[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 03:36:58 EST --- I don't think ibus-table-chinese-all subpackage is necessary or useful, maybe it'll be better to remove this meta-package. Debian and ibus-table-others don't include a such subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623871] Review Request: flies-python-client - library and client for working with Flies server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623871 James Ni j...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623871] Review Request: flies-python-client - library and client for working with Flies server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623871 --- Comment #22 from James Ni j...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 03:39:21 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: flies-python-client New Branches: el5 Owners: jamesni InitialCC: dchen petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244
--- Comment #22 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 04:45:13
EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I updated the package but unfortunately I get an error and can't find
information about it:
+ desktop-file-validate
/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pinta-0.5-1.fc14.i386//usr/share/applications/pinta.desktop
/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pinta-0.5-1.fc14.i386//usr/share/applications/pinta.desktop:
error: file contains at least one line ending with a carriage return, while
lines should only be separated by a line feed character. First such line is:
[Desktop Entry]
Does anyone has an idea on how to solve this?
Try this in %prep:
%{__sed} -i 's/\r//' path_to/pinta.deskop
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592772] Review Request: drobo-utils - Utilities for managing Drobo storage systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592772
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 05:03:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Also, rpmlint has a complaint I've not seen before:
drobo-utils-gui.noarch: E: use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/droboview-root (line
4)
The implication is that pam files are supposed to use include instead of the
pam_stack module. Honestly I can't tell you how to do that.
Removing these lines from the spec should do the trick:
# Detect whether the system is using pam_stack
perl -pi -e's,include(\s*)(.*),required\1pam_stack.so service=\2,'
droboview.pam
touch -r %{SOURCE3} droboview.pam
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658611] Review Request: nuxwdog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658611 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 05:08:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) debuginfo-without-sources usually indicates that the package doesn't build with the proper compiler flags. The spec sets them twice (once manually and again implicitly with the %configure macro) and it looks like they make it onto the compiler command line so I'm not sure what's up. Unfortunately the package from comment 2 fails to build for me: perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make -f Makefile.real all Can't locate ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at Makefile.PL line 24. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 24. Looks like a missing build dependency. It needs perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658725] Review Request: eiciel - graphical acl editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658725 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 05:17:53 EST --- You'll need to follow the non-responsive maintainer policy before you can take over the package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Chris Weyl, the current maintainer, has been away from Fedora for personal reasons for quite some time now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] New: Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 Summary: Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jon.k...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://svn2.xp-dev.com/svn/fedora/tags/1.1.0-1/ptpd.spec SRPM URL: http://svn2.xp-dev.com/svn/fedora/tags/1.1.0-1/ptpd-1.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The PTP daemon (PTPd) implements the Precision Time protocol (PTP) as defined by the relevant IEEE 1588 standard. PTP was developed to provide very precise time coordination of LAN connected computers, synchronising clocks within a ptpd domain within a microsecond. It is used instead of ntpd, as ntpd synchronisation is only within a second and in some situations this is not tight enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 05:40:22 EST --- Jon, is it your first package in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #2 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 05:43:56 EST --- Peter, Yes this is. Done a lot of Red Hat packaging internally at work, but this is my first for Fedora. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244 --- Comment #23 from Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de 2010-12-01 05:51:09 EST --- Thanks for the help! Updates package: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta.spec http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta-0.5-1.fc14.src.rpm However there are quite a lot rpmlint errors about line endings. I reported a bug upstream but do not know if it makes sense to correct all this stuff now. [p...@paullaptop i686]$ rpmlint pin* pinta.i686: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US pinta.i686: E: no-binary pinta.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib pinta.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/pinta.desktop pinta.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/pinta.svg pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/pinta.svg pinta.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/readme.txt pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/readme.txt pinta.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/license-mit.txt pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/license-mit.txt pinta.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/pixmaps/pinta.xpm pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/pixmaps/pinta.xpm pinta.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/pinta.1.gz pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/pinta pinta.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/license-pdn.txt pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/license-pdn.txt pinta.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/todo.txt pinta.i686: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pinta-0.5/todo.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 05:56:23 EST --- I'll review this package and I'll sponsor you (later, after reviewing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244 --- Comment #24 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 06:02:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) However there are quite a lot rpmlint errors about line endings. I reported a bug upstream but do not know if it makes sense to correct all this stuff now. All the reported rpmlint errors and warnings must be corrected to pass the package review. It is up to you to wait for upstream to fix them or fix them yourself in the spec file. I suggest you the latter but if you want to wait for upstream please put add NotReady to the Whiteboard field and remove it only after these problems will be solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #4 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 06:03:46 EST --- Thanks for that, much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 06:09:17 EST
---
Builds fine in koji for F-14
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636504
Notes:
* The 'Packager' field should be removed entirely.
* Reformat %description text to fin into 80-chars lines.
* This package doesn't honour CFLAGS (see build-log)
* No need to explicitly install doc-files. Just mark them as %doc in the %files
section (they will be picked up by rpmbuild automatically from
%{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}
* This line is generally ok:
cd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/src
but I'd rather cut it down to cd src. You're already in
%{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir} so no need to append it again.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 06:14:41 EST --- s,fin,fit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590244] Review Request: pinta - Simple Paint Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590244 --- Comment #25 from Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de 2010-12-01 06:30:18 EST --- Ok, it's done. http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta.spec http://palango.fedorapeople.org/pinta/pinta-0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@city-fan.org
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 07:34:01 EST ---
--
Review checklist:
--
- rpmlint output mostly OK (see below)
- package and spec file naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license as same as Perl, spec matches actual license
- no bundled license file to include
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream (content and timestamp identical)
- package builds OK in mock for Rawhide
- build requirements OK
- no locale data to worry about
- no shared libraries to worry about
- no bundled libraries to worry about
- package makes no attempt to be relocatable (which is good)
- directory ownership is fine
- no duplicate files
- macro usage is consistent
- package is code, not content
- no large docs to concern ourselves with
- docs don't affect runtime
- no header files to worry about
- no static or other libraries to worry about
- no subpackages created or needed
- no libtool archives present
- package is not a GUI app so does not need a desktop file
- no non-ascii filenames
- supplied test suite run in %check and passes in Rawhide
- no scriptlets present or needed
- no pkgconfig files to worry about
--
rpmlint output:
--
perl-IO-InSitu.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rw - re, r, w
perl-IO-InSitu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rw - re, r, w
perl-IO-InSitu.src:17: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 17)
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Spelling errors are to be expected.
Mixed use of spaces and tabs can be trivially fixed by expanding the one tab in
the spec.
--
requires:
--
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
perl(IO::File)
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
perl(base)
perl(Carp)
perl(File::Copy)
perl(File::Temp)
perl(strict)
perl(version)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
These are sane. The perl(base) requirement comes from use base qw( IO::File
);
the manual perl(IO::File) dependency covers this.
--
provides:
--
perl(IO::InSitu)
perl-IO-InSitu = 0.0.2-3.fc15
These are also reasonable but it would be better if the perl(IO::InSitu)
provide was
versioned. The reason that it isn't is that the current auto-provides script
can't
extract the version from this code:
package IO::InSitu;
use version; $VERSION = qv('0.0.2');
You'd have to write a custom provides script to fix that (I did one for
perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser), but I wouldn't say that was a blocker.
RPM itself may grow a better perl provides/requires checker once rpm 4.9 lands.
--
Summary
--
This package is good to go (assuming the tab in the spec is expanded).
Now I just need convincing that you understand the Fedora Packaging Guidelines,
and a small number of package pre-reviews should do the trick.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658125] Review Request: perl-CGI - Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658125 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 07:53:12 EST --- This package includes a -tests subpackage, but the version built from the main perl package does not. This is likely to lead to situations like Bug #640752 in the future. I suggest either removing the -tests subpackage or adding a -CGI-tests subpackage to the main perl package for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #7 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 07:58:20 EST --- I've addressed all the above (and updates the svn repo) but the CFLAGS issue as I can't see anything in my rpmbuild output, can you expand pls so I can address this? Thanks, Jon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #11 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 08:10:00 EST --- Hmm, the build fails in my local mock and even koji now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 08:26:27 EST
---
(In reply to comment #7)
I've addressed all the above (and updates the svn repo) but the CFLAGS issue
as
You should drop these lines now:
cp -p %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYRIGHT
%{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
cp -p %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/README
%{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
cp -p %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/RELEASE_NOTES
%{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
cp -p %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/ChangeLog
%{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
You already marked these files as %doc so they will be picked up right from the
%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} by rpmbuild.
Also ther is no need to explicitly mention %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}
everytime in the %install section - you already in
%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} so this prefix may be omitted.
I can't see anything in my rpmbuild output, can you expand pls so I can
address
this?
Yes, sure.
Take a look at the build log from the koji link above:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2636505name=build.log
See - no extra compiler's options were passed to ${CC}. You must explicitly set
CFLAGS before make invocation:
CFLAGS=%{optflags} make ptpd
Another one issue which brings my attention is 3-fold extraction of %{SOURCE0}.
This looks somewhat excessive and should be fixed as well. I adwice you to
change %prep section as follows:
%prep
# extract first source implicitly and add in fedora init script and sysconfig
%setup -a 1
Also you may just list these two files as %{SOURCE1} and %{SOURCE2} and just
copy them directly in the %install section w/o touching them during %prep
stage.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #8 from Caius Chance k...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 08:36:23 EST --- I support this. ibus-table-chinese as metapackage with ibus-table-* as subpackage is the best way I reckon. The reason for this is to minimize time of package maintenance. As there are more than 20 tables it is a disaster for the maintainer to keep them each in separated repository, except if they are all owned by someone who is not doing this as their work responsibilities. I am already the victim of that packaging time-sucking disaster, sincerely I don't want Ding-Yi to suffer from the same consequence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605674] Review Request: perl-IO-InSitu - Avoid clobbering files opened for both input and output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605674 --- Comment #7 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu 2010-12-01 08:58:55 EST --- http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-IO-InSitu-0.0.2-4.fc14.src.rpm is updated to fix rpmlint warning about spaces and tabs. Thank you so much for your tutelage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658125] Review Request: perl-CGI - Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658125 --- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 09:11:50 EST --- Thanks, but I don't like idea that we would have -test sub-package for everything in perl core. I'd rather obsoleted this CGI-tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658125] Review Request: perl-CGI - Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658125 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-12-01 09:25:43 EST --- That's fine; just be consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658125] Review Request: perl-CGI - Handle Common Gateway Interface requests and responses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658125 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-12-01 09:36:10 --- Comment #11 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 09:36:10 EST --- Built without -test sub-package on all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 --- Comment #51 from Aleksey Popkov alek...@oscada.org.ua 2010-12-01 09:38:06 EST --- Spec URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid.spec SRPM URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.8-10.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 --- Comment #50 from Aleksey Popkov alek...@oscada.org.ua 2010-12-01 09:37:19 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lightsquid Short Description: lightsquid is a small and fast Squid log analyzer. Owners: aleksey2005 Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #9 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 09:44:32 EST --- Thanks for that, its looking much tidier its has to be said. Put that all together now and push it to svn. Thanks, Jon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 --- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@michelsylvain.info 2010-12-01 09:55:38 EST --- Arun, are there any problems with building the packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652573] Review Request: ghc-zip-archive - Haskell zip-archive library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652573 John Haxby john.ha...@oracle.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.ha...@oracle.com --- Comment #1 from John Haxby john.ha...@oracle.com 2010-12-01 10:25:00 EST --- When I try to build this I get: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JBZkcU + umask 022 + cd /home/jch/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd zip-archive-0.1.1.6 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/runghc Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/doc/ghc-zip-archive-0.1.1.6 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/zip-archive-0.1.1.6 '--libsubdir=$compiler/$pkgid' --enable-shared --ghc -p Configuring zip-archive-0.1.1.6... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: binary -any error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JBZkcU (%build) I suspect that this is something to do with the binary in zip-archive.cabal but really I have no idea what. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945
--- Comment #7 from Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 10:53:55 EST ---
Okay, everything seems to be in order. I tried to build atinject and it went
smoothly.
So here is the full review for the latest posted files (comment #2):
PASSED:
Package name is OK
License is OK
Release is consistent with guidelines
Source verified
Patches are OK
No typos found in summary/description
BuildRoot is OK
{?dist} used correctly
License is marked %doc
FHS guidelines met
Package/Vendor/Distribution tags not used
No use of 'Copyright'
Summary does not end in period
Post and Postun reqs used correctly
Package compiled on x86_64
Summary and description are 80 chars
%clean present
cp -a used, which preserves timestamps
Package owns all files and dirs
No duplicates in %files
FAILED:
No prebuilt binaries- FAILED
- There is a apache-maven-3.0/maven-ant-tasks-2.1.1.jar that is also in the
buildroot.
RPMLint on built packages - FAILED
- As discussed above, /etc/maven/fragments/maven should be %config
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646686] Review Request: mod_xsendfile - Apache module to send files efficiently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646686 Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wf...@virginia.edu --- Comment #1 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu 2010-12-01 11:20:15 EST --- The source file is named .gz but the file is actually a .bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646686] Review Request: mod_xsendfile - Apache module to send files efficiently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646686 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-01 11:44:19 EST --- That is funny, never noticed. I've pinged the upstream maintainer about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047 --- Comment #14 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 11:53:50 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-feeds.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-feeds.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636448 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2636448 build (dist-f14, drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636450 buildArch (drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2636450 buildArch (drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636450 buildArch (drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2636448 build (dist-f14, drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2636448 build (dist-f14, drupal6-feeds-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully 5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658942] New: Review Request: drupal6-schema - The Schema API allows modules to declare their database tables in a structured array and provides API functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-schema - The Schema API allows modules to declare their database tables in a structured array and provides API functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658942 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-schema - The Schema API allows modules to declare their database tables in a structured array and provides API functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-schema.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Introduced in Drupal 6, the Schema API allows modules to declare their database tables in a structured array (similar to the Form API) and provides API functions for creating, dropping, and changing tables, columns, keys, and indexes. The Schema module provides additional Schema-related functionality not provided by the core Schema API that is useful for module developers. Currently, this includes: Schema documentation: hyperlinked display of the schema's embedded documentation explaining what each table and field is for. Schema structure generation: the module examines the live database and creates Schema API data structures for all tables that match the live database. Schema comparison: the module compares the live database structure with the schema structure declared by all enabled modules, reporting on any missing or incorrect tables. rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-schema.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636751 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2636751 build (dist-f14, drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636752 buildArch (drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2636752 buildArch (drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636752 buildArch (drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2636751 build (dist-f14, drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2636751 build (dist-f14, drupal6-schema-1.7-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655184] Review Request: drupal6-data - Data module helps you model, manage and query related sets of tables.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655184 --- Comment #5 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 11:54:57 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-data.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-data.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636690 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2636690 build (dist-f14, drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm): free 2636690 build (dist-f14, drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm): free - open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636691 buildArch (drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2636691 buildArch (drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2636691 buildArch (drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2636690 build (dist-f14, drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2636690 build (dist-f14, drupal6-data-1.0-0.1.alpha14.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:02:19 EST --- django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:04:10 EST --- django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656179] Review Request: drupal6-imagecache - ImageCache allows you to setup presets for image processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656179 --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:06:36 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imagecache.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-imagecache.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637104 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637104 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637105 buildArch (drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637105 buildArch (drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637104 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637104 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imagecache-2.0-0.1.beta10.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656182] Review Request: drupal6-imageapi - This API is meant to be used in place of the API provided by image.inc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656182 --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:11:43 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imageapi.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-imageapi.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637112 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637112 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm): free 2637112 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm): free - open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637113 buildArch (drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2637113 buildArch (drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637113 buildArch (drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637112 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637112 build (dist-f14, drupal6-imageapi-1.9-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:12:32 EST --- django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:15:21 EST --- django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:16:11 EST --- Updated files http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-token.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-token.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637120 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637120 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm): free 2637120 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm): free - open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637121 buildArch (drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2637121 buildArch (drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637121 buildArch (drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637120 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637120 build (dist-f14, drupal6-token-1.15-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:14:01 EST --- django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-ajax-selects-1.1.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657040] Review Request: tudu - A simple, command line interface to do list application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657040 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2010-12-01 12:16:57 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tudu New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: sparks InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656190] Review Request: drupal6-pathauto - The Pathauto module automatically generates path aliases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656190 --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:24:13 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-pathauto.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-pathauto.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637132 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637132 build (dist-f14, drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-20.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637133 buildArch (drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2637133 buildArch (drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637133 buildArch (drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637132 build (dist-f14, drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-20.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637132 build (dist-f14, drupal6-pathauto-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526805] Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526805 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:34:50 EST --- lua-loop-2.3-0.2.beta.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526805] Review Request: lua-loop - Class models for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526805 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lua-loop-2.3-0.2.beta.fc14 |lua-loop-2.3-0.2.beta.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 --- Comment #8 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 12:33:04 EST --- Updated spec/srpm: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-3.0-3.fc14.src.rpm http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven.spec I didn't go to 3.0.1 because (without cursing too much) upstream added jboss.netty, tomcat6, jetty and 2 packages we don't yet have in fedora as dependencies. Gotta love them for it... I'll see what can be done about those dependencies later after contacting upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653805] Review Request: drupal6-ctools - This suite is primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653805 --- Comment #11 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:46:02 EST --- Updated files: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-ctools.spec http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-ctools.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637462 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637462 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637463 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2637463 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637463 buildArch (drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637462 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637462 build (dist-f14, drupal6-ctools-1.8-1.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 12:55:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) Arun, are there any problems with building the packages? No. I was little busy with my day job :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553606] Review Request: kde-plasma-birthday-reminder - Birthday Reminder Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553606 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588436] Review Request: rubygem-httpclient - gives something like the functionality of libwww-perl (LWP) in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588436 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588463] Review Request: rubygem-prawn - PDF generator for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588463 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588476] Review Request: rubygem-spork - A forking Drb spec server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588473] Review Request: rubygem-rr - double techniques for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588473 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Imporved URI/URL handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588437] Review Request: rubygem-fakefs - A fake filesystem for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588437 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588442] Review Request: rubygem-heckle - unit test sadism(tm) at it's core
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588442 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588477] Review Request: rubygem-webmock - mock object support for web dev in ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588477 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588469] Review Request:rubygem-prawn-format - an extension of Prawn that allows inline formatting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588469 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588466] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-core - Common file for Prawn, Prawn is a PDF generator for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588466 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588471] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-security Popular Password Protection Permissions for Prawn PDFs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588471 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588470] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-layout - An extension to Prawn that provides table support and other layout functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588470 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|StalledSubmitter| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:29:31 EST --- emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 12:29:24 EST --- emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646686] Review Request: mod_xsendfile - Apache module to send files efficiently
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646686 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-01 12:31:19 EST --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mod_xsendfile.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mod_xsendfile-0.12-2.fc14.src.rpm * Wed Dec 1 2010 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 0.12-2 - Upstream fixed tar ball packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654047] Review Request: drupal6-feeds - An import and aggregation framework for Drupal.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654047 Paul W. Frields pfrie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2010-11-22 09:58:52 |2010-12-01 13:49:03 --- Comment #15 from Paul W. Frields pfrie...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 13:49:03 EST --- OK, I'll reclose this then, Jason -- thanks. Peter, we'll have to handle this as a separate bug. I'll file one and then we'll take it from there. In the meantime, I've sent negative karma to the update in updates-testing so hopefully it will not be pushed anywhere else. It automatically gets pushed to Rawhide and it is now broken there. New bug 658989 filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] New: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm Description: Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval. rpmlint output: [as...@alice SPECS]$ rpmlint drupal6-job_scheduler.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637675 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free 2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 2637676 buildArch (drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm): open (x86-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 2637675 build (dist-f14, drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.1.beta3.fc14.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634909] Review Request: v8 - JavaScript Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909 Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 14:39:28 EST --- Could you please add a pkg-config file to v8-devel? It would make it easier to use as a library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||658989 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:02:45 EST --- Exception granted. - provide bundled(murmurhash) SPEC: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/shedskin.spec SRPM: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/shedskin-0.6-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:25:25 EST --- django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:22:43 EST --- django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #10 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 15:23:15 EST --- See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556611#c9 Adding to FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:24:14 EST --- django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:34:00 EST --- django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:32:38 EST --- django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608509] Review Request: python-subvertpy - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608509 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: subvertpy - |Review Request: |Python bindings for |python-subvertpy - Python |Subversion |bindings for Subversion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 640742] Review Request: drupal6-ckeditor - Replace textarea fields with the CKEditor - a visual HTML editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640742 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |drupal-ckeditor - Replace |drupal6-ckeditor - Replace |textarea fields with the|textarea fields with the |CKEditor - a visual HTML|CKEditor - a visual HTML |editor |editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 15:31:16 EST --- django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659082] New: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tho...@apestaart.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14/redland-bindings.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: Redland is a library that provides a high-level interface for RDF (Resource Description Framework) implemented in an object-based API. It is modular and supports different RDF/XML parsers, storage mechanisms and other elements. Redland is designed for applications developers to provide RDF support in their applications as well as for RDF developers to experiment with the technology. This package provides Python, Perl, Ruby and PHP bindings for redland. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #11 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-01 16:19:27 EST --- Thats annoying and interesting at the same time as I thought I'd done all the relevant searches before creating this. From that original package it was withdrawn, as opposed to any official line taken, so I assume this now needs to wait for FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|658489(FE-BUNDLEDLIBS) | --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-01 16:29:29 EST --- BTW, I also asked about the murmurhash license and the result is that we'll just use it under the MIT license. Is there some other part of the software that is public domain? Also, keep in mind that the license tag reflects the binary package, not the source package, so it is not useful to indicate which parts of the source are under which license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 16:53:44 EST --- adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649781] Review Request: cortado - Java media framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649781 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 16:57:01 EST --- cortado-0.6.0-2.fc14, jorbis-0.0.17-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 16:53:56 EST --- rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642985] Review Request: rubygem-timecop - Provides a unified method to mock Time.now, Date.today in a single call
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642985 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||rubygem-timecop-0.3.5-2.fc1 ||4 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652803] Review Request: adf-gillius-fonts - Gillius ADF sans-serif typeface family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||adf-gillius-fonts-1.008-3.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-01 16:53:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 16:57:36 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01 16:54:33 EST --- gmpy-1.14-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
