[Bug 654374] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654374 --- Comment #13 from viji vijivijayaku...@gmail.com 2010-11-27 03:26:58 EST --- @Ralf Thank you so much for your suggestions, I will defiantly have a look at it. I am updating the same to the latest svn export as this release has many issues with qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633240] Review Request: mod_auth_token - token based URI access for apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633240 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net 2010-11-27 03:24:42 EST --- I'm not familiar with the sponsoring system, but yes, I don't have access to any fedora infrastructure, and would probably need some sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654374] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654374 --- Comment #12 from viji vijivijayaku...@gmail.com 2010-11-27 03:23:45 EST --- @Michel Please ignore the previous spec file and SRPM, I mean the upstream release (0.2.0). We need to use the latest SVN export itself as the 0.2.0 release has many issue with qt, it breaks. I will be updating a new spec file and srpm with the svn export, the svn related issues which you have mentioned will be taken care of. Thank you so much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657520] Review Request: perl-Array-Utils - Small utils for array manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657520 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|emmanuel.sey...@club-intern ||et.fr Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2010-11-27 04:30:48 EST --- Taking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657520] Review Request: perl-Array-Utils - Small utils for array manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657520 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2010-11-27 04:35:02 EST --- The rpm is for Array-Utils 0.3 but 0.4 and 0.5 both came out in May 2010. Lubomir, can you update your package before we go any further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657366] Review Request: spacewalk-branding - Spacewalk branding data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657366 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2010-11-27 07:13:48 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: spacewalk-branding Short Description: Spacewalk branding data Owners: msuchy Branches: F-14, EL-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657040] Review Request: tudu - A simple, command line interface to do list application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657040 --- Comment #16 from Ken Nelson nelsoni...@gmail.com 2010-11-27 09:30:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) SPEC: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/tudu/tudu.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/tudu/tudu-0.7-2.fc14.src.rpm Just tried it out. Works great! -k- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 09:35:35 EST --- gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 09:35:41 EST --- gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 647510] Review Request: premake - A cross-platform build configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647510
--- Comment #8 from Joachim de Groot jdegr...@web.de 2010-11-27 10:51:50 EST
---
Thank you for the review! I have updated the spec file:
Spec URL: http://fedora.jaydg.nl/premake.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedora.jaydg.nl/premake-4.3-1.fc14.src.rpm
Changes:
- packed latest version
- changes license to BSD
- added readline-devel to BuildRequires
- added a man page
- do not clean %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}
- added version-release pair to changelog
rpmlint is silent now:
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
The provided test suite could be run during the build, but unfortunately one
test fails on x86_64, so I chose not to add it. I'll report the bug upstream
and run the tests when it has been fixed:
os.findlib_FindSystemLib:
/home/joachim/tmp/premake-4.3/tests/base/test_os.lua:18: expected true but was
false
600 tests passed, 1 failed
I'm not sure about the symlink, as upstream calls the current version premake4
throughout the documentation and chosen this name as the scripts for version 4
are incompatible to scripts for the previous versions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651880] Review Request: rubygem-couchrest - Lean and RESTful interface for CouchDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651880 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 11:22:47 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 11:23:40 EST --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 11:36:44 EST --- djmount-0.71-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/djmount-0.71-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 614329] Review Request: emacs-common-w3m - W3m interface for Emacsen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614329 Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@michelsylvain.info changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||657745, 657746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643014] Review Request: fetch-crl3 - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643014 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 13:58:01 EST --- fetch-crl3-3.0.4-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643014] Review Request: fetch-crl3 - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643014 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 13:57:26 EST --- fetch-crl3-3.0.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643014] Review Request: fetch-crl3 - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643014 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fetch-crl3-3.0.4-1.el5 |fetch-crl3-3.0.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 643014] Review Request: fetch-crl3 - Downloads Certificate Revocation Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643014 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||fetch-crl3-3.0.4-1.el5 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-27 13:57:31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800
--- Comment #52 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27
14:10:54 EST ---
(In reply to comment #51)
@Mamoru Tasaka
built rpm for keyring-0.5
Koji scratch build Url:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2615701
Please check it. Now, I think we can release python-keyring as a noarch since
it no longer depends on the c++ libraries. Also, I am uncertain about the
Requires packages. Do I need to include
Requires : PyKDE4 PyQt4
for kde
Gnome doesn't seem to have any specific dependency.
Well,
- at least new python-keyring binary rpm must have
Obsoletes: %{name}-gnome 0.5, Obsoletes: %{name}-kwallet 0.5
and Obsoletes: %{name}-debuginfo 0.5 (because of arch-dependent -
noarch switch).
- Currently I don't think we should add Requires: PyKDE4 PyQt4 for
functionality on KDE, and we don't have to add Provides: %{name}-gnome =
foo
or so (repoquery shows that currently no packages on Fedora depend
on python-keyring-{gnome,kwallet} on F-15/14/13)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 15:25:13 EST --- djmount-0.71-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/djmount-0.71-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: python-pbs - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964
--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-11-27 15:25:09
EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
MUSTFIX:
- Include the LICENSE.openpbs file in %doc for both subpackages
Some additional nitpicking:
- Also consider including the AUTHORS and CHANGES files in %doc
- python-pbs and %{altpython}-pbs subpackages have different Group tags;
might
make sense to put them both into same group. Also, if you use same group,
then you only have to specify Group tag for main package and the subpackage
inherits it automatically.
- %descriptions for both subpackages still refer to 'pbs_python' package name
All these comments are valid and should have been trivial for me to have seen..
Thanks.
%changelog
* Sat Nov 27 2010 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 4.3.0-4
- Finish renaming package to python-pbs. rhbz#657027
- Add LICENSE.openpbs and CHANGES files to doc. rhbz#657027
- Consistantly group altpython package in same group.
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/python-pbs.spec
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/pbs_python/python-pbs-4.3.0-4.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing - RELAX NG validator in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-11-27 15:37:04 EST --- On a quick look the only thing using the upstream source checkout would buy us would be that the test suite is included in it. I'll have a look at using it, and if I end up doing so, will also quite probably build trang and dtdinst from it since it's one checkout that contains them all (there's a separate review request for trang which would become obsolete). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652412] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin delivering appliance to local filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652412 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 15:40:23 EST --- By the way I would appreciate it if you would have some time for reviewing my review package (bug 639638) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652412] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin delivering appliance to local filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652412 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 15:38:39 EST --- 2 issues ! Sources - The gem file in your srpm does not match what I could download from the URL written in your spec. Looks like after 0.0.4 gem was uploaded to rubygems.org, you modified gem file locally. * Usability - It seems that boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin cannot be loaded directly: $ irb irb(main):001:0 require rubygems = true irb(main):002:0 require boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin NoMethodError: undefined method `plugin' for main:Object from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin-0.0.4/lib/boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin.rb:21 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require' from (irb):2 irb(main):003:0 As this script seems the main script for this gem, I think this should be fixed. Perhaps this script should have requirement for boxgrinder-build/managers/plugin-manager $ irb irb(main):001:0 require rubygems = true irb(main):002:0 require boxgrinder-build/managers/plugin-manager = true irb(main):003:0 require boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin = true irb(main):004:0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: python-pbs - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-11-27 15:50:00 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639638] Review Request: rubygem-rsvg2 - Ruby binding of librsvg-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639638 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-11-27 15:53:49 EST --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rsvg2/rubygem-rsvg2-0.90.5-3.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rsvg2/rubygem-rsvg2.spec * Sun Nov 28 2010 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.90.5-3 - Cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585598] Review Request: python26-PyXML - XML libraries for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585598 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-11-27 16:06:34 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-PyXML Short Description: XML libraries for python Owners: stevetraylen Branches: el5 InitialCC: This is a strictly EPEL5 only build - i.e devel can be closed down immediately. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585598] Review Request: python26-PyXML - XML libraries for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585598 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-11-27 16:06:59 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-PyXML Short Description: XML libraries for python Owners: stevetraylen Branches: el5 InitialCC: This is a strictly EPEL5 only build - i.e devel can be closed down immediately. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652406] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin - BoxGrinder files required to build appliances with Fedora OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652406 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2010-11-27 16:06:15 EST --- Thanks, Marek. This now builds and installs cleanly. One thing: before you do a final build, please change the %description to be a bit longer. BoxGrinder Build Fedora Operating System Plugin isn't very descriptive. --- This package (rubygem-boxgrinder-build-fedora-os-plugin) is APPROVED by bos --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 585598] Review Request: python26-PyXML - XML libraries for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585598 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-11-27 16:04:12 EST --- Thanks, missing build requires added and now builds in mock. http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-PyXML/python26-PyXML.spec http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python26-PyXML/python26-PyXML-0.8.4-22.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941 --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-11-27 16:12:44 EST --- I don't really want to be primary maintainer but I'd be happy to comaintain once this is reviewed and in the distro and I can also work on addressing at least some of the review blockers. So I've got an updated package here: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/pypy-1.4-2.fc13.src.rpm http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/pypy.spec Working its way through the build system here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2629927 If it fails to build in the buildsystem, I'll take another crack at it this weekend. Things fixed: 1) License tag is better. dmalcolm: I found the list of licenses that had been included in the spec file present in the LICENSE file. If that's where you got the original list from then the license tag should now be correct. I was able to remove LGPL and Distributable because those were coming from bundled jar files. I removed the bundled jars (see below) so that should now be fine. 2) The Source0 is now a URL to upstream. 3) pypy-libs Req now versioned 4) The build isn't make driven but I didn't look at parallelizing it. 5) rpmlint c): Yeah, it's because it's named -libs. Another possible name is -stdlib since it is the python stdlib(for pypy). 5e) I was waiting for the koji build to complete to see if this is still an issue with 1.4. 5f) dmalcolm, what did we decide to do with this on the python and python3 packages? Other: * Removed bundled jar files. Pre-built files are not allowed. It looks like these were present in case we were building a pypy that targets the jvm (rather than POSIX-C). Simple removal should be fine until/unless we want to enable that backend. If we do enable that, one of the jar files is packaged for Fedora (jna) but the other (jasmin) is not. * Build pypy with itself after the first build as upstream recommends this now (and it's supposed to be faster than using cpython) * Build the jit'ed version on both x86 and x86_64 (1.4 feature) * It looked like we weren't picking up the CFLAGS so I added a patch to pick up the CFLAGS environment variable * In the same patch, the code that configures for linux was mandating a static libffi. I changed that so that the shared libffi should be picked up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652408] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin - BoxGrinder files required to convert appliances to VMware format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652408 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||b...@serpentine.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2010-11-27 16:14:00 EST --- Builds and installs cleanly, dependencies look okay, spec file is clean. Before you do a final build, please fix the %description to be more useful than BoxGrinder Build VMware Platform Plugin. --- This package (rubygem-boxgrinder-build-vmware-platform-plugin) is APPROVED by bos --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 --- Comment #5 from Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl 2010-11-27 16:13:09 EST --- I clarified the situation with upstream (my apologies for the delay, I have been on a business trip). The license is GPLv2 only. here is what Jan replied: Hi, ffgtk is GPLv2 only, no GPLv3. I'll change the manpage. Jan Is this sufficient? The man page in SVN upstream now has: .\ Copyright (c) 2009, Jan-Michael Brummer jan.brum...@tabos.org .\ .\ This is free documentation; you can redistribute it and/or .\ modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as .\ published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 only. .\ .\ The GNU General Public License's references to object code .\ and executables are to be interpreted as the output of any .\ document formatting or typesetting system, including .\ intermediate and printed output. .\ .\ This manual is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, .\ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of .\ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the .\ GNU General Public License for more details. .\ .\ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public .\ License along with this manual; if not, write to the Free .\ Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, .\ Boston, MA 02111-1301 USA. at the top for the documentation. The License section now has: .SH LICENSE This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 only. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but \fBWITHOUT ANY WARRANTY\fR; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02111-1301 USA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631964] Review Request: python-pbs - PBS/Torque python module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631964 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-11-27 17:01:20 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pbs Short Description: PBS/Torque python module Owners: stevetraylen Branches: el4 el5 el6 f13 f14 InitialCC: Many thanks for the review. It will go into all branches unmodified except el4 where I will have to change the %global for %define but I'll do that only in the el4 branch I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 604031] Review Request: kde-plasma-kprayertime - Displays Islamic prayer Time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604031 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-11-27 17:08:04 EST --- * rpmlint clean * sources: OK $ md5sum kprayertime4.01.src.tar.gz 098682e4b6c6b5b1f5caf68f4d3ca412 kprayertime4.01.src.tar.gz * license ok * builds on F13, F14 and Rawhide * installs/runs ok * files ok I'm not really sure, if upstream calls it kde-plasma-kprayertime or kde-plasma-kprayertime4. I think it is prefered to write BuildRequires: cmake gettext instead of BuildRequires: cmake,gettext. Your package doesn't seem to need gettext, since no translations are included. I think the description should end with a period. The capitalization of Islamic Prayer time is also different for the description and the summary. You may have to add these two lines, since your package introduces a shared library. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656938] Review Request: python-shapely - Geometric objects, predicates, and operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656938 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656938] Review Request: python-shapely - Geometric objects, predicates, and operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656938 --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-11-27 18:03:13 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-shapely Short Description: Geometric objects, predicates, and operations Owners: volter Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648679] Review Request: jabber-roster - A Python tool for listing your Jabber roster contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648679 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 18:33:46 EST --- jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648679] Review Request: jabber-roster - A Python tool for listing your Jabber roster contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648679 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc14 |jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648679] Review Request: jabber-roster - A Python tool for listing your Jabber roster contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648679 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 18:34:45 EST --- jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648679] Review Request: jabber-roster - A Python tool for listing your Jabber roster contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648679 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jabber-roster-0.1.0-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-11-27 18:33:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 18:37:11 EST --- gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gedit-valencia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gedit-valencia-0.3.0-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583105] Review Request: djmount - Mount MediaServers content as a Linux file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583105 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-27 18:37:23 EST --- djmount-0.71-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update djmount'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/djmount-0.71-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657795] New: Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657795 Summary: Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: volke...@gmx.at QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package is new to Fedora. Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/libspatialite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/libspatialite-2.4.0-0.1.RC4.fc13.src.rpm Description: SpatiaLite extension enables SQLite to support spatial data, in a way conformant to OpenGIS specifications. It implements spatial indices, spatial functions and supports metadata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657795] Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657795 --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-11-27 19:56:31 EST --- Will probably change the summary to A complete Spatial DBMS in a nutshell, which I just found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmcki...@nexcess.net Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net 2010-11-27 21:09:18 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: swaks New Branches: el4 el5 el6 Owners: mmckinst InitialCC: tibbs I eamiled Jason about swaks in EPEL. He is not interested in maintaining the EPEL branches but is fine with me maintaining them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
