[Bug 655581] Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655581 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 --- Comment #10 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 04:31:08 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: maven Short Description: Java project management and project comprehension tool Owners: sochotni akurtakov Branches: f14 InitialCC: java-sig F-14 branch just to workaround fedpkg bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ke...@tummy.com), ||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 05:33:33 EST --- Hi Kevin, I am having problems to build this package. It appears that not all the work in the backend has been done. 2638831 build (dist-rawhide, /gfs2-utils:c4f049f791f862220b28e1baff35a9f7446539fe): open (x86-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - FAILED: BuildError: package gfs2-utils is blocked for tag dist-f15 Can you please fix it and make sure to unlock it for all stable releases too? f13/f14. No plans to backport to f12 before EOL. Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 05:56:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) Well, read these: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple_licensing_situations.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field Do those not answer your question? Partly. Your binary still confuses me... But your second link talks about files, and the source files are MIT, python binaries are GPLv3, same what I wrote above. - GPLv3 and MIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #4 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2010-12-02 06:54:15 EST --- reply to comment #3) Were you going to post the fixed package anywhere? If you mean service-default-enabled then fixed package was placed on the same link. Only udpxy.init source was changed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 07:29:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) Thats annoying and interesting at the same time as I thought I'd done all the relevant searches before creating this. From that original package it was withdrawn, as opposed to any official line taken, so I assume this now needs to wait for FE-Legal? Yes' we need explicit approval from FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654848] Review Request: apvlv - PDF viewer which behaves like Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654848] Review Request: apvlv - PDF viewer which behaves like Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654848 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 08:46:11 EST --- apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226014] Merge Review: libgnome-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226014 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Flag||fedora-review- Last Closed||2010-12-02 08:43:41 --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 08:43:41 EST --- Package has been orphaned https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgnome-java and it is obsolete when the current java-gnome is in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583236] Review Request: vlc - The cross-platform open-source multimedia framework, player and server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583236 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2010-12-02 09:14:53 EST --- comment #19 is a good suggestion. I'll be happy to work on bringing only libvlc + free codecs to fedora. Nicolas, is that agreeable? Do you have a preference whether I re-use the vlc-core pkg name or have another suggestion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477
--- Comment #7 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 09:53:59 EST
---
OK thanks for the feedback and srry for the delay (was off all last week).
Updated package to:
1. remove BuildRoot and clean section
2. Consistently use macros
3. jar and javadocs are now named %{name} and not %{name}-%{version}
4. installed pom.xml and used maven macros
As far as the javadoc subpackage, it already depends on the main package, so I
think this isn't an issue (please elaborate if so). Also I'm just going to
leave it as ant for now as thats the quickest way to get this is and is still
standards compliant, we can update the package if this ever becomes an issue.
Updated SPEC and SRPM:
Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-posix.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13.src.rpm
Again thanks for the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655883] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655883 Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Thibault North thibault.no...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 09:56:49 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: latexila Short Description: Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop Owners: tnorth Branches: f14 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 --- Comment #8 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 09:55:22 EST --- Also changed patch0 to include the jar.compress=true fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554187] Review Request: shedskin - Python to C++ compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 09:57:13 EST --- At this point I can't figure out why you're not getting it. The source code contains some .c files which are GPLv2+ and some other .c files which are BSD. They're compiled together to form an executable. Since some of the files are licensed as GPL, the resulting executable is also GPL. The License tag should read: License: GPLv2+ But you've read that and it doesn't answer the question I think you're asking, so perhaps you're simply asking a different question than the one I'm answering. Let me try a different way. Please tell me which file present in the built, non-debuginfo rpm, is under the MIT license. Just find one that is pure MIT with no GPL code compiled together with it. You have to do this anyway, because when you include a complicated license tag like that you have to say which files are under which license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624146] Review Request: ups debugger - a C/C++ debugger w/ GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624146 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 10:05:32 EST --- Are you entirely sure you wish to maintain a package that hasn't been developed in over seven years? How do you plan to address issues without an upstream? Have you considered setting up proper hosting for the project and continuing development yourself, rather than carrying around a bunch of patches in the Fedora package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579925] Review Request: tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||Sta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 10:14:02 EST --- Nice, everything is in order now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579925] Review Request: tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|Sta |StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637
--- Comment #5 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 10:21:15 EST
---
OK thanks for the feedback and srry for the delay (was off all last week).
Updated package to:
1. include pom.xml and run the maven macros
2. install jar and javadocs as %{name} and not %{name}-%{version}
3. execute one 'ant jar javadoc' command (good catch, thx for this)
I still left the javadoc subpackage depending on the main one to keep
consistency w/ all the other jruby packages. If this poses to be a big issue in
the future we can just update the package.
Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-netdb.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13.src.rpm
Again thanks for the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657795] Review Request: libspatialite - Enables SQLite to support spatial data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657795 viji vijivijayaku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vijivijayaku...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vijivijayaku...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from viji vijivijayaku...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 10:17:42 EST --- Looks fine, few observations: - There is a shared-lib-calls-exit issue - /usr/lib64/libspatialite.so.2.0.4 e...@glibc_2.2.5. See if we can patch it OR leave as it is, not a big deal. - Try to include the following as doc %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL README - We can also put Requires : proj geos gdal sqlite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 624434] Review Request: UFW - Uncomplicated Firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624434 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 10:26:22 EST --- This package needs a lot of work, and there was never any response to Jochen's comments above. Do you still wish to submit this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 10:23:48 EST --- Sweet,thx alot. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jnr-posix Short Description: Java Posix layer Owners: mmorsi Branches: f13 f14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626122] Review Request: libqmf - Qt Messaging Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 10:28:15 EST --- What is the status of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625558] Review Request: configure-trackpoint - trackpoint configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625558 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 10:42:18 EST --- Thanks. Everything is good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 10:52:30 EST --- Thank you greatly New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jnr-netdb Short Description: Network services database access for java Owners: mmorsi Branches: f13 f14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ke...@tummy.com) | --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-12-02 11:06:19 EST --- Please try again now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649425] Review Request: kaudiocreator - Program for ripping and encoding Audio-CDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649425 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 11:16:37 EST --- Review === Good: - rpmlint checks return: kaudiocreator.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kaudiocreator Safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on F-14 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file OK == Notes == * BuildRequires: gtk2 seems wrong. I did a scratch build without it (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2639728) and it built fine (as expected). You should remove it from your final package. * %clean is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean (it is still needed if you need this package for EPEL) * BuildRoot is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag (it is still needed if you need this package for EPEL) * It is no longer necessary to delete the buildroot as the first step of %install in active Fedora targets. It is still needed if you need this package for EPEL. These items are relatively minor, so I won't hold the review up on them. APPROVED. (If you could do a review on 656010, I would appreciate it, shouldn't be too rough.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 11:33:31 EST --- erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639278] Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|erlang-lfe-0.6.1-4.fc14 |erlang-lfe-0.6.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645762] Review Request: django-staticfiles - A Django app that provides helpers for serving static files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645762 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 11:33:26 EST --- django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-staticfiles'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-staticfiles-0.3.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645761] Review Request: django-threadedcomments - a simple yet flexible threaded commenting system for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645761 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 11:33:43 EST --- django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-threadedcomments'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-threadedcomments-0.5.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659368] New: Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 Summary: Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/luabind.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/luabind-0.9.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Luabind is a library that helps you create bindings between C++ and Lua. It has the ability to expose functions and classes, written in C++, to Lua. It will also supply the functionality to define classes in Lua and let them derive from other Lua classes or C++ classes. Lua classes can override virtual functions from their C++ base classes. It is written towards Lua 5.0, and does not work with Lua 4. NOTE: This package depends on boost-build and boost-jam, which are new subpackages from the boost package. They exist in rawhide, and are in pending updates for Fedora 13 and 14: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost-1.41.0-10.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost-1.44.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 Bug 561484 depends on bug 561462, which changed state. Bug 561462 Summary: Review Request: jaffl - Java Abstracted Foreign Function Layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561462 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Mohammed Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 11:38:49 EST --- jnr-posix and jnr-netdb have been reviewed, approved, and are working their way into Fedora. Those were the last two JRuby dependencies. Updated jruby to latest upstream release: SPEC URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/jruby-1.5.5-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583236] Review Request: vlc - The cross-platform open-source multimedia framework, player and server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583236 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 11:41:26 EST --- As warned at Spot on Fudcond Zurich, but not on this tread actually. vlc playback hightly depends on FFmpeg. If you cannot offer to have that library in fedora that will make vlc users suffer even with free software codecs. Will you be able to read libvpx with such vlc-free ? No, because it depends on ffmpeg itself as no specific module is ever planed to be made from vlc but using the ffmpeg libavcodec decoder. Same for some chroma conversion, thoses have been removed from next vlc branch because they were duplicating with ffmpeg ones. With that said, there is no common point of comparing Gstreamer and vlc as a Framework when there is to deal with patent concern. Whereas Gstreamer pick out the single code they want from FFmpeg to make a Gstreamer module. VLC removes everything that is already present in FFmpeg to avoid duplication, so it makes a big difference. You won't solve that using modules, when such specific module doesn't even exists for the single task you want. Or such sigle modules would need to be compiled two time, (one patentless and another patent version). So, such ffmpeg-less vlc will probably not work well and be a pain to maintain, when it will have to deal with playbacks. Which is probably not what targets phonon backend. And I'm not yet sure that the server only side in fedora can be completed without functionality loss. At least, I would like to have some feedback as the conditional to make it build in a fedora mock are worked on from the current rpmfusion spec file. Just simple tasks: - It would be interesting to list which codecs work at playback, which one doesn't. - list the vlc-core modules built from a fedora mock from those built from current package. - checks from the source code of the fedora vlc-core modules if they have preprocessor macro from optional patented dependencies. - check if such module is actually usefull for something. - etc. Last, there is still a real problem with the cache plugin at runtime. (the patch from rex was at build time). It would have allowed for new vlc modules to be correctly registered. For now, new modules sometime won't be seen because vlc-cache-gen is crashing while installing a new module. (in which case yum reinstall vlc-core strangely solve things sometime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #13 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-12-02 11:40:00 EST --- http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/jing-trang.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/jing-trang-2009-7.fc14.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2639853 - Put Xalan instead of Saxon in build path (regression in -6). - Build with OpenJDK. Comment 12 was correct, but it's not enough to fix the build with GCJ, there are other issues. This one's built with OpenJDK, I don't plan to spend time to get the build working with GCJ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641690] Review Request: k4dirstat - Graphical Directory Statistics for Used Disk Space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641690 --- Comment #9 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 11:51:02 EST --- P.S. If you can review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 in trade for this one, I'd appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641690] Review Request: k4dirstat - Graphical Directory Statistics for Used Disk Space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641690 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 11:50:01 EST --- === Review === == Bad == License: GPLv2 and LGPLv2 is not quite right. The code is clearly a mix of GPL and LGPL, but the version is never specified by upstream, so we need to ask upstream to clarify if a version of each license is preferred (the versioning in the License texts doesn't tell us the answer to this because of how the GPL and LGPL are written). Alternately, we can simply assume that any version of the licenses are applicable (License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+), because of how the GPL and LGPL are written, but I think it would be easiest for you to ask upstream to indicate which versions of those licenses the code is under. Also, ask them to indicate the versioning in their source code so that it will be clear for everyone. == Good == - rpmlint says: k4dirstat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US du - dew, doe, Du k4dirstat.src: W: strange-permission k4dirstat-snapshot.sh 0744L k4dirstat.src: W: invalid-url Source0: k4dirstat-2.7.0.tar.bz2 k4dirstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US du - dew, doe, Du k4dirstat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary k4dirstat All safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2 or LGPLv2) not OK, text in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - package compiles on F-14 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok == Notes == * %clean is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean (it is still needed if you need this package for EPEL) * BuildRoot is unnecessary in active Fedora targets, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag (it is still needed if you need this package for EPEL) * It is no longer necessary to delete the buildroot as the first step of %install in active Fedora targets. It is still needed if you need this package for EPEL. Get the license clarification and update the tag, and I will approve this package. The items in Notes would be nice to see resolved at the same time, but I won't require them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658796] Review Request: ptpd - implements the Precision Time protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658796 --- Comment #13 from Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 12:08:53 EST --- Ok, no probs. Putting aside this issue for a moment, is the package itself looking sound now? I'll understand if you don't want to spend any more time reviewing it, just interesting in the current state of play. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636654] Review Request: gorm - The GNUstep graphical interface builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636654 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(joc...@herr-schmi | |tt.de) | Last Closed||2010-12-02 12:31:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616935] Review Request: gworkspace - The official GNUstep workspace manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616935 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2010-12-02 12:45:42 EST --- O, the main issue are the warnings about dangling relative symlinks. This may be a hint to sym links which points to files which are not packaged in the submitted package. I have done a probe relating to this warning messages and have to find out, that the compaints targets files exists in the submitted package. This was the reason for ignoring this huge amount of warning because I think there is a weakness of danling sym links detection in rpmlint. The missing of the man pages are not a issue for GUI releated applications and the unusal location of header files is common for GNUstep related applications. At least the wak symbol warning may only fixed by the upstream, so I don't have investigate any time to fix it as long as the applcaiton works properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639369] Review Request: gfs2-utils - Fileysystem utilities for the GFS2 Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639369 --- Comment #30 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 13:27:58 EST --- It appears Steven did build rawhide and f13. I am unable to test f14 myself as I am getting some other errors. Steven will figure that out. Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 13:30:43 EST --- I talked to the selinux folks who are quite surprised that any binary in that path works with executable stack. Are you certain that you are exercising the portion of the code that requires it? It really should fail unless you set the allow_execstack boolean. BTW, by useful I meant remotely relevant as examples. A bunch of cocoa stuff that you can't even run because you're on the wrong operating system doesn't sound all that useful to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 13:41:20 EST --- OK, after more checking, the package requires executable heap, not executable stack. Setting allow_execmem off causes this when running the kernel: /usr/lib64/ccl/lx86cl64 remap spjump: Permission denied That means that for most installs it will be OK, but for some it won't. I can't really say how much of an issue this is; you probably want to talk to the selinux folks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556128] Review Request: ff-utils - Utilities to test force feedback of input device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556128 --- Comment #10 from Didier Moens didier.mo...@dmbr.ugent.be 2010-12-02 13:57:54 EST --- ff-utils has not been updated since October 2003. Could you please consider applying the submitted patch from http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2098907group_id=44724atid=440671 ? This patch ports ff-utils to 64-bit (32-bit compatible), and adds kernel 2.6 compatibility. The patch applies cleanly (when removing the cflags patch), and actually makes ff-utils usable on x64 architecture with modern kernels. (tested with kernel-2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616177] Review Request: eazykeyboard - A simple onscreen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616177 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:08:54 EST --- eazykeyboard-2.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616177] Review Request: eazykeyboard - A simple onscreen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616177 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|eazykeyboard-2.0-3.fc14 |eazykeyboard-2.0-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648244] Review Request: ghc-base64-bytestring - Fast base64 encoding and deconding for ByteStrings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648244 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:10:36 EST --- ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-base64-bytestring'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-base64-bytestring-0.1.0.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630260] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec - Fast combinator parsing for bytestrings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:09:51 EST --- ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-attoparsec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-0.8.2.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616177] Review Request: eazykeyboard - A simple onscreen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616177 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:07:53 EST --- eazykeyboard-2.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639263] Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:12:34 EST --- erlang-rebar-2-3.20101120git90058c7.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 639263] Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||erlang-rebar-2-3.20101120gi ||t90058c7.fc14 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 616177] Review Request: eazykeyboard - A simple onscreen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616177 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||eazykeyboard-2.0-3.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-02 14:08:02 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654848] Review Request: apvlv - PDF viewer which behaves like Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:10:52 EST --- apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update apvlv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632858] Review Request: emacs-slime - The superior lisp interaction mode for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632858 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:15:06 EST --- emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-slime'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-slime-3.0-0.1.20101113cvs.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571364] Review Request: man-db - Database cached manual pager suit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571364 Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cjwat...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #16 from Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com 2010-12-02 14:31:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) These warnings look somewhat dangerous, in particular the non-debug() calls: catman.c:344: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' manp.c: In function 'has_mandir': manp.c:1112: warning: field precision should have type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long int' manp.c:1124: warning: field precision should have type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long int' manp.c: In function 'create_pathlist': manp.c:1215: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long int' manp.c:1215: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'long int' Thanks. Nobody passed these on to me (upstream), but I happened to come across this bug and I've now fixed them in bzr for man-db 2.6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623871] Review Request: flies-python-client - library and client for working with Flies server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623871 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:34:17 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531544] Review Request: python-trml2pdf - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531544 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:32:47 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652412] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-local-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin delivering appliance to local filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652412 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:36:51 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:33:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648945] Review Request: maven - Java project management and project comprehension tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648945 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:36:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:36:07 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:33:58 EST --- This ticket is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657040] Review Request: tudu - A simple, command line interface to do list application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657040 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:38:51 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655883] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655883 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:38:32 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654862] Review Request: saphire - Yet another shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654862 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 14:37:41 EST --- This ticket is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to the reviewer. Please fix and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:50:52 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 14:49:56 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Bug 652400 depends on bug 652396, which changed state. Bug 652396 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-core - Core files required by BoxGrinder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652396 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654862] Review Request: saphire - Yet another shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654862 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kwiz...@gmail.com QAContact|kwiz...@gmail.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-12-02 14:53:06 EST --- So I have to wait one more day? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #18 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 15:22:16 EST --- New upstream version. The previous version does not build under el5, our main target distribution. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons-0.6.3-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #19 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 15:23:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) New upstream version. The previous version does not build under el5, our main target distribution. Sorry, the src.rpm URL is incorrect. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons-0.6.4-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655883] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655883 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655883] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655883 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 15:40:04 EST --- latexila-2.0.1-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/latexila-2.0.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638909] Review Request: erlang-gproc - Extended process registry for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638909] Review Request: erlang-gproc - Extended process registry for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 16:00:55 EST --- erlang-gproc-0-0.3.20100929gitf0807c9.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gproc-0-0.3.20100929gitf0807c9.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-02 16:45:18 EST --- perl-PDL requires this for EL-6. I can maintain it there if needed if you do not, Iain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658611] Review Request: nuxwdog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658611 --- Comment #5 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 17:10:10 EST --- I have added the additional dependency on perl(ExtUtils::Makemaker) and removed the (redundant) manual setting of the compiler flags. It turns out that the issue where the debuginfo files lacks sources was due to an error in a build script in my svn repo. If you use the srpm to rebuild - the debuginfo rpm builds just fine (with all sources). So - at this point, there are no errors or warnings reported by rpmlint. The new stuff is located at: Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/released/nuxwdog/nuxwdog.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/released/nuxwdog/nuxwdog-1.0.0-7.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 17:53:40 EST --- jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 17:52:54 EST --- jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 17:54:24 EST --- jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 17:54:47 EST --- jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370
Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com
Status Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #1 from Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com 2010-12-02
17:54:49 EST ---
Disclaimer: I'm not a sponsor.
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
$ rpmlint /tmp/python-tgmochikit.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
$ rpmlint /tmp/python-tgmochikit-1.4.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/ciupicri/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-tgmochikit-1.4.2-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
OK
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK, although I think that the BSD licensed code from Yahoo should be mentioned
somewhere.
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
OK
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
OK
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
OK
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
OK
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
N/A
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
N/A
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
N/A
# MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11]
N/A
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [12]
N/A
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [13]
OK
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)[14]
OK
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [15]
OK
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
NO ( see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros )
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root %{buildroot}
rm -rf %{buildroot}
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
OK
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
OK
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
OK
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 18:02:16 EST --- Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tgmochikit.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tgmochikit-1.4.2-2.fc13.src.rpm * Buildroot env var fixed to be a macro instead. * Changed license tag to mention BSD and added a patch I'm proposing to upstream (both tgmochikit and mochikit authors) to mention BSD in their LICENSE.txt as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654862] Review Request: saphire - Yet another shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654862 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 18:09:01 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654862] Review Request: saphire - Yet another shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654862 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-02 18:15:04 EST --- You should expect that your request will not be processed if it is not properly formatted or if the ticket state is not correct. Yes, this implies that you will need to wait until the next run of the request queue for your request to be processed. We try to make sure the queue is processed at least once per day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com 2010-12-02 18:24:11 EST --- The two issues were indeed fixed and I was also able to import tgmochikit in the Python interpretor. A small suggestion: since the the package is for TurboGears Widgets, maybe it should require the TurboGears package because as far as can I see it doesn't make sense to install it without TurboGears. I declare the package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579925] Review Request: tclreadline - GNU Readline extension for Tcl/Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2010-12-02 18:31:02 EST --- Regarding the naming guidelines: I was too much focussed on how the packaging itself is done, sorry. I've no idea regarding the rpmlint complaints so far, I will have to investigate here, but: I won't fork tclreadline, because I'm using it to rarely and I'm not really familiar with tcl programming. The patches applied are mostly from Debian, so I would like to keep everything how it is, because there are some further tclreadline users out there. If that makes the review from your point of view a no-go, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 531544] Review Request: python-trml2pdf - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531544 Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-02 18:49:06 --- Comment #18 from Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com 2010-12-02 18:49:06 EST --- The package built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2640437 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2640531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-12-02 18:56:23 EST --- Thanks Cristian! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-tgmochikit Short Description: MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets Owners: toshio lmacken fschwarz Branches: f14 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #10 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 18:59:23 EST --- Caius, Thanks, but even with ibus-table-chinese-all, I still need to maintain those tables as sub-packages. As Jens Petersen pointed out, we can use yum install ibus-table-chinese-* to install all chinese table in one go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 19:01:18 EST --- Peng, You need click on take on the right of Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it to make your review to be recognized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #12 from Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com 2010-12-02 19:44:55 EST --- In case you are interested, I've released a new version, which removed ibus-table-chinese-all, and support out-of-source cmake build. Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/ibus-table-chinese.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101201-1.el6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657908] Review Request: esniper - A lightweight console application for sniping eBay auctions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657908 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-12-02 19:50:06 EST --- Done I also added a frontend script, I haven't noticed before. Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/esniper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/esniper-2.24.0-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #13 from Caius Chance k...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-02 20:05:46 EST --- I misunderstood. I also dislike -all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
