[Bug 632970] Review Request: rec-applet - An audio recording applet for the GNOME-desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632970 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity 2010-11-17 02:44:54 EST --- Looks OK now :) This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614299] Review Request: python-ordereddict - Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict that works in Python 2.4-2.6.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614299 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2010-11-17 01:55:15 EST --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457343] Review Request: jquery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use javascript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457343 Steven Garcia changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webwha...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Steven Garcia 2010-11-17 01:46:43 EST --- It seems as though no efforts have been made on this for over two years and two months. This review appears to be abandoned or forgotten. I would very much like to maintain the jquery package. I have rewritten the jquery spec using an existing working model MochiKit. Please, allow me to resubmit the jquery package for review. Can someone give me a hint as to if this is possible and how I can regain review submission for this package? Spec URL: http://aikiframework.org/files/jquery/jquery.spec SRPM URL: http://aikiframework.org/files/jquery/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: jQuery is a new type of JavaScript library. jQuery is a fast, concise, JavaScript Library that simplifies how you traverse HTML documents, handle events, perform animations, and add Ajax interactions to your web pages. jQuery is designed to change the way that you write JavaScript. If possible, this would be my third package review submission to Fedora and I need a sponsor. I set the jquery package to require the sizzle package which can be seen here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654151. Ran successful rpmlint on spec, srpm and rpm $ rpmlint SPECS/jquery.spec \ SRPMS/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Ran successful mock rebuild $ mock --rebuild SRPMS/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.1.6 starting... State Changed: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled State Changed: start INFO: Start(SRPMS/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm) Config(fedora-13-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean INFO: chroot (/var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386) unlocked and deleted State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 1.1.6 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.6 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(SRPMS/jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm) Config(default) 0 minutes 26 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386/result Ran successful koji scratch builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=fosdevel&state=all $ koji build --scratch dist-f13 jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605788 $ koji build --scratch dist-f13-kde jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605777 $ koji build --scratch dist-f13-updates-candidate jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605785 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14 jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605775 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-gobject jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605780 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-kde jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605774 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-updates-candidate jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605783 $ koji build --scratch dist-f15 jquery-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605782 A JavaScript library similar in packaging was approved and has existed in Fedora for quite a while. The name of the package is MochiKit which can be seen here http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=MochiKit.git;a=tree. Here is a link to the approved review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176528. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632970] Review Request: rec-applet - An audio recording applet for the GNOME-desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632970 --- Comment #12 from Cédric OLIVIER 2010-11-17 01:42:43 EST --- Thanks. So you can find here an updated package with the last release and modifications according your last comment. Spec file : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-3/rec-applet.spec SRPM file: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/rec-applet-0.2.3-3/rec-applet-0.2.3-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-PyWavelets - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2010-11-17 01:27:27 EST --- several issues: 1. Name: python-PyWavelets -> Name: python-pywt See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 2. BuildRequires: python-setuptools is useless for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652544] Review Request: erlang-rpm-macros - Macros for simplifying building of Erlang packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652544 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-11-17 01:21:02 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-17 01:21:02 EST --- Ok, the package is available in Rawhide so I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639263] Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 Bug 639263 depends on bug 639278, which changed state. Bug 639278 Summary: Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-11-17 01:19:27 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-11-17 01:19:27 EST --- Ok, the package is available in Rawhide so I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 Andreas Loening changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(loen...@alum.mit. | |edu)| --- Comment #12 from Andreas Loening 2010-11-17 01:06:18 EST --- Hi Peter, I've had precious little time to devote to side projects, so if Mario would be interested in being the lead on the packaging that'd be quite okay with me. Mario, did you ever get the soname issue worked out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554103] Review Request: fgrun - Graphical frontend for launching FlightGear flight simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103 --- Comment #13 from pankaj pandey 2010-11-17 00:53:10 EST --- I'm unable to package for fedora as the some tools (koji) don't work behind proxy (c#6). I thought Fabrice may take it up, but since it was quite long back i'm not sure if he's still around. If thats the case then i think the review request may need to be dropped. I'll be glad if there's anything i can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||r.landm...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r.landm...@redhat.com
Flag||needinfo?(alek...@oscada.or
||g.ua)
--- Comment #38 from Ruediger Landmann 2010-11-16
23:39:01 EST ---
Hi Aleksey: just a few more things to look at here:
- = N/A
/ = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output is clean:
===
$ rpmlint SPECS/lightsquid.spec
SPECS/lightsquid.spec: W: no-%build-section
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
* OK
$ rpmlint SRPMS/lightsquid-1.8-7.fc14.src.rpm
lightsquid.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) analizer -> analyzer,
canalize, nationalizer
* Please correct to "analyzer"; "Small" would also be better than "Little"
here:
%description
%{name} Small and fast Squid log analyzer.
* Also, I suggest:
Summary: Light, small, and fast log analyzer for Squid proxy
* Also, for the subpackage, I suggest:
%package apache
Summary: Web controls for %{name}
Group: Applications/Internet
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: httpd
%description apache
Configuration files and scripts for Apache.
lightsquid.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US analizer -> analyzer,
canalize, nationalizer
lightsquid.src: W: strange-permission lightsquid.spec 0600L
* Should be 644
lightsquid.src: W: no-%build-section
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/lightsquid-1.8-7.fc14.noarch.rpm
lightsquid.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) analizer -> analyzer,
canalize, nationalizer
lightsquid.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US analizer ->
analyzer, canalize, nationalizer
lightsquid.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/cron.daily/lightsquid
* Remove:
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/lightsquid
this is not a config file (yes, rpmlint will then complain
"non-conffile-in-etc", but this is expected)
lightsquid.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cron.daily/lightsquid
* Please fix
lightsquid.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lightparser.pl
* Unfortunate, but not a blocker
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/lightsquid-apache-1.8-7.fc14.noarch.rpm
lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
===
[/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific
items
[/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type in spec file: GPLv2
* Files in package state "GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any
later version", therefore GPLv2+
[/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
* GPL is in gnugpl.txt
[/] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
* md5sums do not match:
$ md5sum SOURCES/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
9b7de3d45da769ae058ac06318c56c54 SOURCES/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
$ md5sum ~/Download/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
310a7e16017290232183753d73f3559d /home/rlandmann/Download/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
* Please express Source0 as:
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605683
[/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly (with the %find_lang macro)
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[/] Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
[/] P
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-PyWavelets - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c ||om) Bug 522821 depends on bug 633194, which changed state. Bug 633194 Summary: Review Request: ghc-glade - Haskell binding to libglade2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633194 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651613] Review Request: haddock - Haskell documentation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 22:41:40 EST --- wordgroupz-0.3.1-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordgroupz-0.3.1-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 22:41:47 EST --- wordgroupz-0.3.1-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordgroupz-0.3.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 22:36:54 EST --- python-keyring-0.4-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-keyring-0.4-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 22:36:47 EST --- python-keyring-0.4-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-keyring-0.4-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 569671] Review Request: elliptics - Distributed hash table storage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570394] Review Request: perl-SQL-Beautify - An SQL Beautifier Written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570394 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 22:29:32 EST --- Was the license ever clarified? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 Ratnadeep Debnath changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rtn...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #46 from Ratnadeep Debnath 2010-11-16 22:22:15 EST --- Sorry for the absence. :( I got busy here with submission of my research paper for review, plus college seminars. I am submitting a scratch build for my packages for f15. Do I need to make a SCM request for f15? I cannot switch to f15 in my fedora-git folder. $fedpkg switch-branch f15 Unable to switch to another branch: Unknown remote branch f15 Apart from that, for pushing the package to bodhi, please check if the fields chosen are correct : Type : newpackage Request : Testing Bugs : #593800 and others default values -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611328] Review Request: hydra - Fast login cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611328 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(haeb...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 22:13:37 EST --- There's been plenty of commentary on this ticket but no response at all from the submitter. Marcus, please respond or we'll have to close this ticket out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654151] Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654151 --- Comment #2 from Steven Garcia 2010-11-16 21:56:35 EST --- Here are some reference notes for anyone interested in reviewing this package (sizzle). A JavaScript library similar in packaging was approved and has existed in Fedora for quite a while. The name of the package is MochiKit which can be seen here http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=MochiKit.git;a=tree. Here is a link to the approved review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176528. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532241] Review Request: emacs-identica-mode - Identica mode for emacs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532241 --- Comment #5 from Arun SAG 2010-11-16 21:03:10 EST --- Updated to the latest version: (the info file needs fix) SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-identica-mode-1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-identica-mode.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651613] Review Request: haddock - Haskell documentation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2010-11-16 21:03:00 EST --- Created attachment 460968 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=460968 haddock.spec-1.patch Patch to clean up a bit: - fix base package group - use upstream main webpage - don't need filelist file for base package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654151] Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654151 --- Comment #1 from Steven Garcia 2010-11-16 20:58:06 EST --- Here is the link to Source1: Conf URL: http://aikiframework.org/files/sizzle/sizzle.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654151] New: Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654151 Summary: Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: webwha...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://aikiframework.org/files/sizzle/sizzle.spec SRPM URL: http://aikiframework.org/files/sizzle/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A pure-JavaScript CSS selector engine designed to be easily dropped in to a host library. This is my second package review submission to Fedora and I need a sponsor. Ran successful rpmlint on spec, srpm and rpm $ rpmlint SPECS/sizzle.spec \ SRPMS/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Ran successful mock rebuild $ mock --rebuild SRPMS/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.1.6 starting... State Changed: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled State Changed: start INFO: Start(SRPMS/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm) Config(fedora-13-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean INFO: chroot (/var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386) unlocked and deleted State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 1.1.6 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.6 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(SRPMS/sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm) Config(default) 0 minutes 24 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386/result Ran successful koji scratch builds https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=fosdevel&state=all $ koji build --scratch dist-f13 sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605578 $ koji build --scratch dist-f13-kde sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605576 $ koji build --scratch dist-f13-updates-candidate sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605572 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14 sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605573 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-gobject sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605565 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-kde sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605570 $ koji build --scratch dist-f14-updates-candidate sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605567 $ koji build --scratch dist-f15 sizzle-1.4.4-1.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654151] Review Request: sizzle - JavaScript CSS selector engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654151 Steven Garcia changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2010-11-16 20:20:18 EST --- Will try to look at this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634037] Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2010-11-16 20:16:01 EST --- ping-a-ling? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532241] Review Request: emacs-identica-mode - Identica mode for emacs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532241 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||michel+...@michelsylvain.in ||fo AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|michel+...@michelsylvain.in ||fo Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Arun SAG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||saga...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|saga...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-11-16 19:37:56 EST --- I'm taking a slightly unusual approach to specifying BuildRequires:, specifying pkgconfig modules instead of the usual -devel package names. This aligns better with configure.ac (so one can easily verify that the two are in sync), and build problems due to API changes would abort the build earlier (during root FS setup rather than during the rebuild phase). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-11-16 19:31:29 EST --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2605434 rpmlint: SRPM: ease.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib ==> this is due to the rpath fix, adding /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the system libdirs so that libtool does not add RPATHs for /usr/lib64 in the linked binaries ease.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean ease.src: W: no-buildroot-tag ease.src: W: no-%clean-section ==> only targeting recent Fedora releases 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. ease-*.x86_64.rpm: ease.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ease ease-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. note: rpmlint-ing the installed RPM results in a lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings; this might shed some light into the issue: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00034.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654007] Review Request: python-simplemediawiki - Extremely low-level wrapper to the MediaWiki API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654007 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654139] New: Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654139 Summary: Review Request: ease - GNOME desktop presentation application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel+...@michelsylvain.info QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/ease.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/ease-0.4-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Ease is a modern desktop presentation application for GNOME, with Clutter-based visuals. With a simple design, Ease is painless to use. It is intended to integrate well into your current GNOME-based desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648679] Review Request: jabber-roster - A Python tool for listing your Jabber roster contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648679 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2010-11-16 19:18:27 EST --- rpmlint: $ rpmlint ./jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm ./noarch/jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm jabber-roster.src: W: no-buildroot-tag jabber-roster.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jabber-roster 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - no libs - noarch ok - no *.la - BR/R ok - License ok - macros everywhere - %files ok SHOULD: - please query upstream to include a proper license file instead of links to the web. _ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226405] Merge Review: selinux-doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226405 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 --- Comment #4 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16 19:01:13 EST --- Created attachment 460960 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=460960 Review for new package rhn-custom-info-5.4.2-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553649] Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gho...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16 18:59:56 EST --- I meant to come back to this one, but it somehow managed to slip through a crack somewhere. Sorry. I see only a couple minor issues at the moment, so just fix those up and you should be good to go. I will attach the full review shortly. - Changelog in prescribed format Please add a hyphen to the beginning of line 74. Sorry for nitpicking. ;-) - Requires correct, justified where necessary If you are building this against EL4 you should Require python with a versioned dependency, and then only after testing that you're building on < EL5. If you aren't building against EL4 then you should instead drop that Requires directive altogether since rpmbuild will pick that up on its own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560852] Review Request: devmon-templates - Templates for Devmon SNMP Device Monitoring for Hobbit/BigBrother
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560852 Bug 560852 depends on bug 560853, which changed state. Bug 560853 Summary: Review Request: devmon - SNMP Device Monitoring for Hobbit/BigBrother https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560853 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||DEFERRED Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560853] Review Request: devmon - SNMP Device Monitoring for Hobbit/BigBrother
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560853 Colin Coe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Last Closed||2010-11-16 18:50:38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560852] Review Request: devmon-templates - Templates for Devmon SNMP Device Monitoring for Hobbit/BigBrother
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560852 Colin Coe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Last Closed||2010-11-16 18:49:52 --- Comment #2 from Colin Coe 2010-11-16 18:49:52 EST --- I need to cancel this and associated requests as I won't have the time to maintain any more packages. Thank you for looking though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561073] Review Request: gist - Absolutely the best command line gister
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561073 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 18:43:30 EST --- Unfortunately pings on tickets don't really work because very few people will see them (and it makes it look as if there's been recent activity, which has the opposite effect from what you want). The upstream source seems to be properly versioned now; it looks like they've recently gone to 2.0.0. Care to update? Unfortunately a properly versioned package is actually older (rpm-wise) than the version you've submitted, but that shouldn't cause any real problems. (This is why we usually recommend using a version of 0 and release of 0.20100201 instead unless you're sure that upstream will never switch to using regular version numbers.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528461] Review Request: ocaml-fieldslib - OCaml library for folding over record fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528461 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 18:40:15 EST --- No problem; just making sure it didn't fall through the cracks (again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2010-11-16 18:42:08 EST --- git's master branch has the latest sip (which should be available upstream), and I *think* defattr fixed too, fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2010-11-16 18:42:48 EST --- nvm, defattr fail there too. :( fixing that now, easyfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #19 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-11-16 18:37:07 EST --- Ruben, Do you mind if I request an EL-6 branch for this perl module and for perl-Nagios-Plugin? I don't mind co-maintaining them. Regards, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16 18:31:27 EST --- Below are the issues I found. I will attach a full review shortly. - License field in spec is correct sipgen/parser.c is GPLv3+ with exceptions sipgen/parser.h is GPLv3+ with exceptions A quick IRC discussion indicated that this likely needs to appear in the License field somewhere. I'm hoping spot gets back to me for confirmation about it to be sure, though perhaps it would be better to just ask legal to be extra certain. - License files installed when any subpackage combination is installed sip-macros package does not pull in license files It looks like you create macros.sip yourself based on the program's API version. What license does it have? Can you include that license along with the sip-macros package? - Sources match upstream unless altered to fix permissibility issues Upstream MD5: No longer on upstream's server Your MD5: 0a591ef6e59aa16e56822d3eb9fe21b8 sip-4.10.5.tar.gz Unfortunately, upstream seems to clean out old tarballs quite frequently. I wouldn't block the review because of that, though. - Each %files section contains %defattr The python3 packages lack %defattr macros Please add %defattr macros to the python3 packages' %files sections. I hope that helps! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 --- Comment #2 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16 18:31:59 EST --- Created attachment 460953 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=460953 Review for F14 package sip-4.10.5-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc1 |django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc1 |4 |3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:19:51 EST --- django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:20:49 EST --- django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560852] Review Request: devmon-templates - Templates for Devmon SNMP Device Monitoring for Hobbit/BigBrother
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560852 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 18:21:49 EST --- Is this package still needed? It looks like it's been merged into the devmon package you submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649777] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:15:28 EST --- jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jorbis'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650180] Review Request: tkabber - Client for the Jabber instant messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650180 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tkabber-0.11.1-2.svn1948.fc |tkabber-0.11.1-2.svn1948.fc |14 |13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650180] Review Request: tkabber - Client for the Jabber instant messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650180 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:15:46 EST --- tkabber-0.11.1-2.svn1948.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc1 |django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc1 |2 |4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gho...@fedoraproject.org, ||rdie...@math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gho...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612076] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:13:52 EST --- ghc-feldspar-language-0.3.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-feldspar-language'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-feldspar-language-0.3.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc1 ||2 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-16 18:17:23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579662] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Search Interface with Electronic Dictionaries for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:15:57 EST --- emacs-lookup-1.4.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-lookup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645354] Review Request: django-tracking - Django site visitor tracking, including basic blacklisting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645354 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:17:18 EST --- django-tracking-0.2.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652533] Review Request: pgRouting - Provides routing functionality to PostGIS/PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652533 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:14:12 EST --- pgRouting-1.03-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pgRouting'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pgRouting-1.03-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635450] Review Request: docky - MacOS-like docker app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635450 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:13:57 EST --- docky-2.0.7-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update docky'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docky-2.0.7-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650180] Review Request: tkabber - Client for the Jabber instant messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650180 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||tkabber-0.11.1-2.svn1948.fc ||14 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652835] Review Request: ktikz - Editor for the TikZ language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:12:09 EST --- ktikz-0.10-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ktikz'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ktikz-0.10-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650180] Review Request: tkabber - Client for the Jabber instant messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650180 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 18:12:28 EST --- tkabber-0.11.1-2.svn1948.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528461] Review Request: ocaml-fieldslib - OCaml library for folding over record fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528461 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-11-16 18:05:27 EST --- Yeah sorry I meant to, but then obviously I didn't. Give me a little longer. This package is important for a Fedora 15 proposed feature ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560071] Review Request: php-pecl-augeas - PHP bindings to the Augeas API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560071 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 18:06:41 EST --- Pedro, have you done any work to obtain a sponsor? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group has some pointers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554103] Review Request: fgrun - Graphical frontend for launching FlightGear flight simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554103 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 18:03:57 EST --- Is anyone (besides Hans and I) listening? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620385] Review Request: BEDTools - A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620385 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-11-16 17:58:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-11-16 17:06:40 EST --- Lets keep the warnings, then: Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/gtkwhiteboard.spec SRPM URL: http://roma.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652257] Review Request: focuswriter - A fullscreen, distraction-free writing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652257
Golo Fuchert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||packa...@golotop.de
--- Comment #1 from Golo Fuchert 2010-11-16 16:54:05 EST
---
Some initial comments on the package:
- No need to BuildRequire gcc-c++
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- %setup -q is sufficient, -n %{name}-%{version} is the standard argument
- PREFIX=%{_prefix} would be better than PREFIX=/usr since the standard
might be changed one day.
- COPYING, ChangeLog and README should be included as %doc, COPYING is a must.
- Don't forget to update the icon cache when installing new icons:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed|2009-12-28 06:45:44 |2010-11-16 16:41:39 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 16:39:18 EST --- For some reason python programmers like to put the '#!' line on files that are not supposed to be executed directly. I've no idea at all why they do this, but it causes the rpmlint complaints you tried to fix. You can either accept the complaint (they're not sufficiently problematic to block acceptance of the package) or you can fix them by removing the first line of the python source files (with sed -i -e '1d'. Making the files executable when they aren't executables isn't the right solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226405] Merge Review: selinux-doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226405 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gho...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226405] Merge Review: selinux-doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226405
Garrett Holmstrom changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||gho...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16
16:31:02 EST ---
Most of this package's problems simply arise from its age. Upstream seems to
be dead; is this package still relevant? If it is no longer relevant maybe it
would be better to just retire it. I will attach a full review shortly, but I
will also present the things that need to be fixed here.
- License files included in package %docs or not included in upstream source
- License files installed when any subpackage combination is installed
Just fix these with "%doc LICENSE".
- Sources match upstream unless altered to fix permissibility issues
Upstream MD5: ???
Your MD5: 5836fbb58dbd20586415d7f4baa0b55b selinux-doc-1.26.tgz
Is upstream dead? rpmlint and I get 404s from the URI in the spec file, and I
failed to find a new upstream.
- Relocatability is justified
Does "Prefix: %{_prefix}" need to be there for some reason? I would drop it,
but if it is important to the package then the spec file should say why.
- Has dist tag
This is not a blocker, but adding a dist tag wouldn't be a bad idea to get this
package in line with most of the others.
- Correct BuildRoot tag on < F10/EL6
- Correct %clean section on < F13/EL6
Since this package is only building on F12 and up you can dump both the
BuildRoot tag and the %clean section if you want. This also isn't required,
though the buildroot given in the spec file is somewhat unusual.
- Text files encoded in ASCII or UTF-8
README.HIERARCHY contains non-ISO extended-ASCII characters
Perhaps the file's encoding could be converted?
- File timestamps preserved by file ops
This isn't mandatory, but would you mind adding -p switches to cp commands?
One other thing that seemed off to me is the Group field. Shouldn't it be
"Documentation"?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226405] Merge Review: selinux-doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226405 --- Comment #2 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-11-16 16:31:57 EST --- Created attachment 460934 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=460934 Review for F14 package selinux-doc-1.26-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606
--- Comment #4 from Golo Fuchert 2010-11-16 16:23:47 EST
---
After having a closer look at the package I would like to point out the
following things:
- The files TODO and README are included in the package. However, they are
empty (already in the source tarball). I see no point in including these
files then. Maybe you can ask upstream if this is a mistake.
- If you update the version of the software you should reset the release number
to 1
- As far as I can tell it is not necessary to require xneur, this dependency is
found automagically during the build process.
- The icon tag in the .desktop file should not have an explicit file extension
(.png here)
Furthermore, Martin (from comment #3) hinted me at the following points:
- the autotools (autoconf, automake, autoheader, libtool, ...) are only needed
when existing configure.ac or Makefile.am files are changed. This is not the
case here and so they don't have to be included.
- It would be better to be more precise in the %file section. Excessive
globbing might lead to unwanted files being packaged. So it would be better to
make the following changes:
%{_bindir}/* =>%{_bindir}/gxneur
%{_mandir}/man?/*=>%{_mandir}/man1/gxneur.1*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 16:09:29 EST --- Cool, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634909] Review Request: v8 - JavaScript Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-16 15:49:28 EST --- I'm not committing to reviewing this but I noticed a couple things: 1) I see that we're installing jsmin.py... If this is a derivative of the jsmin stuff that Douglas Crockford did then we can't do that. jsmin is not under an fsf free license (the silly "must be used for good, not evil clause does that to us). 2) usually we don't make shared libraries if upstream is not making shared libraries due to being afraid that we'll choose a version that upstream will later stomp on. The same idea (upstream reusing the version number we use for a later, API incompatible, release of their own) would seem to apply here. However, I do see that Debian is providing versioned dynamic libs (Their patches are different, though... perhaps we should adopt their approach? http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libv8-2.4.7) The best outcome would be for upstream to start providing versioned dynamic libraries. Have you contacted them about this? The debian patches are to the build files so they could be an appropriate starting point for that discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-11-16 15:38:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This looks pretty good. rpmlint says: > > gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib > Which is bogus. > > gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang >/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/linuxWiimoteLib.py > Why is this file executable? Actually, why are any of the .py files > executable? They're not intended to be run directly. This should be fixed. Just to make rpmlint happy. Otherwise, we get: [cascavel:/home/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result] rpmlint gtkwhiteboard-1.3-4.fc14.noarch.rpm gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/gtkwhiteboard.py 0644 /usr/bin/python gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/mousecontrol.py 0644 /usr/bin/python gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/perspective.py 0644 /usr/bin/env gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/whiteboard.py 0644 /usr/bin/python gtkwhiteboard.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtkwhiteboard 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. What should I do? Keep the files 755 or use 644 and get those warnings? > > gtkwhiteboard.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtkwhiteboard > It would be nice to have a manual page but it's not mandatory. > > Where did whii.png come from? I am concerned that a picture of a Wii > controller with the Wii logo visible as an icon may pose a legal issue. > Perhaps I'm just being paranoid, but I know Nintendo is fond of lawsuits so it > would be good to have the legal folks give their OK. I suspect that if this > is > an issue, fixing it should be easy since the icon does not come from upstream > at all. If it came from someplace on the net, that may also pose a copyright > issue. I think I just cut and paste from here: http://computer.yourdictionary.com/images/computer/_WII.GIF The picture is really nice for an icon ... > > The desktop file has a problem: > > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-3.fc14.x86_64/usr/share/applications/gtkwhiteboard.desktop: > error: (will be fatal in the future): value "GNOME" in key "Categories" in > group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the > following categories: GTK This is easy to fix. > > * source files match upstream. sha256sum: > 9610f498bb1711aff2898fdaa9533319fbb2fb74c7b2588c8387b969ed510e2c >gtkwhiteboard-1.3.zip > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * license field matches the actual license (for the code, at least). > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package (in README file). > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * package builds in mock (14, x86_64). > * package installs properly. > X rpmlint has valid complaints. > * final provides and requires are sane: >gtkwhiteboard = 1.3-3.fc14 > = >/bin/sh >/usr/bin/env >/usr/bin/python >pybluez >python(abi) = 2.7 >python-xlib >wxPython > > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > X file permissions are odd. > * no generically named files > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > X desktop file has an error. I am looking forward to hearing from you, so I can produce the final .src.rpm version. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #8 from Simo Sorce 2010-11-16 15:34:59 EST --- I've got distracted and haven't updated it. Will see if I can find out some time in the week end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 15:05:34 EST --- Did anything ever happen with this package? I see plenty of commentary but no updated srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553210] Review Request: nanny - Parental Control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553210 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 15:07:29 EST --- Did anything ever happen with this ticket? Could potential reviewers get an updated package to look at? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553893] Review Request: rubygem-tiny_mce - TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553893 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-11-16 15:01:14 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 15:01:14 EST --- The ticket this depends on was closed due to lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567241] Review Request: taxbird 0.15 -- Need Sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567241 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(dirk-gottsch...@i | |t-internet-service.de) | Last Closed||2010-11-16 14:59:31 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 14:59:31 EST --- The ticket this depends on was closed due to lack of response; this should be closed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 528461] Review Request: ocaml-fieldslib - OCaml library for folding over record fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528461 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 14:43:02 EST --- Did you want to move forward with this? I know it sat in the queue for a while, and if you no longer wish to continue with the package then feel free to just close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 14:39:41 EST --- Thanks. This looks pretty good. rpmlint says: gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib Which is bogus. gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/linuxWiimoteLib.py Why is this file executable? Actually, why are any of the .py files executable? They're not intended to be run directly. This should be fixed. gtkwhiteboard.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtkwhiteboard It would be nice to have a manual page but it's not mandatory. Where did whii.png come from? I am concerned that a picture of a Wii controller with the Wii logo visible as an icon may pose a legal issue. Perhaps I'm just being paranoid, but I know Nintendo is fond of lawsuits so it would be good to have the legal folks give their OK. I suspect that if this is an issue, fixing it should be easy since the icon does not come from upstream at all. If it came from someplace on the net, that may also pose a copyright issue. The desktop file has a problem: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-3.fc14.x86_64/usr/share/applications/gtkwhiteboard.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "GNOME" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" requires another category to be present among the following categories: GTK * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 9610f498bb1711aff2898fdaa9533319fbb2fb74c7b2588c8387b969ed510e2c gtkwhiteboard-1.3.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license (for the code, at least). * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package (in README file). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (14, x86_64). * package installs properly. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: gtkwhiteboard = 1.3-3.fc14 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python pybluez python(abi) = 2.7 python-xlib wxPython * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are odd. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X desktop file has an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 14:05:38 EST --- gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-16 14:03:14 EST --- I may have led you astray; Fedora doesn't need it and EL6 doesn't need it, but el5, being ancient, still needs BuildRoot, %clean and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-16 14:04:44 EST --- gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek 2010-11-16 13:57:26 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mingw32-webkitgtk Short Description: MinGW Windows web content engine library Owners: epienbro Branches: f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
