[Bug 639529] New: Review Request: apache-commons-pool - rename of jakarta-commons-pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-pool - rename of jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639529 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-pool - rename of jakarta-commons-pool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.sp...@arcor.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a re-review of existing package! Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-pool/apache-commons-pool.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-pool/apache-commons-pool-1.5.5-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The goal of Pool package is it to create and maintain an object (instance) pooling package to be distributed under the ASF license. The package should support a variety of pool implementations, but encourage support of an interface that makes these implementations interchangeable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639529] Review Request: apache-commons-pool - rename of jakarta-commons-pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639529 Chris Spike chris.sp...@arcor.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||588764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 --- Comment #18 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 03:38:28 EDT --- Created attachment 451170 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=451170 spec cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226335] Merge Review: pyOpenSSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226335 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com, ||p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226547] Merge Review: x86info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226547 --- Comment #17 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 03:38:01 EDT --- Following are the changes proposed in above patch 1) Guidelines suggests to keep timestamps of upstream installed files. So please use install -p See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 2) Guidelines suggests package built above F-13 do not need %clean, buildroot and cleaning of buildroot See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 3) Guidelines recommends defattr usage as %defattr(-, root, root,-) See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226335] Merge Review: pyOpenSSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226335 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 03:43:49 EDT --- If possible please update to latest upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226335] Merge Review: pyOpenSSL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226335 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 03:42:07 EDT --- Created attachment 451171 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=451171 spec cleanup This will clean the package. Please commit this patch or allow to commit. If not replied in a week, will commit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553142] Merge Review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553142 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637489] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch1 - Search engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637489 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639594] New: Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639594 Summary: Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout-0.3.2-2.fc13.src.rpm Other rpms and logs from the mock build are available here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/ Description: Scout is an interface to Tomboy notes or Gnote that uses DBus to communicate. It presents a command-line interface and tries to be as simple to use as possible. Different actions can be taken to interact with Tomboy or Gnote. Actions are simple to create, making the application easily extensible. Current actions make it possible to list note names, display note contents, search for text inside notes and to delete notes. Additional Info : needs pandoc for generation of man pages. The haskell sig is in the process of packaging pandoc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639594] Review Request: scout - A CLI interface to Tomboy notes and Gnote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639594 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 08:38:14 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout-0.3.2-3.fc13.src.rpm koji scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2507979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626004] Review Request: osm2pgsql - Imports map data from OpenStreetMap to a PostgresSQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626004
Jon Burgess jburgess...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jburgess...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #3 from Jon Burgess jburgess...@googlemail.com 2010-10-02
10:04:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-dependency-tracking
and:
osm2pgsql.c: In function 'main':
osm2pgsql.c:818:28: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
These seem to be minor issues that don't affect the functionality of the
program. However, they should of course be investigated by the upstream
developer.
Hi. I'm the main upstream author for osm2pgsql. I just committed a fix for that
warning in r23440 of the osm2pgsql SVN code.
- The program is supposed to report its version as %{version}-%{svn_ver}, but
the latter string is empty - that might also be worth fixing and sending
upstream.
In the upstream version the Makefile generates this via $(shell svnversion) but
the SVN metadata is discarded in the 'svn export' step. How about putting this
in the osm2pgsql.spec:
make %{?_smp_mflags} SVN=%{svn_ver}
This ends up being reported like:
$ /usr/bin/osm2pgsql -v
osm2pgsql SVN version 0.69-20101002
Alternative you could put %{release} in there. The purpose of this string is to
help myself and other developers keep track of which revision/snapshot someone
has used, anything which can be tracked back to a specific source version is
sufficient.
- As the license is not included as text, the Guidelines suggest pointing
this out to upstream and asking them to correct this mistake.
What do you want here, a copy of the GPL COPYING file added into the osm2pgsql
SVN tree? I can do that if you want.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-10-02 11:40:38 EDT --- Additional informations: Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508166 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint rubygem-rvm-1.0.11-2.fc13.noarch.rpm rubygem-rvm.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-rvm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rvm-install 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Documentation is moved to a separate package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639615] New: Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639615 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rvm - Ruby Version Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-rvm.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-rvm-1.0.11-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: RVM is a command line tool which allows us to easily install, manage and work with multiple ruby environments from interpreters to sets of gems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639617] New: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-rails - Cucumber Generators and Runtime for Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-rails - Cucumber Generators and Runtime for Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639617 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-rails - Cucumber Generators and Runtime for Rails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-cucumber-rails.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-cucumber-rails-0.3.2-3.fc13.src.rpm Description: Cucumber-Rails brings Cucumber to Rails2 and Rails3. It contains 2 generators - one for bootstrapping your Rails app for Cucumber, and a second one for generating features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639617] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber-rails - Cucumber Generators and Runtime for Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639617 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-10-02 12:05:52 EDT --- Additional informations: Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508203 $ rpmlint rubygem-cucumber-rails-0.3.2-2.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616779] Review Request: rubygem-json_pure - JSON implementation in pure Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616779 --- Comment #16 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-10-02 12:24:36 EDT --- I removed that line, but unfortunately build log expired. I did a build for this version (without patching test) and seems like it works: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508205 Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-json_pure.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-json_pure-1.4.6-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639619] New: Review Request: rubygem-simple-navigation - Ruby library for creating navigation for your Rails2 or Sinatra application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simple-navigation - Ruby library for creating navigation for your Rails2 or Sinatra application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639619 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simple-navigation - Ruby library for creating navigation for your Rails2 or Sinatra application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-simple-navigation.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-simple-navigation-3.0.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: With the simple-navigation gem installed you can easily create multilevel navigation for your Rails, Sinatra or Padrino applications. The navigation is global in a single configuration file. It supports automatic as well as explicit highlighting of the currently active navigation through regular expressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639619] Review Request: rubygem-simple-navigation - Ruby library for creating navigation for your Rails2 or Sinatra application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639619 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2010-10-02 12:27:08 EDT --- Additional informations: Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508224 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint rubygem-simple-navigation-3.0.0-2.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215
--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-10-02 12:52:27 EDT
---
Hi,
More niggles, I'm afraid:
1. You need to add the licence to the main package still: %doc gpl.txt
2. Also, now you've moved the location of the jar files to a subdirectory, your
simplyhtml.sh script no longer works, so you need to fix that.
3. Your package must also own that subdirectory, so in your files section, you
should change this line:
%{_javadir}/%{name}/*.jar
To say this instead:
%{_javadir}/%{name}
4. One thing I should perhaps have spotted earlier, by convention we normally
BuildRequires:java-devel and Requires:java in Java packages. So although
your other dependencies drag in all the necessary stuff, it's good practice to
include those anyway.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-10-02 12:58:27 EDT --- By the way, you can fix the script by passing the name of the subdirectory to build-classpath instead of the individual jar names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adel.gadl...@gmail.com --- Comment #52 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 14:13:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) Just thinking out loud here, but how about a situation where the icon is only shown when the user clicks on an item from a list to get more information. Then, that icon (and only that icon) is downloaded from something like the pkgdb if the network is up, and a category placeholder icon is used if it is not. This (and the only show for installed apps) suggestion both suck IMO. (from a user experience POV). Regarding auditing, as the license tag is generated by a script you'd have to audit the script (i.e check whether it works correctly) rather than checking every license by hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 --- Comment #10 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2010-10-02 14:42:36 EDT --- Ok I hope everything is ok now. SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/SimplyHTML/SimplyHTML-0.13.1-4.fc14.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/SimplyHTML/SimplyHTML.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639098] Review Request: rubygem-gtk2 - Ruby binding of GTK+-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639098 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635302] Review Request: rubygem-cairo - Ruby bindings for cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635302 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637939] Review Request: rubygem-gdk_pixbuf2 - Ruby binding of GdkPixbuf-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637939 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637448] Review Request: rubygem-glib2 - Ruby binding of GLib-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637448 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639636] Review Request: rubygem-poppler - Ruby binding of poppler-glib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639636 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||635302, 637448, 637939, ||639098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639638] Review Request: rubygem-rsvg2 - Ruby binding of librsvg-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639638 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||635302, 637448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637448] Review Request: rubygem-glib2 - Ruby binding of GLib-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637448 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635302] Review Request: rubygem-cairo - Ruby bindings for cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635302 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||639638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639638] New: Review Request: rubygem-rsvg2 - Ruby binding of librsvg-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rsvg2 - Ruby binding of librsvg-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639638 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rsvg2 - Ruby binding of librsvg-2.x Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rsvg2/rubygem-rsvg2.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rsvg2/rubygem-rsvg2-0.90.2-3.fc.src.rpm Description: Ruby/RSVG is a Ruby binding of librsvg. This package depends on other packages currently in review request queue, so currently no scratch build on koji is available. mockbuild log for F-14 is available at: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rsvg2/MOCK-rubygem-rsvg2.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615319] Review Request: cgnslib - Computational Fluid Dynamics General Notation System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615319 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-10-02 16:18:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 17:08:19 EDT --- Oops, forgot f13. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-csv Short Description: CSV loader and dumper Owners: mathstuf Branches: f13 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630208] Review Request: ghc-csv - CSV loader and dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630208 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co |fedora-cvs? |m) | --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 17:07:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-csv Short Description: CSV loader and dumper Owners: mathstuf Branches: f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 17:11:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghc-colour Short Description: A model for human colour/color perception Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635256] Review Request: qtop - tool for monitoring PBS systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635256 fo...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #8 from fo...@cern.ch 2010-10-02 19:32:07 EDT --- Here is the latest and greatest version, including nice command line options. Spec URL: http://cern.ch/fotis/QTOP/qtop.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/fotis/QTOP/qtop-42-1.src.rpm Description: Monitoring tool for PBS-based cluster systems, incl. torque. I wonder why it takes so long for this ticket to progress... is there perhaps any action pending on this side? tia, Fotis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #9 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-10-02 19:44:19 EDT ---
Review summary:
* Fails rpmlint due to debuginfo without sources. May need to patch Makefile
to pass -g option to valac. Possibly should arrange to pass make's CFLAGS as
arguments to valac's -X option, to be passed to C compiler.
Review detail:
[FAIL] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
$ rpmlint *.rpm *.spec
gedit-valencia.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin - plug in,
plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin - plug in,
plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tooltips - tool
tips, tool-tips, toolkit
gedit-valencia.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocompletion -
auto completion, auto-completion, incompletion
gedit-valencia.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocomplete -
auto complete, auto-complete, completeness
gedit-valencia.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin - plug in,
plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin - plug in,
plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tooltips - tool
tips, tool-tips, toolkit
gedit-valencia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocompletion -
auto completion, auto-completion, incompletion
gedit-valencia.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocomplete -
auto complete, auto-complete, completeness
gedit-valencia.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin - plug in,
plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugin - plug
in, plug-in, plugging
gedit-valencia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tooltips - tool
tips, tool-tips, toolkit
gedit-valencia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocompletion
- auto completion, auto-completion, incompletion
gedit-valencia.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocomplete -
auto complete, auto-complete, completeness
gedit-valencia-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
gedit-valencia-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings.
[OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL.
[OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines.
[N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[N/A] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[OK] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set
[Bug 639652] New: Review Request: python-pika - AMQP client library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pika - AMQP client library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639652 Summary: Review Request: python-pika - AMQP client library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ilia.cheishv...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://github.com/icheishvili/rpms/raw/master//python-pika.spec SRPM URL: http://github.com/icheishvili/rpms/raw/master//python-pika-0.5.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This is an AMQP 0-8/0-9-1 client library for Python. I am hoping to get it included in Extras. Pika is a pure-Python implementation of the AMQP 0-8 protocol (with an 0-9-1 implementation on a separate git branch, for now) that tries to stay fairly independent of the underlying network support library. It also tries to stay neutral as to programming style, supporting (where possible) both synchronous and asynchronous approaches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(rtn...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #29 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 23:06:01
EDT ---
I updated the buildrequires to kdelibs4-devel. I also added
LDFLAGS=-L %{_libdir}/kde/devel
in the %build section. I installed kdelibs4-devel in my system.
After executing rpmbuild -ba for python-keyring.spec, it successfully built the
rpm and srpm. But it is failing to do a scratch build in koji.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
--- Comment #30 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2010-10-02 23:16:56
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
I updated the buildrequires to kdelibs4-devel. I also added
LDFLAGS=-L %{_libdir}/kde/devel
in the %build section. I installed kdelibs4-devel in my system.
After executing rpmbuild -ba for python-keyring.spec, it successfully built
the
rpm and srpm. But it is failing to do a scratch build in koji.
Koji scratch build successful.
Koji scratch build url :
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2508667
I replaced %{_libdir}/kde/devel with %{_libdir}/kde4/devel and build is
working.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639661] New: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for
cross-compilation for ARM target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU
Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: e...@brouhaha.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/review/arm/binutils/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/review/arm/binutils/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs-2010q1_188-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
This is a cross-compilation version of GNU Binutils, which can be used to
assemble and link binaries for the %{target} platform.
This Binutils package is based on the CodeSourcery
%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel} release, which includes improved ARM target
support compared to the corresponding FSF release. CodeSourcery
contributes their changes to the FSF, but it takes a while for them to
get merged. For the ARM target, effectively CodeSourcery is upstream
of FSF.
Note that this is part of a cross-development chain targeting bare-metal
development or for use with an embedded RTOS, as opposed to cross-developing
for Linux.
This review request obsoletes an earlier review request for
arm-none-eabi-binutils, bug #565313.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639661] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-10-02 23:58:23 EDT --- *** Bug 565313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565313] Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-none-eabi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565313 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-10-02 23:58:23 --- Comment #7 from Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com 2010-10-02 23:58:23 EDT --- Closing this bug request, as I am switching to using the CodeSourcery release of Binutils, which has better ARM support than the FSF release. CodeSourcery contributes their improvements to the FSF, but they take a long time to make it into official FSF releases. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 639661 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537640] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 --- Comment #13 from Luke Hutchison luke.hu...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 01:23:03 EDT --- + If I try to launch pdfmod with a PDF filename on the commandline, I get the following (F14 has bumped up the .so version to 5): Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.DllNotFoundException: libpoppler-glib.so.4 at (wrapper managed-to-native) Poppler.Document:poppler_document_new_from_file (intptr,intptr,intptr) at Poppler.Document.NewFromFile (System.String uri, System.String password) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at PdfMod.Pdf.Document.get_PopplerDoc () [0x0] in filename unknown:0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 537640] Review Request: pdfmod - A simple application for modifying PDF documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537640 Luke Hutchison luke.hu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luke.hu...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Luke Hutchison luke.hu...@gmail.com 2010-10-03 01:22:40 EDT --- Claudio -- I just tried installing your packages from http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/repo/ on F14, and I get the following error on opening the file chooser: Marshaling activate signal Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. --- System.ArgumentNullException: Argument cannot be null. Parameter name: path2 at System.IO.Path.Combine (System.String path1, System.String path2) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at Hyena.XdgBaseDirectorySpec.GetXdgDirectoryUnderHome (System.String key, System.String fallback) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at PdfMod.Gui.Client.CreateChooserm__A (System.String s) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Linq.Enumerable+CreateSelectIteratorc__Iterator10`2[System.String,System.String].MoveNext () [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Linq.Enumerable+CreateWhereIteratorc__Iterator1D`1[System.String].MoveNext () [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String].AddEnumerable (IEnumerable`1 enumerable) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String]..ctor (IEnumerable`1 collection) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToArray[String] (IEnumerable`1 source) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at PdfMod.Gui.Client.CreateChooser (System.String title, FileChooserAction action) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at PdfMod.Gui.Actions.OnOpen (System.Object o, System.EventArgs args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoMethod:InternalInvoke (object,object[],System.Exception) at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke (System.Object obj, System.Object[] parameters) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Delegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.MulticastDelegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at System.Delegate.DynamicInvoke (System.Object[] args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at GLib.Signal.ClosureInvokedCB (System.Object o, GLib.ClosureInvokedArgs args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at GLib.SignalClosure.Invoke (GLib.ClosureInvokedArgs args) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at GLib.SignalClosure.MarshalCallback (IntPtr raw_closure, IntPtr return_val, UInt32 n_param_vals, IntPtr param_values, IntPtr invocation_hint, IntPtr marshal_data) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at GLib.ExceptionManager.RaiseUnhandledException(System.Exception e, Boolean is_terminal) at GLib.SignalClosure.MarshalCallback(IntPtr raw_closure, IntPtr return_val, UInt32 n_param_vals, IntPtr param_values, IntPtr invocation_hint, IntPtr marshal_data) at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.Run() at PdfMod.Gui.Client..ctor(Boolean loadFiles) at PdfMod.PdfMod.Main(System.String[] args) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
