590680 Bug 590680 depends on bug 588142, which changed state. Bug 588142 Summary: Review Request: maven-release - Release a project updating the POM and tagging in the SCM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590679] Review Request: xmltool - Tool to manage XML documents through a Fluent Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590679 Bug 590679 depends on bug 588142, which changed state. Bug 588142 Summary: Review Request: maven-release - Release a project updating the POM and tagging in the SCM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588142] Review Request: maven-release - Release a project updating the POM and tagging in the SCM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142 Guido Grazioli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Guido Grazioli 2010-05-25 14:53:12 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, i've been away from work (and the F project) for a bunch of days; maven-release is now built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-05-25 14:46:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > That's a bad example -- /usr/share/mime is actually owned by the filesystem > > package as well, which is guaranteed to be installed at all times. > > $ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime/packages > shared-mime-info-0.70-3.fc12.x86_64 > My mistake; I was checking at work and the only RPM machines there are running openSUSE. The openSUSE solution would actually make sense: make /usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages be part of the basic filesystem package. I'll check with the Fedora packaging list on the specific issue of shared-mime-info, actually. One would think that it should be a component installed by default, but that no other package depends on (per packaging policy), but as it is, it is pulled in by PackageKit. Thanks for noticing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc1 |python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc1 |1 |2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:43:43 EDT --- python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc12|nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:38:27 EDT --- python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:36:02 EDT --- python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:35:51 EDT --- nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc13 |python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc1 |python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc1 |3 |1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589737] Review Request: python-ipaddr - A python library for working with IP addresses, both IPv4 and IPv6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589737 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:38:13 EDT --- python-ipaddr-2.1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591982] Review Request: batti - Simple battery monitor for the system tray
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591982 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2010-05-25 14:32:12 EDT --- Thanks for your comments, Martin. (In reply to comment #2) > - the package license seems to be GPLv2+, not GPLv3+ > > - file COPYING is missing in %doc Both fixed. SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/batti-0.3.7-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/batti.spec > - if I understand the guidelines correctly, BR: python-devel is not sufficient > any longer, but an explicitly given Python version number is required > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires) AFAIK there is no need to select a python version. batti should build both with python 2 and 3 so I prefer to make the switch when Fedora finally switches. This is easier with a simple "python-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:34:56 EDT --- nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-25 14:34:34 EDT --- python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561451] Review Request: nailgun - Framework for running Java from the cli without the JVM startup overhead
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||nailgun-0.7.1-2.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 582234] Review Request: python-eventlet - Highly concurrent networking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582234 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.el5 |python-eventlet-0.9.7-1.fc1 ||3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613
--- Comment #9 from Jim Radford 2010-05-25 14:29:51 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> That's a bad example -- /usr/share/mime is actually owned by the filesystem
> package as well, which is guaranteed to be installed at all times.
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime/packages
shared-mime-info-0.70-3.fc12.x86_64
> With bash-completion, the consensus is actually to grab the directory. The
> rationale is similar to the one you outline -- that it's too trivial to create
> a subpackage.
I would say that rationale applies in this case as well.
> With emacs support, the consensus is the other way around, as far as I can
> tell,
I stopped looking after finding a few examples to support my position, but the
official policy agrees with you.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs
They also mention issues with the .elc files across versions.
> any heavy Emacs user would probably know to look for emacs-*
> subpackages anyway.
I know to look for them, but I *hate* doing it. The elisp files are small text
files that affect nothing if you don't have emacs installed but provide joy and
happiness if you do. The choice is clear to me, especially in this case where
the program was *intended* to be used with emacs.
> Any deviation is a bug (I'd appreciate it if you could file those, they do
> need to be fixed).
As you might expect, I disagree that it's a bug. The rationale you mention
"size of the files" clearly doesn't apply in this case.
$ wc -l /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ledger.el*
1307 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ledger.el
255 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ledger.elc
$ wc -l /etc/bash_completion.d/{git,subversion}
2276 /etc/bash_completion.d/git
1332 /etc/bash_completion.d/subversion
> If I still don't convince you, then let me know and I'll remove myself from
> the bug.
You haven't convinced me, but you represent the official policy just fine. I
plan to look for a technical solution, but failing that I'll put it in a
separate package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579
--- Comment #19 from David A. Wheeler 2010-05-25
13:54:23 EDT ---
Thanks, I'm now looking over the updated 1.4-2 version. Much progress, but a
few more things to do.
The rpmbuild now works on 32-bit x86, and "rpmlint" is now much happier
compared to 2 versions ago. I did:
rpmlint frama-c.spec ../RPMS/i586/frama-c-*-2.*
../SRPMS/frama-c-1.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
The only rpmlint reports involve the license, which you're already addressing
with fedora legal:
frama-c.i586: W: invalid-license QPL with modifications
frama-c-devel.i586: W: invalid-license QPL with modifications
frama-c.src: W: invalid-license QPL with modifications
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I don't understand why this package installs "/usr/bin/ptests.byte".
I don't think that is a user-level program; I believe that is just
a test program that should be *used* during a "make check" as part of the
build.
Thus, I think you should NOT install that program as part of this package.
Based on comment #3:
* All rpmlint errors are gone, except for the licensing issues being addressed.
There's no longer a "chcon" command (inc. the unneeded comment)
* The "-jessie" option will require a change to "why" after
frama-c enters the repository, so that's addressed.
* I see your name ("Mark Rader") in the ChangeLog at the end, good!
Usually there's a blank line between major entries (E.g., between leading
"*"),
you probably should add that.
Regarding comment #6 and comment #12:
* Excluding the ".byte" files is fine. But that means that this package won't
work on some architectures, so you need some ExcludeArch statements.
Regarding comment #13:
* Revision number bumped, good! Thanks.
* I *still* don't understand this comment:
"The configure file uses graph.cmo in compiling a test program to
check for ocamlgraph, but Fedora doesn't include this file in its
distributions."
But Fedora *does* include the ocaml-ocamlgraph package, and that
package specifically installs "/usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cmo".
So I really don't understand what this spec is trying to say.
(I realize that you inherited this package from others, so this is probably
inherited as well, but it sure isn't clear as it is.)
* I really think you should prefix the filename of Patch1 with "frama-c-".
Otherwise, if someone builds many packages inside a shared rpmbuild/SOURCES
directory, there's a (tiny) risk that this will overlap with something else.
The risk is tiny, but better to avoid the question.
* Patch2 (ptests) has *no* explanation, and that is NOT okay.
Need to briefly explain what it does, and either (1) when it was sent
upstream, or (2) why it wasn't sent upstream. I believe that is a MUST.
* Nit: "plug in's" is still not a word. An "'s" is either a possessive or
an appreviation of "is", and this is neither (it's just a plural).
I'd suggest "plug-ins" instead. If the spellchecker whines, too bad.
* No %check section. It's not required, but it'd be nice if it worked.
In the long term, a %check section - even one with just one trivial test -
will catch problems like silently failed builds.
* I'll check the %files list separately.
You really need to do a Koji build (see comment #18). I can't do that this at
this moment from where I am (due to SSL munging where I am), but I did "mock
--rebuild" on 32-bit, and found a problem that Koji would have found. I think
you're missing a BuildRequires. When I use mock --rebuild, I get:
ocamlc.opt -o lib/gui/Scope.cmo -w Ael -warn-error A -annot -g -I src/misc
-I src/ai -I src/memory_state -I src/toplevel -I src/slicing_types -I
src/pdg_types -I src/kernel -I src/logic -I src/lib -I src/project -I src/buckx
-I src/gui -I external -I cil/src -I cil/src/ext -I cil/src/frontc -I
cil/src/logic -I cil/ocamlutil -I lib/plugins -I lib -I +ocamlgraph
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnomecanvas-2
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1:
Error: Error while building custom runtime system
In short, the build is complaining that there is no library gnomecanvas-2. A
quick "rpm -qf /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so" suggests to me that you need to
add this to the spec file:
BuildRequires: libgnomecanvas-devel
Once I added that "BuildRequires: libgnomecanvas-devel", the mock build worked
for me. You should still do a Koji build, since that will detect problems on
many architectures. (Be sure to add ExcludeArch's first; we already know that
this package will NOT work on some other architectures because it doesn't
generate proper .byte files.)
As noted in "How to create an RPM package", I've found it to be very helpful to
"yum install auto-buildrequires" and then run "auto-br-rpmbuild -ba SPECFILE".
Unfortunately, it didn't seem to be enlightening in this case.
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-05-25 13:26:15 EDT --- That's a bad example -- /usr/share/mime is actually owned by the filesystem package as well, which is guaranteed to be installed at all times. With bash-completion, the consensus is actually to grab the directory. The rationale is similar to the one you outline -- that it's too trivial to create a subpackage. With emacs support, the consensus is the other way around, as far as I can tell, and any heavy Emacs user would probably know to look for emacs-* subpackages anyway. If you want, you can mention it in the package description or in a README.Fedora file. Any deviation is a bug (I'd appreciate it if you could file those, they do need to be fixed). If I still don't convince you, then let me know and I'll remove myself from the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588142] Review Request: maven-release - Release a project updating the POM and tagging in the SCM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588142 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 13:07:05 EDT --- Hi Guido, We need this for a number of things, please say smth or I'll do the rawhide build on Thursday. Thanks, Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 Jim Radford changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(radf...@blackbean | |.org) | --- Comment #7 from Jim Radford 2010-05-25 12:57:40 EDT --- > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories > MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages It is common for this rule to be broken for the very reasons I outlined. See for example the rule on MIME files. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo Notice that like bash_completion, you just drop a file in the directory. If you have shared-mime-info, bash-completion or in this case emacs installed then things just work and if you don't they work as well. Win-win. The reason humans do reviews is so they can make exceptions to well meaning but not always applicable rules. If these prominent examples are not enough to convince you, I'm sure I can find more... See: clisp puppet monotone ... Then again there are lots of packages that have a separate emacs packages. I still hold that this is a stupid practice. I want things to just work and given the limits of rpm/yum, the best way in this case to just include the emacs mode in the main package. As for the directory ownership issue, I'm ambivalent. Some packages (like puppet) grab the common directory and some like the users of bash-completion and shared-mime-info don't. Given that the latter uses are explicit policy, I lean toward that, but both have merits. > I'd find it hard to go ahead with this review. I suggest contacting the > fedora-packaging list for a clarification, or I can step back and you can try > convincing another maintainer that dangling links are the best way out of > this. No problem. Thanks for your time. I'll consider bringing it up on the list if no one else steps up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #17 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 12:14:33 EDT --- Upstream kindly provided patch to remove libgettextpo dependency RHEL-5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2208854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: hslogger - Logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten 2010-05-25 12:00:29 EDT --- Hi Lakshmi, do you want to maintain hslogger in Fedora? I am afraid that is a bit more complicated than running cabal2spec. Please start here if you want to become a maintainer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join If you study that page and linked material I guess you can answer your own question above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 11:40:49 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-25 11:44:39 EDT --- Thanks for review. Requesting CVS New Package CVS Request === Package Name: apache-commons-jxpath Short Description: Simple XPath interpreter Owners: sochotni fnasser Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-25 11:38:42 EDT --- Fixed owner of directories Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jxpath-1.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561470] Review Request: beakerlib - shell-level integration testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561470 Petr Muller changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Petr Muller 2010-05-25 11:34:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: beakerlib Short Description: A shell-level integration testing library Owners: afri Branches: F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25
11:21:31 EDT ---
Review:
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Output:
apache-commons-jxpath.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-jxpath
Not a problem.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
NOTOK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
%{_mavenpomdir}
%{_mavendepmapfragdir} should not be owned
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK: I'm aware this is a rename and obsoletes/provides are good.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #18 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-25 11:14:42 EDT --- Hi Robin, I just got the confirmation that you can drop "and Public Domain" from the License field. Sorry for the confusion. Next time I'll know better. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Depends on||594756 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 11:07:02 EDT --- I'll take this one. I'm making it depends on apache-commons-beanutils review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595676] Review Request: apache-commons-el - rename of jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595676 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-05-25 11:06:45 EDT --- Thanks. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: apache-commons-el Short Description: The Apache Commons Extension Language Owners: sochotni fnasser Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594756] Review Request: apache-commons-beanutils - rename of jakarta-commons-beanutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594756 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||595749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 11:04:12 EDT --- Moved /usr/bin/spectrum to /usr/sbin RHEL-5 build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2208775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595676] Review Request: apache-commons-el - rename of jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595676
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25
11:04:23 EDT ---
Review:
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Output:
apache-commons-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US javax ->
java, java x, Java
apache-commons-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US servlet ->
servile, serviette, servility
apache-commons-el.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jsp -> esp,
asp, tsp
apache-commons-el.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-el
Not a problem.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK: I'm aware this is a rename and obsoletes/provides are good.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583102] Review Request: radiotray - Radio Tray is a streaming player for listening to online radios
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583102 --- Comment #10 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-05-25 11:00:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/radiotray.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/radiotray-0.5.1-3.fc12.src.rpm Hi, Thanks for the review and pardon me for taking so much time to post an update, I was in training for the entire week. Everything should be fixed now! rpmlint is still silent after the changes and the package build fine in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #7 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-05-25 10:52:08 EDT --- Update the srpm and spec files for python-keyring Spec URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/python-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/python-keyring-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595676] Review Request: apache-commons-el - rename of jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 10:36:51 EDT --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595220] Review Request: buildnumber-maven-plugin - Build Number Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595220 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-05-25 10:30:58 EDT --- Things to be fixed: buildnumber-maven-plugin-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-license The MIT License buildnumber-maven-plugin-javadoc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/javadoc/buildnumber-maven-plugin buildnumber-maven-plugin-1.0 buildnumber-maven-plugin.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-beta-4-1 ['1.0-0.1.beta4.fc13', '1.0-0.1.beta4'] javadoc subpackage is missing requires on jpackage-utils main package is missing standart requires: Requires: jpackage-utils Requires(post): jpackage-utils Requires(postun): jpackage-utils Requires: java global should be used instead of define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-05-25 10:33:18 EDT --- Can I suggest you do a scratch build in Koji, ie: koji build --scratch dist-f14 frama-c-1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592579] Review Request: Frama-c - Framework for source code analysis of C software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592579 --- Comment #17 from Mark Rader 2010-05-25 10:30:04 EDT --- There is an updated version of the bug source. Spec URL: http://tpath3.dnsalias.net/openproofs/frama-c.spec SRPM URL: http://tpath3.dnsalias.net/openproofs/frama-c-1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm Description:Frama-C is a suite of tools dedicated to the analysis of the source code of software written in C. I have excluded the .byte files. It should now compile correctly on the 64 and 32 bit platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595676] Review Request: apache-commons-el - rename of jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595676 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||588764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] New: Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: socho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jxpath-1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Defines a simple interpreter of an expression language called XPath. JXPath applies XPath expressions to graphs of objects of all kinds: JavaBeans, Maps, Servlet contexts, DOM etc, including mixtures thereof. Please note that this is a re-review of existing package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595749] Review Request: apache-commons-jxpath - rename of jakarta-commons-jxpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595749 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||588764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #6 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-05-25 10:09:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > There is one rpmlint error and lot of warnings. Please fix those. > > > [she...@brc ~]$ rpmlint Downloads/python-keyring-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm > 1>python-keyring.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Store and access your > passwords safely. > 2>python-keyring.src: E: description-line-too-long C from python. It can be > used in any application that needs safe password storage. > python-keyring.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog oops ... forgot to run rpmlint before submitting the review. I will be uploading the changes shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #5 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-05-25 10:07:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ratnadeep, check spec file from Bug 593999 if you wish, it can possibly help > you. Thanks :). I made some changes in my spec based on spec file from Bug 593999. I will be uploading the changes shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #17 from Robin Norwood 2010-05-25 09:54:32 EDT --- How about we hash that question out on the devel list or fedora-legal? I'm still working with upstream to get the patch issue resolved, so there's plenty of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #16 from Chen Lei 2010-05-25 09:33:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > LGPLv2+ + Public domain = LGPLv2+, because LGPLv2+ contains all limitation > > Public domain > > > > Yesterday, someone confirmed this with spot. > A couple of months ago I got different information about this. But if the > additional "Public Domain" tags can now be omitted, then that's fine. Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means the material is not copyrighted and no license is needed. If LPGL files compile with some others common license such as MIT BSD, the license is also LPGL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request - ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell "tagged" DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 Bruno Wolff III changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@wolff.to --- Comment #1 from Bruno Wolff III 2010-05-25 09:35:06 EDT --- I'll look at doing an unofficial review (as I am not a sponsor) Friday (when I have a day off). I need practice reviewing and if you become a packager with this package, it will make it easier for you to finish packaging ghc-hslogger. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #15 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-25 09:25:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > LGPLv2+ + Public domain = LGPLv2+, because LGPLv2+ contains all limitation > Public domain > > Yesterday, someone confirmed this with spot. A couple of months ago I got different information about this. But if the additional "Public Domain" tags can now be omitted, then that's fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578480] Review Request: spectrum - XMPP transport/gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #15 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 09:15:32 EDT --- Issues in comment 11, comment 12 and many other small issues were provided into new release. All stuff is available in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2208579 EPEL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2208598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #14 from Chen Lei 2010-05-25 09:08:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > The License should be LGPLv2+, license field is for binary not for source. > > > Incorrect. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario > The license of the file is "compiled" into the library and thus part of the > binary. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License:_field LGPLv2+ + Public domain = LGPLv2+, because LGPLv2+ contains all limitation Public domain Yesterday, someone confirmed this with spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 594943] Review Request: libnoise - A general-purpose library that generates three-dimensional coherent noise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-25 09:00:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > The License should be LGPLv2+, license field is for binary not for source. Incorrect. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario The license of the file is "compiled" into the library and thus part of the binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
