[Bug 606666] Review Request: sselp - Prints X selection to standard out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-25 02:32:10 EDT --- Thanks for the hint, it's fixed in the following version (and not to late for initial cvs) SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/sselp.spec SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/sselp-0.2-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603631] Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603631 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psatp...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psatp...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603628] Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603628 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2010-06-25 02:15:26 EDT --- + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2271467 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.src: W: no-buildroot-tag not required from f13 aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided crimson-text-fonts ok, since changes happened in devel only + source files match upstream url 4fde45b7b447e558da9585826734cd7b crimson_text_100608.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. - package installed properly. 1) a) Crimson Text Roman (Book, Semibold, Bold) b) Crimson Text Italic (Book, Semibold, Bold) are the two these are 2 families but when we install it show in font selection Crimson Text - Italit Roman Semibold Semibold Bold Bold so user cant recognize, which one is roman and which one italic family suggestion: use family name 1) Crimson Text Roman and 2) Crimson Text Italic in .sfd file 2) It will be good to make two subpackages a) will be aldusleaf-crimson-text-roman-fonts a) will be aldusleaf-crimson-text-italic-fonts it will give birth to common package as well, as per fonts spec guideline + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. // ask this + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634
--- Comment #6 from Parag 2010-06-25 02:15:15 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Some suggestions:
> 1.Group: Development/Languages->Group: Development/Libraries
>
> Development/Languages is for python runtime only.
May I know where its documented? I think we can find many python-* packages in
Fedora using Development/Languages
> 2.
> It'll be better add %check to the spec after %install, then del robofab/test
>
> %check
> PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} python RoboFab/robofab/test/runAll.py
>
Is this MUST by guidelines.
> 3. Are all files under Scripts useless for this package?
I see they are broken.
+ python robofab/test/runAll.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "robofab/test/runAll.py", line 5, in
import robofab.test
ImportError: No module named test
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 Kyle VanderBeek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kyle VanderBeek 2010-06-25 01:46:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-markupsafe Short Description: XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python Owners: kylev lmacken Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-25 01:30:17 EDT --- Yep, that builds fine for me. rpmlint just says: python-markupsafe.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/markupsafe/_speedups.so _speedups.so() (64bit) which as far as I know you can't do anything about because we have no dependency filtering for arch-specific packages. The only issue I see: perhaps I'm missing something, but does the URL actually have anything at all to do with this package? I can't find any mention at all of this module at http://dev.pocoo.org/. It's what pypi says, so I'm no going to fret over it, but it seems a bit odd. Honestly I'd probably list the pypi page here instead because it at least has useful information related to the module. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d2a1980ea5bae80a999dad6aafe1ad2f0440522630caeecb84ffe061c8054342 MarkupSafe-0.9.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: python3-markupsafe-0.9.2-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm _speedups.so()(64bit) python3-markupsafe = 0.9.2-3.fc14 python3-markupsafe(x86-64) = 0.9.2-3.fc14 = libpython3.1.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 3.1 python-markupsafe-0.9.2-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm _speedups.so()(64bit) python-markupsafe = 0.9.2-3.fc14 python-markupsafe(x86-64) = 0.9.2-3.fc14 = libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * %check is present and all tests pass: Ran 2 tests in 0.270s Ran 2 tests in 0.253s * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588435] Review Request: rubygem-libxml-ruby - libxml support for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588435 --- Comment #22 from Matthew Kent 2010-06-25 01:25:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Should I postpone reviewing this for now? I think so. I've posted http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/2010-June/001514.html but no feedback yet. Hopefully someone steps up to maintain it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603628] Review Request: aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts - A latin font for the production of technical books and papers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603628 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psatp...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psatp...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kana...@kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-06-25 00:34:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kana...@kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-06-25 00:33:47 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Mail-POP3Client New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] New: Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.ergo-project.org/?p=kolab-fedora.git;a=blob_plain;f=el5/custom-el5-kolabsys.com/SPECS/perl-XML-TreePP.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.ergo-project.org/packages/perl-XML-TreePP/0.39/1.el5/src/perl-XML-TreePP-0.39-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607878] Review Request: perl-XML-TreePP - Pure Perl implementation for parsing/writing XML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||607873, 607877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||607873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607876] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607876 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||607875, 607873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607875] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607875 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607877] New: Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607877 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-FeedPP - Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.ergo-project.org/?p=kolab-fedora.git;a=blob_plain;f=el5/custom-el5-kolabsys.com/SPECS/perl-XML-FeedPP.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.ergo-project.org/packages/perl-XML-FeedPP/0.41/1.el5/src/perl-XML-FeedPP-0.41-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Parse/write/merge/edit RSS/RDF/Atom syndication feeds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607875] New: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607875 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.ergo-project.org/?p=kolab-fedora.git;a=blob_plain;f=el5/custom-el5-kolabsys.com/SPECS/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.ergo-project.org/packages/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL/1.3/1.el5/src/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL-1.3-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Dependency for OTRS in #607873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607875] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-SSL - Simple IMAP account handling with SSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607875 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||607873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||607875 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] New: Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Summary: Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.ergo-project.org/?p=kolab-fedora.git;a=blob_plain;f=el5/custom-el5-kolabsys.com/SPECS/otrs.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.ergo-project.org/packages/otrs/2.4.7/1.el5/src/otrs-2.4.7-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Revival of a previously retired package. Original review request: #180015 OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System (also well known as trouble ticket system) with many features to manage customer telephone calls and e-mails. The system is built to allow your support, sales, pre-sales, billing, internal IT, helpdesk, etc. department to react quickly to inbound inquiries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607876] New: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607876 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Simple - Simple IMAP account handling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://git.ergo-project.org/?p=kolab-fedora.git;a=blob_plain;f=el5/custom-el5-kolabsys.com/SPECS/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.ergo-project.org/packages/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple/1.1916/1.el5/src/perl-Net-IMAP-Simple-1.1916-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Dependency for OTRS in #607873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607873] Review Request: OTRS - Open Source Ticket Request System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607873 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|n...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603633] Review Request: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts - This is designed for classicists, Biblical scholars, medievalists, linguists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603633 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2010-06-25 00:14:50 EDT --- + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2269813 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. * scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts.src: W: no-buildroot-tag now buildroot is not required, so this is ok *scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided cardo-fonts since cardo-fonts built only for devel version and for very short life span, provide is not required really. + source files match upstream url 82bca1b561f5a84c676d27dd4e0280a1 cardo99.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. in Manual98a.pdf page 14 it is written "This font is free for personal, non-commercial, or non-profit use. It may also be used to prepare camera-ready copy for papers that will appear in academic journals, even if the author of the paper receives remuneration for article. Any other commercial use (includ- ing the printing of books to be sold at a profit) requires the purchase of an appropriate li- cense. Individuals may give copies to others, as long as all files from the original zip ar- chive are kept together and none is altered. This software may not be posted on any web page, included in any compilation, or sold in any form without the express permission of David J. Perry. Those who wish to promote the use of this font are encouraged to put a link to my home page http://scholarsfonts.net on their web sites so that others may download it." It is conflicting with the mentioned license OFL in the font file. On http://scholarsfonts.net/ It is written that from .99 version cardo-fonts are released under OFL Manual98a.pdf is written for old version of cardo-fonts, so i think better to drop it. Or good to ask upstream to update it for the license change. - License text is included in package. good to ask upstream to include license text in package, since license in ttf file is not visible vi all application. will be good if you can add License as source1 in this package + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. // ask this + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2010-06-24 23:06:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Taxi Short Description: Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization Owners: iarnell Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607081] Review Request: perl-Data-Taxi - Taint-aware, XML-ish data serialization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607081 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #19 from Dan Fuhry 2010-06-24 22:38:24 EDT --- Update: Version 1.1.7 of Enano was released in December, resolving our use of Text_Wiki. We now have our own parser code that integrates much better with the Enano. There are other pieces of third party code, but they're not really libraries - more like a single file, or in cases like phpWiki's diff code <10 files, worth of source code. It's not that much. Have a look at: http://enanocms.org/licenses/ phpWiki's diff engine is 8 files, some modified some not IIRC. MediaWiki's table engine is one file with a few helper functions that were cherry picked out of its parser code. phpBB's Advanced Visual Confirmation Mod is one file + a couple of fonts. Modified from original version, removed all phpBB-specific code and kept only the image generation features. Jim Tucek's e-mail encryptor is half of a file (includes/email.php). Ported to PHP from Javascript. Tigra Tree Menu, 1 file. Modified from original version. DOM-drag: removed in 1.1.8, 1 file, modified. freeCap: 1 file, modified. jQuery: 2 files, one is jquery.js, the other is jquery UI, the latter of which was built with the tool on their website (limited feature set for smaller file size) TinyMCE: Neal is working on a package for this. The core package is unmodified for easy upgrades, but we use a modified version of tinymce_gzip to integrate with Enano's shared cache directory, which makes webmasters' (and SELinux policy writers') lives easier by not requiring a separate apache-writable directory for TinyMCE. MD5/SHA1 in Javascript: 20K of code in 1 file. FastJSON: 1 file out of Zend Framework. It would be absolutely ridiculous to bundle all of the Zend Framework for this one file, which we've modified to fix bugs with Unicode. famfamfam Silk icons: bits and pieces used, compiled into sprites, resized, custom versions made, etc. Again, impractical to use the whole package (~1000 images) for ~30 icons. As you can see, most of these are just very small pieces of bigger projects, or have been modified. Hope this clears up the issue. -Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606666] Review Request: sselp - Prints X selection to standard out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60
--- Comment #10 from Mohamed El Morabity 2010-06-24
21:12:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Two remarks:
> - Description does not end with a dot
> - make is not verbose, so cflags cannot be verified:
Sorry for missing these issues.
Mathias: to fix the nonverbose compilation, you can add this in %prep:
sed -i "s/@\${CC}/\${CC}/" Makefile
Anyway the flags may be OK with the fixes suggested above, the Makefile is
simple enough to check it. Anyway, logs are better for proof ^^
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606714] Review Request: eekboard - A Virtual Keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606714 --- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno 2010-06-24 20:35:23 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/eekboard/eekboard.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/eekboard/eekboard-0.0.3-2.fc13.src.rpm and Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2269458 Anyone to review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576685] Review Request: pekwm - A small and flexible window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576685 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 18:48:42 EDT --- pekwm-0.1.12-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pekwm-0.1.12-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576685] Review Request: pekwm - A small and flexible window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576685 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 18:06:35 EDT --- pekwm-0.1.12-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pekwm-0.1.12-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 599723] Review Request: pyjamas26 - A python to Javascript compiler, Widget set, Framework and Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599723 Dave Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalc...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2010-06-24 17:41:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) [snip] > NOTE: This is intended for the python26 stack in EPEL5 only. > Its been changed to use that python stack, but is otherwise the same as the > already approved pyjamas version. Can you provide a diff against the other package please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 17:37:37 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.306-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.306-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Gabriel Espinoza changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Gabriel Espinoza changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review |Review Request: Agender - A |Request: Agender - A small, |small, simple and |simple and cross-platform |cross-platform schedule |schedule tool |tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Gabriel Espinoza changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Agender - A |FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review |small, simple and |Request: Agender - A small, |cross-platform schedule |simple and cross-platform |tool|schedule tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Gabriel Espinoza changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Linux |All -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607802] New: Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607802 Summary: Review Request: Agender - A small, simple and cross-platform schedule tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: virtuoso...@users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/agender/files/Agender-1.1.5.2.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/agender/files/Agender-1.1.5.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Agender is a small cross-platform schedule tool where you associate some notes with a date or with no date in particular if you mark the note as sticky, you simply start it and it will create a task-bar icon and stay in the background,without annoying you,it can also be configured to run on login. This is my first package, so i need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 --- Comment #5 from Kyle VanderBeek 2010-06-24 17:17:45 EDT --- I totally blew it and missed your second paragraph. Fixed BuildRequires and have done scratch builds for rawhide, F-13, F-12 and EPEL-5 (all the targets that Mako is currently on). http://www.kylev.com/tmp/python-markupsafe-0.9.2-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-24 16:42:06 EDT --- It does build OK if I add a build dependency on python-setuptools-devel and a conditionalized dep on python3-setuptools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-06-24 16:23:01 EDT --- Still fails to build on rawhide, same error as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606666] Review Request: sselp - Prints X selection to standard out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2010-06-24 16:18:39 EDT --- Two remarks: - Description does not end with a dot - make is not verbose, so cflags cannot be verified: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342 --- Comment #2 from Kyle VanderBeek 2010-06-24 16:07:36 EDT --- Updated with fixed with_python3 and sitearch rather than sitelib. Spec in same place, new SRPM http://www.kylev.com/tmp/python-markupsafe-0.9.2-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607777] Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-06-24 15:17:33 EDT --- Koji scratch build results (F-13): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2271016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588435] Review Request: rubygem-libxml-ruby - libxml support for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588435 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-24 15:18:49 EDT --- Should I postpone reviewing this for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 557011] Review Request: clamsmtp - A Daemon to virus scan mail using clamav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557011 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-24 15:17:28 EDT --- Nathanael, would you upload the new srpm anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600467] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600467 --- Comment #20 from chris desjardins 2010-06-24 15:11:12 EDT --- OK reverting to release 6. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/JAGS/JAGS.spec Source URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/JAGS/JAGS-2.1.0-6.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607778] Review Request: xnoise-plugins-core - Core plugins for xnoise
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||60 Summary|Review Request: -|plugins for xnoise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607777] Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||607778 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606379] Review Request: rubygem-oniguruma - Bindings for the oniguruma regular expression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606379
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-24
15:06:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> add "-V" option to the "gem install" command
>
> I am sorry, but I was not able to make the build better.
- Here adding "-V" option is just to make build log more
verbose so that we can check what is actually done (especially
if optflags are correctly honored or not)
> The debug package has still no sources included:
>
> $ rpmlint ~/rubygem-oniguruma-debuginfo-1.1.0-2.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> rubygem-oniguruma-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- With rebuilt on koji, debuginfo rpm is correctly generated. Please
check if you have surely redhat-rpm-config installed.
> The patch includes the path so I is easier to add other commands (No "cd" is
> needed jet). This can changed back later.
- See below.
For -2:
* Unneeded || :
- Please avoid to use "|| :" unless really unavoidable
( In this case, if "make all" fails rpmbuild must stop
there and "|| :" should really be removed )
* Patch0
- Making patch header contain such large paths should be
avoided ( current patch cannot be used with the version
is to be upgraded )
Containing "oniguruma-1.1.0/Rakefile" is enough for header.
* Macros in comment
rubygem-oniguruma.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{optflags}
rubygem-oniguruma.src:54: W: macro-in-comment %{geminstdir}
- It is preferable that you always excape macros in comment with
using %% because (while for this case there are no problems)
macros are expanded even in comments which sometimes causes
some unexpected errors.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607777] New: Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Summary: Review Request: xnoise - Tracklist-centric Media Player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silva...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/xnoise.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/xnoise-plugins-core-0.1.6-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Xnoise is a Gtk+ media player with a tracklist-centric design. The tracklist is a list of video or music tracks that are played one by one without being removed (right side of window). This gives you the possibility to enqueue any track in any order, regardless if they are on the same album or not. The tracks can be reordered at any time by using drag and drop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607778] New: Review Request: -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silva...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/xnoise-plugins-core.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/xnoise-plugins-core-0.1.6-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This package contains the core plugins for xnoise. Their usage with xnoise is optional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585719] Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719 --- Comment #14 from Alain PORTAL 2010-06-24 15:00:38 EDT --- %changelog * Thu Jun 24 2010 Alain Portal 3.1.68-7.rev1750 - Update source file to svn rev 1750 Spec URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/wxformbuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-7.rev1750.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 248338] Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248338 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lyos.gemininore...@gmail.co ||m, mschwe...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-24 13:58:41 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gnome-applet-netspeed New Branches: F-13 Owners: mschwendt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591011] Review Request: kfilefactory - An easy to use filefactory.com uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591011 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:28:16 EDT --- kfilefactory-0.1.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604093] Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Test your SYNOPSIS code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604093 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:29:28 EDT --- perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604653] Review Request: perl-Test-NoTabs - Check the presence of tabs in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604653 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:29:17 EDT --- perl-Test-NoTabs-1.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:35:03 EDT --- libsurl-0.7.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsurl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsurl-0.7.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604653] Review Request: perl-Test-NoTabs - Check the presence of tabs in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604653 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-NoTabs-1.0-3.fc12 |perl-Test-NoTabs-1.0-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604653] Review Request: perl-Test-NoTabs - Check the presence of tabs in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604653 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:30:14 EDT --- perl-Test-NoTabs-1.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600467] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600467 --- Comment #19 from Martin Gieseking 2010-06-24 13:26:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > He said that I need to only add libtoool-ltdl-devel in the > BuildRequires. Therefore, I believed this rendered my patches unnecessary. Hi Chris, you should not rely on this. Since using bundled libraries is not permitted in Fedora, you have to ensure that these are not linked. You usually do this by removing the bundled libs. Thus, I suggest to revert to release 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2010-06-24 13:19:07 EDT --- If the original iptraf upstream is dead, then you can use Obsoletes/Provides instead of Conflicts See packaging guideline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604093] Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Test your SYNOPSIS code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604093 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:29:05 EDT --- perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604653] Review Request: perl-Test-NoTabs - Check the presence of tabs in your project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604653 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-NoTabs-1.0-3.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:28:47 EDT --- rubygem-sup-0.10.2-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604093] Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Test your SYNOPSIS code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604093 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-4.f ||c13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591011] Review Request: kfilefactory - An easy to use filefactory.com uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591011 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kfilefactory-0.1.1-1.fc12 |kfilefactory-0.1.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598553] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Regexp - Represent a regular expression of some sort
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598553 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:35:25 EDT --- perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.007-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598553] Review Request: perl-PPIx-Regexp - Represent a regular expression of some sort
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598553 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:28:28 EDT --- perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.007-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601633] Review Request: rubygem-sup - A console-based email client written in ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-sup-0.10.2-5.fc13 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:27:09 EDT --- libsurl-0.7.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsurl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsurl-0.7.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604093] Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Test your SYNOPSIS code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604093 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-4.f |perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-4.f |c13 |c12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #6 from Niels de Vos 2010-06-24 12:36:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I recommend that you ask upstream to clarify the license in the source code > header. Until they reply, the license tag should reflect the license header in > the source code: GPL+. I have contacted the author and archivemount-0.6.1.tar.gz has been released to resolve the license issue. It is definitely LGPLv2+. I got a confirmation by email, but that is in German, so I wont share it here. The latest .spec and SRPM can be downloaded here: - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount.spec - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm $ rpmlint archivemount.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm archivemount.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem -> file system, file-system, systematic archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gz -> g, z, gs archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bz -> bx, b, z archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filesystem -> file system, file-system, systematic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Cheers, Niels -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601585] Review Request: perl-mime-construct - Construct/send MIME messages from the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601585 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:24:17 EDT --- perl-mime-construct-1.11-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-mime-construct'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-mime-construct-1.11-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634
--- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-06-24 12:24:42 EDT ---
Some suggestions:
1.Group: Development/Languages->Group: Development/Libraries
Development/Languages is for python runtime only.
2.
It'll be better add %check to the spec after %install, then del robofab/test
%check
PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitelib} python RoboFab/robofab/test/runAll.py
3. Are all files under Scripts useless for this package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591011] Review Request: kfilefactory - An easy to use filefactory.com uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591011 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:23:27 EDT --- kfilefactory-0.1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591011] Review Request: kfilefactory - An easy to use filefactory.com uploader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591011 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||kfilefactory-0.1.1-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573741] Review Request: RBTools - Tools for interacting with ReviewBoard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573741 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||RBTools-0.2-5.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573741] Review Request: RBTools - Tools for interacting with ReviewBoard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573741 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 12:19:30 EDT --- RBTools-0.2-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600467] Review Request: jags - Just Another Gibbs Sampler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600467 --- Comment #18 from chris desjardins 2010-06-24 11:36:51 EDT --- Updated: SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/JAGS/JAGS.spec Source URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1501309/Fedora/JAGS/JAGS-2.1.0-7.fc13.src.rpm The change from -6 to -7 is that I removed the patches for ltdl. The upstream author informed that while JAGS ships with its own copy of ltdl if it detects a system copy then it will automatically use that and not the version in the sources. He said that I need to only add libtoool-ltdl-devel in the BuildRequires. Therefore, I believed this rendered my patches unnecessary. This is reflected in the new .src.rpm and .spec file. Also he thinks it's probably fine to remove those two .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 543685] Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543685 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-24 11:30:44 EDT --- > the -static subpkg contains the -devel Provides Ah, this is problem actually, because anything with "BuildRequires: libnes-devel" would implicitly get libnes-static. [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 --- Comment #4 from Parag 2010-06-24 10:48:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-robofab Short Description: Reads and writes UFO font files Owners: pnemade Branches: F-13 EL-6 InitialCC: i18n-team fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567241] Review Request: taxbird 0.15 -- Need Sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567241 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-06-24 10:45:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Is that the reason why review bug 567240 has stalled, too? Well bug 567240 stalled, because the submitter preferred not to returned to his package's review - It probably would have been better to close the whole package submission chain, but I seemingly missed to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606127] Review Request: colortool - useful tool for web-designers/graphic artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606127 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Vogel 2010-06-24 10:44:21 EDT --- I just updated the package; so the current file urls are: SPEC: http://colortool.googlecode.com/files/colortool-1.0-1.fc13.spec SRPM: http://colortool.googlecode.com/files/colortool-1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #6 from Fabian 2010-06-24 10:39:29 EDT --- Thanks for responding to this review. I'm on it asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567241] Review Request: taxbird 0.15 -- Need Sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567241 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mschwe...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-24 10:25:46 EDT --- Upon sending my comment, bugzilla said: Changes submitted for bug 567241 Email sent to: d...@…, nott...@…, cwick...@…, bug...@…, fedora-package-rev...@… Excluding: imran...@… [1], e...@…, dirk-gottsch...@… [2], nob...@…, fedora...@…, extras...@… [1] the previous reviewer [2] the package submitter Is that the reason why review bug 567240 has stalled, too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567241] Review Request: taxbird 0.15 -- Need Sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567241 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dirk-gottsch...@i ||t-internet-service.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567241] Review Request: taxbird 0.15 -- Need Sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567241
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-24 10:20:08
EDT ---
> Requires: libgeier = 0.11
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
> %{_datadir}/*
The tarball looks like translation objects are built. Hence:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546871] Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546871 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2010-06-24 10:08:26 EDT --- Nothing to review here -> NotReady [ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#The_Whiteboard ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2010-06-24 10:10:33 EDT --- python-robofab.noarch: W: no-documentation PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603634] Review Request: python-robofab - reads and writes UFO font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603634 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivazquez...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ivazquez...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606759] Review Request: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606759 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-24 09:12:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > nvi.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch27: nvi-28-regex_widechar.patch > Still there too, but I take it this patch might be needed later. I expect that during the further life of this package somebody will take a serious look at these patches. Most of them should be probably thrown away. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603846] Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603846 Bastien Nocera changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera 2010-06-24 09:16:40 EDT --- Disabled the rpaths work-around as it breaks the GIR file generation. Built in libpeas-0.5.0-3.fc14 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606759] Review Request: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606759 Matej Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-24 09:14:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nvi Short Description: 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi Owners: mcepl Branches: F-13 EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 Ratnadeep Debnath changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
